Notices
ScoobyNet General General Subaru Discussion

you know you own an impreza when...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 28 March 2008 | 06:19 PM
  #61  
NACRO's Avatar
NACRO
BANNED
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 4,787
Likes: 0
From: Your home is worthless.You can't afford to run your car.Your job is on the line.Schadenfreude rules.
Default

rbaz:

Grip has nothing to do with handling.

You can have a car that has relatively little grip but that handles very well indeed.

A case in point is a Morris Minor. Absolute scream to drive at 20mph round a wet roundabout with fully controllable oversteer and a highly rewarding direct feel.

This is because handling is entirely subjective whereas grip is a physical quantity that can be measured.
Old 28 March 2008 | 06:21 PM
  #62  
GlesgaKiss's Avatar
GlesgaKiss
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 6,284
Likes: 4
From: Scotland
Default

Originally Posted by rbaz
How is that then

A MX5 may handle well but the grip levels have to be good for it to achieve this.

Fair enough if a chassis is well balanced but has very little grip it can be fun but if there is no grip you cant say it handles good.
Handling is all about how(as you've stated) well balanced the car is, and the way it changes direction and tackles cambers through corners. thats a good handling car. Its hilarious when people buy a sh*te handling car and then spend loads of money on suspension to make it handle better when at the end of the day it will probs end up still not as quick through the twisty's as a car that handles great standard
Old 28 March 2008 | 06:22 PM
  #63  
catons scooby's Avatar
catons scooby
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 492
Likes: 0
From: essex
Default

35. when you open a car with framed windows when the windows are down, you hit your head on the frame

done this a thousand times lol

first thing comes to your head with....
rally car....................subaru
rwd car ....................skyline
someone who loves a fast car but doesn't want to be branded mid life.................porshe
Old 28 March 2008 | 06:22 PM
  #64  
Norman Dog's Avatar
Norman Dog
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,039
Likes: 24
From: South Shields Tyne & Wear
Default

Originally Posted by NACRO

An Impreza has lots of grip but doesn't handle very well compared to the MX5.
But an Impreza isn't :-
A.) Slow
B.) A car for girls

Old 28 March 2008 | 06:24 PM
  #65  
PantsUK's Avatar
PantsUK
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,118
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Norman Dog
But an Impreza isn't :-
A.) Slow
B.) A car for girls


Old 28 March 2008 | 06:27 PM
  #66  
Varboy's Avatar
Varboy
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,579
Likes: 0
From: Hampshire
Default

You confuse it with the countless other hatchback parked in Sainsburys.

(this of course applies to the version X)
Old 28 March 2008 | 06:33 PM
  #67  
Turbo2's Avatar
Turbo2
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,027
Likes: 0
From: Northants. 22B sold, as-new Lotus Omega instead.
Default

It's true: the MX5 has perfectly balanced 50/50 weight distribution front and rear. This clearly helps the handling. Some more expensive popular sports cars have as much as 62% of their weight over the back axle, so have needed an awful amount of engineering wizardry to overcome the laws of physics and yet still retain great handling.
Old 28 March 2008 | 06:37 PM
  #68  
rbaz's Avatar
rbaz
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,695
Likes: 0
From: France
Default

I give up what’s the point.
You will disagree what ever I say.

But can you answer me this why be so negative towards Impreza drivers?? This all started from a post that was meant to be a joke not to be taken the pi*s out of and picked to bits by you. Why didn’t you just say nothing?
Old 28 March 2008 | 06:39 PM
  #69  
NACRO's Avatar
NACRO
BANNED
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 4,787
Likes: 0
From: Your home is worthless.You can't afford to run your car.Your job is on the line.Schadenfreude rules.
Default

Originally Posted by rbaz
I give up what’s the point.
You will disagree what ever I say.

But can you answer me this why be so negative towards Impreza drivers?? This all started from a post that was meant to be a joke not to be taken the **** out of and picked to bits by you. Why didn’t you just say nothing?
Just a bit of banter that was taken out of context by Subaru owners with an inferiority complex I'm afraid.

