Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related
View Poll Results: Would you report them for benefit fraud?
Yes..the thieving scumbags
111
86.05%
No..Nothing to do with you
18
13.95%
Voters: 129. You may not vote on this poll

Would you stick a 'friend' in who is committing benefit fraud?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 19 February 2008, 10:33 PM
  #121  
PeteBrant
Scooby Regular
 
PeteBrant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Worthing..
Posts: 7,575
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Lisawrx
Pete, I maybe reading the whole thread the wrong way but do you really think the OP and this mate are in fact close pals. I'm not so sure as even in the thread title he referred to him as a 'friend'. He also mentioned fears of comeback if he did act. Doesn't sound like a great friendship, and he is possibly fearful of even discussing this with his 'friend' as if any dobbing in happens at a later date, the 'friend' may well think he is responsible, when it could easily be any of the people in the pub, who have heard him bragging about it.
Dunno , maybe I am reading it the wrong way. For me, a "Friend" is a friend, and not an aquaintance, or a bloke i see down the pub or whatever - But then, that's quite possibly just me.

Nontheless, if I shopped one of my "Friends" I would expect raminifcaitons, I mean I have drawn first blood , so to speak.
Old 19 February 2008, 10:35 PM
  #122  
PeteBrant
Scooby Regular
 
PeteBrant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Worthing..
Posts: 7,575
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by davyboy
OK, lets use the example of home improvements.

A builder, bathroom, kitchen fitter.

If they said I'd knock some money of for cash....what would you say?

Of couse this means I will give you a 17.5% discount to a lot of people.
To be fair davy , I think the response to this would be that there is a world of difference between not paying a couple of hundred quid on a VAT bill, and habitually fraudulently claiming thousands in benefits.
Old 19 February 2008, 10:35 PM
  #123  
davyboy
Scooby Regular
 
davyboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Some country and western
Posts: 13,488
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Fraud is Fraud though.
Old 19 February 2008, 10:49 PM
  #124  
JTaylor
Scooby Regular
 
JTaylor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Home
Posts: 14,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PeteBrant
I honestly have no idea - I am quite pleased I am not in that position.
So you have no idea as to what you'd do if the fraud continued after your discussion with your imaginary friend.

Originally Posted by PeteBrant
Ok, so, where have I defended this chaps right to commit benefit fraud?
And you don't deny that your fictitious friend has no right to commit benefit fraud.

From both these statements I deduce that your only issue is with 'grassing' on your fictitious mate. Everyone has this issue, Pete, but most of us reckon that if they're dipping their hands into the pockets of the rest of us (otherwise known as Peter-thieving) then they're not worth counting as friends. Surely this renders your initial contrary comments redundant.
Old 19 February 2008, 10:52 PM
  #125  
NotoriousREV
Scooby Regular
 
NotoriousREV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,581
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I had a mate who was doing something similar. I didn't grass, but the emphasis is strongly on the "had".
Old 19 February 2008, 10:52 PM
  #126  
Brun
Scooby Senior
 
Brun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Harrogate
Posts: 14,230
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

I have now read it all and i would still shop them



Funnily enough they used to brag about it all the time too - until one of the other neighbours beat me to it and reported them.
And what was the result?
Old 19 February 2008, 11:07 PM
  #127  
dpb
Scooby Regular
 
dpb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: riding the crest of a wave ...
Posts: 46,493
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
Talking

Originally Posted by Lisawrx
Shock horror, we agree on something.

I totally agree with the suggestion of making people work for their 'benefits' when it is clear they are abusing the system.

Pete, I maybe reading the whole thread the wrong way but do you really think the OP and this mate are in fact close pals. I'm not so sure as even in the thread title he referred to him as a 'friend'. He also mentioned fears of comeback if he did act. Doesn't sound like a great friendship, and he is possibly fearful of even discussing this with his 'friend' as if any dobbing in happens at a later date, the 'friend' may well think he is responsible, when it could easily be any of the people in the pub, who have heard him bragging about it.
Pete jus loves to play devils advocate , hes more intrested in this couples friendship now apparently than anything else - its sort of touching really
Old 19 February 2008, 11:11 PM
  #128  
Daryl
Scooby Senior
 
Daryl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 2,354
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PeteBrant
I'm not contrary
Just. Incredibly. Supercilious.

