Notices
ScoobyNet General General Subaru Discussion

MD321H is a goodun'

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 22 October 2009 | 10:52 AM
  #31  
Anders_WR1's Avatar
Anders_WR1
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,405
Likes: 0
From: Surrey
Default

Originally Posted by dunx
Btw Dunx, if you read this, I agree the turbo sounds louder with the Lateral turbo hose!

But in a good way ?

LOL

dunx
The louder the better
Old 22 October 2009 | 11:09 AM
  #32  
Anders_WR1's Avatar
Anders_WR1
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,405
Likes: 0
From: Surrey
Default

Originally Posted by lunar tick
I've just fitted Harvey's up-pipe for GT Spec headers and also experienced more low down and midrange torque. However, like you, we also found (on Zen's rollers) a slight drop off in power (about 10bhp) over 6500rpm. I use a Hyperflow wing-mounted air intake so maybe it's something inherent in the up-pipe design?

Cheers, Andrew
That saves me spending on a better induction kit if you already fitted one. Looks like that will be my max power until I fit a 2.1 stroker some time.

Mark, what sort of power and torque would I expect from a 2.1 with MD321H?

Anders
Old 28 October 2009 | 09:47 PM
  #33  
harvey's Avatar
harvey
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (48)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 10,419
Likes: 1
From: Darlington
Default

I use a Hyperflow wing-mounted air intake so maybe it's something inherent in the up-pipe design?
Absolutely nothing to do with the uppipe design.
If you guys are running around 400 bhp with inner wing filters I suggest you fit a bigger filter and find out what happens.

One uppipe design will not cater for a range of specifications which is why I actually have four uppipe designs. The trick is in selecting the right uppipe. During the substantial testing what we did find was that the air filter size had to be increased.
Old 28 October 2009 | 11:22 PM
  #34  
lunar tick's Avatar
lunar tick
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 815
Likes: 2
From: Northumberland
Default

Cheers Harvey - food for thought as ever

(although still doesn't explain why on dyno runs on same day before and after fittng your up-pipe I experienced a slight drop in top end power with the SAME air filter [still prefer the power delivery with your up-pipe tho])

Last edited by lunar tick; 28 October 2009 at 11:25 PM.
Old 29 October 2009 | 01:47 AM
  #35  
harvey's Avatar
harvey
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (48)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 10,419
Likes: 1
From: Darlington
Default

Trust me. If the uppipe makes a big difference which my special 3 bolt flange uppipe does you need to ingest more air and I have proven that on a number of occasions.
Have a word with Paul Armin. He picked up about 20 bhp just by putting on a bigger filter although he was sceptical about what I was telling him in the first place.
Old 29 October 2009 | 02:05 PM
  #36  
Anders_WR1's Avatar
Anders_WR1
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,405
Likes: 0
From: Surrey
Default

Harvey, I'm in the same situation - inner wing filter that was supplied with Hybrid FMIC. Can a larger inner wing filter be fitted, or do I buy something like the RCM cone and fit under bonnet?

Has anyone fitted an RCM cone with Hybrid FMIC? It looks like the FMIC pipework might be in the way?

Anders
Old 29 October 2009 | 02:36 PM
  #37  
RA Dunk's Avatar
RA Dunk
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 9,073
Likes: 0
From: My turbo blows, air lots of it!!
Default

Originally Posted by Anders_WR1

Mark, what sort of power and torque would I expect from a 2.1 with MD321H?
I would be intrested in this as well, still got the 20G but was thinking about the 321H, Im guessing with a forged build and more boost 420-430 is do able and maybe as high as 450-460 with methanol or E85?

Originally Posted by Anders_WR1

Has anyone fitted an RCM cone with Hybrid FMIC? It looks like the FMIC pipework might be in the way?

Anders
lol me and you are thinking along the same wave lenghts here, just bought a RCM filter for mine and was wondering the same
Old 31 October 2009 | 12:51 AM
  #38  
Anders_WR1's Avatar
Anders_WR1
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,405
Likes: 0
From: Surrey
Default

Originally Posted by RA Dunk
I would be intrested in this as well, still got the 20G but was thinking about the 321H, Im guessing with a forged build and more boost 420-430 is do able and maybe as high as 450-460 with methanol or E85?



lol me and you are thinking along the same wave lenghts here, just bought a RCM filter for mine and was wondering the same
I recon 420-430 sounds about right, but may be it would allow the 400lbft to be reached with decent boost?

