Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related

Was the £250k win on Deal or No Deal fixed ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 15 January 2007, 04:49 PM
  #31  
Smiler
Scooby Regular
 
Smiler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Posts: 256
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by talizman
Anyone who says that the programme didn't completely engineer the gamble by offering a paltry £45k in those circumstances is mad

A recent player (black girl) who was left with the £250k and her other box was a few k (from memory), was offered £107,000 and obviously she dealt. She'd be made to risk it with such an offer.

Offering £45k was as close to guaranteeing a gamble as the producers could get, and it got them their big winner that gives the ratings the boost they wanted.
Did you watch the show with Morris? He had £20K and £250K and wasn't offerd a small amount to go for it.
Old 15 January 2007, 04:53 PM
  #32  
Smiler
Scooby Regular
 
Smiler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Posts: 256
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DCI Gene Hunt
Trying to give this show credibility by saying it's about people and their personalities is the funniest thing I've heard in ages.......
Do you watch the show? The banker learns from people before they sit in the hot seat, hence why different offers are made.

The bit where he announces a break and everyone thinks it's funny is the worst bit....... blobby, blob.. blob
Agreed. To my knowledge (although I did go through a period of not watching it) only one contestant has actually announced the breaks himself as he knew exactly where they came in.
Old 15 January 2007, 04:56 PM
  #33  
Boro
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Boro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Cornwall
Posts: 7,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I think FIX is the wrong word, everyone still has a choice to make, she COULD have took the money. Maybe engineered to a point of probability, but even with such a low offer to persuade a gamble, it could have been 3k left.

Ask yourself this... What would YOU have done?

Gamble? £250,000 v £3000

or

Take £43000
Old 15 January 2007, 05:09 PM
  #34  
ScuuBdoo
Scooby Regular
 
ScuuBdoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ireland
Posts: 927
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

As long as there is 250K on the board I would "No Deal" all the way. You may as well gamble seeing that you arrived in the seat with nothing, hence nothing to loose.
Old 15 January 2007, 05:09 PM
  #35  
LG John
Scooby Regular
 
LG John's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Bradford
Posts: 13,720
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'd gamble every time - without hesitation and £45,000 is a LOT of money to me!! Enough to bring about significant change in my life (more than half the term of my mortgage)! I just can't take on odds that bad for an assured sum, it goes against all my ethics as a gambler
Old 15 January 2007, 05:12 PM
  #36  
jasey
Scooby Senior
 
jasey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Scotchland
Posts: 6,566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ScuuBdoo
As long as there is 250K on the board I would "No Deal" all the way. You may as well gamble seeing that you arrived in the seat with nothing, hence nothing to loose.
Even if the other box had 1p in it and you were offered say £100,000 ?
Old 16 January 2007, 12:23 AM
  #37  
talizman
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
talizman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 5,947
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Smiler
.

Therefore the banker based all his offers on this information.
Did he tell you that?


Originally Posted by Smiler
Did you watch the show with Morris? He had £20K and £250K and wasn't offerd a small amount to go for it.
Might have done, but I don't memorise their names! How much was he offered? I'd guess circa £100k based on the others who still had the £250k box in play at the last offer?


Originally Posted by Boro
I think FIX is the wrong word, everyone still has a choice to make, she COULD have took the money. Maybe engineered to a point of probability, but even with such a low offer to persuade a gamble, it could have been 3k left.

Ask yourself this... What would YOU have done?

Gamble? £250,000 v £3000

or

Take £43000
I agree, like I said previously, they can never "fix" it, unless the contestants are plants, as no one knows from one show to the next what an individual might do once in the hot seat, but what they certainly can do, is engineer it to the max, and IMHO thats what goes on day in day out, and especially in the £250k winner's show! No way that offer was based on her previous opinions on sweeps!


Originally Posted by ScuuBdoo
As long as there is 250K on the board I would "No Deal" all the way. You may as well gamble seeing that you arrived in the seat with nothing, hence nothing to loose.
I disagree. Imagine your last 2 boxes are the £250k and say £10k. The average offer seems to be around £100k. You'd be willing to walk away with a paltry £10k (relatively speaking!) just for the gamble of winning £250k when £100k would make a considerable difference to most working class folks lives!
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
fatboy_coach
General Technical
15
18 June 2016 03:48 PM
Davalar
General Technical
19
30 September 2015 08:54 PM
JackClark
Computer & Technology Related
3
30 September 2015 08:29 PM
Mad Hammer
Subaru Parts
2
29 September 2015 08:15 PM
Nick_Cat
Computer & Technology Related
2
26 September 2015 08:00 AM



Quick Reply: Was the £250k win on Deal or No Deal fixed ?



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:06 PM.