Not that I necessarily disagree with you on this - let him who is without sin, live and let live etc...
Old 19 February 2008, 11:14 PM
  #129  
dpb
Scooby Regular
 
dpb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: riding the crest of a wave ...
Posts: 46,493
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Bull****e! the ******* need to learn the error of their ways
Old 19 February 2008, 11:23 PM
  #130  
Daryl
Scooby Senior
 
Daryl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 2,354
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dpb
Bull****e!


Ask yourself this - if it came to it, would you be prepared to tell that person face to face what you had done? If the answer is yes, then fine, go ahead, but if the answer is no, don't do it.

Simple really.
Old 19 February 2008, 11:23 PM
  #131  
Lee247
SN Fairy Godmother
 
Lee247's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Far Far Away
Posts: 35,246
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

OP, You are cracking jokes. I am flogging my guts out working and this freeloader is getting loads of dosh from this stupid lot in power.
I would have no hesitation in shopping them, friend or no friend.
Sorry, can't be arsed to read the whole thread, it's late
Old 19 February 2008, 11:28 PM
  #132  
PeteBrant
Scooby Regular
 
PeteBrant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Worthing..
Posts: 7,575
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JTaylor
So you have no idea as to what you'd do if the fraud continued after your discussion with your imaginary friend.
Correct
Originally Posted by JTaylor
And you don't deny that your fictitious friend has no right to commit benefit fraud.
He hasn't got a right to commit benefit fraud, no.
Originally Posted by JTaylor
From both these statements I deduce that your only issue is with 'grassing' on your fictitious mate.
Correct
Originally Posted by JTaylor
Everyone has this issue, Pete, but most of us reckon that if they're dipping their hands into the pockets of the rest of us (otherwise known as Peter-thieving) then they're not worth counting as friends. Surely this renders your initial contrary comments redundant.
I don't agree - Lots of my friends may do things I don't necessairly agree with, or hold points of view I don't agree with, but that doesn't mean that they're not worth counting as friends.

As an example, let's say one of my best friends cheats on his wife, and acts like a complete **** to her. Should I stop being his friend because he is being an arsehole to someone else?
Old 19 February 2008, 11:29 PM
  #133  
PeteBrant
Scooby Regular
 
PeteBrant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Worthing..
Posts: 7,575
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Daryl
Just. Incredibly. Supercilious.
Really? Blimey, I didn't think I came across like that! Certainly not intentional. I shall have to read what I put before hitting the post button in future.
Old 19 February 2008, 11:31 PM
  #134  
PeteBrant
Scooby Regular
 
PeteBrant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Worthing..
Posts: 7,575
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dpb
, hes more intrested in this couples friendship now apparently than anything else - its sort of touching really

To be fair, that was always my "angle".

Originally Posted by dpb


Pete jus loves to play devils advocate
Someone has to round here!
Old 19 February 2008, 11:32 PM
  #135  
Lee247
SN Fairy Godmother
 
Lee247's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Far Far Away
Posts: 35,246
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PeteBrant
Should I stop being his friend because he is being an arsehole to someone else?
Yes
Old 19 February 2008, 11:33 PM
  #136  
Suresh
Scooby Regular
 
Suresh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 4,622
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Thumbs down

Use of the word 'grass' implies that reporting an anti-social common criminal is cowardly or undesired behaviour. Who in their right mind defends someone who is stealing from society? Are we supposed to consider such scum as modern day Robin Hoods or something

I voted to 'grass' the bludger in case you hadn't guessed
Old 19 February 2008, 11:42 PM
  #137  
Daryl
Scooby Senior
 
Daryl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 2,354
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PeteBrant
Really? Blimey, I didn't think I came across like that!
Maybe I was a bit harsh, but a couple of your posts seemed a little contemptuous!
Old 19 February 2008, 11:58 PM
  #138  
Petem95
Scooby Regular
 
Petem95's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Scoobynet
Posts: 5,387
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Grass the scum asap!!
Old 20 February 2008, 12:13 AM
  #139  
Lisawrx
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
Lisawrx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Where I am
Posts: 9,729
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by PeteBrant
Really? Blimey, I didn't think I came across like that! Certainly not intentional. I shall have to read what I put before hitting the post button in future.
Don't get too down about it. While my, and others views on this may be very different to your's in this case, you are entitled to have your opinion, just as anyone else. I respect that you have put your feelings across without the need to insult others.

