Notices
General Technical
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Explain the MD321 turbo?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06 January 2008 | 01:45 PM
  #121  
banny sti's Avatar
banny sti
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (68)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 16,598
Likes: 22
From: Type R
Default

Are you running an MD195S turbo jd?

Banny
Old 06 January 2008 | 01:48 PM
  #122  
Jolly Green Monster's Avatar
Jolly Green Monster
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 16,548
Likes: 2
From: ECU Mapping - www.JollyGreenMonster.co.uk
Default

Originally Posted by jd5217


my sti8 with the www.eginetuner.co.uk gt30 hybrid on stock internals
when do you see full boost on the road?
Old 06 January 2008 | 02:18 PM
  #123  
black newage's Avatar
black newage
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by jd5217


my sti8 with the www.eginetuner.co.uk gt30 hybrid on stock internals
torque appears to be low for 420ish bhp? any explanations? bearing in mind im getting 380 on similar bhp but with different turbo on a 18 housing on a standard 2.0
Old 06 January 2008 | 02:27 PM
  #124  
Jolly Green Monster's Avatar
Jolly Green Monster
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 16,548
Likes: 2
From: ECU Mapping - www.JollyGreenMonster.co.uk
Default

torque curve looks like staged boost? lower and then increasing with RPM?
written on the graph it says 1.5bar?

or it wheel span

Simon
Old 06 January 2008 | 05:24 PM
  #125  
MartynJ's Avatar
MartynJ
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,629
Likes: 3
From: Enginetuner Plymouth for 4wd RR Mapping Apexi Ecutek Alcatek Proper Garage More than just a laptop!
Default

Originally Posted by Jolly Green Monster
when do you see full boost on the road?
Logfile taken from SimTek ecu shows from applying full load @ 2700rpm full boost of 1.5 bar is achieved @ 3500rpm...
Old 07 January 2008 | 12:24 PM
  #126  
banny sti's Avatar
banny sti
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (68)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 16,598
Likes: 22
From: Type R
Default

On a 2ltr engine is their any real benefit in running the 3" inlet pipe or is it better to run the standard size?

banny
Old 07 January 2008 | 01:26 PM
  #127  
ZEN Performance's Avatar
ZEN Performance
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,859
Likes: 0
From: Wellingborough, Northamptonshire
Default

the more interesting thing is an STI8 with simtek ECU.
Old 07 January 2008 | 01:39 PM
  #128  
Bartop's Avatar
Bartop
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,317
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by banny sti
On a 2ltr engine is their any real benefit in running the 3" inlet pipe or is it better to run the standard size?

banny
Mark @ Lateral said no real tangible benefit of going to 3" inlet pipe to me, I've got the standard size samco on mine.
Old 07 January 2008 | 02:11 PM
  #129  
MartynJ's Avatar
MartynJ
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,629
Likes: 3
From: Enginetuner Plymouth for 4wd RR Mapping Apexi Ecutek Alcatek Proper Garage More than just a laptop!
Default

Originally Posted by Zen Performance
the more interesting thing is an STI8 with simtek ECU.
Were you not aware they did them .....?
Old 07 January 2008 | 04:53 PM
  #130  
Mad Hammer's Avatar
Mad Hammer
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (55)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 4,078
Likes: 1
From: 1/4 mile PB 8.89 @ 160
Default

Originally Posted by banny sti
On a 2ltr engine is their any real benefit in running the 3" inlet pipe or is it better to run the standard size?

banny
Nope my 321T runs a standard size prodrive silicone inlet from Mark. You do need a silcone pipe though. We first ran mine on the standard inlet pipe and car would not hold more than 1.5 bar over 6k revs, changing it to the sicone pipe solved the problem and it now runs 2 bar to the red line with no issues.
Old 07 January 2008 | 05:54 PM
  #131  
bigarf's Avatar
bigarf
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (67)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,061
Likes: 0
From: w,yorkshire
Default

i may have missed something here but i was under the impresion that the only difference in the h and the t was the size of the inlet.i thought the h had the standered inlet and the t had the bigger 3in inlet.
Old 07 January 2008 | 07:58 PM
  #132  
frayz's Avatar
frayz
Essex Area Moderator
Essex Subaru Owners Club Badge
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 19,945
Likes: 2
From: "Engineering Perfection in Essex"
Default