RCM cone looks bloody tight. Will post a new thread asking if anyone has fitted under bonnet filter with Hybrid FMIC.

Anders
Old 31 October 2009 | 01:02 AM
  #39  
Anger's Avatar
Anger
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,848
Likes: 30
From: Surrey
Default

On my 2.0 with RCM large cone at 1.7bar it made 413bhp on V-power

torque was about the 360ish region
Old 31 October 2009 | 01:19 AM
  #40  
RA Dunk's Avatar
RA Dunk
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 9,073
Likes: 0
From: My turbo blows, air lots of it!!
Default

Originally Posted by Anders_WR1
I recon 420-430 sounds about right, but may be it would allow the 400lbft to be reached with decent boost?

RCM cone looks bloody tight. Will post a new thread asking if anyone has fitted under bonnet filter with Hybrid FMIC.

Anders
I think with a forged build 400LBFT should be more than do able with 2 bar of boost, going to be using it with a 2.1 stroker in mine so should hopefully generate a bit more torque than a 2.0, If i was too see 450-460 with a drop of methanol or E85 i would be happy with that
Old 31 October 2009 | 01:28 AM
  #41  
Anger's Avatar
Anger
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,848
Likes: 30
From: Surrey
Default

Originally Posted by RA Dunk
I think with a forged build 400LBFT should be more than do able with 2 bar of boost, going to be using it with a 2.1 stroker in mine so should hopefully generate a bit more torque than a 2.0, If i was too see 450-460 with a drop of methanol or E85 i would be happy with that
Your going to need a T for that kind of power
Old 31 October 2009 | 01:32 AM
  #42  
JP4's Avatar
JP4
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,734
Likes: 0
From: 700+ WR1 aka The Vuvu Zela...10.6 @ 136 weighing 1370kg....say no more....
Default

Originally Posted by Anders_WR1
I recon 420-430 sounds about right, but may be it would allow the 400lbft to be reached with decent boost?

RCM cone looks bloody tight. Will post a new thread asking if anyone has fitted under bonnet filter with Hybrid FMIC.

Anders
Ive been running 422bhp / 400lbs (@ 4200 rpm) on my std 2 ltr wr1 block at 1.8 bar without any probs - all managed by a solaris ecu.
Old 31 October 2009 | 09:32 AM
  #43  
RA Dunk's Avatar
RA Dunk
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 9,073
Likes: 0
From: My turbo blows, air lots of it!!
Default

Originally Posted by Anger
Your going to need a T for that kind of power
If the H`s are capable of 420-430 on V-power with the correct set up then surely 450 shouldent be impossible on E85 or methanol?, I seem to remember Mark/Lateral saying he has heard of one making 490 on race fuel
Old 06 April 2011 | 08:36 PM
  #44  
Anders_WR1's Avatar
Anders_WR1
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,405
Likes: 0
From: Surrey
Default

An update to this old thread, finally got around to fitting the Syvecs ECU yesterday, bigger under bonnet filter, 3 BAR map sensor and Wideband. Pat was in charge of programming ECU with his usual high level of detail

After mapping the meths in, we went for a test drive what a difference 60lbft makes! After some tweaking on the launch control Pat suggested proper test, I haven't grinned that much in ages. Awesome. Turbo whistling holding just under 1BAR stationary, pops and bangs out the other end then wollop, all four wheels light up and no bog down at all

ECUTEK (lower power running 1.55 BAR) and Syvecs V-Power + 16% meths (1.7 BAR midrange, full power made at same 1.5BAR)


Syvecs 1.4Bar midrange V-Power vs Syvecs 1.7Bar midrange V-Power + 16% meths (I know it not a fair comparison, need to get more graphs from Charlie)


Boost graph for the above



Fuelling, V-Power vs V-Power + Meths

Last edited by Anders_WR1; 06 April 2011 at 08:44 PM.
Old 06 April 2011 | 09:06 PM
  #45  
Jolly Green Monster's Avatar
Jolly Green Monster
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 16,548
Likes: 2
From: ECU Mapping - www.JollyGreenMonster.co.uk
Default

nice one!

