McLaren could be in serious trouble!....
#121
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Near Bristol
Posts: 1,164
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
it will be interesting to see the tension in this weekends race, certainly without informing the public of exactly what evidence they have against mclaren i can see they are going to lose a lot of supporters and revenue over this.
it does seem the fia is always biased towards ferrari.
it does seem the fia is always biased towards ferrari.
#122
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Worthing..
Posts: 7,575
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ah ok, I stand corrected. I was under the impression that McLaren had said that Coughlan did not share the information he had with anybody at the company in the first inquest, but it subsequently turned out that he had shared details with much of the company hierarchy.
#123
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Couch Spud
Posts: 9,277
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
With Maclaren now having NO constructors points for the 2007 season, does this mean they will move to the back of the paddock and pit lanes for 2008 ?
#124
I thoght McClaren has sort of turned round the situation, well I mean for the last two games anyway. I mean the Hesky/Owen partnership is working and with the likes of Barry and SWP playing aswell as they are England look good at the mo.
#125
Pete. That's not correct. McLaren did admit that some employees had seen the documents but that they did not act on them.
The FIA's position on penalising McLaren is quite clear:
'...to apply those penalties, the governing body the FIA would need conclusive proof that McLaren had used that information to their benefit, and the FIA says that did not exist...'
And that's from the original enquiry, which makes this decision even more baffling and still doesn't answer the contradiction of allowing the drivers to continue if they genuinely believe the car to be illegal.
The FIA's position on penalising McLaren is quite clear:
'...to apply those penalties, the governing body the FIA would need conclusive proof that McLaren had used that information to their benefit, and the FIA says that did not exist...'
And that's from the original enquiry, which makes this decision even more baffling and still doesn't answer the contradiction of allowing the drivers to continue if they genuinely believe the car to be illegal.
It looks suspiciously as though the FIA have laid penalties in a way to do the maximum injury to McClaren with as little trouble to themselves with regard to the rest of this season. I wonder if it is down to personalities as has been said.
Les
#126
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Somewhere in Kent, sniffing some V-Power
Posts: 15,029
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That's the problem, I don't think it is fair to the sport to take away just the constructors points. If the Mclaren cars were illegal, or the organisation that produced them, acted illegally, then mclaren should be kicked out of 07, driver's included.
It might not be there fault, but what if they have gained through their teams wrong doings? Is it still fair to let them keep the points they earned in the those cars? Ofcorse it isn't. The FIA need shooting to be honest. They have quite clearly tailored this outcome to suit their pockets, not the sport.
It might not be there fault, but what if they have gained through their teams wrong doings? Is it still fair to let them keep the points they earned in the those cars? Ofcorse it isn't. The FIA need shooting to be honest. They have quite clearly tailored this outcome to suit their pockets, not the sport.
#127
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Wickford, Essex - GamerTag - lCE
Posts: 2,570
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As if its only reset then the 4 races left will probably give them enough points to overtake most of the other teams!
#128
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Couch Spud
Posts: 9,277
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think it is Zero points for the entire 2007 season
So if they win every race and come 2nd too in every race does the team below get their points as though they never even raced ?
So if they win every race and come 2nd too in every race does the team below get their points as though they never even raced ?
#130
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: The Great White North
Posts: 25,080
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This is rather amusing (shamelessly nicked the link from a post by spider on 22B.com)
So what's the deal with 2008? Are they allowed to race if the cars are found to not be using anything that may have been gleaned from the Ferrari documents? Are they prohibited from racing in 2008, or are they allowed to race but will not score any constructors points, but drivers can score points?
So what's the deal with 2008? Are they allowed to race if the cars are found to not be using anything that may have been gleaned from the Ferrari documents? Are they prohibited from racing in 2008, or are they allowed to race but will not score any constructors points, but drivers can score points?
#131
Scooby Regular
Theres no direct proof the 07 car has an advantage due to knowledge gained by Mike Coughlan.
Mike Coughlan had the information from Nigel Stepney who was pissy with Fez for their treatment of him post-schumacher
Theres no proof Ron Dennis allowed that information to influence the 07 car.
Theres no proof Ron Dennis knew Mike Coughlan had those details.
There are emails between drivers naming Coughlan as having Fez information.
Theres rumour, Ron Dennis found out about emails when Alonso said he had information that the FIA would be interested - and pop another 0 on the end of my cheque (or similar leverage)
Theres rumour it was Ron Dennis that told the FIA about the emails because he didn't want Alonso having something over the team and because it was the right thing to do.
