If you are unmarried and have children......
#31
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Surrey, UK
Posts: 8,384
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#32
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Class record holder at Pembrey Llandow Goodwood MIRA Hethel Blyton Curborough Lydden and Snetterton
Posts: 8,626
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ditto
But to answer the question, I assume you mean unmarried long established couple both bringing up the child?
That was the case for us and our daughter has daddies surname on the birth certificate.
At the time I felt marriage is just an expensive certificate to confirm what both of us already know wrt our choice of life partner, however fatherhood changes a persons outlook on life - and in my case my view on marriage changed, as did my car collection and bank account
But to answer the question, I assume you mean unmarried long established couple both bringing up the child?
That was the case for us and our daughter has daddies surname on the birth certificate.
At the time I felt marriage is just an expensive certificate to confirm what both of us already know wrt our choice of life partner, however fatherhood changes a persons outlook on life - and in my case my view on marriage changed, as did my car collection and bank account
#33
I think as a man you should be quite concerned that your offspring aren't carrying your surname and therefore a mark of your family line. In fact men who say they don't care or aren't bothered come across as quite pathetic.
At this point in time, until proven otherwise, our sole reason for existence is to propagate the human race. The reality is our existence is reasonably pointless if we don't produce offspring. So there is massive psychological reason for seeing your offspring carrying your name forward.
I feel sorry for you that you will never experience the true essence of a father-child relationship, the hints of immortality with the child continuing in life with the father's name, his line and possibly his dreams.
Some social examples of the importance of the relationship :
"Like father, like son"
"Dance with my Father" - Luther Vandross
"Father and Son" - Cat Stephens
The relationship between God and Jesus
Contrast these with what society views are of the "mother and son" relationship which are often of a more negative tone.
"Mummy's boy"
Freud's Oedipus complex.
I just can't understand why you wouldn't want you children to carry your surname.
#34
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: 0-60 in half an hour
Posts: 1,756
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
But to answer the question, I assume you mean unmarried long established couple both bringing up the child?
I have a son (and a daughter on the way ) and currently my son carries his Father's surname.....however, we have no intention of marrying.
#36
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Worthing..
Posts: 7,575
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
(i)You have sons(s) and
(ii)They actually have kids themselves
See, thats the thing, it really doesn't matter
At this point in time, until proven otherwise, our sole reason for existence is to propagate the human race. The reality is our existence is reasonably pointless if we don't produce offspring. So there is massive psychological reason for seeing your offspring carrying your name forward.
I beg to differ.
I agree, the purpose of existance is to procreate, but I would suggest such urges are due to natural impluse and desire to reproduce, rather than any absurd desire not to have your surname dissapear.
Of course, cultures that do not have surnames are obviously doomed to extinction.
Example, My Step brother hates his old man with a passion. Hasn't spoken to him in 10 years. I am closer to my Step father than my real father, and despite having not sharing the same blood, or even *shock* having a different surname, I see him as a father and turn to him when I need the fatherly thing. I.e. he has always been there when I need him, ergo, he is my Father.
Some social examples of the importance of the relationship :
"Like father, like son"
"Dance with my Father" - Luther Vandross
"Father and Son" - Cat Stephens
The relationship between God and Jesus
Contrast these with what society views are of the "mother and son" relationship which are often of a more negative tone.
"Mummy's boy"
Freud's Oedipus complex.
"Like father, like son"
"Dance with my Father" - Luther Vandross
"Father and Son" - Cat Stephens
The relationship between God and Jesus
Contrast these with what society views are of the "mother and son" relationship which are often of a more negative tone.
"Mummy's boy"
Freud's Oedipus complex.
Evidently!
Last edited by PeteBrant; 13 February 2007 at 01:38 PM.
#37
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Surrey, UK
Posts: 8,384
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think as a man you should be quite concerned that your offspring aren't carrying your surname and therefore a mark of your family line. In fact men who say they don't care or aren't bothered come across as quite pathetic.
