Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related

Anyone sick of the 'green'/Global warming stuff yet?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07 March 2008, 02:33 PM
  #211  
Klaatu
Scooby Regular
 
Klaatu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,911
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Martin2005
This whole Al 'I invented the internet' Gore thing is of course just another right wing piece of propoganda that was regularly trotted out by Fox, Rush Limpbar, Sean Hanity and the rest of the neo-con nutcase estabilment during the 2000 election. I'm surprised you fell for it.
The fact he has provided false infromation about "cliamte change". The fact is his wealth originated in the oil industry (Just ask the natives). The fact is he is now "involved" in one of the major "carbon trading" companies in Europe.

I smell a rotten egg. Nothing to do with "right wing", it's fact, unlike his mocunetary!
Old 07 March 2008, 02:35 PM
  #212  
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Martin2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Klaatu
I want/expect nothing from you, persoanlly. What I expect every individual to do is examine the real data, not what the IPCC, Govn't and Al "I invented the internet" Gore tells you what is fact. It isn't fact.

Climate changes, always has, always will. And eventually, the Earth will be burnt to dust!
Nobody is disputing the fact the climate has changed many times in the 4 billion years the earth has been about. It's the RAPID change in temps that is the big concern.
Old 07 March 2008, 02:37 PM
  #213  
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Martin2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Klaatu
The fact he has provided false infromation about "cliamte change". The fact is his wealth originated in the oil industry (Just ask the natives). The fact is he is now "involved" in one of the major "carbon trading" companies in Europe.

I smell a rotten egg. Nothing to do with "right wing", it's fact, unlike his mocunetary!

So we're back to conspiracy theories again
Old 07 March 2008, 02:43 PM
  #214  
Klaatu
Scooby Regular
 
Klaatu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,911
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Martin2005
So we're back to conspiracy theories again
Rhe only theory is....."we've caused "it"". Are you that much of an an idiot? No, please, don't answer that.
Old 07 March 2008, 02:44 PM
  #215  
Klaatu
Scooby Regular
 
Klaatu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,911
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Martin2005
So we're back to conspiracy theories again
The only theory is....."we've caused "it"". Are you that much of an an idiot? No, please, don't answer that.
Old 07 March 2008, 02:45 PM
  #216  
Paul3446
Scooby Regular
 
Paul3446's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 3,236
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
"Its quite simple if the global average temperature goes up then the planet is warmer.

On the whole, taken as an average, temps are going up. "



Not in the last 10 years they're not! Why is that? Given all the CO2 we have released in that period and temperatures haven't gone up.

No-one can explain this it appears?
Old 07 March 2008, 02:46 PM
  #217  
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Martin2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Klaatu
The only theory is....."we've caused "it"". Are you that much of an an idiot? No, please, don't answer that.
So you're back to insults then!
Old 07 March 2008, 02:48 PM
  #218  
Paul3446
Scooby Regular
 
Paul3446's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 3,236
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'm not insulting you, so you can answer my question concerning the last 10 years!
Old 07 March 2008, 03:12 PM
  #219  
Klaatu
Scooby Regular
 
Klaatu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,911
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Martin2005
So you're back to insults then!
Can you, or your "scientists" explain the "anomally" since 1998, that with compound Co2 emissions since 1998, we don't see compound temperature rises.
Old 07 March 2008, 03:17 PM
  #220  
Paul3446
Scooby Regular
 
Paul3446's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 3,236
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

No they can't, I've been banging on about that for the last day.

All they can do is trot out the government line, Global Warming is happening and there's no point even questioning it, because we believe everything we're told!
Old 07 March 2008, 03:29 PM
  #221  
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Martin2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Paul3446
I'm not insulting you, so you can answer my question concerning the last 10 years!
No, I have no idea what the answer is.
Old 07 March 2008, 03:31 PM
  #222  
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Martin2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Klaatu
Can you, or your "scientists" explain the "anomally" since 1998, that with compound Co2 emissions since 1998, we don't see compound temperature rises.
They are not 'my scientist' I have absolutely no axe to grind here. As I've said dozens of times of this and other GW threads, I keep my mind open to both sides of this debate, to rule out one or the other out would be a folly.

Last edited by Martin2005; 07 March 2008 at 10:34 PM.
Old 07 March 2008, 03:53 PM
  #223  
Paul3446
Scooby Regular
 
Paul3446's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 3,236
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

So you agree that, given that the last 10 years have been perhaps the worst ever for CO2 emmissions and that temperatures in that time haven't risen, it appears unlikely that the two are linked?
Old 07 March 2008, 04:01 PM
  #224  
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Martin2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Paul3446
So you agree that, given that the last 10 years have been perhaps the worst ever for CO2 emmissions and that temperatures in that time haven't risen, it appears unlikely that the two are linked?
Now you're trying to put words into my mouth.