The only thing I've disagreed with is your lack of understanding re: grip/handling.
Old 28 March 2008 | 06:41 PM
  #70  
rbaz's Avatar
rbaz
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,695
Likes: 0
From: France
Default

Originally Posted by NACRO
Just a bit of banter that was taken out of context by Subaru owners with an inferiority complex I'm afraid.

Banter you are so negative on all your posts tho? If it was banter you wouldn't get accused of being a troll.
Old 28 March 2008 | 07:56 PM
  #71  
NACRO's Avatar
NACRO
BANNED
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 4,787
Likes: 0
From: Your home is worthless.You can't afford to run your car.Your job is on the line.Schadenfreude rules.
Default

Originally Posted by rbaz
Banter you are so negative on all your posts tho? If it was banter you wouldn't get accused of being a troll.
The Impreza is an excellent car that offers a balance between reliability, price, speed and all weather ability.

Is that positive enough for you?

It's the truth as is the fact that it has now been surpassed by it's rivals and cars from a sector below (ie FWD hot hatches)
Old 28 March 2008 | 08:24 PM
  #72  
JimmyBFC's Avatar
JimmyBFC
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,615
Likes: 0
From: Barnsley
Default

Originally Posted by NACRO
I find that interesting, my choice for a performance car would be RWD. It's far more rewarding and ultimately tends to be faster given reasonable conditions. It's amusing to note that in wet conditions on the 'ring that the Impreza fraternity don't appear to be as quick as the so called advantage of AWD should make them. Maybe down to the driver?

I also agree that straight line drags aren't very interesting but they do seem to be very popular with a lot of owners on here.

As for dismissing some very capable and interesting cars with 'stick them up their *****' surely as a car enthusiast you should be a little more open minded?

lol....your probably right, I should be more open minded, and true, I wouldn't, or shouldn't knock it b4 ive tried it, I have got a lot of loyalty towards the Impreza's though mate, you must undertand that eh
Old 28 March 2008 | 09:26 PM
  #73  
bushiwarrior's Avatar
bushiwarrior
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,991
Likes: 1
From: Belfast
Default

Originally Posted by NACRO
We weren't talking about my car by popular demand but you insisted:-

superior engineering an evolution has removed all traces of 'tail happy' behaviour in the 911. If you ever get the chance to drive one you'll realise just how effective this is and how much more stable (as you'd expect) they are than most other cars whatever their drive system.
although there were all abandoned in the snow along with most bmw's lol
Old 28 March 2008 | 09:38 PM
  #74  
samcowrx's Avatar
samcowrx
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,281
Likes: 0
From: Oxford- the shire
Default

44: There are some weird people on SN.

As much as i like this forum, including the great advice and techie help i get from here, i just cant help noticing that there are some right planks on here.
Old 28 March 2008 | 09:55 PM
  #75  
happy dude's Avatar
happy dude
Scooby Newbie
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by NACRO
The Impreza is an excellent car that offers a balance between reliability, price, speed and all weather ability.

Is that positive enough for you?

It's the truth as is the fact that it has now been surpassed by it's rivals and cars from a sector below (ie FWD hot hatches)
Where are you gettings your truth facts from??? Please dont say that hopeless test drive that was on fifth gear
Old 28 March 2008 | 10:16 PM
  #76  
RJM25R's Avatar
RJM25R
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,428
Likes: 0
From: Oldham
Default

??????????????
Old 28 March 2008 | 10:17 PM
  #77  
RJM25R's Avatar
RJM25R
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,428
Likes: 0
From: Oldham
Default

Originally Posted by catons scooby
35. when you open a car with framed windows when the windows are down, you hit your head on the frame

done this a thousand times lol

first thing comes to your head with....
rally car....................subaru
rwd car ....................skyline
someone who loves a fast car but doesn't want to be branded mid life.................porshe

Skyline = 4wd?
Old 28 March 2008 | 10:34 PM
  #78  
escott's Avatar
escott
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 977
Likes: 0
From: SE London
Default

Originally Posted by NACRO
41. you hold up faster accelerating cars by refusing to move over on empty dual carriageways because you've got an attitude problem

42.you drive so dangerously owners of faster cars decide to give up on making fast and safe progress in order to not be involved in your accident

43. you seem to have a bee in your bonnet about people driving 300bhp FWD hot hatches just because one with 200bhp whupped the *** of the current Impreza on a damp/wet track and they have a better image/cost less to run/are faster most of the time.

