Notices
ScoobyNet General General Subaru Discussion

BP ultimate or Shell Optimax

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12 July 2006, 05:35 PM
  #31  
WRX300MAN
Scooby Regular
 
WRX300MAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: North London
Posts: 1,368
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Red face

Lads . .

Can you actually feel the difference . . .

Only my engine can feel the difference . . .I will just STFU with my humble (non chaved up) WRX300 . . . .Could never tell the difference between Tesco's , BP, and Optimax and ESSO Supreme. . . .

Only difference being Tesco is not so great on fuel economy, and BP is extortionate . .

Its been good conversing!
Old 12 July 2006, 07:08 PM
  #32  
sticks
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
sticks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: middlesex
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs up

have always used optimax,even when i had my rs turbo.
top fuel
Old 12 July 2006, 08:23 PM
  #33  
Gutmann pug
Scooby Regular
 
Gutmann pug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 8,425
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Is this still going on?
Old 12 July 2006, 08:28 PM
  #34  
Anthony Crichton-Wheeler
Scooby Regular
 
Anthony Crichton-Wheeler's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: A stones throw from Canal Street - very handy!!
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Sometimes you poeple can be so **** There is no way the average driver can tell the difference between 95 and 97 RON. Don't you realise the fuel companies thrive on fools like you They are making money out of the placebo that they are providing those foolish enough to fall for the propaganda

I use 95 RON Sainsburys in my STI (using 2p off vouchers) and pay no more than 94p a litre as a result

AND I still get 30 mpg on a quiet drive
Old 12 July 2006, 10:56 PM
  #35  
C2forWRX
Scooby Regular
 
C2forWRX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: North
Posts: 1,303
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

for the sake of a couple of pence a litre id rather have better quality petrol in a NEW car, that provides any slight mpg increase and a smooth sounding engine. thats why i use optimax.

I also believe its hard to FEEL the difference.
Old 13 July 2006, 02:02 AM
  #36  
ZEN Performance
Former Sponsor
 
ZEN Performance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Wellingborough, Northamptonshire
Posts: 2,859
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Having mapped a number of cars on a variety of fuels. An average driver certainly should be able to tell the difference between optimax and ultimate, let alone optimax and 95RON.

Ultimate from a mapping perspective is shockingly bad considering it's supposedly only 1RON or so different from Optimax.
Old 13 July 2006, 09:32 AM
  #37  
Wurzel
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (1)
 
Wurzel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wildberg, Germany/Reading, UK
Posts: 9,707
Likes: 0
Received 73 Likes on 54 Posts
Default

My car was mapped on a mix of V-power and BP 95. It was done like this so I could continue to run my car on UK petrol, but I need to use min 97 ron which during the petrol crisis at Christmas was not easy. Before my car was mapped, if I used 95 ron the car sounded and performed like a VW Beatle. You can tell the difference between 95 and 97 but I doubt you can tell the difference between optimax and ultimate, but I am open to being proved wrong.

The smell and colour of our V-power runs rings round that crap you call Optimax in the UK, the sooner you get decent petrol the better.
Old 13 July 2006, 12:00 PM
  #38  
New_scooby_04
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
 
New_scooby_04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: The Terry Crews of moderation. P P P P P P POWER!!
Posts: 18,687
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by C2forWRX
for the sake of a couple of pence a litre id rather have better quality petrol in a NEW car, that provides any slight mpg increase and a smooth sounding engine. thats why i use optimax.

I also believe its hard to FEEL the difference.
Just an additional comment; some peeps on here have reported increased KL activity on BP ultimate, that has dissappeared shortly after reverting to Optimax... of course we don't know if the conditions under which they were tested are like for like. However, when I hear mappers, who see what is happening with the car on various fuels saying that Ultimate is bad, I listen!! Increases in protection against DET are far more valuable to me than a few bhp!

Ns04
Old 14 July 2006, 08:42 PM
  #39  
Anthony Crichton-Wheeler
Scooby Regular
 
Anthony Crichton-Wheeler's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: A stones throw from Canal Street - very handy!!
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by C2forWRX
for the sake of a couple of pence a litre id rather have better quality petrol in a NEW car, that provides any slight mpg increase and a smooth sounding engine. thats why i use optimax.

I also believe its hard to FEEL the difference.
Then why waste your money on a placebo?

And how the hell can a flat four sound smooth, its one of the most rugged off beat engines you can get, why it even rivals a diesel for uneven idle
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Abx
Subaru
22
09 January 2016 05:42 PM
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
28
28 December 2015 11:07 PM
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
12
18 November 2015 07:03 AM
scoob1985
Wanted
0
13 September 2015 12:06 PM



Quick Reply: BP ultimate or Shell Optimax



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:44 PM.