It is nice to think you place so much emphasis on friendship, that you would hold this view, but take into account how little 'friends' place on people such as yourself. They may be friends, but are happy to you rob you to fund their lifestyle, that doesn't sound like a true friendship to me. These people know what they are doing, and until someone stops it, it will continue, with you, me and others footing the bill.
Old 20 February 2008, 12:24 AM
  #140  
little-ginge
Scooby Regular
 
little-ginge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: It's like finding a cocktail sausage, when what you really wanted was a rather large saveloy.
Posts: 20,535
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Depends on how you would feel after shopping them - but I'd say do it..

It's bleddy typical - those who genuinelly need/deserve these benefits have to fight to get them - those who are obviously pissing on the system seem to have it handed to them on a silver platter..
Old 20 February 2008, 07:40 AM
  #141  
Mitchy260
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Mitchy260's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Well 87+% of Snr's s are of the same opinion.

Im surprised no-one has commented on the actual amount of benefits received for being a 'single' mum of 2. The figure i think is extraordinary.

She would need to be earning £28000 per year just to break even with what she is accustomed to just now. It will never be in her interests to seek work as she is better off than the average UK worker who earns £24000 per year.

Not bad for someone who has never done a days work in their life and is unskilled so to speak.

To make it worth her while and waste 37hrs of her life at work, she would need to be earning a good £10-15k more than what she is now. Who would pay an unskilled mum of 2 that has never worked a day in her life £38-£43000 per year.

More like £5.75 an hour or £11000 per year

I give you the governments ludicrous benefit system
Old 20 February 2008, 07:51 AM
  #142  
NotoriousREV
Scooby Regular
 
NotoriousREV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,581
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PeteBrant
As an example, let's say one of my best friends cheats on his wife, and acts like a complete **** to her. Should I stop being his friend because he is being an arsehole to someone else?
That depends entirely on your personal values. Do you value fidelity as a worthy personality trait?

You can easily judge a person by the company he keeps as it's a clear mirror of their values. If all your friends are low life scum, chances are you are too.
Old 20 February 2008, 07:55 AM
  #143  
NotoriousREV
Scooby Regular
 
NotoriousREV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,581
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

She receives full housing benefit worth about £125pw (£6500pa) - She's stealing this as it should be reduced/removed if living with a partner

She receives full council tax benefit worth around (£1000pa) - She's stealing this as it should be reduced/removed if living with a partner

She claims IS at £59pw (£3070pa) - She's entitled to that

She claims DLA motability that she gets £45pw for and uses that for free car/insurance/tax + servicing (£2340pa) - She's entitled to that

She also gets the DLA Care component which is £17.10pw or (£900pa) - She's entitled to that

She has 2 children that she claims (£1570pa) in child benefits. - She's entitled to that

She is also entitled to £1845+£1845+£545 in child tax credits (£4235pa) - This would be reduced, but probably not by much

She also gets £10pw maintenance from the CSA for her 1st child (£520) - She's entitled to that

So actually, it's not that much that she's "stealing". I voted to shop her, but actually it'd probably cost more to do her than she's overclaiming.
Old 20 February 2008, 08:20 AM
  #144  
Mitchy260
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Mitchy260's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by NotoriousREV
She receives full housing benefit worth about £125pw (£6500pa) - She's stealing this as it should be reduced/removed if living with a partner

She receives full council tax benefit worth around (£1000pa) - She's stealing this as it should be reduced/removed if living with a partner

She claims IS at £59pw (£3070pa) - She's entitled to that

She claims DLA motability that she gets £45pw for and uses that for free car/insurance/tax + servicing (£2340pa) - She's entitled to that

She also gets the DLA Care component which is £17.10pw or (£900pa) - She's entitled to that

She has 2 children that she claims (£1570pa) in child benefits. - She's entitled to that

She is also entitled to £1845+£1845+£545 in child tax credits (£4235pa) - This would be reduced, but probably not by much

She also gets £10pw maintenance from the CSA for her 1st child (£520) - She's entitled to that

So actually, it's not that much that she's "stealing". I voted to shop her, but actually it'd probably cost more to do her than she's overclaiming.
Yes very true, the £6500 rent +£1000 CT.