I could understand you posting this in response to someone boasting about dangerous driving, but not to a post obviously just meant to be entertaining (which it is). The comment that this is just 'banter' is kind of contradicted by some of your later posts.
Old 28 March 2008 | 10:35 PM
  #79  
escott's Avatar
escott
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 977
Likes: 0
From: SE London
Default

Originally Posted by samcowrx
44: There are some weird people on SN.

As much as i like this forum, including the great advice and techie help i get from here, i just cant help noticing that there are some right planks on here.
Couldn't agree more.
Old 29 March 2008 | 12:33 AM
  #80  
rbaz's Avatar
rbaz
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,695
Likes: 0
From: France
Default

Originally Posted by samcowrx
44: There are some weird people on SN.

As much as i like this forum, including the great advice and techie help i get from here, i just cant help noticing that there are some right planks on here.
I agree why they dont move on after scooby ownwership is beyond me
Old 29 March 2008 | 12:59 AM
  #81  
Bubba po's Avatar
Bubba po
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 60,269
Likes: 0
From: Cas Vegas
Default

Originally Posted by rbaz
Erm yes it does
If you use the engine braking makes a big difference.
Do you have the vaguest idea what you're on about?

The sole force that slows down a car when braking on the road is the friction of its TYRES against the ROAD SURFACE. Which is what NACRO was alluding to. It doesn't matter if you have 6-pots, 12-pots or blummin' 36-pots coupled with 20" ventilated discs; or whether you're engine braking, hand-braking or otherwise. If you're in any doubt about the truth of this statement, just imagine how well your brakes would work on a frictionless surface like an ice-rink or an oil patch. Just because AWD vehicles generally have better traction for accelerating than 2WD vehicles (for a given amount of available grip), it does not follow that they stop any quicker.
Old 29 March 2008 | 01:09 AM
  #82  
rbaz's Avatar
rbaz
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,695
Likes: 0
From: France
Default

Originally Posted by Bubba po
Do you have the vaguest idea what you're on about?

The sole force that slows down a car when braking on the road is the friction of its TYRES against the ROAD SURFACE. Which is what NACRO was alluding to. It doesn't matter if you have 6-pots, 12-pots or blummin' 36-pots coupled with 20" ventilated discs; or whether you're engine braking, hand-braking or otherwise. If you're in any doubt about the truth of this statement, just imagine how well your brakes would work on a frictionless surface like an ice-rink or an oil patch. Just because AWD vehicles generally have better traction for accelerating than 2WD vehicles (for a given amount of available grip), it does not follow that they stop any quicker.
So a 205 GTI will behave in the same under braking as the Impreza will at the same speed in wet conditions while turning in to a bend??

I may be wrong but am fairly sure I could out brake one in the wet

Will a car stop quicker using engine braking from say 120mph or just the same without??
Old 29 March 2008 | 01:11 AM
  #83  
martwrxsl's Avatar
martwrxsl
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 691
Likes: 0
From: chelmsford essex
Default

Read all the crap the porsche owner has to say. The reason the subaru handles better in wet conditions has nothing to do with 50/50 weight distribution, balanced throttle response or whatever other b*llocks he likes to think. It's down to the limited viscous slip differential. To make it easy for him I'll explain. When the front wheels of a subaru slip the back wheels catch them up. When the rear wheels spin the front wheels catch them up. Hence giving more power to the wheels that aren't slipping.

That is the reason a subaru is excellant in wet conditions and on bad road surfaces.

Evo's do the same process but from left to right by electronics and friction clutches.