Originally Posted by bigarf
i may have missed something here but i was under the impresion that the only difference in the h and the t was the size of the inlet.i thought the h had the standered inlet and the t had the bigger 3in inlet.
The H and T are two competely different turbos mate.
Old 08 January 2008 | 02:43 PM
  #133  
jd5217's Avatar
jd5217
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,156
Likes: 1
From: over the hills and far away
Default

Originally Posted by Zen Performance
the more interesting thing is an STI8 with simtek ECU.
the 1st!
Old 08 January 2008 | 05:05 PM
  #134  
Andy.F's Avatar
Andy.F
Subaru Tuning Specialist
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,654
Likes: 1
From: 7.74 @179 mph 1/4 mile - road legal
Default

Originally Posted by frayz
The H and T are two competely different turbos mate.
They are quite similar actually and share many of the same parts, lets just say you may not be able to tell them apart from the outside

Last edited by Andy.F; 08 January 2008 at 05:08 PM.
Old 08 January 2008 | 08:08 PM
  #135  
silent running's Avatar
silent running
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,957
Likes: 1
From: East coast.
Default

Originally Posted by Mad Hammer
Nope my 321T runs a standard size prodrive silicone inlet from Mark. You do need a silcone pipe though. We first ran mine on the standard inlet pipe and car would not hold more than 1.5 bar over 6k revs, changing it to the sicone pipe solved the problem and it now runs 2 bar to the red line with no issues.
Interesting. I was thinking about getting one of these myself because I'm on my 3rd OE pipe so far and don't want to pay £200 for a pipe where I'm going to block most of the outlets off anyway. Do you use a VTA dump valve, or keep it recirculating and somehow modify the Prodrive pipe to take input from the DV return?
Old 08 January 2008 | 08:27 PM
  #136  
Andy.F's Avatar
Andy.F
Subaru Tuning Specialist
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,654
Likes: 1
From: 7.74 @179 mph 1/4 mile - road legal
Default

You can use a Samco, SFS or Perrin pipe and retain the recirc port if required.
Old 08 January 2008 | 08:49 PM
  #137  
Mad Hammer's Avatar
Mad Hammer
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (55)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 4,078
Likes: 1
From: 1/4 mile PB 8.89 @ 160
Default

Originally Posted by silent running
Interesting. I was thinking about getting one of these myself because I'm on my 3rd OE pipe so far and don't want to pay £200 for a pipe where I'm going to block most of the outlets off anyway. Do you use a VTA dump valve, or keep it recirculating and somehow modify the Prodrive pipe to take input from the DV return?
I use a HKS VTA which seems to work well, so the Prodrive one was ideal for me, or do as Andy suggests.
Old 08 January 2008 | 11:13 PM
  #138  
bigarf's Avatar
bigarf
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (67)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,061
Likes: 0
From: w,yorkshire
Default

Originally Posted by Andy.F
They are quite similar actually and share many of the same parts, lets just say you may not be able to tell them apart from the outside
so how do you tell the difference between the 2 and what is the reason for fitting some with standered inlet and some with larger ones.
Old 08 January 2008 | 11:35 PM
  #139  
Jolly Green Monster's Avatar
Jolly Green Monster
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 16,548
Likes: 2
From: ECU Mapping - www.JollyGreenMonster.co.uk
Default

Originally Posted by bigarf
so how do you tell the difference between the 2 and what is the reason for fitting some with standered inlet and some with larger ones.
number written on the turbo dynamics label.

inlet size - convenience of fitment now really as it seems to make little difference to power output
Old 09 January 2008 | 09:26 AM
  #140  
dynamix's Avatar
dynamix
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 9,708
Likes: 3
From: near you
Default

Originally Posted by Jolly Green Monster
number written on the turbo dynamics label.

inlet size - convenience of fitment now really as it seems to make little difference to power output
Does it help reduce surge or do the H and T not suffer from that?
Old 09 January 2008 | 10:03 AM
  #141  
Andy.F's Avatar
Andy.F
Subaru Tuning Specialist
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,654
Likes: 1
From: 7.74 @179 mph 1/4 mile - road legal
Default

Less surge with the smaller inlet in my experience.
Old 09 January 2008 | 10:56 AM
  #142  
reano's Avatar
reano
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
From: Near a V-Power petrol station or A&B roads
Default

Originally Posted by lunar tick
Marmski - I have the 321H on a standard 03 STI engine. If it's the 'H' you're referring too (I think it is when you mention 400/400) then here are my thoughts:

Can a standard MY05 STi Type UK take this turbo/power with its standard clutch? - Yes, providing you're not into full-blooded standing start launches

As i understand from various reading other supporting mods would need to be:
650-750cc injectors - yes, 650s are perfect
New Headers (im assuming i can still keep un-equal?) - yes, tubular headers really lifted the performance of my H compared to ported OEMs
Decat system - I run hi-flow sports cat and have just squeezed out 400bhp
Turbo - Yes
Walbro 255 Fuel Pump - yes
Remap - absolutely!

