Any Finance people here?
#31
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Scoobynet
Posts: 5,387
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Matteeboy
Just about to stick a half decent sum into A&L (5.65% at present) - Hopefully that's safer?
#32
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Mars
Posts: 11,470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Pete - Very unlikely to draw it and I'm keen to stick the money with a name I know and trust - ICICI are some Indian bank (I think) and I'm not convinced on Icesave.
#33
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Scoobynet
Posts: 5,387
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I can understand that, I also use Bradford and Bingley who's instant access saver pays 5.35% AER. Remember to not put more than £35k into any one account as its only insured to that amount.
#34
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Mars
Posts: 11,470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#35
Scooby Senior
Does anyone know where you can get a history of the FTSE 100 (if that is what this was linked to)? It took a big fall in the first half of 2002, so maybe Elmer invested at the top of the market and it has only just got back up to those levels?
#36
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: God's promised land
Posts: 80,907
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Actually i'd be pretty annoyed. It started 2002 at about 5,200 and ended 2006 at about 6,200.
Like many funds, however, they took such a beating in late 2002/early 2003 that the fund managers probably didn't get back in again soon enough. From the low of about 3,500 in March 2003 it's been pretty much a one way street, with only the fairly sharp (and temporary) sell-off in April 2006 interrupting the trend.
#37
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Lincolnshire
Posts: 15,623
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
"Thats unbelievable - if they'd invested in emerging markets you could have seen on average over 20% per year, so you would be looking at about £125k."
what nonsense, he bought a guaranteed investment and you suggest they should have stuck it in high risk equites?
what nonsense, he bought a guaranteed investment and you suggest they should have stuck it in high risk equites?
#38
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Mars
Posts: 11,470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#39
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: God's promised land
Posts: 80,907
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#40
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 15,271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The main problem with short term equity products is that they cannot take account of long term equity growth AND upfront fees on these types of products are between 2 and 6% so you lose out a huge chunk up front before you start unless you do a deal with your provider or IFA.
#43
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Lincolnshire
Posts: 15,623
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Joe public and the whole finance industry.
My dad had a pension with Equitable life. Everyone said its the provider of accountants,you cant go wrong. I remember reading the contract and it GUARANTEED a return of 6% (i think) per annum. When it came to claim they never honoured it. Where i come from thats called THEFT and they got away with it.
My dad had a pension with Equitable life. Everyone said its the provider of accountants,you cant go wrong. I remember reading the contract and it GUARANTEED a return of 6% (i think) per annum. When it came to claim they never honoured it. Where i come from thats called THEFT and they got away with it.
#44
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 15,271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In my experience people don't invest in pensions because it is easier to put money into fast cars, fast women, plasma TVs and great holidays. It is more a question of bird in the hand and two in the bush.
It would be true that the combined efforts of rubbish regulation and mixed up providers have not helped the cause - but it is primarily an easy excuse.
Rannoch
#45
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Lincolnshire
Posts: 15,623
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Can you elucidate?
In my experience people don't invest in pensions because it is easier to put money into fast cars, fast women, plasma TVs and great holidays. It is more a question of bird in the hand and two in the bush.
It would be true that the combined efforts of rubbish regulation and mixed up providers have not helped the cause - but it is primarily an easy excuse.
Rannoch
In my experience people don't invest in pensions because it is easier to put money into fast cars, fast women, plasma TVs and great holidays. It is more a question of bird in the hand and two in the bush.
It would be true that the combined efforts of rubbish regulation and mixed up providers have not helped the cause - but it is primarily an easy excuse.
Rannoch
Not in my case. I put 3k per year into a cash ISA which i know is not a good way to save for my old age,but at least its transparent and easy to understand.
#46
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 15,271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Joe public and the whole finance industry.
My dad had a pension with Equitable life. Everyone said its the provider of accountants,you cant go wrong. I remember reading the contract and it GUARANTEED a return of 6% (i think) per annum. When it came to claim they never honoured it. Where i come from thats called THEFT and they got away with it.
My dad had a pension with Equitable life. Everyone said its the provider of accountants,you cant go wrong. I remember reading the contract and it GUARANTEED a return of 6% (i think) per annum. When it came to claim they never honoured it. Where i come from thats called THEFT and they got away with it.
In terms of the Equitable - no one 'got away with it' as it was a with profits fund and so owned by ALL the policy holders. ALL the policy holders lost out due to declining funds, not just those with guaranteed products.
Equitable is a rather sad example of mismanaged funds and optimism over equity returns.
It is also very much a minority player in a niche marketplace.
#47
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Pleiades
Posts: 1,294
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Stick it in Premium Bonds, you won't earn anything but you could win and if you do it's tax free, when the limit was £20k the odds were something like 1 in 12 that you could win something.
#48
It still amazes me that you manage to dress yourself in the morning
Explain the scam to me in managed funds - its clear up front what the charges are and if they have not been disclosed you have a very clear route for recompense - this has been true since the early '90s and the FSA regulation on disclosure.