No I don't agree (or disagree for that matter), I don't know, and I very much doubt that you do either
Old 07 March 2008, 09:27 PM
  #225  
PeteBrant
Scooby Regular
 
PeteBrant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Worthing..
Posts: 7,575
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Lots of graphs

NCDC: Climate of 2005 - Annual Review


Keyword here is TREND.

Please, someone find me a downward trend - or at least a levelling off.

If not, then please back up some of you assertions that the planet isn't actually getting warmer without resorting to posting links to "IDONTBELEIVEINGLOBALWAMRING.com"
Old 07 March 2008, 09:34 PM
  #226  
Suresh
Scooby Regular
 
Suresh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 4,622
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Klaatu
The only theory is....."we've caused "it"". Are you that much of an an idiot? No, please, don't answer that.
LMFAO.
Put-down of the year (so far)
Old 07 March 2008, 10:33 PM
  #227  
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Martin2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Suresh
LMFAO.
Put-down of the year (so far)
You are obviously of the same schoolof thought - can't have a grown-up debate without using idiotic personal insults
Old 07 March 2008, 10:38 PM
  #228  
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Martin2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PeteBrant
Lots of graphs

NCDC: Climate of 2005 - Annual Review


Keyword here is TREND.

Please, someone find me a downward trend - or at least a levelling off.

If not, then please back up some of you assertions that the planet isn't actually getting warmer without resorting to posting links to "IDONTBELEIVEINGLOBALWAMRING.com"
No Pete you're obviously getting confused, the polar ice caps are melting because the planet is getting cooler
Old 08 March 2008, 11:06 AM
  #229  
Leslie
Scooby Regular
 
Leslie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 39,877
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Klaatu
I want/expect nothing from you, persoanlly. What I expect every individual to do is examine the real data, not what the IPCC, Govn't and Al "I invented the internet" Gore tells you what is fact. It isn't fact.

Climate changes, always has, always will. And eventually, the Earth will be burnt to dust!
I sometimes wonder about you with some of your posts! I made a post to say that I had seen the climate changing over a period of years and you attacked me for saying it and then effectively said what I had just stated. I certainly did not attack you personally either.

Did you actually read my posts before you quoted them or was that too difficult?

Les
Old 08 March 2008, 11:26 AM
  #230  
Geezer
Scooby Senior
 
Geezer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: North Wales
Posts: 5,826
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

Originally Posted by Martin2005
No Pete you're obviously getting confused, the polar ice caps are melting because the planet is getting cooler
Antarctic ice is actually increasing, that's a real kick in the ***** for cimate doomoligists.

Geezer
Old 08 March 2008, 12:36 PM
  #231  
Suresh
Scooby Regular
 
Suresh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 4,622
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Martin2005
You are obviously of the same schoolof thought - can't have a grown-up debate without using idiotic personal insults


If Global warming is happening and if it is man-made, then the only way to stop it getting worse is to curb population growth and fully switch to nuclear power. No amount of panicing green lefties is going to achieve this. Given your choice of words about the subject in this thread (which contradict your stated position to be on the fence), you are clearly a paid up member of the panicing club
Old 08 March 2008, 02:59 PM
  #232  
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Martin2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Suresh


If Global warming is happening and if it is man-made, then the only way to stop it getting worse is to curb population growth and fully switch to nuclear power. No amount of panicing green lefties is going to achieve this. Given your choice of words about the subject in this thread (which contradict your stated position to be on the fence), you are clearly a paid up member of the panicing club

No I'm not, because I challenge some of the conspiracy theorists, doesn't make me a greeny or a doom-monger, just a concerned citizen
Old 08 March 2008, 03:01 PM
  #233  
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Martin2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Geezer
Antarctic ice is actually increasing, that's a real kick in the ***** for cimate doomoligists.

Geezer

Is it?

Where's the evidence of that? Every report I have seen states that Arctic Ice is receeding
Old 08 March 2008, 03:15 PM
  #234  
PeteBrant
Scooby Regular
 
PeteBrant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Worthing..
Posts: 7,575
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Martin2005
No I'm not, because I challenge some of the conspiracy theorists, doesn't make me a greeny or a doom-monger, just a concerned citizen
I think this is the point.

Just because you have a concern about climate change does not make you some form of seal hugging peace-crisp lunatic.

The skeptical view is that it is a revenue rasing exercise. Which sort of completely falls down when you have a choice not to pay the extra taxes. If you live a greener lifestyle you don't pay the tax - that is the whole idea of duty - to dissaude people from doing things - It's the reason cigarettes and alcohol are so expensive. I don't see anyone calling "conspiracy" because **** cost £5.70 a packet. If you smoke, you pay for it, if you don;t you don't. If you drive 5 litre gussling car , you pay for it, if you don't you don't - You aren't forced to pay the duty, you have a choice.

Cutting CO2 emissions and other pollutants has got to be a positive thing, surely. Even if climate change is not down to man, it is still a positive thing.
Old 08 March 2008, 03:15 PM
  #235  
Geezer
Scooby Senior
 
Geezer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: North Wales
Posts: 5,826
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

Originally Posted by Martin2005
Is it?