The 08 car will be studied and if its found to have Fez inspired design, McLaren could be disqualified from 08 constructors.
Most people not F1 mad, don't realise theres 2 constructors so probably won't really give a damn.
Personally, its a bit harsh and I honestly believe Ron Dennis didn't know Coughlan had the documents until it was too late.
Mike Coughlan had the information from Nigel Stepney who was pissy with Fez for their treatment of him post-schumacher
Theres no proof Ron Dennis allowed that information to influence the 07 car.
Theres no proof Ron Dennis knew Mike Coughlan had those details.
There are emails between drivers naming Coughlan as having Fez information.
Theres rumour, Ron Dennis found out about emails when Alonso said he had information that the FIA would be interested - and pop another 0 on the end of my cheque (or similar leverage)
Theres rumour it was Ron Dennis that told the FIA about the emails because he didn't want Alonso having something over the team and because it was the right thing to do.
The 08 car will be studied and if its found to have Fez inspired design, McLaren could be disqualified from 08 constructors.
Most people not F1 mad, don't realise theres 2 constructors so probably won't really give a damn.
Personally, its a bit harsh and I honestly believe Ron Dennis didn't know Coughlan had the documents until it was too late.
#132
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: The Great White North
Posts: 25,080
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Reading this indicates that Alonso acted on information he was given by Coughlan and that Alonso knew where the information was coming from. If this is the case, then why not strip him of his points and disqualify him from racing? Not punished due to him giving evidence? Hmm, good excuse to use, and obviously he's not being kicked out as people would not watch the remainder of the season, so the money is being protected.
I wonder what Ron has to say to Alonso about all this, if indeed it is true. The article claims that Ferrari has said the information is very reliable, well, of course they'd say that, bit of a no brainer really.
Bottom line, this whole farce brings the "sport" of F1 into public's eye for all the wrong reasons. Regardless, I'm still going to watch the race at Spa, as it could be very interesting indeed.
I wonder what Ron has to say to Alonso about all this, if indeed it is true. The article claims that Ferrari has said the information is very reliable, well, of course they'd say that, bit of a no brainer really.
Bottom line, this whole farce brings the "sport" of F1 into public's eye for all the wrong reasons. Regardless, I'm still going to watch the race at Spa, as it could be very interesting indeed.
#133
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: www.tiovicente.com
Posts: 2,006
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That being the case (from Markus' link) then it makes the FIA look even more conniving because the drivers benefiting from this information (Alonso from the e-mails, apparently not Hamilton) should have their points removed.
You cannot simply penalise the team and not the drivers - still doesn't make sense. Are we to assume that it why Alonso wasn't present in Paris yesterday and Hamilton wasn't?
You cannot simply penalise the team and not the drivers - still doesn't make sense. Are we to assume that it why Alonso wasn't present in Paris yesterday and Hamilton wasn't?
#134
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: The Great White North
Posts: 25,080
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That being the case (from Markus' link) then it makes the FIA look even more conniving because the drivers benefiting from this information (Alonso from the e-mails, apparently not Hamilton) should have their points removed.
You cannot simply penalise the team and not the drivers - still doesn't make sense. Are we to assume that it why Alonso wasn't present in Paris yesterday and Hamilton wasn't?
You cannot simply penalise the team and not the drivers - still doesn't make sense. Are we to assume that it why Alonso wasn't present in Paris yesterday and Hamilton wasn't?
#135
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: www.tiovicente.com
Posts: 2,006
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Dunno. But I've noticed Hamilton bigging up the team at every opportunity, probably in the hope that they'll favour him over Alonso the self proclaimed 'I've brought 0.6 of a second to this team, this year' which is always a good way of getting everyone else on side.
#136
More news from the BBC..
BBC SPORT | Motorsport | Formula One | McLaren exposed by spy evidence
McLaren received a systematic flow of information from a spy within rivals Ferrari for nearly three months this year, the FIA has revealed.
#137
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Runway two seven right.
Posts: 6,652
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Bang to rights I'm afraid.
3.18 On 12 April 2007 at 12.25 Mr. de la Rosa wrote to Mr. Coughlan and asked “ can you explain me as much as you can, Ferrari’s braking system with the [reference to detailed technical information]? Are they adjusting from inside the cockpit…?”
3.19 After a number of exchanges about whether a description would be too
complicated to articulate by e-mail, Mr. Coughlan replies on 14 April 2007 at
14.40 with a technical description which purports to be a description of the
principles underpinning the Ferrari braking system. Ferrari have confirmed that
the description given is an accurate (though incomplete) description of the
principles of its braking system. Coughlan concludes with a statement that “we are looking at something similar”. This latter statement strongly suggests that the McLaren system was being worked on from a position of knowledge of the details of the Ferrari system, which, even if the Ferrari system not being directly copied, must be more advantageous to McLaren than designing a system without such knowledge.
