Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related

Rivers of blood bbc 2 now

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12 March 2008, 01:39 PM
  #151  
PeteBrant
Scooby Regular
 
PeteBrant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Worthing..
Posts: 7,575
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Paul3446
It's between 4 and 5 million as I said yesterday!

If you believe it is 794,000, you must be deranged, or PeteBrant!
Can we get back to how speaking English as a first language is more important than a quality education please? I want to explore this bizarre attitude.
Old 12 March 2008, 01:39 PM
  #152  
Bodgit
Scooby Regular
 
Bodgit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 318
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PeteBrant
I have provided documentary evidence to back this up.

Anyone can provide documentation to back up their arguement if they look hard enough. Do you never question anything you read?
Old 12 March 2008, 01:43 PM
  #153  
PeteBrant
Scooby Regular
 
PeteBrant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Worthing..
Posts: 7,575
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Bodgit
Anyone can provide documentation to back up their arguement if they look hard enough.
Really? Of you go, then.

I didn't have to look hard for mine, it is published by parliament.

I have already asked you, and since you have avoided the question, I'll ask you again:

Where else would you suggest getting unemployment figures other than the ONS?

Where else would you suggest getting population figures other than from the Census?
Old 12 March 2008, 01:46 PM
  #154  
Paul3446
Scooby Regular
 
Paul3446's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 3,236
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
"Can we get back to how speaking English as a first language is more important than a quality education please? I want to explore this bizarre attitude."

Here we go again! I have made absolutely no claim that "speaking English as a first language is more important than a quality education".

You seem to take your own posts, then try to argue against someone who hasn't disagreed with you!
Old 12 March 2008, 01:48 PM
  #155  
Klaatu
Scooby Regular
 
Klaatu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,911
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PeteBrant
Really? Of you go, then.

I didn't have to look hard for mine, it is published by parliament.

I have already asked you, and since you have avoided the question, I'll ask you again:

Where else would you suggest getting unemployment figures other than the ONS?

Where else would you suggest getting population figures other than from the Census?
And you believe Govn't stats? Like Tony Bliar agreed with Bush, there were WMD in Iraq.
Old 12 March 2008, 01:50 PM
  #156  
PeteBrant
Scooby Regular
 
PeteBrant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Worthing..
Posts: 7,575
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Paul3446
Here we go again! I have made absolutely no claim that "speaking English as a first language is more important than a quality education".

You seem to take your own posts, then try to argue against someone who hasn't disagreed with you!

Oh look a sign!

Originally Posted by Paul3446
Out of interest would you be happy to send your child to a school where he would be the only child out of 100 who had English as a first language?

Originally Posted by Me
To me, and I might just be odd, it is the quality of the education that matters, not what the first language of the students is.
Originally Posted by Paul3446
Yes, I think you're right, you are just odd!
Seems pretty clear to me - But maybe i'm wrong - If you could just clarify exactly what you were getting at, then?
Old 12 March 2008, 01:54 PM
  #157  
Bodgit
Scooby Regular
 
Bodgit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 318
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

here is an article I have found

Unemployment rate is six times higher than official figures | the Daily Mail



it quotes.

Ministers yesterday trumpeted the headline unemployment figure for June of 1.65million - a 45,000 fall from three months earlier.

But in the small print, the ONS figures reveal that the real total is 9.6million, because a further 7.95million people in Britain are classed merely as 'economically inactive'.


another link

Unemployment statistics

Last edited by Bodgit; 12 March 2008 at 01:56 PM.
Old 12 March 2008, 01:54 PM
  #158  
PeteBrant
Scooby Regular
 
PeteBrant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Worthing..
Posts: 7,575
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Klaatu
And you believe Govn't stats? Like Tony Bliar agreed with Bush, there were WMD in Iraq.
Worlds biggest conspiracy theorist in "i don't beleive the government" shocker

I think you need to distinguish between parliament, the civil service and the government.

Or are they all lying?

By the by, as much as I agree that the WMD claim was wrong - It was made by the JIC, not the Government. All these discussions are now public record - It was the JIC that said Iraq had WMD.
Old 12 March 2008, 01:58 PM
  #159  
PeteBrant
Scooby Regular
 
PeteBrant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Worthing..
Posts: 7,575
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Bodgit
here is an article I have found

Unemployment rate is six times higher than official figures | the Daily Mail



it quotes.

Ministers yesterday trumpeted the headline unemployment figure for June of 1.65million - a 45,000 fall from three months earlier.

