Pentagon CCTV
#31
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 12,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by DaveD
Jet fuel burns at very high temperatures - much hotter than steel melts at.
#32
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Bristol-ish
Posts: 2,085
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by OllyK
Actually the steel didn't melt, jet fuel (kerosene) burns at about 600C, steel melts at over 1000C, 1200C IIRC, however, 600C combined with the impact was more than enough to weaken it to the point of catastrophic failure. The pools of molten metal referred to by many of the CT lot is more likely Aluminum which does melt below 600C
Thanks for that, I was trying to point out the fire weakened the structure - kinda lost the plot trying to point out all the mistakes! I could imagine the fire burning hotter than 600degC though, due to the "firestorm" effect and the amount of air it could consume with all the windows blown out etc.....
#33
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 12,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by DaveD
D'oh!
Thanks for that, I was trying to point out the fire weakened the structure - kinda lost the plot trying to point out all the mistakes! I could imagine the fire burning hotter than 600degC though, due to the "firestorm" effect and the amount of air it could consume with all the windows blown out etc.....
Thanks for that, I was trying to point out the fire weakened the structure - kinda lost the plot trying to point out all the mistakes! I could imagine the fire burning hotter than 600degC though, due to the "firestorm" effect and the amount of air it could consume with all the windows blown out etc.....
Forced air etc may increase the heat a little, but to be honest I think it's a moot point, the steel doesn't need to melt to loose structural integrity. Already bent due to the force of the collison so the forces are working against it, it wouldn't take much to weaken it more. Most strutural engineers were impressed by how the long the towers actually stayed up before the final collapse.
#34
Scooby Regular
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Here, There, Everywhere
Posts: 10,619
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The US Government thanks all of you Non-thinker's. You believe what they tell you to believe.
For those of you that want to think for yourselves, check out the link & buy yourself a copy.
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.d...SI_PR4_PCN_BIX
And no, it's not me selling them.
For those of you that want to think for yourselves, check out the link & buy yourself a copy.
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.d...SI_PR4_PCN_BIX
And no, it's not me selling them.
#35
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 12,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by stilover
The US Government thanks all of you Non-thinker's. You believe what they tell you to believe.
For those of you that want to think for yourselves, check out the link & buy yourself a copy.
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.d...SI_PR4_PCN_BIX
And no, it's not me selling them.
For those of you that want to think for yourselves, check out the link & buy yourself a copy.
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.d...SI_PR4_PCN_BIX
And no, it's not me selling them.
#36
Scooby Regular
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Here, There, Everywhere
Posts: 10,619
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by OllyK
So you spout a load of information, which is shown to be inaccurate, .
I to believed everything the US government said about 9/11, and it was only when I watched this DVD, that I was able to say things just don't add up. I didn't even want to watch it, but I'm pleased I did.
Just watch it and see. What harm will it do ??
#37
Scooby Senior
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Next door to the WiFi connection
Posts: 16,293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Facts say some of it is inaccurate. Although I do believe people have a right to be suspicious of some of the things that have gone on. Really makes interesting reading but you can always pick flaws in everything, regardless of it being legit etc.
If it was a missile that hit the Pentegon does your DVD explain where that paticular plane and 59 passengers and staff dissapearred to and where their families came from or were they just made up people?
If it was a missile that hit the Pentegon does your DVD explain where that paticular plane and 59 passengers and staff dissapearred to and where their families came from or were they just made up people?
#38
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 12,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by stilover
And who say's it's inaccurate ???? The US government.
Everything said about 9/11 that is different from what the US government says is a conspiracy theory. Why not buy a copy of the DVD and see for yourself.
I to believed everything the US government said about 9/11, and it was only when I watched this DVD, that I was able to say things just don't add up. I didn't even want to watch it, but I'm pleased I did.
Just watch it and see. What harm will it do ??
Just watch it and see. What harm will it do ??
Ask yourself some questions. If the Twin Towers really were blown up by explosives, how did they get the hundreds of tonnes of explosves in to the building and rigged up, with nobody realising or are you claiming that everybody that worked in the Twin Towers was in on the consipracy, including the ones that died? For the US government to have initiated this would require literally thousands of people to be in on it. When Bill Clinton can't keep a **** with his secretary secret, what chance do you think there is of keeping thousands of people quiet, or did the CIA round them all up and brain wash them?