Nice to meet you yesterday too, not that I put 2 and 2 together until reading this now

Simon
Old 06 April 2011 | 10:25 PM
  #46  
Anders_WR1's Avatar
Anders_WR1
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,405
Likes: 0
From: Surrey
Default

Yeah, I was quizing running MD321V on 2 litre. Not sure which way to go for next turbo, probably MD321T billet.

That car you mapped was a beast, 585bhp on V-Power

About the launch control I was asking Pat that presumably the charge air isn't cooled that much by the FMIC and he said to not hold it on too long. Couldn't the ECU turn on the rad fan, that might help the situation?

Anders
Old 06 April 2011 | 10:45 PM
  #47  
Jolly Green Monster's Avatar
Jolly Green Monster
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 16,548
Likes: 2
From: ECU Mapping - www.JollyGreenMonster.co.uk
Default

Originally Posted by Anders_WR1
Yeah, I was quizing running MD321V on 2 litre. Not sure which way to go for next turbo, probably MD321T billet.

That car you mapped was a beast, 585bhp on V-Power

About the launch control I was asking Pat that presumably the charge air isn't cooled that much by the FMIC and he said to not hold it on too long. Couldn't the ECU turn on the rad fan, that might help the situation?

Anders
The issue is not just charge temp though.. the exhaust valves, headers and turbo will get very hot..

if you watch boost gauge the boost will build and hit max boost on the lauinch control about 5 to 10seconds etc.. no point holding it longer...

it can be an issue when waiting on lights on strip to time it right mind.

Simon
Old 07 April 2011 | 08:46 AM
  #48  
harvey's Avatar
harvey
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (48)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 10,419
Likes: 1
From: Darlington
Default

The trick with launch control is to have the temps at working temp but as low as possible, no heat soak. For instance at the strip you can spray a gardeners water mist / spray on the FMIC core repeatedly from your previous run to take the heat out of your FMIC or TMIC core. You can pack a TMIC core with dry ice but it has to be removed prior to staging. Bonnet open to allow heat to disipate. Turbo exhaust heat wrapped. Intercooler pipes to T.B. insulated. run engine about 2k rpm for 20 secs to get fresh air in.
I very much doubt the radiator cooling fans will have a noticable effect on ACTs but they do help pull down the water temperature.
Water methanol spray pre TB helps tremendously.

Last edited by harvey; 07 April 2011 at 08:48 AM.
Old 07 April 2011 | 02:17 PM
  #49  
Terminator X's Avatar
Terminator X
Owner of SNet
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 11,513
Likes: 0
From: Berkshire
Default

Originally Posted by JP4
Good combo of team to have on board for upgrades and mapping - Pat was able to get 422bhp / 400lbs from my std 2 ltr - 15k later and still strong as ever!
Is that £'s or miles

TX.
Old 07 April 2011 | 07:23 PM
  #50  
DukeBoy's Avatar
DukeBoy
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
From: West Sussex
Default

Originally Posted by Anders_WR1
That car you mapped was a beast, 585bhp on V-Power

Anders
Yes and it put a smile on my face for the drive home, nice to meet you and glad you where happy with your results
Old 08 April 2011 | 05:43 PM
  #51  
Anders_WR1's Avatar
Anders_WR1
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,405
Likes: 0
From: Surrey
Default

Originally Posted by Jolly Green Monster
The issue is not just charge temp though.. the exhaust valves, headers and turbo will get very hot..

if you watch boost gauge the boost will build and hit max boost on the lauinch control about 5 to 10seconds etc.. no point holding it longer...

it can be an issue when waiting on lights on strip to time it right mind.

Simon
I was thinking it might help with charge temps, as the fans suck a fair amount of air through the front and might pull some in through the FMIC. Next time I'm parked up and the fans come on, I'll see if there's much suction in front of the FMIC.

Appreciate there's more to it than that though.

Anders
Old 08 April 2011 | 05:46 PM
  #52  
Anders_WR1's Avatar
Anders_WR1
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,405
Likes: 0
From: Surrey
Default

Originally Posted by DukeBoy
Yes and it put a smile on my face for the drive home, nice to meet you and glad you where happy with your results
That must be insanely quick, the difference on my car was noticeable with extra 27bhp and 60lbft !

Anders
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
stevie1982
General Technical
70
02 November 2012 07:22 PM
sunnyrex
General Technical
37
17 April 2008 02:40 PM



Quick Reply: MD321H is a goodun'



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:00 PM.