But in the small print, the ONS figures reveal that the real total is 9.6million, because a further 7.95million people in Britain are classed merely as 'economically inactive'.


another link

Unemployment statistics

Bodge, I must have posted about 5 times that there are 8 million people between 16-64 out of work - What are you trying to disagree with?
Old 12 March 2008, 01:59 PM
  #160  
Klaatu
Scooby Regular
 
Klaatu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,911
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PeteBrant
Worlds biggest conspiracy theorist in "i don't beleive the government" shocker

I think you need to distinguish between parliament, the civil service and the government.

Or are they all lying?

By the by, as much as I agree that the WMD claim was wrong - It was made by the JIC, not the Government. All these discussions are now public record - It was the JIC that said Iraq had WMD.
There is no difference as they are controlled by "third parties". Yes, they are lying. It seems you are too gullible to see through the ****.
Old 12 March 2008, 02:01 PM
  #161  
PeteBrant
Scooby Regular
 
PeteBrant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Worthing..
Posts: 7,575
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Klaatu
It seems you are too gullible to see through the ****.
I think im happy to rely on public enquiry and investigation to get to the truth, rather than supposition and presumption.

If that makes me gullible, I'm cool with that.
Old 12 March 2008, 02:01 PM
  #162  
Paul3446
Scooby Regular
 
Paul3446's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 3,236
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
"Bodge, I must have posted about 5 times that there are 8 million people between 16-64 out of work - What are you trying to disagree with? "

I think you'll find I posted that, you then argued it for a while and are now claiming it as your own stat!
Old 12 March 2008, 02:02 PM
  #163  
Klaatu
Scooby Regular
 
Klaatu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,911
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PeteBrant
Bodge, I must have posted about 5 times that there are 8 million people between 16-64 out of work - What are you trying to disagree with?
Parliament stats, of course. Govn't stats would be different, so too civil service stats.
Old 12 March 2008, 02:09 PM
  #164  
Paul3446
Scooby Regular
 
Paul3446's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 3,236
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul3446
Yes, I think you're right, you are just odd!

Seems pretty clear to me - But maybe i'm wrong - If you could just clarify exactly what you were getting at, then?



I didn't say why you were odd, just making my assumptions from the drivel you post here every day!

For the record, I would choose a school with English speaking children that performed well.

Let me put it a simpler way for you, if you had two schools that the government told you were performing the same, but in one your kid would be the only English speaker, which school would you choose?
Old 12 March 2008, 02:43 PM
  #165  
PeteBrant
Scooby Regular
 
PeteBrant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Worthing..
Posts: 7,575
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Paul3446
For the record, I would choose a school with English speaking children that performed well.
I didn't give you that as an option, try again.

Ill spell out the options again so you can give me your answer


(i)English as first language Average performing school

Or

(ii)Foreign language as first language but Top of the league tables.

Originally Posted by Paul3446
Let me put it a simpler way for you, if you had two schools that the government told you were performing the same, but in one your kid would be the only English speaker, which school would you choose?
Simpler way as in "oops - let me move the goalposts"

In answer to your question (assuming by only English speaker you mean only person with English as ther first language, i.e. the teachers etc can still speak English) then either or - As long as the quality of education was high, then it wouldn't matter either way In fact it might be an advantge for the foreign language school as your child will by default, pick up another language.- As I said before, what do you think English people sending thier kids to Swiss finishing schools are doing?

Last edited by PeteBrant; 12 March 2008 at 03:04 PM.
Old 12 March 2008, 02:45 PM
  #166  
fatherpierre
Scooby Regular
 
fatherpierre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Surrey/London borders.
Posts: 8,300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

What was this thread about?

Forgotten......
Old 12 March 2008, 02:47 PM
  #167  
PeteBrant
Scooby Regular
 
PeteBrant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Worthing..
Posts: 7,575
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Paul3446
I think you'll find I posted that, you then argued it for a while and are now claiming it as your own stat!

No, Paul, what I argued, is that 8 million people out of work does not equal 8million people on the dole.
Old 12 March 2008, 03:39 PM
  #168  
Paul3446
Scooby Regular
 
Paul3446's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 3,236
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

But 794,000 claiming benefits does equal 794,000 out of work?
Old 12 March 2008, 03:42 PM
  #169  
Paul3446
Scooby Regular
 
Paul3446's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 3,236
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
"In answer to your question (assuming by only English speaker you mean only person with English as ther first language, i.e. the teachers etc can still speak English) then either or - As long as the quality of education was high, then it wouldn't matter either way In fact it might be an advantge for the foreign language school as your child will by default, pick up another language.- As I said before, what do you think English people sending thier kids to Swiss finishing schools are doing? "


So you are saying you would send your child to a school where he was the only English speaker, (as a first language) and not a school where all the children spoke English, if all other things were equal!

