jonny_693

iTrader: (5)

Lol Stickymicky. Its exactly this type of thing that dont do them any favours. Our lasses brother is a bummer, I dont hold anything against him for it. Him and his bf are ok. Its the ones you meet who you can shake hands with and they say 'by the way im gay' So What? I dont care. I dont meet someone for the first time and say 'by the way i'm straight'. As for adopting kids and teaching them about it at 5yrs old, WRONG! I didn't even know one was till i was at least 10, if I can sign something when my daughter reaches 5 to excuse her from this lesson i will be! All this pc stuff is B***S**T, Its even bah bah bl**dy White sheep now, Tho i am currently teaching her the Original and best version lol

Abdabz

As soon as you brand yourself you put yourself in someones firing line.

I hate everything about gay the fruity voices, the gay pride thing, gay villages, going to sunbed places, the camp walking, the sh@gging other men up the one way valve known as the anus - the whole caboodle.
BUT if I dont see it, if it's not in my face, I dont think about it and that's fine...

Advertising like that might make a fudge nudger feel proud to have an unnatural issue with his sexuality, but it will simply move more of the apathetic towards anti gayness and be completely counter productive.

The problem is, that Peter Tatchell and his affilliates are stupid beyond belief.

jonny_693

iTrader: (5)

Fudge nudger, LOL mate.

Paul3446

Did anyone else guffaw when Peter Tatchell got smacked in the face in Russia!

jods

Let me put the record bent, sorry, STRAIGHT for final.


GAY = WRONG
STRAIGHT = RIGHT


There is NOTHING Natural about gayer sex - It is totally against what nature meant our bodies to do - END OF DISCUSSION.

















Although - Two blonde birds with great t1ts going at it is pretty cool, as long as I get to "Do them" when I feel like it

Paul3446

Too right, nowt wrong with Spare Rib Ticklers in my book!

New_scooby_04

iTrader: (4)

Homosexuals are gay!

SetoN

I'll tell you what is disgusting! heterosexual partners that can have children naturally and then don't do their ******* job as parents. My girlfriend is a teacher in a primary school in a nice area (Stockport). The amount of children that come to school without a wash, clean clothes or breakfast is unbelievable. The school has to have a breakfast club for the parents that cant be arsed feeding their own kids, all free of course, they can drop their kids off earlier so they can shoot off to Ladbrokes for the day. Not before popping in and nicking some toast for themselves of course! 10 children out of 21 got to school on time on Friday, the rest get in when their parents can be bothered to get up. This is happening in a nice middle class area. I don't want to think about in the lower class areas.

So do I have a problem with gay fostering, adoption? Not if they do a better job than these scummy parents no. I don't remember hearing about the massive gay crime problems we have either. I missed the "another ghayer shot in gang bang shooting on London estate" article. And I don't have to worry about a gayher blowing himself up on a train either.

So if they want to stick their poo stick up another gays anus then let them. I'll keep my hatred aimed at those set on on destroying this country, not the ones that are just trying to fit in. Ever heard of Muslim family trying to adopt? didn't think so.

SetoN

Leslie

In the days before homosexuality became officially legal, those who were just used to keep it to themselves, nobody cared, and there were no witch hunts to smoke them out and prosecute. No one got wound up about it and in the same way heterosexuals did not go around splashing all that in the headlines either.

As Hutton D said, there was no need to make a fuss about people's sexuality and why that can't just stay like that is difficult to understand. Its almost like the case of "protesting too much".

I certainly am not interested in other people's sexuality, I don't care about it one way or the other and I certainly don't like to see references like that plastered all over the place!

Les

Snug Rhino

lets be sensible now though...that's not true is it. If you were gay in 1975 and someone at work found out , maybe saw you out with your partner, do you seriously expect us to believe that they would have been regarded as all fine with no negative implications?

You may as well say apartheid was good because the blacks just stayed out of town and all was rosey!

The Zohan

Yup, totally agree!

I think Stonewall need to get over it.

GC8WRX

God made adam and eve, not adam and steve

Norman D. Landing

Drove past the Stonewall poster today, it's been sprayed over so will check for the next installment next week (PS It's in Blackburn and I lol'ed at it last week)

DocJock

FFS have a listen to yourself...

How two consenting adults pleasure themselves is not your place to judge right or wrong.

By your argument there is nothing natural about heterosexual sex with contraception, oral sex, and handjob or a ****. I'll bet you've partaken of those though.

Bigot.

J4CKO

iTrader: (1)

I am generally very supportive of Gay people, it must be tough coming out and dealing with the prejudice but it seems these days the prejudice is largely gone, the law is more lenient for Gay Sex than straight, so it makes me wonder whether the Stonewall people kind of miss a bit of the shock factor they used to have and have got a bit like Daffyd Thomas out of Little Britain, its like the country by and large (and the civilised world) has gone "Yep, you like your own sex and thats fine" and they now miss being the victim ?


