Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related

UK housing market is 'overvalued'

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01 August 2007, 01:01 AM
  #31  
pimmo2000
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (6)
 
pimmo2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: On a small Island near France
Posts: 14,660
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by abbott
ohhhhhhhhh my god where are you from mate immoving down your way !!!

you can just about scrape a 1 bed flat up my way for 100k !!!
On the Wirral ! Quite a nice area really. Nothing posh but good enough for a 1st home.
Old 01 August 2007, 09:55 AM
  #32  
philc
Scooby Regular
 
philc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: NZ
Posts: 767
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

- got a sense of deja vu when I read this topic ....

Kiwi housing is 'riskiest in the world' - New Zealand's source for business, stock market & currency news on Stuff.co.nz

- so, you think you've got problems !
Old 01 August 2007, 10:08 AM
  #33  
GrahamG
Scooby Regular
 
GrahamG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Hunting for my next Impreza!
Posts: 2,388
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Well i'm up the shoot... just in the process of buying a place now. We got about 9k of the asking price, if that helps.
Old 01 August 2007, 06:45 PM
  #34  
Petem95
Scooby Regular
 
Petem95's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Scoobynet
Posts: 5,387
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Have people not noticed how worries about credit and debt have been causing massive losses on the stock market, and major buy-outs have been unable to go ahead due to nobody willing to take on the debt?....

IMO prices will take a big dip - however I also believe it will be no cheaper to buy a house as a result, as higher interest rates, tighter credit controls and less disposible income due to rapidly inflating prices (petrol, food, bills) will mean you'll be spending the same % of your remaining take-home on the mortgage, despite the amount borrowed being a fair bit less!

The "ive made a killing on my house" "greed is good" lot need to wake up and smell the coffee regarding prices however!
Old 02 August 2007, 09:00 AM
  #35  
lozgti
Scooby Regular
 
lozgti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,490
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The whole property market excitement thing seems to have died a death.

Having just moved house I obviously hope values continue to rise.Can't see it though.Think we are at the levelling off stage if anything with houses going for a reasonable amount less than the asking prices.

Sure someone will have a nice graph to prove me wrong
Old 02 August 2007, 09:34 AM
  #36  
ChefDude
Scooby Regular
 
ChefDude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,290
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

on the up side, for people with some spending money and no mortgage, the increases in bank lending rates to combat the debt market are strengthening the pound against the usd.

and this helps me buy cheap lenses for my camera from the states

anyone looked at arb'ing GBP -> USD -> NZD ?
Old 02 August 2007, 09:41 AM
  #37  
Dracoro
Scooby Regular
 
Dracoro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: A powerslide near you
Posts: 10,261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by lozgti
Having just moved house I obviously hope values continue to rise.
Why?
It just means it gets more expensive to get into the next property in the ladder. i.e. when you need to leave a 2 bed flat for a 3 bed house it costs that much more. If prices fall then it becomes more affordable to trade up.

People, stupidly, like the idea of their property rising in value, however it's only of use if they wish to sell and cash in (which is generally only for people with other poperties as investments, not single property owners).

For example

3 bed House costs £300k
4 bed house costs £400k
To trade up you need to find/finance £100k.

Prices then, for example, double everywhere.

Great! your 3 bed house is now worth £600k
However the 4 bed house that you need to buy (say you have kids growing up and need more roon) are now costing £800k.
Therefore you now need to find/finance £200k instead of £100k.
Old 02 August 2007, 09:58 AM
  #38  
lozgti
Scooby Regular
 
lozgti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,490
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dracoro
Why?
My equity increases?

Appreciate what you are saying but this move will probably be the last for the next good few years anyway.Moved to a nice area in readiness for kids going to school.Have a nice property,garden,double garage (joy )

As it is last move for a bit I suppose it doesn't really matter,however it is nice to think you have a bit of a'cushion' as it were.

As I said though,I think things are levelling out.It is time for wages to play catch up as I don't think (probably wrong ) there has ever been such a large gulf between what people earn and what they need to borrow to buy.

Reality is...it is overvalued
Old 02 August 2007, 10:16 AM
  #39  
philc
Scooby Regular
 
philc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: NZ
Posts: 767
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ChefDude
on the up side, for people with some spending money and no mortgage, the increases in bank lending rates to combat the debt market are strengthening the pound against the usd.

and this helps me buy cheap lenses for my camera from the states

anyone looked at arb'ing GBP -> USD -> NZD ?
in the past 5 days the NZD has gone from US 81cents to US 76 cents - so someone is doing very nicely ...
Old 02 August 2007, 12:10 PM
  #40  
jonc
Scooby Regular
 
jonc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 7,642
Likes: 0
Received 20 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dracoro
Why?
It just means it gets more expensive to get into the next property in the ladder. i.e. when you need to leave a 2 bed flat for a 3 bed house it costs that much more. If prices fall then it becomes more affordable to trade up.

