Notices
General Technical
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

how to get more torque?? RR results inside

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 26 March 2007 | 04:30 PM
  #31  
turboDean's Avatar
turboDean
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,618
Likes: 0
From: South Wales, Scoobless, Type R is gone!
Default

Originally Posted by Andy.F
There is a later design of hybrid which has a tube and fin core that is the exact same size 600x300x75
It is lighter and higher flowing, you only need to pick one up to tell there is a significant difference.
The core I refer to is the one you changed over to use on your own WRX last year, not the 95mm thick 'monster' core.

For others benefit, the easy way to identify them is the more efficient tube/fin has a rounded edge and the bar/plate has a sharp square edge to the cores.
This is the newer GT spec kit

I've just ordered one for my car to replace my autobahn88 kit, coz i think this is the reason my car had low figures compared to others on here with simular setup's.
I run a VF34 with supporting mods and only made 312bhp and around 260lb/ft of torque, where as most people running VF34 setup's are making 330-350bhp and aorund 300lb/ft of torque.

Won't be able to tell 100% if this is the cause as i will have also added an AVCR, 550 injectors and be running a fuel additive when it's mapped by Andy again in May.
Old 26 March 2007 | 05:26 PM
  #32  
Ian's Avatar
Ian
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,845
Likes: 1
From: Cambridge
Default

Originally Posted by Jolly Green Monster
Ian,

thinking out loud have you checked there is no intercooler pipe leaks?
perhaps a jubilee is allowing air to escape but the pipe is not able to burst off due to it contacting something etc?

Simon
the pipes are all good, i have put the bolt style clamps on, one join did have a slight leak, but i refitted it and all seams to be good now (this was all done before the rr)
Old 26 March 2007 | 06:07 PM
  #33  
Jolly Green Monster's Avatar
Jolly Green Monster
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 16,548
Likes: 2
From: ECU Mapping - www.JollyGreenMonster.co.uk
Default

okay cool..

if you are not able to get AFR or boost plot from the run on these rollers to help out further then it would be worth taking it to another set of rollers or I should check it over.

Simon
Old 26 March 2007 | 07:24 PM
  #34  
Andy.F's Avatar
Andy.F
Subaru Tuning Specialist
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,654
Likes: 1
From: 7.74 @179 mph 1/4 mile - road legal
Default

Originally Posted by AndrewC
The difference in pressure drop at 1.35bar (as per the car that started this thread) is between 1 and 1.5psi - are you saying that this will cause a difference of over 40bhp and similar if not more in torque?

I don't think 10:1 AFR at 4500rpm will help the torque much!
Where did you get the 10:1 AFR from Andrew ? I'm sure thats not what Simon mapped it to.
For 1.35 bar on the plenum, what was the turbo having to boost to ?

23 to achieve 20 psi ?

3psi is worth approx 30bhp at 6000 rpm in my experience.

Andy
Old 26 March 2007 | 07:44 PM
  #35  
mickywrx's Avatar
mickywrx
Unmapped 12.4s @ 105
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 11,777
Likes: 4
From: Newcastle. 330bhp-289lb/ft @ 1bar boost - 12.4s @ 105mph
Post

Originally Posted by Andy.F
What intercooler do you have Micky ? Thats an excellent result for 380cc injectors and 1 bar of boost ! Is that without any octane booster ?

I'd be a bit wary of running it hard on a cold day though as your injectors have maxed out from approx 5300 upwards, if you get a denser airflow then you have no more fuel to add, you will run lean and may melt something.

Andy
Hi Andy,

My intercooler is the Autobahn one from Flat4online. Forgot to include it.

Ran with a litre of Silkolene Pro boost and V-Power.

I've got some 440cc injectors to have fitted, when they've been flow checked, not sure if it wouldn't run like a dog though.

Micky
Old 26 March 2007 | 08:17 PM
  #36  
Simon Roe's Avatar
Simon Roe
Scooby Newbie
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Andy.F
Where did you get the 10:1 AFR from Andrew ? I'm sure thats not what Simon mapped it to.
For 1.35 bar on the plenum, what was the turbo having to boost to ?

23 to achieve 20 psi ?

3psi is worth approx 30bhp at 6000 rpm in my experience.

Andy
I see where Andrew got that from.. from Mickys post.. nothing to do with Ian's...

Originally Posted by mickywrx
My car, MY94 WRX, made 330.1 bhp and 289 lb/ft on the Dastek RR at Motoscope in Northallerton last Sunday.

