Concorde youtube tribute
#31
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: The Great White North
Posts: 25,080
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't have many regrets, but one of them is not having flown on Concorde to New York. I know it wasn't as spacious or refined as the upper/business class cabins on most of the new generation of aircraft, but then those planes cannot hold a candle to Concorde.
Why is it so special? For me it's because it was the pinnacle of passenger jet engineering. Granted the very large aircraf we have know are in a way engineering marvels, but are they capable of supersonic flight, I don't think so. That was the other endearing thing about the old girl, she could fly supersonic, and was the only passenger jet in active service to do this and I think that this will remain for quite some time.
There's also the fact that she was British, ok, not 100 percent british as Air France was involved. She also pished off the yanks as they could not build their own copy and did their oh-so-normal spoilt brat impression and decide to try and prevent it from landing in the US.
I do hope there will be a spiritual sucessor to Concorde, preferably one that can accommodate far more passengers, and thus bring supersonic intercontiental flight to the masses. It does irk me somewhat that crossing the atlantic in the 21st Century still takes far too long.
Why is it so special? For me it's because it was the pinnacle of passenger jet engineering. Granted the very large aircraf we have know are in a way engineering marvels, but are they capable of supersonic flight, I don't think so. That was the other endearing thing about the old girl, she could fly supersonic, and was the only passenger jet in active service to do this and I think that this will remain for quite some time.
There's also the fact that she was British, ok, not 100 percent british as Air France was involved. She also pished off the yanks as they could not build their own copy and did their oh-so-normal spoilt brat impression and decide to try and prevent it from landing in the US.
I do hope there will be a spiritual sucessor to Concorde, preferably one that can accommodate far more passengers, and thus bring supersonic intercontiental flight to the masses. It does irk me somewhat that crossing the atlantic in the 21st Century still takes far too long.
#32
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: West London
Posts: 1,914
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I work for BA as an engineer, the company has little concern anymore of its past and only concern for the future and profit.
Concordes' cards were marked as soon as it became too difficult to source parts and one was used as a spares supply. I'd love to see it still in the air and i'd also have loved to see Branson take a few on and run them for many more years but as we all know he's a publicity ***** and had no genuine interest in doing that.
There is still a Concorde outside our East Base hangars and although it was handed over to the BAA for them to display they too have seen fit to abandon it. Shame really.
There are still people within BA who share your sense of occasion and history but unfortunately the ones holding the purse strings are more like Snug Rhino above and couldn't care less.
IMO the chances of seeing one take to the skies again are zero, i'd love to one day eat my words though
Concordes' cards were marked as soon as it became too difficult to source parts and one was used as a spares supply. I'd love to see it still in the air and i'd also have loved to see Branson take a few on and run them for many more years but as we all know he's a publicity ***** and had no genuine interest in doing that.
There is still a Concorde outside our East Base hangars and although it was handed over to the BAA for them to display they too have seen fit to abandon it. Shame really.
There are still people within BA who share your sense of occasion and history but unfortunately the ones holding the purse strings are more like Snug Rhino above and couldn't care less.
IMO the chances of seeing one take to the skies again are zero, i'd love to one day eat my words though
#33
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: www.tiovicente.com
Posts: 2,006
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sadly as far as i know BA still own all the aircraft and rather then sell them to the like's of Richard Branson who had genuine aspiration's of flying her again. They seem content to loan them to various museum's around the globe where they sit at mother nature's mercy in many cases.
I should imagine the spares would be in very short supply.
However i have heard a rumour that the only near flight ready one is an Air France example cared for daily by engineers.
Keep the faith but i fear the chance's are almost zero of seeing her airborne again.
I should imagine the spares would be in very short supply.
However i have heard a rumour that the only near flight ready one is an Air France example cared for daily by engineers.
Keep the faith but i fear the chance's are almost zero of seeing her airborne again.
The simple fact of the matter is that EADS (Airbus) refused to continue with the manufacture and stocking of spares available for the aircraft, consquently the CofA was withdrawn. Without it, the airlines could not operate Concorde.
After the crash at CDG, despite rumours to the contrary, BA was the only airline commited to getting the aircraft back into service with Air France initially reluctant and only shamed into it by BA's commitment which is why they spend so much refurbishing their airframes to comply with the 21st century.