I am supportive generally as I reckon if a man gets a trouser stirring for another bloke of the same magnitude (good word for a week with an Earthquake in it) as I do when I see a woman that I approve of then I say go for it, enjoy.

I do, as has been mentioned before get a bit p1ssed off at the campness for the sake of it and the deliberate ways they can use to try and shock us conservative, Straight "Breeders", my old boss was a Lesbian and spent most of her time arranging Gay and Lesbian events in work time, it tended to get a bit over the top, you like Fannies, I like Fannies but I dont have to spend half of my working day promoting how great fanny munching is !

Tam the bam

one of the funniest things I have read here this week.

_Meridian_

iTrader: (1)

Go and look up Alan Turing.


M

jods

Complete Bollocks Mate.
















Stockport is a right **** tip. It's near Adswood for a start

jods

Yes it is my place and Nature backs me up. If we were meant to poke poo instead of vag then the human race would die out damn sharpish!

The URGE to have Hetero Sex is natural, If you decide to "Bag up" / pop pills to stop getting "up stick" then so be it - Doesn't detract from the natural urge.

And Yes - I have partaken of loads of stuff but always with a member of the opposite sex.

Don't get bent out of shape - I just really think bumfun with a member of the same sex is 100% unsustainable as a method of keeping the human race healthy, lively and fruitful.



Do you bat for the other side?

Just read some of your posts here https://www.scoobynet.com/non-scooby...-stuff-up.html

Are a fully paid up member of the Quentin Crisp Appreciation Society?

J4CKO

iTrader: (1)

I think Jods that that the point Seton is making is that and Scumbag, child abusing, heavy smoking, drug taking, alcoholic, violent, perverts can breed if straight yet Gay people are considered the bottom (sic) of the pile when it comes to adopting kids.

Doesn't mean that if you are Gay you are a Peado, or is you are straight you are not, doesn't mean if you are Gay your adoptive kids will suffer stigma or that if you are straight your kids won't.

To be honest if I were a kid needing adoption I would take my chances with a Gay couple (Blokes or Women) rather than staying in care, obviously a straight couple is the best solution but life is always about compromise.

kingofturds

iTrader: (1)

The gays will be wanting the right to vote next

jods

Glad we agree on that then.

Oh - By the way - I used to live in Stockport for a long time (Well, Cheadle Hulme to be precise) so I'm not talking from a position of total ignorance.

Maybe things have changed in the 10 years or so I've been away.

Is the Red Lion near the town hall still a dump?

DocJock

100% secure in my heterosexuality so maybe that's why I don't feel threatened by homosexuality in others.

Where to start with your ignorant diatribe?

The urge to PROCREATE is natural.
The urge to have sex for pleasure is an acquired habit that humans have developed and is not any more natural in a heterosexual context than a homosexual one.

What percentage of your sexual encounters are with the intention of breeding?
The vast majoriy of people have sex for pleasure, not to breed. Can you not manage to distinguish between the two? Maybe the concept of free choice doesn't fit into your little 'black or white' world?

jods

Now, I do have a problem with your next comment. You say that homosexual sex is just as normal as heterosexual sex because some humans have developed a penchent for it - Is that the basis for your argument ?


Okay let's say you are correct and it is perfectly natural/normal to engage in homosexual encounters because a % of the population enjoy it.

What about the % of the population that like to have sex with babies?
Is that okay as well - because it gives some people pleasure ?

Jacko is correct in saying that it is about compromise but unfortunately, the further you deviate from the majority curve the more un-natural / abnormal you become - It's just a numbers thing.

Gilesdwrc

Reading this thread and at the bottom of the last page was a gay dating advert!!

Who says the advertising on here isn't relevent?

DocJock

Jeez, you do have problems with reading, don't you.

I said non-procreative sex is not a 'natural' urge either way.
Don't try to put another interpretation on to that.

ps, I'm obviously going to assume you don't have your brown wings

jods

No you didn't...

You said
"Sex for pleasure is... not any more natural in a heterosexual context than a homosexual one."

So - by reduction you are saying Homo / Hetero sex is equally natural.

And you are WRONG.

You failed to address my question about people who enjoy/gain pleasure from having sex with infants - Is that "Not any more natural" [Jeez, I bet you don't not use double negatives don't you]

Admit it - I am right and you aren't not affirmatively incorrect

kingofturds

iTrader: (1)

Snug Rhino

Jesus, its like 1970 in here. Is Jim Davidson a new sponsor of SN?

jods

FPMSL