Did I just hear that right?
17 December 2007, 12:30 PM
#31
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Between the Fens and the Wolds.
Posts: 3,027
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just the same as the UK giving around £268 million to Sudan for peace keeping when they are currently planning yet another war !
Madness.
Madness.
17 December 2007, 01:12 PM
#32
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 892
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not quite the same. With this one you can directly associate the money you have paid in tax with an individual getting £4k!
Doesn't it make you feel all warm inside knowing that you've paid for some loser to go home and spend your money living it up for a week before he comes back for his next installment!
Doesn't it make you feel all warm inside knowing that you've paid for some loser to go home and spend your money living it up for a week before he comes back for his next installment!
17 December 2007, 01:16 PM
#33
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Wanting the English to come first in England for a change!
Posts: 2,091
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
******* labour, spineless pr1cks, where the **** is my 4k, me and a mate are trying to start a business and ive had no help whatsoever!
Why cant labour just get rid of the illegals, put them on a plane and wave goodbye??
Why is it frowned upon if we mention removing illegals, there are too many of them, full stop!!!!!
Why cant labour just get rid of the illegals, put them on a plane and wave goodbye??
Why is it frowned upon if we mention removing illegals, there are too many of them, full stop!!!!!
18 December 2007, 10:27 AM
#35
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wildberg, Germany/Reading, UK
Posts: 9,707
Likes: 0
Received 73 Likes
on
54 Posts
If it genuinely wasn't safe for them to return and they aren't a ****** then that would all have been taken into consideration by the panel that rejected their claim.
Labour, stop pandering to everyone, nobody else has any quarms about deporting people.
18 December 2007, 12:06 PM
#36
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 39,877
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
18 December 2007, 12:08 PM
#37
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Disco, Disco!
Posts: 21,825
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Why should we worry if it is SAFE for them to return? also what legal battles? if they fail to get asylum they should be deported end of. It is not our problem if it is not safe for them to return to their own country! The only reason it possibly wouldn't be safe for them to be deported back was if they were a ****** in their own country then tough they deserve what they get.
If it genuinely wasn't safe for them to return and they aren't a ****** then that would all have been taken into consideration by the panel that rejected their claim.
Labour, stop pandering to everyone, nobody else has any quarms about deporting people.
If it genuinely wasn't safe for them to return and they aren't a ****** then that would all have been taken into consideration by the panel that rejected their claim.
Labour, stop pandering to everyone, nobody else has any quarms about deporting people.
18 December 2007, 02:03 PM
#39
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Merthyr Tydfil
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This is outrageous. They get money for being sent back. Yet, I work damn hard, pay all my taxes, insure my car etc. But then get told that I am not allowed any form of tax credit to put my daughter in to day care while we are at work. Really does take the p1$$ living here.
18 December 2007, 02:06 PM
#40
Scooby Regular
![[Davey]'s Avatar](data:image/svg+xml;utf8,<svg xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg' viewBox='0 0 50 50'><circle class='avatar-circle-default' fill='%23806b84' cx='25px' cy='25px' r='20px'></circle><text class='avatar-text-default' x='49%' y='53%' fill='white' text-anchor='middle' alignment-baseline='middle'>[</text></svg>)
I think the politically correct term is crazed islamic rag head
18 December 2007, 03:14 PM
#45
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: South Bucks
Posts: 3,213
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Why should we worry if it is SAFE for them to return? also what legal battles? if they fail to get asylum they should be deported end of. It is not our problem if it is not safe for them to return to their own country! The only reason it possibly wouldn't be safe for them to be deported back was if they were a ****** in their own country then tough they deserve what they get.
If it genuinely wasn't safe for them to return and they aren't a ****** then that would all have been taken into consideration by the panel that rejected their claim.
Labour, stop pandering to everyone, nobody else has any quarms about deporting people.
If it genuinely wasn't safe for them to return and they aren't a ****** then that would all have been taken into consideration by the panel that rejected their claim.
Labour, stop pandering to everyone, nobody else has any quarms about deporting people.
My worry is what I outlined in my original response. That people will treat it as a revolving door.
I quite agree regarding ******* but with many countries information is not immediately available and the ******* (amongst others) will be travelling on forged/doctored or no-id. anyway. How do you separate a genuine case from a genocidal maniac?
J.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post