View Poll Results: Infractions Do We Want Them or Not?
Scrap the Infraction System
68
42.77%
Keep as is
32
20.13%
Keep and show the User who has done the Infraction
59
37.11%
Voters: 159. You may not vote on this poll
Should SN Ditch Infraction System
#94
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Surrey/London borders.
Posts: 8,300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#95
Scooby Senior
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Scotchland
Posts: 6,566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#97
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Logged Out
Posts: 10,221
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#98
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Surrey/London borders.
Posts: 8,300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#101
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Surrey/London borders.
Posts: 8,300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#102
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Surrey/London borders.
Posts: 8,300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#103
Scooby Senior
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Scotchland
Posts: 6,566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If someone steals Heather Mills McCartney's false leg you can be the one to tell her nothing's changed .
#106
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (1)
Lets have a clear an open list of all the the people who have been infracted since the start and the posts they were infracted for. (I believe that a lot of the people who do not like it have the wrong 'reason' for wanting it taken away).
Then I think we should vote which idiots or trolls we want banned for life
Show me the stats!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Then I think we should vote which idiots or trolls we want banned for life
Show me the stats!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
#109
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (1)
It suits me to stay behind with all the women , if that means we can start being a car enthusiasts site again and not a self opinionation society.
Back to the good old days where people wanted to help each other out here, Rather that just talk about Politics (or other $hite), I say.
#111
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
Regardless of the petty bickering of SN members, the fully paid up members of SN have not shown themselves to be honest, intelligent people with good judgement. Instead some have shown themselves to be pathetic backstabbing cowards. And the Infraction system has been the perfect medium for them to hide behind.
The powers that be need to rethink the infraction system in order to make it less susceptible to abuse by power hungry morons with delusions of superiority.
Anyone issuing an infraction should have to give reason for the action as well as filling out a complaint form that is sent to the recipient of the infraction as well as the moderators. The complaint will then have to be reviewed by the mods who will then judge the infraction to be either fair or not and then either let the infraction stand or withdraw it.
It may sound drawn out, but if members can't be trusted to behave with integrity then they shouldn't be given power to judge.
The powers that be need to rethink the infraction system in order to make it less susceptible to abuse by power hungry morons with delusions of superiority.
Anyone issuing an infraction should have to give reason for the action as well as filling out a complaint form that is sent to the recipient of the infraction as well as the moderators. The complaint will then have to be reviewed by the mods who will then judge the infraction to be either fair or not and then either let the infraction stand or withdraw it.
It may sound drawn out, but if members can't be trusted to behave with integrity then they shouldn't be given power to judge.
#113
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Logged Out
Posts: 10,221
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It suits me to stay behind with all the women , if that means we can start being a car enthusiasts site again and not a self opinionation society.
Back to the good old days where people wanted to help each other out here, Rather that just talk about Politics (or other $hite), I say.
Back to the good old days where people wanted to help each other out here, Rather that just talk about Politics (or other $hite), I say.
#114
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (1)
Regardless of the petty bickering of SN members, the fully paid up members of SN have not shown themselves to be honest, intelligent people with good judgement. Instead some have shown themselves to be pathetic backstabbing cowards. And the Infraction system has been the perfect medium for them to hide behind.
The powers that be need to rethink the infraction system in order to make it less susceptible to abuse by power hungry morons with delusions of superiority.
Anyone issuing an infraction should have to give reason for the action as well as filling out a complaint form that is sent to the recipient of the infraction as well as the moderators. The complaint will then have to be reviewed by the mods who will then judge the infraction to be either fair or not and then either let the infraction stand or withdraw it.
It may sound drawn out, but if members can't be trusted to behave with integrity then they shouldn't be given power to judge.
The powers that be need to rethink the infraction system in order to make it less susceptible to abuse by power hungry morons with delusions of superiority.
Anyone issuing an infraction should have to give reason for the action as well as filling out a complaint form that is sent to the recipient of the infraction as well as the moderators. The complaint will then have to be reviewed by the mods who will then judge the infraction to be either fair or not and then either let the infraction stand or withdraw it.
It may sound drawn out, but if members can't be trusted to behave with integrity then they shouldn't be given power to judge.
I think that is a logical argument.
But, if it is a valid infraction and is upheld - why cant we go one further and get rid of the infractee???
I think I have done 2 - If anyone thinks that is excessive???
#116
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
You know, I have just noticed I too can infract (Thanks for the heads up FP ). And yet it has never occured to me to find out whether or not I can infract as I consider myself open to debate. If I see something on the internet I don't wish to I have the power to choose to see something elsewith a simple click of my mouse. If I disagree with someones opinion I am grown up enough to put my point accross and listen to fair arguement.
#117
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Surrey/London borders.
Posts: 8,300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You know, I have just noticed I too can infract (Thanks for the heads up FP ). And yet it has never occured to me to find out whether or not I can infract as I consider myself open to debate. If I see something on the internet I don't wish to I have the power to choose to see something elsewith a simple click of my mouse. If I disagree with someones opinion I am grown up enough to put my point accross and listen to fair arguement.
Go on, hit someone with a scoobyslap
#119
Scooby Regular
The ScoobySlap
The basic point is, if you don't like something - don't read it. If it is really out-of-order RTM .....
Originally Infractions were given out correctly and stopped spam and glaring trolling ..... not now - I was Infracted for asking what the downsides were to mapping your car .... it was my own thread and a simple question .... which shows how pathetic it has become!
The basic point is, if you don't like something - don't read it. If it is really out-of-order RTM .....
Originally Infractions were given out correctly and stopped spam and glaring trolling ..... not now - I was Infracted for asking what the downsides were to mapping your car .... it was my own thread and a simple question .... which shows how pathetic it has become!