I believe the only car to have all four wheels electronically individually controlled is a nissan skyline, hence it's abilities in all conditions.
Old 29 March 2008 | 01:23 AM
  #84  
Bubba po's Avatar
Bubba po
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 60,269
Likes: 0
From: Cas Vegas
Default

Originally Posted by rbaz
So a 205 GTI will behave in the same under braking as the Impreza will at the same speed in wet conditions while turning in to a bend??

I may be wrong but am fairly sure I could out brake one in the wet

Will a car stop quicker using engine braking from say 120mph or just the same without??

You may outbrake him for a number of reasons, none of which relate to the Impreza's AWD system. You may have grippier, wider tyres with more efficient water-dispersal; or your suspension may be so good that your tyres never break contact with the road surface. As for your final question, I suspect that stamping with all your might on excellent brakes with all the electronic wizardry that modern technology can provide will undoubtably be better than attempting to employ engine braking in a situation that requires an emergency stop. Unless you drop into first and bring the clutch up pronto (which would stress every part of the drivetrain unbearably). Attempting to use engine braking would be hopelessly inefficient. Just think about the time (however short) that the drive is uncoupled when you are changing into each lower gear- there is effectively zero engine braking for that period.
Old 29 March 2008 | 01:24 AM
  #85  
martwrxsl's Avatar
martwrxsl
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 691
Likes: 0
From: chelmsford essex
Default

[QUOTE=rbaz;7768808]So a 205 GTI will behave in the same under braking as the Impreza will at the same speed in wet conditions while turning in to a bend??QUOTE]

If neither person touches the accelerator than the 205gti will handle better because it's a lighter car. In the real world you will touch the accelerator and the subaru will find more grip because it's always trying to do this permanently because of it's limited slip diff.
Old 29 March 2008 | 01:26 AM
  #86  
Bubba po's Avatar
Bubba po
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 60,269
Likes: 0
From: Cas Vegas
Default

[QUOTE=martwrxsl;7768852]
Originally Posted by rbaz
So a 205 GTI will behave in the same under braking as the Impreza will at the same speed in wet conditions while turning in to a bend??QUOTE]

If neither person touches the accelerator than the 205gti will handle better because it's a lighter car. In the real world you will touch the accelerator and the subaru will find more grip because it's always trying to do this permanently because of it's limited slip diff.
He's talking about behaviour under braking, not acceleration.
Old 29 March 2008 | 01:31 AM
  #87  
dunx's Avatar
dunx
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 14,333
Likes: 0
From: Slowly rebuilding the kit of bits into a car...
Default

Sorry not all true my dear NACRO... my pals standard bug-eye WRX gave a Clio cup 19? a kicking from the lights this week (yes he was trying !)

LOL

DunxC

P.S. My car grips,stops and handles..... I'm a happy bunny.
Old 29 March 2008 | 01:31 AM
  #88  
rbaz's Avatar
rbaz
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,695
Likes: 0
From: France
Default

Originally Posted by martwrxsl
[If neither person touches the accelerator than the 205gti will handle better because it's a lighter car. In the real world you will touch the accelerator and the subaru will find more grip because it's always trying to do this permanently because of it's limited slip diff.
I take it you have never driven one fast on a wet road then.

Am not going to be accelerating under very heavy braking.
The Impreza will be more stable due to its transmition.

Last edited by rbaz; 29 March 2008 at 01:34 AM.
Old 29 March 2008 | 01:34 AM
  #89  
martwrxsl's Avatar
martwrxsl
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 691
Likes: 0
From: chelmsford essex
Default

[QUOTE=Bubba po;7768860]
Originally Posted by martwrxsl

He's talking about behaviour under braking, not acceleration.
Ok the 205 gti would because it's a lighter load under braking.
Old 29 March 2008 | 01:36 AM
  #90  
rbaz's Avatar
rbaz
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,695
Likes: 0
From: France
Default

[QUOTE=martwrxsl;7768878]
Originally Posted by Bubba po

Ok the 205 gti would because it's a lighter load under braking.
Or it will go very light at the rear and be unstable



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:15 AM.