View Poll Results: SaraSquares - Baby come back?
MODS to Apologise - Upgrade SS to lifetime member
22
21.15%
SS to Apologise - Come back to the fold
10
9.62%
SS has made her choice and should stick to it
61
58.65%
SS has made her choice but should see this thread
15
14.42%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 104. You may not vote on this poll
SARASQUARES !!!
23 October 2007, 12:12 PM
#61
Cannot believe some loser infracted NorthDave!! Crazy.....
I never took notice of her posts as they all seemed like utter nonsense to me.... bring her back or dont let her back... who really gives a toss?????
I never took notice of her posts as they all seemed like utter nonsense to me.... bring her back or dont let her back... who really gives a toss?????
23 October 2007, 12:25 PM
#63
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 39,877
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I dont have a problem with your posts Les and generally you are an interesting read.
Surely you have to admit that posts about every aspects of life get a bit annoying. Especially when a whole tribe of guys are following her round trying to flirt with daft smileys.
I'm not talking about the cancer thread here so dont get me wrong.
Thanks for that though!
Surely you have to admit that posts about every aspects of life get a bit annoying. Especially when a whole tribe of guys are following her round trying to flirt with daft smileys.
I'm not talking about the cancer thread here so dont get me wrong.
Thanks for that though!
Whatever you or anyone thought about Sara's posts, she is a good hearted person and I don't think she merited such derisory comments as have been made about her in this thread.
Les
23 October 2007, 12:31 PM
#64
But Les, if someone asks a "poll" such as this, should only the "I love Sara" brigade respond and all those who dislike her stay away, or should people be able to give their honest opinion.....
Maybe the poll should of been...
Sarasquares........ is she
1) amazing
2) ace
3) fantastic
4) All of the above
Maybe the poll should of been...
Sarasquares........ is she
1) amazing
2) ace
3) fantastic
4) All of the above
23 October 2007, 12:32 PM
#65
Scooby Regular
You forgot option 5
Which should have read
"Sarah can do what she wants as far as this BBS is concerned, frankly. Should she decide to "return", however, she should learn to be a little less over sensitive to issues about which she feels strongly. She should accept that everyone else has a right to voice their own opinion, which may well differ from hers, and desist from infracting them for voicing that opinion"
That would have got my vote
"Sarah can do what she wants as far as this BBS is concerned, frankly. Should she decide to "return", however, she should learn to be a little less over sensitive to issues about which she feels strongly. She should accept that everyone else has a right to voice their own opinion, which may well differ from hers, and desist from infracting them for voicing that opinion"
That would have got my vote
23 October 2007, 12:38 PM
#66
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: The Terry Crews of moderation. P P P P P P POWER!!
Posts: 18,687
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Which should have read
"Sarah can do what she wants as far as this BBS is concerned, frankly. Should she decide to "return", however, she should learn to be a little less over sensitive to issues about which she feels strongly. She should accept that everyone else has a right to voice their own opinion, which may well differ from hers, and desist from infracting them for voicing that opinion"
That would have got my vote
"Sarah can do what she wants as far as this BBS is concerned, frankly. Should she decide to "return", however, she should learn to be a little less over sensitive to issues about which she feels strongly. She should accept that everyone else has a right to voice their own opinion, which may well differ from hers, and desist from infracting them for voicing that opinion"
That would have got my vote
23 October 2007, 01:13 PM
#69
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: There is only one God - Elvis!
Posts: 8,328
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I dont know the full story (so correct me if i'm wrong) but.....
Sara was chucking around infractions simply because she didn't agree with other peoples view points, yet got all shirty when the mods/webby banned her for misuse of the infraction policy which part of is below and i gather is part of Scoobynets terms and conditions that users agree to when we sign up.
Infractions may only be given for specific reasons, set by the administrators. These reasons are Trolling, Being offensive / abusive to other members, Racism, Spamming, and Abuse of the infraction system. Infractions given for posts which do not fall into these categories will be reversed, and the user who gave them will potentially receive and infraction if we feel this was not simply a mistake.
So.... what i can gather Sara has chucked her toys out of the pram because she has been found to be abusing the infraction system and now she has been punished she has stropped off in a huff.
Well fair enough, i'm sorry but the world will keep turning and Scoobynet will keep running.
If i have got the above story wrong then please feel free to correct me
Sara was chucking around infractions simply because she didn't agree with other peoples view points, yet got all shirty when the mods/webby banned her for misuse of the infraction policy which part of is below and i gather is part of Scoobynets terms and conditions that users agree to when we sign up.
Infractions may only be given for specific reasons, set by the administrators. These reasons are Trolling, Being offensive / abusive to other members, Racism, Spamming, and Abuse of the infraction system. Infractions given for posts which do not fall into these categories will be reversed, and the user who gave them will potentially receive and infraction if we feel this was not simply a mistake.