#39
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 12,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by davegtt
If it was a missile that hit the Pentegon does your DVD explain where that paticular plane and 59 passengers and staff dissapearred to and where their families came from or were they just made up people?
#40
Originally Posted by davegtt
If it was a missile that hit the Pentegon does your DVD explain where that paticular plane and 59 passengers and staff dissapearred to and where their families came from or were they just made up people?
#41
Scooby Senior
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Next door to the WiFi connection
Posts: 16,293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by GaryCat
They are all being kept hostage in Area 51 waiting for the next Heavens Gate comet to take them to another dimension.
#42
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 12,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What I want to know is why the CT'ists have to make things so damn complex. If they claimed the CIA trained up a dozen or so guys to hijack 4 planes and crash 2 in to the WTC, 1 in to the Pentagon and 1 in to the Whitehouse to give them an opportunity to go off kicking ***, then'd I'd just about buy in to that. The evidence still all fits. But when they start claiming that they blew the WTC up with explosives, used missles on the Pentagon and so on, it just gets all too far fetched and just doesn't remotely tie up with the evidence.
#43
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Markyate.Imprezas owned:-wrx-sti5typeR-p1-uk22b-modded my00. Amongst others!
Posts: 8,541
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by OllyK
Ask yourself some questions. If the Twin Towers really were blown up by explosives, how did they get the hundreds of tonnes of explosves in to the building and rigged up, with nobody realising or are you claiming that everybody that worked in the Twin Towers was in on the consipracy, including the ones that died? For the US government to have initiated this would require literally thousands of people to be in on it. When Bill Clinton can't keep a **** with his secretary secret, what chance do you think there is of keeping thousands of people quiet, or did the CIA round them all up and brain wash them?
Olly. I've seen a dvd that explains how all this is possible. It's amazing that you can't pull your head from your **** and see the light
The film Men In Black showcases the device to make all what you say possible, it's a neutralizer I believe
#44
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 12,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
And for those that like to dig around in different sources here's some more reading:
http://www.popularmechanics.com/scie...e/1227842.html
http://eric.bart.free.fr/iwpb/witness.html
http://www.geocities.com/someguyyoud.../witnesses.htm
http://edition.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001...7.victims.html
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/n...sasterngs.html
http://www.popularmechanics.com/scie...e/1227842.html
http://eric.bart.free.fr/iwpb/witness.html
http://www.geocities.com/someguyyoud.../witnesses.htm
http://edition.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001...7.victims.html
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/n...sasterngs.html
#45
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 12,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by scoobynutta555
Olly. I've seen a dvd that explains how all this is possible. It's amazing that you can't pull your head from your **** and see the light
The film Men In Black showcases the device to make all what you say possible, it's a neutralizer I believe
The film Men In Black showcases the device to make all what you say possible, it's a neutralizer I believe
Any which way, it's more plausible than some of the stuff on Loose Change, but then again some of them do seem to think no planes hit the WTC and the MIB were involved
#47
Scooby Regular
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Here, There, Everywhere
Posts: 10,619
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by OllyK
Here's a bigger question, if it was a missile, how did all that plane wreckage get on the front lawn of the pentagon?
Independent reports are not always independent !!!!!!
Unless the US government told you they were !!!!!!
#48
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 12,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by stilover
All the evidence ??????? One piece of plane. Where's all the rest.
ALL from the document I keep telling you to read. If you read it, you'll find more pictures of the wreckage, wreckage with AA paintwork, wreckage parts that are of sufficient size to be recognisable and can be matched to parts of a 757
I never said a missile hit the pentagon. I said a mini remote controlled spy plane hit it. You don't get much wreckage from a small spy plane do you. Where is all the luggage from the plane? Where are all the body parts? All the seats? Suppose they disintegrated on impact ?
Body parts were found, read the practical mechanics report I cited. DNA has been found for almost all the people that were on the plane. Clothing was found, personal effects etc, come on you're about 6 months behind, the Loose Change bunch have already changed their story about this due to the DNA evidence and are claiming the passengers were butchered and parts of them put in the payload of the missle so that the DNA would be found
Independent reports are not always independent !!!!!!
Last edited by OllyK; 18 May 2006 at 12:46 PM.
#49
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Tellins, Home of Super Leagues finest, and where a "split" is not all it seems.
Posts: 5,504
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Some people just cannot accept CT's, I mean my dad still thinks man landed on the moon in 1969 - the dumbass
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Badger Stuffer
Non Scooby Related
34
02 July 2003 04:09 PM