dpb

wreckin your right..

ex-webby

Pete,

I'm not going to waste any further time by getting in to an argument with you (my dumby bin is over flowing at the moment). You don't like what I say, or can't abide by what I am requesting then please do not use ScoobyNet.... plain and simple.

You are catagorically one of the biggest wind-up merchants ever to grace ScoobyNet, so continue to post like that (which most of the time is fine) but when you are requested to calm down don't get all defensive and take it on the chin.

A lot of your content is light hearted, but you have to be aware that at times you need to wind your neck in. That is all I am asking you to do at times.

No doubt you will come back with another half witted, life story of a reply.

But please don't fall in to the trap of thinking your untouchable! You like to voice your opinion..... so I am voicing mine and unfortunately mine carrys a bit more poke than yours on here!

Take a chill pill and clean out your pipe and de-fur ball your slippers.

Regards,
Shaun.

pslewis

Shaun

I never think that I am untouchable .............. but, you would miss me - you KNOW you would!!

I'm just seriously surprised that whatever I have said in the last 3 days has actually amounted to anything worthy of a reprimand?? I have been away for weeks, so I will put your response down to the fact that you are having pslewis withdrawal symptoms and have forgotten how I post ..... there we are, your ready made excuse for acting a bit sharp

Pete

chocolate_o_brian

iTrader: (22)

pete, il excuse the lovers comment, yeah most of the stuff you post is light hearted, and sometimes genuinly funny (maybe its my fault for having a user name like chocolate_o_brian - proper bait to folk such as your self), but you have this problem where as you believe as you have been a member for years and years, you are untouchable. i did miss yout comments over the last weeks, but mainly for good reasons.

its good sometimes to read drivvle that you spout, sometimes your advice is helpful, but if the webmaster is saying calm it, god damn old man, you must be crossing the liner. nobody is asking you too stop being a old stuck in his ways "sarcy auld b@stard, please continue, but tremember your not the most respected user on here are you?

and stop picking up on little points of peoples arguments and punctuation when giving your replies, if you want to argue use the main points in peoples posts. i assume you will understand the angle im coming from, but i expect the usual reply, so im leaving it at that mr lewis.

andy

Maz

iTrader: (34)

Be fair Shaun there's a lot out there who post far more offensive things than Pete. Hopefully we will have parity and you will be equally vocal about them too.

Maz

chocolate_o_brian

iTrader: (22)

its a good piont einstein_ra but a lot of these more offensie comments are from newbies, whereas pete has been doing it for years. il make the point that im not on any personal crusade of getting him off here, just im a vocal character and will voice my opinions, whether controversial or not... sounds like im in the same mould as pete

pslewis

We all know that I am a very minor irritant to some - as you say, there are some terrible posts from others - quite why there has been this attack upon me, now - I find very hard to fathom.

Maybe Shaun would like to post the words I used which overstepped the line, then - at least - I will know at what level I need to wind my neck in .... seems fair??

Or maybe I will just get banned and that will be the end of a beautiful relationship!

Pete

Maz

iTrader: (34)

Like charges do repel! As you have alluded earlier Pete has been here for a long time and surely this accords him some esteem, although we do need him in the stocks albeit for charity. Whaddya say Pete?

dpb

If it wasnt clear for all to see..(((.))))

We now have it in writing for all to see - management acknowledgement that Pete's sole mission is the wind-up.

pslewis

You will notice that Webby said that it was his OPINION .... I don't think he was stating a fact???

People think I'm on a wind-up, but I'm not - at my age I think differently to some others on here and I have strong views about things .... thats NOT a wind-up and it's NOT trolling either!!

For example:- People modify their cars and then complain when those same cars blow up ............. I find that stupid and I say so (that is NOT trolling, it's simply an opinion!).

Lets not get confused that someone who disagrees with some things is a troll or on a wind-up ... they probably are NOT!

The CockLink is another case in point ..... why buy a safety related item that can be ADJUSTED so that it renders it totally useless???????? - not trolling and not a wind-up ... simply a brilliant Engineering mind brough to the subject and advice offered freely!

Pete

dpb

There is absolutly NO proof that you are an engineer or any one of a myriad of job titles you come up with.!!

pslewis

There is NO proof that you are a man ...................

Come to think about it, that would explain a lot - you are a WOMAN aren't you???!!!!!!!!

And it's ABSOLUTELY!!! Dear God!!

Pete

dpb

ye Whatever..

Maz

iTrader: (34)

Come on you two give it a rest!

dpb

Petes got a problem with wimmim see..

chocolate_o_brian

iTrader: (22)

pete will you categorically deny that you are neither "dci gene hunt" and or "drboobfondler", as they have mysteriously disappeared since your return. is it a witch hunt against an unpopular scoobynet character?

pslewis

I will state here and now that I am NO-ONE but pslewis!!!

Certainly I was/am NOT those two you have mentioned!!!

Pete

GC8

'drboobfondler' was a low-quality troll and a bell-end to boot. 'DCI Gene Hunt' was a far higher quality troll who managed to emulate Pete's characteristics quite sucessfully. I think that I know who it was though.....

Id just let this go if I were you Pete.

pslewis

I have let it go ....... I am responding to questions is all

Pete