My spec:

Standard EJ20 engine
Standard engine management, Z4 Ecu, unchipped AFAIK although I should take the cover off and have a look.
Standard TD05-16g turbo
Standard 380(?)cc injectors
Standard headers
GReddy Profec B Spec II boost controller, running roughly 1bar of boost.
Magnex up-pipe
Revolution downpipe
Blitz Nur Spec R
Apexi Power Intake
Walbro fuel pump

Graphs:

Power and Torque


Boost AFR etc



Everything stated as standard above is as it was when I bought the car 2 years ago, anything that may have been changed before that I don't know. Apart from the Z4 ecu which was purchased from Grade A last summer.

So, to increase my torque level, I should have my headers ported. Think I read it right.

Micky
Simon
Old 26 March 2007 | 08:48 PM
  #37  
Jolly Green Monster's Avatar
Jolly Green Monster
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 16,548
Likes: 2
From: ECU Mapping - www.JollyGreenMonster.co.uk
Default

Originally Posted by Simon Roe
I see where Andrew got that from.. from Mickys post.. nothing to do with Ian's...



Simon
wrong username.. doh..
Old 26 March 2007 | 08:50 PM
  #38  
mickywrx's Avatar
mickywrx
Unmapped 12.4s @ 105
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 11,777
Likes: 4
From: Newcastle. 330bhp-289lb/ft @ 1bar boost - 12.4s @ 105mph
Post

Old 27 March 2007 | 12:12 PM
  #39  
AndrewC's Avatar
AndrewC
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 2,209
Likes: 0
From: Lancashire
Default

Yeah I mistook the images further down - although my statement still stands, just for a different car
Old 27 March 2007 | 09:16 PM
  #40  
Andy.F's Avatar
Andy.F
Subaru Tuning Specialist
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,654
Likes: 1
From: 7.74 @179 mph 1/4 mile - road legal
Default

But the car you refer to running 10:1 made excellent power for the mods/boost Andrew !
Old 27 March 2007 | 09:33 PM
  #41  
ZEN Performance's Avatar
ZEN Performance
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,859
Likes: 0
From: Wellingborough, Northamptonshire
Default

I don't beleive the intercooler core is the culprit. I have had good results with the bar and plate cores.
Old 27 March 2007 | 09:44 PM
  #42  
P20SPD's Avatar
P20SPD
Drag it!
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 9,866
Likes: 0
From: Flame grilled Wagon anyone?
Default

Split pipe near the towing eye hook on the passenger side? or where it passes the fan cowling?

Seen a few damaged pipes that way.
Old 27 March 2007 | 10:23 PM
  #43  
Jolly Green Monster's Avatar
Jolly Green Monster
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 16,548
Likes: 2
From: ECU Mapping - www.JollyGreenMonster.co.uk
Default

just checked through the map and log files.. all looks very good.. it took a lot of timing.. boost tails to 1.2bar about 6200rpm.. took a lot of timing when mapped.. something must have altered somewhere?
Have seen ne injectors richen up as the storage fluid in them cleans out but I still don't think it would be enough to cause a drop in power this much if the rollers reproduced how it actually runs on the road..

I need to check it over Ian..

Simon
Old 28 March 2007 | 10:42 AM
  #44  
Ian's Avatar
Ian
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,845
Likes: 1
From: Cambridge
Default

Originally Posted by Jolly Green Monster
just checked through the map and log files.. all looks very good.. it took a lot of timing.. boost tails to 1.2bar about 6200rpm.. took a lot of timing when mapped.. something must have altered somewhere?
Have seen ne injectors richen up as the storage fluid in them cleans out but I still don't think it would be enough to cause a drop in power this much if the rollers reproduced how it actually runs on the road..

I need to check it over Ian..

Simon

ok,
the garage has put a good copy of the RR graph in the post for me, and hopefully i will have it soon
Old 28 March 2007 | 12:20 PM
  #45  
ZEN Performance's Avatar
ZEN Performance
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,859
Likes: 0
From: Wellingborough, Northamptonshire
Default

"garages" don't have rolling roads!
Old 28 March 2007 | 09:38 PM
  #46  
Andy.F's Avatar
Andy.F
Subaru Tuning Specialist
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,654
Likes: 1
From: 7.74 @179 mph 1/4 mile - road legal
Default

Back in your cage, spanner monkey
Old 28 March 2007 | 09:47 PM
  #47  
Jolly Green Monster's Avatar
Jolly Green Monster
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 16,548
Likes: 2
From: ECU Mapping - www.JollyGreenMonster.co.uk
Default

lol
Old 29 March 2007 | 10:57 AM
  #48  
Ian's Avatar
Ian
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,845
Likes: 1
From: Cambridge
Default

a new grahp from the RR


Last edited by Ian; 29 March 2007 at 11:01 AM.
Old 29 March 2007 | 12:09 PM
  #49  
Jolly Green Monster's Avatar
Jolly Green Monster
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 16,548
Likes: 2
From: ECU Mapping - www.JollyGreenMonster.co.uk
Default

Spooled very late.. either the load was very unrealistic on the rollers or there is a boost leak somewhere or similar.