Once the decision had been forced upon BA, Branson in his usual inimitable style got as much cheap PR out of the situation as possible by stating that he'd operate the aircraft and traded on the usual anti-BA brigade's emotions. Again, without the CofA Virgin could never have operated the aircraft. Not then, not now and not in the future but by trading on people's ignorance he got some valuable PR which didn't cost him a penny.
The only reason Concorde was ever profitable was down to the government of the day writing off the development costs which ran into the billions. Without that, BA and Air France would never have turned a profit.
There was nothing genuine about Branson's aspirations to operate the air frames apart from naivety.
#34
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: In the sport section...
Posts: 5,292
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I live 15 minutes from Manchester airport and i'm really really pi$$ed off at myself for neve going to watch it take off or land
Hopefully one day i will
Hopefully one day i will
#36
Scooby Regular
Join Date: May 2006
Location: I have ad blocked my rep - so dont waste your time!
Posts: 1,548
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not quite spot on though is it - BA made a profit ONLY because the debt was written off by the gov and the bottom line is they make a LOT more money from their high end passengers flying them PROPER business class and not at mach 9 in a tin loo roll.
If it was a good commercial jet it would still fly today....but its not. Its a 1999 Subaru RB5. Quick, but thats about it unless you count "nostalgia".
If it was a good commercial jet it would still fly today....but its not. Its a 1999 Subaru RB5. Quick, but thats about it unless you count "nostalgia".
#38
Scooby Senior
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: RIP - Tam the bam & Andy the Jock
Posts: 14,333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Any other 70's people remember that classic film....
The Concorde ... Airport '79
At twice the speed of sound, can the Concorde evade attack? ..... you bet it can
Although...the Concorde featured in the film first flew as F-WTSC on 31 Jan 1975, and was the 7th Concorde built. It was re-registered as F-BTSC (serial number 203)in May 1975, and it appears with this registration in the film. The Concorde was leased from Aerospatiale (France) for the movie, and was sold to Air France in October 1980. This Concorde was the same aircraft which crashed after tyre bust caused a fule tank to rupture and the leaking fuel catch fire on July 25th 2000, while taking off from Charles De Gaulle Airport in Paris
The Concorde ... Airport '79
At twice the speed of sound, can the Concorde evade attack? ..... you bet it can
Although...the Concorde featured in the film first flew as F-WTSC on 31 Jan 1975, and was the 7th Concorde built. It was re-registered as F-BTSC (serial number 203)in May 1975, and it appears with this registration in the film. The Concorde was leased from Aerospatiale (France) for the movie, and was sold to Air France in October 1980. This Concorde was the same aircraft which crashed after tyre bust caused a fule tank to rupture and the leaking fuel catch fire on July 25th 2000, while taking off from Charles De Gaulle Airport in Paris
#39
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Runway two seven right.
Posts: 6,652
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not quite spot on though is it - BA made a profit ONLY because the debt was written off by the gov and the bottom line is they make a LOT more money from their high end passengers flying them PROPER business class and not at mach 9 in a tin loo roll.
If it was a good commercial jet it would still fly today....but its not. Its a 1999 Subaru RB5. Quick, but thats about it unless you count "nostalgia".
If it was a good commercial jet it would still fly today....but its not. Its a 1999 Subaru RB5. Quick, but thats about it unless you count "nostalgia".
#40
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Weston Super Mare, Somerset.
Posts: 14,102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not quite spot on though is it - BA made a profit ONLY because the debt was written off by the gov and the bottom line is they make a LOT more money from their high end passengers flying them PROPER business class and not at mach 9 in a tin loo roll.
If it was a good commercial jet it would still fly today....but its not. Its a 1999 Subaru RB5. Quick, but thats about it unless you count "nostalgia".
If it was a good commercial jet it would still fly today....but its not. Its a 1999 Subaru RB5. Quick, but thats about it unless you count "nostalgia".
#41
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Home
Posts: 14,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not quite spot on though is it - BA made a profit ONLY because the debt was written off by the gov and the bottom line is they make a LOT more money from their high end passengers flying them PROPER business class and not at mach 9 in a tin loo roll.
If it was a good commercial jet it would still fly today....but its not. Its a 1999 Subaru RB5. Quick, but thats about it unless you count "nostalgia".
If it was a good commercial jet it would still fly today....but its not. Its a 1999 Subaru RB5. Quick, but thats about it unless you count "nostalgia".
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JackClark
Computer & Technology Related
1
25 September 2015 06:50 PM
Adam Kindness
ScoobyNet General
0
15 September 2015 03:31 PM