So.... what i can gather Sara has chucked her toys out of the pram because she has been found to be abusing the infraction system and now she has been punished she has stropped off in a huff.
Well fair enough, i'm sorry but the world will keep turning and Scoobynet will keep running.
If i have got the above story wrong then please feel free to correct me
23 October 2007, 01:14 PM
#70
Scooby Regular
and probably having a right good laugh at some of the comments in this thread
23 October 2007, 01:17 PM
#71
SN Fairy Godmother
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Far Far Away
Posts: 35,246
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
23 October 2007, 01:27 PM
#75
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 39,877
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
But Les, if someone asks a "poll" such as this, should only the "I love Sara" brigade respond and all those who dislike her stay away, or should people be able to give their honest opinion.....
Maybe the poll should of been...
Sarasquares........ is she
1) amazing
2) ace
3) fantastic
4) All of the above
Maybe the poll should of been...
Sarasquares........ is she
1) amazing
2) ace
3) fantastic
4) All of the above
Les
23 October 2007, 01:29 PM
#76
Depends on how big an **** she was being..... I do not know her or have any desire to be one of her clique and just ignored her, but others may of thought she was an absolute ****.
23 October 2007, 03:15 PM
#77
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: The Great White North
Posts: 25,080
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My understanding of the situation was that there was a disagreement between Sara and one of the mods over a thread (may have been more than one thread) and this resulted in a temp ban via the infraction system. There was a debate as to wether it could be seen if the ban could be lifted, and it was deemed that it would not be lifted and as such the sarasquares account ceased posting on SN.
I have been known to be somewhat, well, nasty, to her in the past, however, I did relent and we were rather amicable towards each other.
Wether the SS account posts again isn't an overly big deal. If she is posting under another username then I'm sure those she want's to know it's her will know, and the rest can be oblivious to this, and that would no doubt be the aim of the new account.
I have been known to be somewhat, well, nasty, to her in the past, however, I did relent and we were rather amicable towards each other.
Wether the SS account posts again isn't an overly big deal. If she is posting under another username then I'm sure those she want's to know it's her will know, and the rest can be oblivious to this, and that would no doubt be the aim of the new account.
23 October 2007, 03:22 PM
#78
Scooby Regular
I don't know exactly what she got banned for, but if you care to look you will see that she was "on a mission" with several topics, about which only Sarah's view counted.
It's not speculation, it is a matter of fact. Now, I would say that she is quite entitled to take that line, and make her point. The problem is, when you "abuse" the system to make it, you have to accept the penalty.
The rules are there, like them or hate them, right or wrong.
Last edited by Devildog; 23 October 2007 at 03:37 PM. Reason: pished at lunch, can't spell!
23 October 2007, 03:24 PM
#79
Scooby Regular
23 October 2007, 03:26 PM
#80
Scooby Regular
OK, thats me filled in. Never really paid much attention so didn't notice if she was the keyboard crusader type - looked fit though
I'd advise keeping a lookout for someone posting as saratriangle
BTW - thats not meant to be rude. I'm bored today.
I'd advise keeping a lookout for someone posting as saratriangle
BTW - thats not meant to be rude. I'm bored today.
23 October 2007, 03:38 PM
#83
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: The Great White North
Posts: 25,080
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
23 October 2007, 04:00 PM
#85
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: The Terry Crews of moderation. P P P P P P POWER!!
Posts: 18,687
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hi Mate - all you have to do is search many of the threads Sarah posted on.
I don't know exactly what she got banned for, but if you care to look you will see that she was "on a mission" with several topics, about which only Sarah's view counted.
It's not speculation, it is a matter of fact. Now, I would say that she is quite entitled to take that line, and make her point. The problem is, when you "abuse" the system to make it, you have to accept the penalty.
The rules are there, like them or hate them, right or wrong.
I don't know exactly what she got banned for, but if you care to look you will see that she was "on a mission" with several topics, about which only Sarah's view counted.
It's not speculation, it is a matter of fact. Now, I would say that she is quite entitled to take that line, and make her point. The problem is, when you "abuse" the system to make it, you have to accept the penalty.
The rules are there, like them or hate them, right or wrong.
Cheers Devildog,
Think I've got enough from the above. What I would say is that if one leaves a community in protest, that's fair enough (although it's sad if it has to come to that) However, then returning using an different username somewhat undermines their protest.
Ns04
23 October 2007, 04:04 PM
#86
Scooby Regular
Cheers Devildog,
Think I've got enough from the above. What I would say is that if one leaves a community in protest, that's fair enough (although it's sad if it has to come to that) However, then returning using an different username somewhat undermines their protest.
Ns04
Think I've got enough from the above. What I would say is that if one leaves a community in protest, that's fair enough (although it's sad if it has to come to that) However, then returning using an different username somewhat undermines their protest.
Ns04
, although, yes, to leave in protest and come back as another username is, well, a bit wierd.