People, stupidly, like the idea of their property rising in value, however it's only of use if they wish to sell and cash in (which is generally only for people with other poperties as investments, not single property owners).

For example

3 bed House costs £300k
4 bed house costs £400k
To trade up you need to find/finance £100k.

Prices then, for example, double everywhere.

Great! your 3 bed house is now worth £600k
However the 4 bed house that you need to buy (say you have kids growing up and need more roon) are now costing £800k.
Therefore you now need to find/finance £200k instead of £100k.
This isn't necessarily always the case, if you buy wisely, it is possible to add substancial value to the property at the time of sale to ease the next step up the property ladder. For example, a property with out of date fixtures fittings and in a poor decorative state. Doing it up, modernise it and or extend it will add value to the property over the rise of the average property. This is one of the factors that has driven up the property prices over the decade.
Old 02 August 2007, 04:16 PM
  #42  
Gordo
Scooby Regular
 
Gordo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,227
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Dracoro is spot on (Jonc is also right but his is a different point). The media and New Labia have promoted the concept of being wealthier because your house has gone up in value. Assuming it's your only/main residence this is nonsense. Put it this way - someone's house goes up £100k so they borrow £50k for a new car / to go on holiday etc. this is silly - they're never going to crystallize the £100k uplift so it's not real money (unless they default on the loan and have to to pay it off!) - the point is they now have £50k of debt. Would they have borrowed the £50k if the house hadn't gone up in value? Course they wouldn't as that would be madness.

My gut feel is there will be a correction - I know several large buy to let investors who are in the process of or have already liquidated their assets. the consumer debt it going to come home to roost as interest rates continue to creep up and the impact of the previous rate rises comes through.

The supply / demand argument is right and it's complicated (people see renting as 'dead money' and would rather hose it away on interest, buy-to-letters driving up demand, immigration, low interest rates, general feel good fator etc). I don't buy it, though - I was told this morning (by a developer) that 30% of city centre flats in Leeds are vacant. That tells me the market's overheated.

I for one would welcome a correction - jonc's logic is right in that you should always be able to add to the underlying value of a property that would benefit from work done to it - the issue is you may still lose money in the process if the market's dipping, especially given the high costs associated with moving (stamp duty in particular).

Not like me to be bearish!

Gordo
Old 02 August 2007, 04:48 PM
  #43  
john banks
Scooby Regular
 
john banks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: 32 cylinders and many cats
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

For the first full quarter that I was renting after selling my previous house, the land registry data showed a drop in house prices of 2.2% in my region, one of the hotspots apparently. The second quarter land registry data isn't out yet for Scotland, but HBOS data showed a 0.6% gain. So in six months house priced have dropped and my savings/investments have increased by about 3% after tax. I pay the same to rent my present property that a 100% interest only mortgage would cost on the old one which was a third of the size. Only the crazy would extend themselves on credit to buy at this point in my area IMHO. The gains were last year. The only way it makes sense to buy is if you're convinced that prices are going to continue to rocket upwards. Otherwise renting is FAR more attractive. Even returning to sensible levels of borrowing and honest comparisons with renting would result in an almighty crash, and it will take years for incomes to catch up. I'm more convinced than ever of a crash now.
Old 02 August 2007, 11:50 PM
  #44  
Terminator X
Owner of SNet
iTrader: (7)
 
Terminator X's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Berkshire
Posts: 11,513
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'm older than that, it was O Level

TX.

Originally Posted by TopBanana
I think you're stretching the useful application of GCSE economics.
Old 02 August 2007, 11:52 PM
  #45  
Terminator X
Owner of SNet
iTrader: (7)
 
Terminator X's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Berkshire
Posts: 11,513
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Of course they are! Big demand & low supply = high prices. Low demand & high supply = the opposite. Housebulders can't build em quick enough, simple as that.

TX.

Originally Posted by bugsti
House prices are not driven by supply and demand.
They are driven by fear and greed.
Old 02 August 2007, 11:55 PM
  #46  
Terminator X
Owner of SNet
iTrader: (7)
 
Terminator X's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Berkshire
Posts: 11,513
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Ah, the wise words of someone who no doubt rents!

TX.

Originally Posted by Dracoro
Why?
It just means it gets more expensive to get into the next property in the ladder. i.e. when you need to leave a 2 bed flat for a 3 bed house it costs that much more. If prices fall then it becomes more affordable to trade up.
Old 02 August 2007, 11:58 PM
  #47  
Terminator X
Owner of SNet
iTrader: (7)
 
Terminator X's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Berkshire
Posts: 11,513
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'll bet a £1 that you've been saying this since 2001 when you joined the Forum!

TX.