She would lose the CTC of £1845+£1845 though as her partner earns more than the £15000 that is required to qualify for this. Everyone with a kid on an income of upto £60k is entitled to the £545 element of CTC.

So £6500+£1000+£1845+£1845 = £11190 or £932 a month fraudulently

They have been on the fiddle around 3 years now so over £33000 would have to be backdated if they were caught.
Old 20 February 2008, 08:36 AM
  #145  
The Chief
Scooby Regular
 
The Chief's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: There is only one God - Elvis!
Posts: 8,328
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

You know what i'll stick my neck out here and say dont shop them, why?

Well admitedley he is rubbing your nose in it which is bang out of order, if he asks your opinion tell him what you think and does he think he's right.

I worked part time for Group4 once although only for a brief period who took care of all the mail for the benefits agency, Pensions, disability etc. and i can tell you now that they used to have a full section on fraud and you wouldn't believe how many people got 'grassed up' on a daily basis, every fraud was investigated as it is in the benefits agency interests not to pay out money they dont have to (obviously)

I'm surprised they haven't been grassed up so far but trust me mate they will be.

Your concience is then clear (not that it needs to be) but honestly they will eventually get shopped.
Old 20 February 2008, 08:51 AM
  #146  
PeteBrant
Scooby Regular
 
PeteBrant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Worthing..
Posts: 7,575
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by NotoriousREV
That depends entirely on your personal values. Do you value fidelity as a worthy personality trait?

You can easily judge a person by the company he keeps as it's a clear mirror of their values. If all your friends are low life scum, chances are you are too.
What are you saying here? That anyone that has commmited adultery is low life scum? (that covers an awful lot of people)


And I comletely reject that your friends are chosen by your ethics - rather your social cisrucmstances choose them for you - by and large.
Old 20 February 2008, 08:54 AM
  #147  
SiPie
Scooby Regular
 
SiPie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Scotland
Posts: 7,249
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

What are you saying here? That anyone that has commmited adultery is low life scum? (that covers an awful lot of people)
In my book yes

Why take a vow if it means **** all ?

You either have moral standards or you don't, simple.....

As for benefit cheats, regardless, shop them
Old 20 February 2008, 09:00 AM
  #148  
Henrik
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
Henrik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: London
Posts: 4,121
Received 145 Likes on 109 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PeteBrant
And I comletely reject that your friends are chosen by your ethics - rather your social cisrucmstances choose them for you - by and large.
Might not be a cause, but it's a good indication.
Old 20 February 2008, 09:04 AM
  #149  
PeteBrant
Scooby Regular
 
PeteBrant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Worthing..
Posts: 7,575
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SiPie
In my book yes

Why take a vow if it means **** all ?

You either have moral standards or you don't, simple.....

I'm sure those people who made those vows had every intention of keeping them at the time.


So just to be clear, You befriend someone, and after a while you find they have commited adultery (it is hardly likely to be part of thier introduction "Hi, I'm Ben, I'm an adulterer") and at that point you say "Sorry, I can't be your friend anymore, you're low -life scum."?

As for the moral standards being ablakc and white issue, that's just being silly.

Prince Charles, I reckon, has pretty high moral values, but by your definition has none, and is low life scum into the bargain.
Old 20 February 2008, 09:05 AM
  #150  
scousefly
Scooby Regular
 
scousefly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: sheffield
Posts: 446
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs down IMHO

U should mind your own
Wonder if the boot was on the other foot how you would feel if you got 'grassed' on.
And I think you should stop classing him as your 'friend' as IMHO he clearly isnt. If 1 of my mates was doing this I would let him know it wasnt right then he could wrestle with his conscience.


Quick Reply: Would you stick a 'friend' in who is committing benefit fraud?



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:35 PM.