Notices
Other Marques Non-Subaru Vehicles

Recently bought Porsche Cayman S

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10 April 2008, 03:01 AM
  #31  
jeremy
Scooby Regular
 
jeremy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

CharlesW wrote:
"When it does start to let go it is fairly gentle. Besides the PSM is very effective."

Many people have brought this fact up, that the Cayman is just about the most friendly (well at least up there with the NSX-R and Audi R8) mid-engine car
they have ever driven especially in the wet.

Question: What advantage have any scoobyneters found they have in fast wet
road driving over the Cayman? Does a car as great handling as the Cayman
make 4WD unnecessary? Or should I get real and admit that traction is traction and no Cayman could hold onto a wet road like a well sorted Scoob?

Would love to see a back to back of both. Maybe the new transfer of evo magazine talent will show us video of such a comparison at...
drivers-republic.com
Old 10 April 2008, 03:04 PM
  #32  
lestippp
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
lestippp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Well, having driven both, the Scooby does inspire more confidence on a wet surface but the Cayman offers fantastic balance in any conditions.

In truth I would never push it that hard on a wet corner to test it, preferring to wait for one of the numerous dry days we have , to fully exploit its incredible chassis
Must say to tho that when I have pushed a bit in the wet, it has always been up to it and when the back end has started to break loose it seems very controllable, which, as i've said before is either down to my silky skills or Porsches amazing electronics The scooby always seemed to "snap" loose with little warning and in a big way, not that it happened often, but scary none-the-less

I still think Imprezas are amazing cars for what you spend and have no real competition, as Evo's are to hardcore for most.

One recommendation.... never turn the PSM off on a Porsche unless you are on a track with good run off areas or you feel you need to crash it for the insurance
Old 11 April 2008, 02:44 PM
  #33  
p1doc
Scooby Regular
 
p1doc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,034
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by CharlesW
Jerome,

Porsche make a point of their brakes being more than 2x as powerful as their engines. By which they mean that, if the car accelerates to 100 mph in 10 seconds, it will stop in 5 seconds.

What I suspect is that you are used to cars with more servo assistance to the brakes. So the initial 'bite' might not feel as sharp. You do have to apply more pressure to Porsche brakes to get maximum effect. However this gives you more feel, in that there is a larger range of pressure from a little braking to a full on emergency stop. You only have to look at the brakes on the Cayman S - 318mm front discs and 299 mm rear discs with 4 pot calipers. That should stop a 1350 kg car.
nice report and nice pics.i locum in portree so recognise the scenery-i use over half a tank from inverness to skye
a lot of people in the know reckon the cayman chasis is better than 911 present one ,cayman or 964 carrera4 is on my list of cars to get
martin
Old 11 April 2008, 08:57 PM
  #34  
jeremy
Scooby Regular
 
jeremy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Lestppp,
"The scooby always seemed to "snap" loose with little warning and in a big way, not that it happened often, but scary none-the-less "

I'm pretty sure that there are scooby's about that are are rather more progressive on limit. Certainly the older p1 and RB-5 and from what I hear the Litchfeld modded ones are such.

But I think that maybe the way the Porsche handles in the wet might be
optimal in some ways. I mean if its that adjustable and it slides to
slowly and predicably maybe indeed this is the safest way to drive> Not sure?
Old 13 April 2008, 08:34 PM
  #35  
Mark1983
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Mark1983's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 612
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jer
I love the look of these. There is a red one where I live that looks the dogs. I don't think they will put the 3.6 in the caymen as it would be faster than the flagship 911.
The 911 is changing to a 4 litre engine later this year.
Old 15 April 2008, 12:30 AM
  #36  
spectrum48k
Scooby Regular
 
spectrum48k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,519
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jer
I love the look of these. There is a red one where I live that looks the dogs. I don't think they will put the 3.6 in the caymen as it would be faster than the flagship 911.
that's why they didn't include a limited slip diff, isn't it ?
Old 15 April 2008, 09:49 AM
  #37  
stilover
Scooby Regular
 
stilover's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Here, There, Everywhere
Posts: 10,619
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by spectrum48k
that's why they didn't include a limited slip diff, isn't it ?

Yes. Evo magazine put a cayman S up against a 911 C2S (against Porsches wishes) and they concluded that the Cayman S was as near as damit as fast as the 911. Handled better too.