Originally Posted by Gordo
My gut feel is there will be a correction ...
Old 03 August 2007, 12:29 AM
  #48  
fast bloke
Scooby Regular
 
fast bloke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 26,619
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

There seems to be an awful lot of bollox talked on here by 'experts' from both sides. The doomsayers have been doomsaying since the average house price was 23p. The people at the other end have been forecasting eleventy sqillon percent growth since the same time. The renters can always throw up a few statistics to show that they are technically better off, and the buyers can quote <insert appropriate lender name here> to say that their house has gone up by 100k this week. At the end of the day, if you can negotiate around what you would like to happen and the stories you tell yourself to convince yourself that you are correct, you will find that no-one really has the slightest notion what will happen next. If anyone could predict with any certainty what would happen, they would now be so rich that they would have several slaves to post on the internet while they go off and make an extra few million predicting the future.

p.s. - I would prefer 0% interest rates and inflation at 100%. It would be perfect for my circumstances, but just because I would like it, you will wait a long long time before you find me trying to convince others that I know it will happen
Old 03 August 2007, 08:36 AM
  #49  
Petem95
Scooby Regular
 
Petem95's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Scoobynet
Posts: 5,387
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Terminator X
Of course they are! Big demand & low supply = high prices. TX.
I think its more like big demand, low supply slack lending and low rates = high prices

You could have 50 buyers for every house, but if nobody was able to borrow enough to buy it then it would have to drop in price to a level where people could. Have you noticed how rates are on the up, and lending looks set tighten?

Anyway the supply/demand arguement is the only thing the lenders and EA's have left to talk up the market, and IMO its nowhere near as bad as made out (Clearly some will lap up all they say, eh Tx ).

Do you really think we couldnt see a crash? Look at places like Japan and Hong Kong - GENUINE supply/demand issues as very little land to build on, yet still MASSIVE house price crashes with prices down over 80% in a lot of areas. Or do you prefer to ignore these examples?
Old 03 August 2007, 09:13 AM
  #51  
PeteBrant
Scooby Regular
 
PeteBrant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Worthing..
Posts: 7,575
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by **************
How anyone can argue its nothing to do with demand is ludicrous.

I am currently moving house and had been looking to buy in one particular village. However this village is very nice, hardly any properties come up for sale because no one wants to leave it so therefore supply of properties is very low. The demand to live there is high and this means the property prices are way higher than certain other areas not too far from it. I ended up buying somewhere in another village not so desirable as my 1st choice because I could get a bigger/nicer house for the same money.

Somewhere like Maidstone or the Medway towns for example have much lower house prices than Tunbridge Wells or Sevenoaks simply because demand for houses in Tunbridge Wells and Sevenoaks is far greater than it is in Maidstone or the Medway towns.

That is simple supply and demand economics!
It doesn't quite work like that.


You aren;t factoring in that the demand is limited by the ability to raise the capital. It's not like you are buying oranges.

Demand in Maidstone, will probably be just as high, if not higher, because by default there will be a wider selection of people able to buy the properties at the given price.

THe higher the price, the less people can afford it, therefore demand isn't as high - For example, demand for £3,000,000 houses is not the same as it is for £200,000 houses. Yet the £3,000,000 house is still going up 10% a year.


I am not saying supply/demand isn't an issue, but it is not nearly as simplistic as you are making it out to be.
Old 03 August 2007, 09:56 AM
  #53  
PeteBrant
Scooby Regular
 
PeteBrant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Worthing..
Posts: 7,575
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by **************
I agree with what you are saying about raising the capital but none of it is affected by the .25% raise in interest rates every few months unless it continues long term and we see massively high interest rates. That can't happen as the economy can't sustain it and it would kill of manufacturing in the UK,
Bit late for that, manufacturing is already dead int he uk - When you look at it from a viewpoint of a couple of decades ago.
Originally Posted by **************
cause huge unemployment and a big recession. The Government can not and will not let that happen, they are just trying to find the fine line between how far they can push interest rates without going bang and at the moment I think they are very near the limit as far as manufacturing is concerned.
The Government might not get a choice, For starters they don't control interest rates, the BoE do - And that is primarily governed by the rate of inflation - Which of course to a certain extent is controlled by the government.

And a government that wants to control inflation shouldn't really be lowering the base rate of tax to 20%......

Originally Posted by **************
The point about demand in Maidstone being higher I don't agree with though. The reason a 3 bed detached in Maidstone is £200k - £275k is because there is not the same desire (demand) to live in Maidstone as there is to live in Tunbridge Wells where the same property will be £75k-£100k more for exactly the same size/style house. If the desire/demand was equal the prices would be the same. They are only 20 miles apart and the same distance from London however Tunbridge Wells is vastly more affluent and generally nicer place to live than Maidstone will ever be. Hence people want to live in Tunbridge Wells a lot more than they do in Maidstone. I moved to Maidstone because of that huge price difference but hate it here hence moving outside of it now.
More people, especially FTB's will be able to afford a £100K home, then will a £275K home - The relative niceness of the area becomes irrrlevant - I would prefer to live in Kensington than where I do now, but I don't have the option.