Yeah right!
Old 12 March 2008, 04:08 PM
  #170  
PeteBrant
Scooby Regular
 
PeteBrant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Worthing..
Posts: 7,575
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Paul3446

So you are saying you would send your child to a school where he was the only English speaker, (as a first language) and not a school where all the children spoke English, if all other things were equal!

Yeah right!
Yes, why wouldn't I?

Is there something inherently worng with people that don't speak English as a first language I should know about?
Old 12 March 2008, 04:10 PM
  #171  
Paul3446
Scooby Regular
 
Paul3446's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 3,236
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Whatever you say Pete!!!
Old 12 March 2008, 04:13 PM
  #172  
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Martin2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Klaatu
There is no difference as they are controlled by "third parties". Yes, they are lying. It seems you are too gullible to see through the ****.

I'm begining to think that you may actually be quite mad
Old 12 March 2008, 04:24 PM
  #173  
PeteBrant
Scooby Regular
 
PeteBrant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Worthing..
Posts: 7,575
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Paul3446
Whatever you say Pete!!!
Best tell every foreign speaking person that has sent thier kids to Oxbridge they have made a huge mistake, then.
Old 12 March 2008, 04:35 PM
  #174  
Paul3446
Scooby Regular
 
Paul3446's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 3,236
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Keep em coming Pete!
Old 12 March 2008, 09:11 PM
  #175  
Lisawrx
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
Lisawrx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Where I am
Posts: 9,729
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Paul3446
It's an observation based on your behaviour, not personal abuse!

Out of interest would you be happy to send your child to a school where he would be the only child out of 100 who had English as a first language?
I really can't understand how you came up with such a massive leap in the issue of immigration, to get to ask that question.

As a rule, I would imagine this would be a very unlikely situation to find yourself in. It's hardly like the country is over run with schools like this (I'm not saying there is none, but it's hardly a widespread concern). As an aside, surely it is a good thing that these foreign speaking kids are in education, and although they will start out not speaking English, they will most likely learn this as they go throughout their education, getting a good grasp of the language thus allowing them to better integrate into our society. Surely this is a good thing, and may well stop problems like the strain on doctors surgeries where translators are required.

As for which school would I choose if there were 2, say performing exactly the same, I would most likely send my hypothetical child to the one which where they wouldn't be the only child speaking English as their first language. It's not because I have a problem with foreigners, it's just I would worry it would be a strain on a young child to be in that environment, where less time may be spent with them, and their development may suffer. A school with a more even split I would have no problem with, and I actually think it would be positive for a child to integrate with those from other backrounds at a young age, and maybe help our future generations be a little more tolerant than our own.
Old 12 March 2008, 10:27 PM
  #176  
kingofturds
Scooby Regular
Support Scoobynet!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
kingofturds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Zanzibar
Posts: 17,373
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PeteBrant
Yes, why wouldn't I?

Is there something inherently worng with people that don't speak English as a first language I should know about?
Do you have any idea how alienated your child would feel? School is a stressful enough time as it is, making friends and mixing in with different groups.
Old 12 March 2008, 10:31 PM
  #177  
dpb
Scooby Regular
 
dpb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: riding the crest of a wave ...
Posts: 46,493
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

lol

your only different when someone tells you you are
Old 12 March 2008, 10:33 PM
  #178  
kingofturds
Scooby Regular
Support Scoobynet!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
kingofturds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Zanzibar
Posts: 17,373
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Or when you are the only one speaking English in the school yard.
Old 12 March 2008, 10:50 PM
  #179  
Lisawrx
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
Lisawrx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Where I am
Posts: 9,729
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by kingofturds
Or when you are the only one speaking English in the school yard.

As I'd said, i think that would be really difficult for a young child, and I for one for my reasons mentioned would not be inclined to put a child in that situation, at least not at an early age. I do think we need to be realistic though, this is not an everyday situation and doubt, it ever will be, so it seems like a bit of a pointless arguement.
Old 12 March 2008, 10:55 PM
  #180  
fatherpierre
Scooby Regular
 
fatherpierre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Surrey/London borders.
Posts: 8,300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Lisa, are you and Pete Brant carnally in the know of each other?

You're starting to sound as stupid as he does.


Quick Reply: Rivers of blood bbc 2 now



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:15 PM.