Pakistani man & daughter beheaded
#32
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: same time, different place
Posts: 11,313
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
2 Posts
There's a lot of evidence to show that it's not the size of the sentence that counts, it's the probability of being caught. You need to up the detection and conviction rates, not the sentences. The people who think the sentences should increase usually have no clue about the reality. As stated, there's plenty of death sentences around the world, and those states usually are not crime-free - in fact, the opposite. There's a relationship you want to worry about...
Last edited by Brendan Hughes; 07 December 2006 at 12:15 PM.
#33
Wouldn't work over here, behead your average Asbo Chav scumbag and the turd will continue to walk around virtually unimpeeded, plus they would then claim disabled living allowance.
#34
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Edinburgh (ish)
Posts: 8,089
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by The Snug Rhino
do you think they want to go to prison for life? of course not - they do it because they think they will get away with it.
#35
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 12,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by bugsti
Burglary is rare in the US due to the right of home owners to defend themselves with firearms against intruders.
.
.
USA
Population: 296,410,404
Burglaries Committed: 2,154,126
As a percentage of the population = 0.7%
UK
Population: 60,200,000
Burglaries Committed: 426,872
As a percentage of the population = 0.7%
Damn - guess it's about the same as here in the UK, so that's your theory out of the window.
#36
If you can't see why I said what I did L P Bang, you must be a bit slow in realising the real effects of hard drug dealing. Modern cannabis is also much stronger these days and causes serious mental problems as well as being on the slippery slope to hard and life endangering drugs.
Having seen what I have so far in this life, I personally would not want to be responsible for manufacturing cigarettes and lying to the public about the dangers there are in smoking. Alcohol also has its dangers as anyone has to admit. Taken in moderation it can however be good for you as well. It is a personal choice how you deal with all that and that is fair enough.
Drug dealers are only to be considered as seriously low life and the way they operate in hooking young people and using them to extend their disgraceful trade entitles them to the very least of consideration in my book.
Of course parents have the responsibility for their children's behaviour, but how many young people get sucked in to drug taking without even good parent's knowledge? Are you 100% certain about your children L P Bang?
Les
Having seen what I have so far in this life, I personally would not want to be responsible for manufacturing cigarettes and lying to the public about the dangers there are in smoking. Alcohol also has its dangers as anyone has to admit. Taken in moderation it can however be good for you as well. It is a personal choice how you deal with all that and that is fair enough.
Drug dealers are only to be considered as seriously low life and the way they operate in hooking young people and using them to extend their disgraceful trade entitles them to the very least of consideration in my book.
Of course parents have the responsibility for their children's behaviour, but how many young people get sucked in to drug taking without even good parent's knowledge? Are you 100% certain about your children L P Bang?
Les
#37
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 12,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Brendan Hughes
There's a lot of evidence to show that it's not the size of the sentence that counts, it's the probability of being caught. You need to up the detection and conviction rates, not the sentences. The people who think the sentences should increase usually have no clue about the reality. As stated, there's plenty of death sentences around the world, and those states usually are not crime-free - in fact, the opposite. There's a relationship you want to worry about...
IMO - you need both, no point have 90% detection rates and then handing out 6 month sentences for murder, people think it may still be worth while. You need high detection rates AND significant sentences to act as a deterrant.
#38
Originally Posted by Leslie
Drug dealing is pretty close to murdering people when you think about it so I have little sympathy.
Les
Les
#39
If you had not noticed N D Landing, I was referring to people who deal in drugs and their practices in hooking people into gross addiction to hard drugs with the subsequent fatal consequences.
Les
Les
#40
Scooby Senior
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: North Wales
Posts: 5,826
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Leslie
If you had not noticed N D Landing, I was referring to people who deal in drugs and their practices in hooking people into gross addiction to hard drugs with the subsequent fatal consequences.
Les
Les
There's a lot more deaths each year due to those two than illegal drugs.
Personally I don't think drug dealers are any worse, though I admit they are probably thoroughly unpleasant people!
Geezer
#42
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Texas - It's BIG!
Posts: 2,105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There have been 52 executions in the USA this year, 24 of them in Texas.
On Monday night there were 5 seperate shooting incidents in Houston, one resulting in a death.
Obviously corporal and capital punishment do not eradicate crime "overnight"
The causes of crime is the easiest thing to change, rather than the punishment. So poverty, lack of education, poor parenting, drug and mental health care, community improvements etc etc would reduce the crime rates more than introducing the death penalty.
On Monday night there were 5 seperate shooting incidents in Houston, one resulting in a death.
Obviously corporal and capital punishment do not eradicate crime "overnight"
The causes of crime is the easiest thing to change, rather than the punishment. So poverty, lack of education, poor parenting, drug and mental health care, community improvements etc etc would reduce the crime rates more than introducing the death penalty.
Last edited by 2000TLondon; 07 December 2006 at 01:56 PM.
#43
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: same time, different place
Posts: 11,313
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
2 Posts
Originally Posted by 2000TLondon
There have been 52 executions in the USA this year, 24 of them in Texas.
On Monday night there were 5 seperate shooting incidents in Houston, one resulting in a death.
Obviously corporal and capital punishment do not eradicate crime "overnight"
The causes of crime is the easiest thing to change, rather than the punishment. So poverty, lack of education, poor parenting, drug and mental health care, community improvements etc etc would reduce the crime rates more than introducing the death penalty.
On Monday night there were 5 seperate shooting incidents in Houston, one resulting in a death.
Obviously corporal and capital punishment do not eradicate crime "overnight"
The causes of crime is the easiest thing to change, rather than the punishment. So poverty, lack of education, poor parenting, drug and mental health care, community improvements etc etc would reduce the crime rates more than introducing the death penalty.
#44
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Texas - It's BIG!
Posts: 2,105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Brendan Hughes
Typical bloody Guardian-reading, raving lefty EU-supporting sandal-wearing lentil munching tree-hugger response. If you don't like it there, why don't you **** off back to where you came from?
For example, on average there is one murder a week by someone with mental health problems who has been discharged by local authority into the community under "supervised" care. Do you not think if the government didn't just release these people into the community, and treated them until they were better, or detained them, that we would have 50 less murders each year! Threatening a paranoid schizophrenic with the death penalty doesn't usually stop them going on a rampage, you ignorant fool!
Sorry if that example is a bit too "radical" or left wing for you, I think it's pretty obvious though, mate!
#47
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Texas - It's BIG!
Posts: 2,105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Brendan Hughes
<psst 2000T - look above my post>
#48
Originally Posted by Leslie
.
Drug dealers are only to be considered as seriously low life and the way they operate in hooking young people and using them to extend their disgraceful trade entitles them to the very least of consideration in my book.
Of course parents have the responsibility for their children's behaviour, but how many young people get sucked in to drug taking without even good parent's knowledge? Are you 100% certain about your children L P Bang?
Les
Drug dealers are only to be considered as seriously low life and the way they operate in hooking young people and using them to extend their disgraceful trade entitles them to the very least of consideration in my book.
Of course parents have the responsibility for their children's behaviour, but how many young people get sucked in to drug taking without even good parent's knowledge? Are you 100% certain about your children L P Bang?
Les
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post