The reaons the prices aren't the same is not purely down to supply and demand - There are several other factors at play, not least of which is the "niceness" of the area as you mentioned.

Schools, catchment area, hospitals, transport links, crime statistics, historical value, lay lines, flood plains, weather, population demographic - All of these factors affect the value of a given property. Supply/Demand is just one of those factors, and not necessarily the primary one.
Old 03 August 2007, 10:14 AM
  #55  
PeteBrant
Scooby Regular
 
PeteBrant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Worthing..
Posts: 7,575
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by **************
But its those factors that drive demand up.
Not necessarily. Demand is only present if you have the budget available.

Were demand the driving factor, then you would find only the nice areas going up in value, and the run down, less affluent areas would remain static. As it is, there is pretty much a uniform rise across all property prices.
Old 03 August 2007, 10:30 AM
  #57  
Matteeboy
Scooby Regular
 
Matteeboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Mars
Posts: 11,470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Does it really matter so much?
We have been brainwashed into thinking it's our God given right as UK citizens to own a home and if we can't afford one, then we have failed.

Owning a house has been the best thing ever for about ten years, it's now not quite as appealing to get on the "ladder" - so it kind of levels out.

People forget to look at the entire life cost of a mortgage (which is often taken out at low rates, then goes up over 25 years), people forget that they have to sell their house to realise any cash, people forget that everything else goes up at the same rate.

We have rented two different apartments in the past three years - both almost identical value, both lovely places on the river - One (rented first) was double the rent of the other.

If you're clever (or more likely lucky) with renting, you can pick up a bargain and pocket the rest. You're very very unlikely to pick up a house purchase at a bargain though.
Unless it's in mid Wales.
Old 03 August 2007, 10:44 AM
  #58  
PeteBrant
Scooby Regular
 
PeteBrant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Worthing..
Posts: 7,575
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by **************
Unfortunately this is not correct, well certainly for the part of Maidstone I live in.

House prices have gone up massively in Tunbridge Wells and to a lesser degree in the nicer parts of Maidstone. However the prices in the area of Maidstone I live in have hardly gone up at all since before Christmas and before then they were rising at only a fraction of rate other areas locally were rising at. This is another reason for moving out, the gap between what mine was worth and what I want to move to was getting bigger and bigger every month. I took an offer way below my asking price because that loss was worth taking compared to the increase in gap had I left it on the market and not sold if for a few more months.

Oh and as an example, the new builds round the corner from me that sold for £290k new a year to 2 years ago are now not selling or are being sold by the mortgage companies after being reposessed for £210k and even then they aren't selling!!!
BBC NEWS | In Depth | UK House Prices | Maidstone

Many of the lower prices areas in the Maidstone area have risen more than Tunbridge Wells - For example, the lowest average , Medway, has gone up 9.4% in the last year, versus 3,2 for Tunbridge.

Of course specific local anecdotal examples may be different, but on the whole, there is a uniform rise, if anything, more of a rise in less expensive areas - Supply/Demand is not the only criteria.
Old 03 August 2007, 11:14 AM
  #59  
bugsti
Scooby Regular
 
bugsti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Matteeboy
Does it really matter so much?
We have been brainwashed into thinking it's our God given right as UK citizens to own a home and if we can't afford one, then we have failed.

Owning a house has been the best thing ever for about ten years, it's now not quite as appealing to get on the "ladder" - so it kind of levels out.

People forget to look at the entire life cost of a mortgage (which is often taken out at low rates, then goes up over 25 years), people forget that they have to sell their house to realise any cash, people forget that everything else goes up at the same rate.

We have rented two different apartments in the past three years - both almost identical value, both lovely places on the river - One (rented first) was double the rent of the other.

If you're clever (or more likely lucky) with renting, you can pick up a bargain and pocket the rest. You're very very unlikely to pick up a house purchase at a bargain though.
Unless it's in mid Wales.
Just one thing - after 25 years (assuming you dont move) when you have finished paying your mortgage you live rent free. If you rent then you pay for it as long as you live.
Old 03 August 2007, 11:17 AM
  #60  
Matteeboy
Scooby Regular
 
Matteeboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Mars
Posts: 11,470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Ahhh yes Bug but how much interest have you paid over that 25 years?
A mortgage is a big loan after all.

Not saying it's wrong to buy (quite the opposite), just lots treat house price rises like winning the lottery.


Quick Reply: UK housing market is 'overvalued'



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:44 PM.