Sweet Baby Jesus - Tevez and Mascharano join the Hammers
31 August 2006, 05:50 PM
#31
31 August 2006, 05:58 PM
#34
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: 360 gamertag is also Filfy
Posts: 2,359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Now having these two on board i will be looking for a top 5 finish
But being a hammers fan for 35 years i just know something will go wrong it always does
But being a hammers fan for 35 years i just know something will go wrong it always does
31 August 2006, 06:09 PM
#37
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: 360 gamertag is also Filfy
Posts: 2,359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Think i might fire the scoob up and take a trip down to Upton Park for the villa game
if i can get a ticket,just wish we had them for the Liverpool game and got the revenge we deserved
if i can get a ticket,just wish we had them for the Liverpool game and got the revenge we deserved
31 August 2006, 06:15 PM
#40
I wonder if MSI are involved in a takeover at Upton Park ? !
Originally Posted by someone on [URL="http://www.kumb.com"
www.kumb.com[/URL] forum]
Please bear in mind that we do not OWN these two. MSI are still their owners.
All that has happened is that they have moved from Corinthians to WHU.
Their situation at Sao Paulo was intolerable. The coach would not talk to them because they did not speak Portugese, they were attacked by fans, they had fights on the training ground, etc, etc. They just had to get out.
We will pay their wages but their registration will reamin with MSI which is a London based company.
Please bear in mind that we do not OWN these two. MSI are still their owners.
All that has happened is that they have moved from Corinthians to WHU.
Their situation at Sao Paulo was intolerable. The coach would not talk to them because they did not speak Portugese, they were attacked by fans, they had fights on the training ground, etc, etc. They just had to get out.
We will pay their wages but their registration will reamin with MSI which is a London based company.
31 August 2006, 08:06 PM
#43
Filfy for all your worldy reported WHU news.
http://www.newsnow.co.uk/newsfeed/?n...United&x=6&y=7
other clubs just need change the selection on the left.
http://www.newsnow.co.uk/newsfeed/?n...United&x=6&y=7
other clubs just need change the selection on the left.
31 August 2006, 09:41 PM
#44
Pontificating
Thread Starter
Whats the deal do MSI own the registration of these players and they decide for whom and for how long they play for any one club ??
Surely no self respecting pro would ever allow that to be the case, no disrespect to W Ham and no sour grapes as I never expected Utd to sign anyone of the 250 players they must have been linked with, but when two of thw worlds hottest properties tip up at an unfashionable european club that could not afford to spend £40m + on their signatures along with the expected £50-70k a week salary, West Ham will not divulge any of the details, and even Arsenal Man u would probably struggle to buy and manitain those salaries you keep thinking this is a little odd.
Anyone got any concrete facts on the deal as some reports say the Tevez buy out clause was between £60-80m which is ludicrous.
It surely is the most amazing footy story in years.
Surely no self respecting pro would ever allow that to be the case, no disrespect to W Ham and no sour grapes as I never expected Utd to sign anyone of the 250 players they must have been linked with, but when two of thw worlds hottest properties tip up at an unfashionable european club that could not afford to spend £40m + on their signatures along with the expected £50-70k a week salary, West Ham will not divulge any of the details, and even Arsenal Man u would probably struggle to buy and manitain those salaries you keep thinking this is a little odd.
Anyone got any concrete facts on the deal as some reports say the Tevez buy out clause was between £60-80m which is ludicrous.
It surely is the most amazing footy story in years.
31 August 2006, 09:59 PM
#45
Scooby Regular
I was shocked when I read this earlier today, it looks like they're at West Ham to "ripen" them up for Chelsea, we'll have to see. Either way, it should make for an interesting season...
31 August 2006, 10:30 PM
#46
Scooby Senior
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Next door to the WiFi connection
Posts: 16,293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Funki, remember these guys are coming from poor backgrounds. OK I cant understand their agents reasoning for letting them go where they have but its pretty clear MSI and their Syrian funder have their future lined up nicely.... WHU is just a taster.
It'll be nice to see a S.American make a real impact on us for a change.
It'll be nice to see a S.American make a real impact on us for a change.
01 September 2006, 09:37 AM
#47
WHU are paying them £40k p/week. To comply with FA rules, MSI sold their share in the pairs registration to West Ham yesterday. They have, however, reached an agreement under which the Hammers will have to sell either player if they receive an offer of £35m or match the fee themselves. Most of the profit would go to MSI.
01 September 2006, 10:00 AM
#49
Hats off to TB i guess, although i reckon it could be part of a deal which see's MSI take over the majority sharehold at WHU, therefore we can have the players for season. Then let the big boys fight over them after a season, with who wants to spend the most.
01 September 2006, 11:51 AM
#52
Pontificating
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by lpski1
WHU are paying them £40k p/week. To comply with FA rules, MSI sold their share in the pairs registration to West Ham yesterday. They have, however, reached an agreement under which the Hammers will have to sell either player if they receive an offer of £35m or match the fee themselves. Most of the profit would go to MSI.
Just as I thought then, this isn't football
And if MSI own a share in their registration, which they sold, who owns the rest of the share"s" ?? some business man in south america ? bizarre!!
01 September 2006, 01:21 PM
#54
Pontificating
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by lpski1
Not exactly football in the usual sense of transactions no, i agree. A very good and valid point which i dont know the answer to.
Haven't read a tabloid today, im sure they'll be digging away, if not we'll have to just wait and see what happen at the end of the season if they have blinders
All said and done I'm really looking forward to seeing both play
01 September 2006, 01:24 PM
#55
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: London Town
Posts: 983
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by lpski1
Where are all the unhappy gooners then ? 
we managed to get gallas who we very much need and want, from a bargaining position of a player who wanted to go. we are not able like chelski to write off a player (like they planned to do with gallas), so all in this is a great deal for us.
to get this deal where we don't end up any weaker, and chelski are no stronger, again from the sh*t position wew were in this is great.
to top it off, we get baptista who wenger plans to make into a vieira who can score goals, versus reyes who has consistently failed to deleiver regularly (and another who openly wanted to go - another bad bargaining position), I'm very pleased with the way our club have hustled.
oh and the best bit - we got rid of cygan !!
Last edited by Ted Maul; 01 September 2006 at 01:55 PM.
01 September 2006, 04:04 PM
#57
Pontificating
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by Ted Maul
oh and the best bit - we got rid of cygan !!
Thats the best piece of business since Sours mugged Utd for the £750,000 we paid for Alan Brazil !!
02 September 2006, 10:56 PM
#60
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Parts Unknown (even to me!)
Posts: 1,964
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by pauld37
Just face up to it mate, no-one wants to play for you 
Robert Huth: "almost suicidal" with worry that his move away from your club wouldn't happen.