And then the engine will produce a safe 400/400 on Tesco99/V-Power? Should do; I use a bit of NF for extra safety. Obviously at 400bhp, the engine will be under more stress, but I gather there are several standard engines running well at this power output - the key is good mapping

With regards to other upgrades, are the brembos upto this kinda power? - not really; I'm using Performance Friction discs and pads - absolutely amazing! (suspension is standard shocks but on STi Pink Springs). Also STi panel filter in.

This just sounds like a perfect turbo (why doesnt everyone use these?!!?!) - guess lots of people are put off by the extra outlay compared to some other turbos
This is just the kind of thread I shouldn't be reading but here goes:

I already have the upgraded pump, brakes and miltek 3" decat exhaust. Car is my53 sti with APS TMIC and APS cold air intake doing 350+ bhp on v34 (for over a year now and not one problem).

How much would it cost to add the turbo with all supporting parts (all fitted) to my car ...... I'm after c400/400 on standard vpower/tesco fuel.
Old 14 January 2008 | 10:18 PM
  #143  
ex-webby's Avatar
ex-webby
Orange Club
 
Joined: Oct 1998
Posts: 13,763
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by stevebt
I consdiered this route ?? but once you are rotated it seems a step backwards ?? I have seen alan bells progress with methonal maps , but I still think the garret rotated is the better option for 500bhp plus
I think it depends on how far over 500bhp you want tbh. There are other turbos on the market that can get over 500bhp in the standard position without the need for "funny" fuel mixes and high boost levels.
Old 14 January 2008 | 10:58 PM
  #144  
dynamix's Avatar
dynamix
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 9,708
Likes: 3
From: near you
Default

..

Last edited by dynamix; 20 March 2009 at 09:43 AM.
Old 15 January 2008 | 06:58 AM
  #145  
s9aru shady's Avatar
s9aru shady
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 334
Likes: 0
Default md321t

just fitted the md321t with the 3" inlet to my car this week also fitted new headers and up pipe 650cc injectors zac at mocom is mapping it monday so i think i will be more than happy think i should see some good figures. the engine at the momment is a standard 03 plate sti engine what sort of figures do you think i will see for now will be going 2.5 built engine soon
Old 15 January 2008 | 08:29 AM
  #146  
bigarf's Avatar
bigarf
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (67)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,061
Likes: 0
From: w,yorkshire
Default

mines running the 321h on the standered 03 sti was running 383 but after a few more mods added and a short spell at the scooby clinic its now running 418 which ime well happy with.ill just have to save up for an engine rebuild now as surely it must be on the edge.
Old 15 January 2008 | 07:27 PM
  #147  
Kane STi's Avatar
Kane STi
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
From: Letzebuerg
Default

Is it necessary to use a 3" exhaust with the MD321H?
At the moment I´m using a GT-Spec Header & Up-pipe, decat down-pipe and straight 2,5" to the end.
thx
Serge
Old 15 January 2008 | 09:30 PM
  #148  
dunx's Avatar
dunx
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 14,333
Likes: 0
From: Slowly rebuilding the kit of bits into a car...
Default

Me too !
Is a 3" system essential ? Or can I make do with a catted TSL system till later ?
Then tweak the map once the bank balance recovers a bit !

DunxC
Old 15 January 2008 | 09:34 PM
  #149  
cookstar's Avatar
cookstar
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 33,828
Likes: 0
From: Stroke it baby!
Default

I wonder how many MD's have been bought on the strength of this thread
Old 15 January 2008 | 10:07 PM
  #150  
StuS's Avatar
StuS
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 520
Likes: 0
From: herts
Default

Originally Posted by cookstar
I wonder how many MD's have been bought on the strength of this thread
Probably quite a few



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:24 AM.