A limited slip diff would make it even better. That's the same reason why BMW don't include a limited slip diff on the 335. It would be too close to the M3 on anything but a straight line.
Old 15 April 2008, 10:55 AM
  #38  
markGT
Scooby Regular
 
markGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Here
Posts: 272
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by lestippp
Thanks for the replies chaps, I was only kidding about cheaper to run, my point was more one of "not as dear as you would think" to be honest, although the purchase price is significantly more and on everyday costs such as fuel, insurance and servicing there is little in it. On depreciation the scooby will drop 50% in two years where the Porsche drops about 25 - 30% from a higher price obviously but that equates to about £13 - 15k on each of these cars... surprising isn't it Owning a Porsche is an experience, I just wanted to share some stats that some may find interesting is all.

The Cayman S was first to have the 3.4 flat six with 295bhp, Porsche then put it in the Boxster S as the chassis could easily handle it. My guess is that the Cayman will soon get the 3.6 as an upgrade but we'll wait and see.

Fabioso on the performance side of the car, I'm pretty sure on dry roads the Cayman S is faster and that includes through the twisties, having spent 10 months driving my STi PPP (05) I also appreciate the difference weather makes and in the rain the scooby would have the advantage but then I never got near to the scooby's limits in this kind of weather, preferring to live a little longer instead If you get a chance to drive the Cayman go for it, I guarantee you would be astounded by its levels of grip, traction and handling. I had one for a day last year and that was when I decided I wanted one, I had the scooby at this time so could make good comparisons. I wasn't sure that it was as good as everyone was claiming but it is and more

Stig took the WR1 (quicker than a STi PPP) round the track in 1,29.4 and the Cayman in 1,26.2 so a huge difference I think you'll agree. I never really read much into how a car is driven on public roads as some people drive their corsa's round corners faster than I would but this doesn't make the car faster, just the driver more dangerous / mental really If you pass a 911 turbo, in a WRX because it is being driven by a more cautious driver, the WRX still isn't the fastest car, is it? These comparisons only work where the cars are driven in the same conditions by the same driver, in turn, otherwise it's like comparing Michael Schumacher with your granny

I like to think that I am always unbiased in my opinion on cars and the scooby is still one of my favourites and is a hell of a car for the money so I am not criticising it, just stating that the Cayman IS a faster car when driven well, in good conditions is all.

Simon they are cracking cars and I wish you luck to have one some day.
A Standard STI 280 bhp (not PPP) is quicker than a Caymen S around the Bedford Autodrome (EVO track).

See EVO or Bedford Autodrome West Circuit lap records - FastestLaps.com

As you can see the Porker is quicker on some tracks and slower on some others than a non Prodrive STI. It's all purley subjective but given the price of the Cayman S I'd want it to be blowing the STI in to the weeds not just about matching it. The price of diminishing returns I guess!

Nice motor though!

Last edited by markGT; 15 April 2008 at 03:59 PM.
Old 15 April 2008, 04:11 PM
  #39  
lestippp
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
lestippp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The same Sti was 13s slower than the Cayman S around the ring, where cars speed and handling are truly tested
Power to weight of 217/t versus 185/t in the STi. 0 - 125mph in 18.8 for the Cayman and 21.9 in the STi.

I think this is a similar situation to that which you see in F1 where some tracks suit certain cars.

I would still say that the Cayman S would be hard to beat in a standard STi or a PPP'd version, simply speaking from my experience in both

We all see how the cars are tested on Top Gear and if a 316bhp WR1 (which is an excellent car and seriously quick) dropped 3.2s in 1 lap to a Cayman S then you have a fair idea of what the Porker is capable of Remember these times are from a standing start which benefits the faster launching WR1. I think more importantly, they are carried out by the same driver.

Scooby's are great cars and I will never forget their explosive power but compliant behaviour in daily use. I just wish Subaru would fire their design team and bring in someone to "modernise" the original shape whilst giving the interior a quality face lift and then putting a 2.5 - 3.0lt "boxer" (burble included) engine in it with 300 - 320bhp, what a cracking car that would be

For now though the Cayman rules but loses out in practicality, otherwise it's a stunning car and I would recommend one to anyone who is interested
Old 16 April 2008, 08:33 AM
  #40  
markGT
Scooby Regular
 
markGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Here
Posts: 272
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by lestippp
The same Sti was 13s slower than the Cayman S around the ring, where cars speed and handling are truly tested
Power to weight of 217/t versus 185/t in the STi. 0 - 125mph in 18.8 for the Cayman and 21.9 in the STi.

I think this is a similar situation to that which you see in F1 where some tracks suit certain cars.