However, I think it's a little unfair to brand those that decide otherwise as 'pathectic'.
#38
Guest
Posts: n/a
I am unable to comment in detail as I refuse to go into airing dirty laundry here, especially in terms of going into putting a few things straight that have been said that are factually incorrect. However my stance is that of Kiwi's (traditional and old style maybe but its how I feel and always have) but unfortunately my other half can not see my reasons and/or diasagrees with them therefore we have a situation that can't be resolved with both of us being happy about it.
For once though its good to read reasoned and sensible debate on here without the normal trolling and slagging off.
For once though its good to read reasoned and sensible debate on here without the normal trolling and slagging off.
#39
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: same time, different place
Posts: 11,313
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
2 Posts
Well, the latest trend is apparently merging names - so if yours is Smith and the other's is Jones, the child will be given the name Smones (or Jith?)...
But knowing both of you and your history, very very slightly, via SN, I can guess at reasons behind, and I'd say you need to talk to someone a bit more knowledgeable than the NSR crew. But maybe I'm reading too much into it...
Hope you get it sorted
PS good luck for no.2
But knowing both of you and your history, very very slightly, via SN, I can guess at reasons behind, and I'd say you need to talk to someone a bit more knowledgeable than the NSR crew. But maybe I'm reading too much into it...
Hope you get it sorted
PS good luck for no.2
Last edited by Brendan Hughes; 13 February 2007 at 01:41 PM.
#40
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Class record holder at Pembrey Llandow Goodwood MIRA Hethel Blyton Curborough Lydden and Snetterton
Posts: 8,626
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
B2Z
I know where you're coming from. Although married now, at the time of our 1st born I had no intention of getting married and every intention of spending the rest of our lives together. So when the subject of the surname came up, the reasoning was that of the traditional family tree - in that the father's surname is taken. You don't need to be married to have a child, you don't need to be married to combine families through a new generation, so you don't need to be married for the child to assume the fathers family name.
I know where you're coming from. Although married now, at the time of our 1st born I had no intention of getting married and every intention of spending the rest of our lives together. So when the subject of the surname came up, the reasoning was that of the traditional family tree - in that the father's surname is taken. You don't need to be married to have a child, you don't need to be married to combine families through a new generation, so you don't need to be married for the child to assume the fathers family name.
#41
Scooby Senior
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: RIP - Tam the bam & Andy the Jock
Posts: 14,333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not married, then take the mothers name..... married, then take the husbands...... (unless his name is *******)
#42
Scooby Regular
#43
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: 0-60 in half an hour
Posts: 1,756
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
B2Z
I know where you're coming from. Although married now, at the time of our 1st born I had no intention of getting married and every intention of spending the rest of our lives together. So when the subject of the surname came up, the reasoning was that of the traditional family tree - in that the father's surname is taken. You don't need to be married to have a child, you don't need to be married to combine families through a new generation, so you don't need to be married for the child to assume the fathers family name.
I know where you're coming from. Although married now, at the time of our 1st born I had no intention of getting married and every intention of spending the rest of our lives together. So when the subject of the surname came up, the reasoning was that of the traditional family tree - in that the father's surname is taken. You don't need to be married to have a child, you don't need to be married to combine families through a new generation, so you don't need to be married for the child to assume the fathers family name.
#46
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Markyate.Imprezas owned:-wrx-sti5typeR-p1-uk22b-modded my00. Amongst others!
Posts: 8,541
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Might have something to do with the high divorce rate and the guy getting a shafting. Some blokes have a lot to lose if a marriage goes south.
I would have thought that was obvious TBH.
I would have thought that was obvious TBH.
Last edited by scoobynutta555; 14 February 2007 at 12:56 PM.
#47
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: 0-60 in half an hour
Posts: 1,756
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#48
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Surrey, UK
Posts: 8,384
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#49
I thought that the law was such now though that it does not make much difference if you split either married or not. It seems a pity to get into a relationship to the degree of having children with the forethought that you may split up in the future. Hard on the children for certain.