Where's the evidence of that? Every report I have seen states that Arctic Ice is receeding
*hint* read my post

Geezer
Old 08 March 2008, 03:21 PM
  #236  
Geezer
Scooby Senior
 
Geezer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: North Wales
Posts: 5,826
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

Originally Posted by PeteBrant
I think this is the point.

Just because you have a concern about climate change does not make you some form of seal hugging peace-crisp lunatic.

The skeptical view is that it is a revenue rasing exercise. Which sort of completely falls down when you have a choice not to pay the extra taxes. If you live a greener lifestyle you don't pay the tax - that is the whole idea of duty - to dissaude people from doing things - It's the reason cigarettes and alcohol are so expensive. I don't see anyone calling "conspiracy" because **** cost £5.70 a packet. If you smoke, you pay for it, if you don;t you don't. If you drive 5 litre gussling car , you pay for it, if you don't you don't - You aren't forced to pay the duty, you have a choice.

Cutting CO2 emissions and other pollutants has got to be a positive thing, surely. Even if climate change is not down to man, it is still a positive thing.
But you don't have a choice for fuel duty.

Are you expecting people to stop travelling? Must everyone now live within walking or cycling distance from their place of work?

Fuel is going up in price, so ALL transport is becoming more expensive. You really have no alternative.

As for cutting CO2 emissions, why is that a good thing? The earth is at one of it's lowest ever levels of CO2. It has had concentrations far in excess of what we have now for much of it's history, without any problem.

As for other pollutants, fair enough, but even then the earth would recover in a short time if we wiped ourselves and loads of other species out.

Once again, man arrogance makes him think he can harm something which has endured much worse than our paltry efforts.

Even if we do cause it all and cause a mass extinction, evolution needs it now and again. Don't forget, we are the result of a previous one......

Geezer

Last edited by Geezer; 08 March 2008 at 03:24 PM.
Old 08 March 2008, 03:56 PM
  #237  
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Martin2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Geezer
*hint* read my post

Geezer
OK good point.

Can you show me something that states the Antartic Cap is not melting.
Old 08 March 2008, 03:58 PM
  #238  
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Martin2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Geezer
But you don't have a choice for fuel duty.

Are you expecting people to stop travelling? Must everyone now live within walking or cycling distance from their place of work?

Fuel is going up in price, so ALL transport is becoming more expensive. You really have no alternative.

As for cutting CO2 emissions, why is that a good thing? The earth is at one of it's lowest ever levels of CO2. It has had concentrations far in excess of what we have now for much of it's history, without any problem.

As for other pollutants, fair enough, but even then the earth would recover in a short time if we wiped ourselves and loads of other species out.

Once again, man arrogance makes him think he can harm something which has endured much worse than our paltry efforts.

Even if we do cause it all and cause a mass extinction, evolution needs it now and again. Don't forget, we are the result of a previous one......

Geezer
I'm not sure what you mean by your final point. I think you're saying 'if we all get wiped out so what'

This whole debate has never been about whether the Earth will endure, of course it bloody well will! It's about what impact GW may/or may not have upon mankind, and the social-economic and humanitarian effects

Last edited by Martin2005; 08 March 2008 at 04:01 PM.
Old 08 March 2008, 04:14 PM
  #239  
Geezer
Scooby Senior
 
Geezer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: North Wales
Posts: 5,826
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

NASA

World Climate Report

Science Daily

As for my last point, yes, I was being rather flippant

But still I don't think mankind will be seriously dented, we will just adapt, (ok, maybe a few economic crashes and wars, othing too serious.......)but as IMO it's nothing to do with us, why worry?

Geezer
Old 08 March 2008, 04:29 PM
  #240  
DocJock
Scooby Regular
 
DocJock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: a more anarchic place
Posts: 1,828
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Geezer
Antarctic ice is actually increasing, that's a real kick in the ***** for cimate doomoligists.

Geezer
Very true Joughlin and Tulaczyk measured 27Bn tonne/year increase and lowering temps over the vast majority of the continent Mixed Signals from the South Pole | Environmental Insider News | Find Articles at BNET.com

It's also occuring at the other pole, Zwally et al 2005 found increases in Arctic ice mass of 11Bn (+/-3) tonnes /year over a whole decade! (1992-2002) j05j071 509..527

The only area where ice is disappearing is where it is in contact with warming ocean currents. Land ice is increasing as it has been for decades.

This was at a time when the IPCC and their acolytes were bleating on about vanishing ice caps.
BTW ice caps are not a normal state for this planet. Historically the majority of the time they have not been present.

Last edited by DocJock; 08 March 2008 at 04:31 PM. Reason: added Zwally link


Quick Reply: Anyone sick of the 'green'/Global warming stuff yet?



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:08 PM.