I would still say that the Cayman S would be hard to beat in a standard STi or a PPP'd version, simply speaking from my experience in both

We all see how the cars are tested on Top Gear and if a 316bhp WR1 (which is an excellent car and seriously quick) dropped 3.2s in 1 lap to a Cayman S then you have a fair idea of what the Porker is capable of Remember these times are from a standing start which benefits the faster launching WR1. I think more importantly, they are carried out by the same driver.

Scooby's are great cars and I will never forget their explosive power but compliant behaviour in daily use. I just wish Subaru would fire their design team and bring in someone to "modernise" the original shape whilst giving the interior a quality face lift and then putting a 2.5 - 3.0lt "boxer" (burble included) engine in it with 300 - 320bhp, what a cracking car that would be

For now though the Cayman rules but loses out in practicality, otherwise it's a stunning car and I would recommend one to anyone who is interested
*

I take your point about the Scoob, the Caymen is a cracking motor. On the point about the WR1 it may have slightly more power than MY05 PPP but the MY05 STI is regarded as a much better handling car with the wider track etc etc. Like you said track times are track times.

I nearly bought a C4S before I got my EVO and STI but my wife hates them with a passion. I nearly convinced her to get one then we went to the Le Mans 24hr museum in Le Mans and the Porsche club of French were there about to do a track day. There were about 30 cars with Porsches right through the ages. Anyway to my horror every single one of them was fat and bald and in their late 50's early 60's. My wife turned around to me and said no way! Unfortunately that’s the image Porsche drivers have rightly or wrongly. So I'll probably get one when I'm in my sixties (I hope) when I'm maybe a little flabby and have no hair.

Good luck with the car and enjoy
Old 16 April 2008, 10:11 AM
  #41  
lestippp
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
lestippp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by markGT
*

I take your point about the Scoob, the Caymen is a cracking motor. On the point about the WR1 it may have slightly more power than MY05 PPP but the MY05 STI is regarded as a much better handling car with the wider track etc etc. Like you said track times are track times.

I nearly bought a C4S before I got my EVO and STI but my wife hates them with a passion. I nearly convinced her to get one then we went to the Le Mans 24hr museum in Le Mans and the Porsche club of French were there about to do a track day. There were about 30 cars with Porsches right through the ages. Anyway to my horror every single one of them was fat and bald and in their late 50's early 60's. My wife turned around to me and said no way! Unfortunately that’s the image Porsche drivers have rightly or wrongly. So I'll probably get one when I'm in my sixties (I hope) when I'm maybe a little flabby and have no hair.

Good luck with the car and enjoy
I agree with you on the STi PPP, I loved mine and it was awesome in all departments as far as I was concerned, still miss it sometimes, usually when it is pouring with rain funnily enough

Shame you didn't buy the 911 as you would have loved it, they are truely amazing cars. I spent Saturday and Sunday in an 07 997 C2S and whilst I think my Cayman handles better, I don't think there is a whole lot in it, a truely wonderful sportcar and with 20k servicing also, it may be on my hit list in a year or two (very expensive to buy even when 2 years old ).

On the fat, balding, old git drivers well I am not forty yet, have all my hair and am a 32" waist still so how's that for changing the stereo type Certainly a lot of owners are older but only because they have not been able to afford a porsche sooner. Every car is judged, STi's in particular given their rally looks but if you are a confident person you should drive the car you like, not the car you think others will like
I like to drive different performance cars so I can experience their different strengths. When I first bought the STi PPP I got lots of "boy racer" jibes, now with the Porsche it's "to much money" but in truth these people are just jealous that I am confident enough to drive what ever I like and I recommend this to everyone Its not about the cost of the car it's about spending your budget on whatever you bloody well like... I say go for it and enjoy

All of the current Porsche range is held in the highest esteem by more or less all motoring mags and journo's and I know why this is... quite simply these cars are fabulously engineered
Old 24 April 2008, 04:34 PM
  #42  
spectrum48k
Scooby Regular
 
spectrum48k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,519
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Is it important to get the P.A.S.M. option ?
Also, is the tiptronic any good ?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
KAS35RSTI
Subaru
27
04 November 2021 07:12 PM
crazyspeedfreakz
Wanted
17
05 October 2015 07:19 PM
Brzoza
Engine Management and ECU Remapping
1
02 October 2015 05:26 PM
madmover
Member's Gallery
4
28 September 2015 10:46 AM
shorty87
Other Marques
0
25 September 2015 08:52 PM



Quick Reply: Recently bought Porsche Cayman S



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:18 AM.