When does it spool on the road now? should be 3xxxrpm.. not over 4k like it is on the graph there.

Simon
Old 29 March 2007 | 12:37 PM
  #50  
dynamix's Avatar
dynamix
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 9,708
Likes: 3
From: near you
Default

I ran early on that same day and also had slightly lower figures than I expected from DD Road Dyno runs. Gave me 356/402 - rollers are fine but there is no real cooling for Top Mounts although that wouldnt have affected you DaOne.

For torque, you cant beat a 2.5 but from looking at the graphs it does look like it has a really late boost issue - not wheel spin was it - did you run when it was raining?
Old 29 March 2007 | 12:41 PM
  #51  
Ian's Avatar
Ian
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,845
Likes: 1
From: Cambridge
Default

no, just cold, they strapted the back down on mine as well, where most of the cars there it was just on the front.

will double check when the boost/revs today
Old 29 March 2007 | 01:00 PM
  #52  
Ian's Avatar
Ian
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,845
Likes: 1
From: Cambridge
Default

also on the graph, should the wheel hp match the power hp line?

as they drop off from each other after 186.7 bhp/4300rev?
Old 29 March 2007 | 01:10 PM
  #53  
Lateral Performance's Avatar
Lateral Performance
Former Sponsor
Support Scoobynet!
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,150
Likes: 0
From: 8.95 @ 168mph. Zero to 1KM 194.1mph
Default

I wish they'd re-scale the graph, so you can see above 7K.


Mark.
Old 29 March 2007 | 01:49 PM
  #54  
Ian's Avatar
Ian
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,845
Likes: 1
From: Cambridge
Default

have just been out in the car, 4th gear putting foot down at around 2k reves

0.70 boost @ 3140 revs
0.76 boost @ 3167 revs

1.32 boost @ 4237 revs
1.33 boost @ 3910 revs
1.33 boost @ 4251 revs

what can you tell from this?

boost is on 1.3 setting on the apexi commander
Old 29 March 2007 | 03:00 PM
  #55  
Jolly Green Monster's Avatar
Jolly Green Monster
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 16,548
Likes: 2
From: ECU Mapping - www.JollyGreenMonster.co.uk
Default

when did it hit 1bar?

if it didn't get to 1.3 until 3910revs then you must have a boost leak or gasket leak.. uppipe for example.

Simon
Old 29 March 2007 | 03:47 PM
  #56  
Ian's Avatar
Ian
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,845
Likes: 1
From: Cambridge
Default

will have a check for what reves it hits 1bar later, yes 1.3 @ 3910

the only things different i have done since remap is put the better hose clamps on, and they all look good.

how else can i tell where the leak is coming from?
Old 29 March 2007 | 04:06 PM
  #57  
Jolly Green Monster's Avatar
Jolly Green Monster
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 16,548
Likes: 2
From: ECU Mapping - www.JollyGreenMonster.co.uk
Default

check the inlet pipe too..

Simon
Old 29 March 2007 | 09:01 PM
  #58  
ZEN Performance's Avatar
ZEN Performance
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,859
Likes: 0
From: Wellingborough, Northamptonshire
Default

Originally Posted by DaOne
also on the graph, should the wheel hp match the power hp line?

as they drop off from each other after 186.7 bhp/4300rev?
Because the transmission losses are going up at that point.
Old 29 March 2007 | 09:04 PM
  #59  
mickywrx's Avatar
mickywrx
Unmapped 12.4s @ 105
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 11,777
Likes: 4
From: Newcastle. 330bhp-289lb/ft @ 1bar boost - 12.4s @ 105mph
Post

Originally Posted by Andy.F
But the car you refer to running 10:1 made excellent power for the mods/boost Andrew !
Is that my car? I don't understand this AFR lark
Old 03 May 2007 | 09:28 PM
  #60  
Ian's Avatar
Ian
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,845
Likes: 1
From: Cambridge
Default

bttt, i have fitted a aeromotive fpr, what other mods can i do to try and get my torque up?

headers?
or
apexi avcr?
or
any other ideas?

then map tweek


Quick Reply: how to get more torque?? RR results inside



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:24 PM.