3.20 The e-mail exchange between Mr. de la Rosa and Mr. Alonso dated 25 March
2007 at 01.43 also describes some aspects of the McLaren braking system and
states that “with the information that we have, we believe Ferrari has a similar
system” and goes on to describe highly specific elements of the Ferrari system
(which cannot be set out here for confidentiality reasons but which clearly
demonstrate knowledge of Ferrari’s confidential information).
3.18 On 12 April 2007 at 12.25 Mr. de la Rosa wrote to Mr. Coughlan and asked “ can you explain me as much as you can, Ferrari’s braking system with the [reference to detailed technical information]? Are they adjusting from inside the cockpit…?”
3.19 After a number of exchanges about whether a description would be too
complicated to articulate by e-mail, Mr. Coughlan replies on 14 April 2007 at
14.40 with a technical description which purports to be a description of the
principles underpinning the Ferrari braking system. Ferrari have confirmed that
the description given is an accurate (though incomplete) description of the
principles of its braking system. Coughlan concludes with a statement that “we are looking at something similar”. This latter statement strongly suggests that the McLaren system was being worked on from a position of knowledge of the details of the Ferrari system, which, even if the Ferrari system not being directly copied, must be more advantageous to McLaren than designing a system without such knowledge.
3.20 The e-mail exchange between Mr. de la Rosa and Mr. Alonso dated 25 March
2007 at 01.43 also describes some aspects of the McLaren braking system and
states that “with the information that we have, we believe Ferrari has a similar
system” and goes on to describe highly specific elements of the Ferrari system
(which cannot be set out here for confidentiality reasons but which clearly
demonstrate knowledge of Ferrari’s confidential information).
#138
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: www.tiovicente.com
Posts: 2,006
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Strewth. That being the case, you have to wonder at the intelligence of people like Coughlan, Alonso and De La Rosa leaving a paper trail that long and so easily traceable.
#139
Doesn't take brain of britain to keep that sort of conversation out of mail and on the phone...or IM ;-)
If IM logs are admissable then i'm shafted. All sorts of dirty washing comes out on IM
If IM logs are admissable then i'm shafted. All sorts of dirty washing comes out on IM
#140
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Bristol-ish
Posts: 2,085
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So, there's 'proof' that de la Rosa and Alonso were actively trying to find out confidential information from Ferrari, but they get no penalty.
There's no proof that anyone else in McLaren used any of the Ferrari information directly, yet McLaren gets found guilty.
By the WMSC's own admission:-
Full version here
There's no proof that anyone else in McLaren used any of the Ferrari information directly, yet McLaren gets found guilty.
By the WMSC's own admission:-
.... The WMSC has full jurisdiction to apply Article 151(c) and stresses that it is not necessary for it to demonstrate that any confidential Ferrari information was directly copied by McLaren or put to direct use in the McLaren car to justify a finding that Article 151(c) was breached and/or that a penalty is merited. Nor does the WMSC need to show that any information improperly held led to any specifically identified sporting advantage, or indeed any advantage at all. Rather, the WMSC is entitled to treat possession of another team’s information as an offence meriting a penalty on its own if it so chooses.
Last edited by DaveD; 14 September 2007 at 07:15 PM.
#141
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Oo'p Norf
Posts: 873
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So basically you've got 4 stupid greedy *******, Coughlan, Stepney, De La Rosa, and to top it off Alonso acting like total idiots, and the whole team gets taken down.. still think it's a bit harsh.
There is still no proof that McLaren per se knew Coughlan had this documentation until it was too late, and there's no proof that anything has been used in the cars and/or any advantage gained.
What should happen is Alonso & De La Rosa lose their Super Licenses for 12 months, Alonso stripped of his Drivers' Championship points, and also his Cnstructors' points deducted. In the interests of "team collective responsibility" I think it would have been fair to fine McLaren £10Million.
That quote by the WMSC above is a complete kop out clause... I reckon if this goes to civil court, that comment wouldn't hold much water.
There is still no proof that McLaren per se knew Coughlan had this documentation until it was too late, and there's no proof that anything has been used in the cars and/or any advantage gained.
What should happen is Alonso & De La Rosa lose their Super Licenses for 12 months, Alonso stripped of his Drivers' Championship points, and also his Cnstructors' points deducted. In the interests of "team collective responsibility" I think it would have been fair to fine McLaren £10Million.