Also many ISAs are managed funds so your advice on that is rubbish as well.
Finally, why does a life assurance policy have to pay out? Most term policies pay out nothing unless you DIE or contract a terminal illness.
Sadly for Elmer a five year term policy is probably the worst investment you can make with a lump sum, you can get lucky in the marketplace but unlikely..
Nowadays there are guaranteed bonds that would be much better value (8% per annum) but these were not around five or six years ago.
Rannoch
Explain the scam to me in managed funds - its clear up front what the charges are and if they have not been disclosed you have a very clear route for recompense - this has been true since the early '90s and the FSA regulation on disclosure.
Also many ISAs are managed funds so your advice on that is rubbish as well.
Finally, why does a life assurance policy have to pay out? Most term policies pay out nothing unless you DIE or contract a terminal illness.
Sadly for Elmer a five year term policy is probably the worst investment you can make with a lump sum, you can get lucky in the marketplace but unlikely..
Nowadays there are guaranteed bonds that would be much better value (8% per annum) but these were not around five or six years ago.
Rannoch
If your such a clever sod , perhaps you can clarify why he only got £151 ???
Re the life insurance, it was sold to me, as a ten year term policy, with a payment back at the end.
did you miss most of the eighty's, when mis-selling of insurance / endowments happened, or were you one of the perfect ones, who never ever got caught up in that?
sometimes you eagerness to be caustic, overlooks reading between the lines.
I for one know for a fact i got stung on the managed account stuff, when 2% of what i put in, and earn't every year was taken back in fees.
Mart
Last edited by mart360; 10 January 2007 at 08:02 PM.
#49
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 15,271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by mart360
It amazes me that the ground dosen't whither and die when you look at it,
If your such a clever sod , perhaps you can clarify why he only got £151 ???
If your such a clever sod , perhaps you can clarify why he only got £151 ???
The second reason is compounding. It takes a while to build up strong returns as the capital earning interest is small. Over a long term policy compounding 'can' give outstanding returns. Over a short term compounding does not kick in at all.
Finally, a period of very low interest rates and low equity returns. The type of policy he had would have been in safe investments and so the return would have also been low.
So, proportionately high fees for the policy term AND little chance for compounding to kick in AND the compounding was at a low interest rate. Overall very poor return which I also predicted before he posted what he actually got. I only put in the high estimate to make him feel better and hope for his sake that the money had been simply on high interest deposit - it wasn't
Originally Posted by mart360
Re the life insurance, it was sold to me, as a ten year term policy, with a payment back at the end.
did you miss most of the eighty's, when mis-selling of insurance / endowments happened, or were you one of the perfect ones, who never ever got caught up in that?
did you miss most of the eighty's, when mis-selling of insurance / endowments happened, or were you one of the perfect ones, who never ever got caught up in that?
Originally Posted by Fart360
sometimes you eagerness to be caustic, overlooks reading between the lines.
I for one know for a fact i got stung on the managed account stuff, when 2% of what i put in, and earn't every year was taken back in fees.
Mart
I for one know for a fact i got stung on the managed account stuff, when 2% of what i put in, and earn't every year was taken back in fees.
Mart
If you were 'stung' for management fees then I suggest you did not take the time to find out what you were buying. It can be no surprise that managed funds have fees - they always have and probably always will - it has never been a secret.
#51
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 15,271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I was once - although everything I have posted is very easily available on the web if you search in Google or go to the FSA, Consumer Association or Which websites (you may need to subscribe to the latter).
#52
Re complaining about the missselling, Tbh I,m not worried, call it lesson learnt, and walked out laughing...
I still had the life cover until the fund depleted, but the ex was removed as a beneficiery. with regards to the endowment, the value of the endowment vs the propery was so low, i would be very surprised if it didnt make the term amount (27k) and if it made more, there is sod all i can do about it, i took a protected settlement and walked. i,m well shot, and thats priceless in my book.
This time round we went for differing options, interest only and a lottery ticket every week as if!!
10 yr fixed repayment, which is now out of its penalty period, so we may look to move. life insurance portion may well be covered by my employer, so we may be able to do some offsetting there. As i said 20 years ago, it was a lot different.
Mart
I still had the life cover until the fund depleted, but the ex was removed as a beneficiery. with regards to the endowment, the value of the endowment vs the propery was so low, i would be very surprised if it didnt make the term amount (27k) and if it made more, there is sod all i can do about it, i took a protected settlement and walked. i,m well shot, and thats priceless in my book.
This time round we went for differing options, interest only and a lottery ticket every week as if!!
10 yr fixed repayment, which is now out of its penalty period, so we may look to move. life insurance portion may well be covered by my employer, so we may be able to do some offsetting there. As i said 20 years ago, it was a lot different.
Mart
#53
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post