Les
Les
#51
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: A big town with sh1t shops: Northampton
Posts: 21,366
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Dave's asked me, we've just got to get round to it. It's a case of spending money on the house which we're going to have lots of benefit from, or spending it on a wedding which in reality, doesn't change anything apart from my name!
I do want to get married, but there's always something else to pay for!
I do want to get married, but there's always something else to pay for!
#52
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: 0-60 in half an hour
Posts: 1,756
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I thought that the law was such now though that it does not make much difference if you split either married or not. It seems a pity to get into a relationship to the degree of having children with the forethought that you may split up in the future. Hard on the children for certain.
Les
Les
#53
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Surrey, UK
Posts: 8,384
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Surely, it is sensible to think 'what if?' ESPECIALLY when there are children involved.
Just because one party will do 'the for better or for worse' bit, doesn't mean the other will.
#54
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Markyate.Imprezas owned:-wrx-sti5typeR-p1-uk22b-modded my00. Amongst others!
Posts: 8,541
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I thought that the law was such now though that it does not make much difference if you split either married or not. It seems a pity to get into a relationship to the degree of having children with the forethought that you may split up in the future. Hard on the children for certain.
Les
Les
I'd consider the fact that I'd split up as part of any normal relationship, anything can happen down the road and it's prudent IMHO to make sure you won't be fcuked over.
#55
Yes, thanks for all the explanations. You have to remember that I come from an era where marriage was the normal and expected course by people who wanted to live together and have children. Religious expectations apart, it was regarded as the best way to safeguard any children from the marriage. Please don't think I am trying to be judgemental in any way.
Les
Les
#56
Scooby Regular
Join Date: May 2006
Location: I have ad blocked my rep - so dont waste your time!
Posts: 1,548
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
No, what we are talking about is childrens surnames. That's what this thread is about. Other worries and issues about kids are for another thread. Nor are we talking about parent skills.
I think as a man you should be quite concerned that your offspring aren't carrying your surname and therefore a mark of your family line. In fact men who say they don't care or aren't bothered come across as quite pathetic.
At this point in time, until proven otherwise, our sole reason for existence is to propagate the human race. The reality is our existence is reasonably pointless if we don't produce offspring. So there is massive psychological reason for seeing your offspring carrying your name forward.
I feel sorry for you that you will never experience the true essence of a father-child relationship, the hints of immortality with the child continuing in life with the father's name, his line and possibly his dreams.
Some social examples of the importance of the relationship :
"Like father, like son"
"Dance with my Father" - Luther Vandross
"Father and Son" - Cat Stephens
The relationship between God and Jesus
Contrast these with what society views are of the "mother and son" relationship which are often of a more negative tone.
"Mummy's boy"
Freud's Oedipus complex.
I just can't understand why you wouldn't want you children to carry your surname.
I think as a man you should be quite concerned that your offspring aren't carrying your surname and therefore a mark of your family line. In fact men who say they don't care or aren't bothered come across as quite pathetic.
At this point in time, until proven otherwise, our sole reason for existence is to propagate the human race. The reality is our existence is reasonably pointless if we don't produce offspring. So there is massive psychological reason for seeing your offspring carrying your name forward.
I feel sorry for you that you will never experience the true essence of a father-child relationship, the hints of immortality with the child continuing in life with the father's name, his line and possibly his dreams.
Some social examples of the importance of the relationship :
"Like father, like son"
"Dance with my Father" - Luther Vandross
"Father and Son" - Cat Stephens
The relationship between God and Jesus
Contrast these with what society views are of the "mother and son" relationship which are often of a more negative tone.
"Mummy's boy"
Freud's Oedipus complex.
I just can't understand why you wouldn't want you children to carry your surname.
load of twaddle - kids are fun to have around, i dont want kids to populate the earth....i want them for my own reasons of personal happiness.
i couldnt care less what their surnames are.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post