That quote by the WMSC above is a complete kop out clause... I reckon if this goes to civil court, that comment wouldn't hold much water.
#142
The more I read the more bizarre it gets. Alonso "knew" but escapes punishment ?!
From the bbc
But Ecclestone told the BBC: "It came very close to McLaren being thrown out, it really was a genuine possibility.
"A few of us sort of battled on and campaigned for the fine instead."
Had McLaren been thrown out of the championship altogether, it would have meant the end of the drivers' title challenges of both Lewis Hamilton and Fernando Alonso. "
Had they thrown them all out - they would have lost a huge slice of the audience. Some of whom (like me) are only just returning after 5 years or so of pure boredom with the whole charade. But this verdict is just strange in every respect.
From the bbc
But Ecclestone told the BBC: "It came very close to McLaren being thrown out, it really was a genuine possibility.
"A few of us sort of battled on and campaigned for the fine instead."
Had McLaren been thrown out of the championship altogether, it would have meant the end of the drivers' title challenges of both Lewis Hamilton and Fernando Alonso. "
Had they thrown them all out - they would have lost a huge slice of the audience. Some of whom (like me) are only just returning after 5 years or so of pure boredom with the whole charade. But this verdict is just strange in every respect.
#143
This all may have been precipitated by Alonso. After the Hungarian GP it is alleged that he threatened to reveal the e-mail traffic with de la Rosa to the FIA, if Ron Dennis did not elevate him to No. 1 driver within the McLaren team!
BBC SPORT | Motorsport | Formula One | Alonso 'will not leave McLaren'
But Ron Dennis called his bluff and spoke to the FIA himself about this e-mail traffic.
Fernando Alonso faces end of road over threat to blow whistle - Times Online
BBC SPORT | Motorsport | Formula One | Alonso 'will not leave McLaren'
But Ron Dennis called his bluff and spoke to the FIA himself about this e-mail traffic.
Fernando Alonso faces end of road over threat to blow whistle - Times Online
Last edited by CharlesW; 15 September 2007 at 11:19 AM.
#144
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Scoobynet
Posts: 5,387
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The FIA said beforehand that any of the drivers who provided information would not get any penalty, assuming they did not hide anything. This probably goes some way to explaining why this [the emails] all came out.
Also as Bernie said before the last race, if this was Spyker and Super Aguri it wouldnt even be talking about it! I think spying/design copying has been a part of F1 for a long time - Ferrari wont be exempt from any of that.
Some articles questioning how on earth Hamilton could have not known about this information if it was being discussed by McLaren engineers, and he is said to be close to them and often discussing setup etc. He could be in trouble if it comes to light at a later date that he did know about this information, yet claimed not to to the FIA.
Also as Bernie said before the last race, if this was Spyker and Super Aguri it wouldnt even be talking about it! I think spying/design copying has been a part of F1 for a long time - Ferrari wont be exempt from any of that.
Some articles questioning how on earth Hamilton could have not known about this information if it was being discussed by McLaren engineers, and he is said to be close to them and often discussing setup etc. He could be in trouble if it comes to light at a later date that he did know about this information, yet claimed not to to the FIA.
#145
Very interesting read, thanks for letting us see that. I also feel that Alonso and De La Rosa should get it in the neck for all that and that McClaren should be reinstated. Does not show Alonso in a good light in my opinion.
Les
Les
#148
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: .
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well I think the WMSC statement is enough to prove at least some sort of penalty was deserved althiough I think the one meted out was both overly harsh and not balanced.
At least after reading it there are probably a few contriubutors to this thread feeling a bit stupid now as it's not really possible any longer to say the verdict isn't without at least some justification.
Still a very sad set of events for the sport!!
At least after reading it there are probably a few contriubutors to this thread feeling a bit stupid now as it's not really possible any longer to say the verdict isn't without at least some justification.
Still a very sad set of events for the sport!!
#150
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Couch Spud
Posts: 9,277
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just read that this is also how this penalty will affect Mclaren
They will also have to spend more money next year on freight and travel costs because they will be the 11th team on the grid.
In addition they will find that instead of their current allocation of five garages, they will have two, and instead of their generous allocation of VIP paddock passes for sponsor guests, they will have a limited amount.
They will also have to spend more money next year on freight and travel costs because they will be the 11th team on the grid.
In addition they will find that instead of their current allocation of five garages, they will have two, and instead of their generous allocation of VIP paddock passes for sponsor guests, they will have a limited amount.