Immigration it's bad for the UK officially
#31
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#35
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It's interesting to see the title of this thread, given that the actual reports states 'small benefit'.
I suspect this betrays the poster (and supporters) unbalanced feeling about this key issue.
Try look at this issue without fear and resentment and you never know, you might actually start seeing things differently.
I suspect this betrays the poster (and supporters) unbalanced feeling about this key issue.
Try look at this issue without fear and resentment and you never know, you might actually start seeing things differently.
#36
Yup, it's called "not being a xenophobe"
Let not get carried away with what this report says - It's doesn't vindicate being a massive racist (not that you are one) it says that there is little economic benefit to immigration, it says nothing at all about other benefits/costs. e.g. whether there is a net drain on resources in terms of public services.
Let not get carried away with what this report says - It's doesn't vindicate being a massive racist (not that you are one) it says that there is little economic benefit to immigration, it says nothing at all about other benefits/costs. e.g. whether there is a net drain on resources in terms of public services.
Les
#37
The government justify immigration by lying about it being worth £6bn, this is because mass immigration in itself is a bad thing, so it needs to be justified.
If there is little or no benefit to unprecedented mass immigration, then financially it is neither good nor bad, but most people would see it as a bad thing socially, so overall, immigration at this level is bad for the country.
If there is little or no benefit to unprecedented mass immigration, then financially it is neither good nor bad, but most people would see it as a bad thing socially, so overall, immigration at this level is bad for the country.
Last edited by Paul3446; 01 April 2008 at 03:32 PM.
#38
So Prime minister Brown has stated no cap on immigration as he believes immigrants are massively contributing to the British economy.I am afraid there is no hope for a once Great country if an unelected buffon like Brown is permitted to make irrational decisions like this . God help us all!
#39
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So Prime minister Brown has stated no cap on immigration as he believes immigrants are massively contributing to the British economy.I am afraid there is no hope for a once Great country if an unelected buffon like Brown is permitted to make irrational decisions like this . God help us all!
#42
Tell me why mass immigration at the current level is good for the country.
Given that the financial benefit is now acknowledged to be nothing, what else makes this a good thing?
I'm not talking about controlled immigration, I am talking about the level we have now, eg: 23% of all children born in England were born to mothers who were born abroad. This number will only increase and I don't believe it is sustainable.
Given that the financial benefit is now acknowledged to be nothing, what else makes this a good thing?
I'm not talking about controlled immigration, I am talking about the level we have now, eg: 23% of all children born in England were born to mothers who were born abroad. This number will only increase and I don't believe it is sustainable.
#43
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Tell me why mass immigration at the current level is good for the country.
Given that the financial benefit is now acknowledged to be nothing, what else makes this a good thing?
I'm not talking about controlled immigration, I am talking about the level we have now, eg: 23% of all children born in England were born to mothers who were born abroad. This number will only increase and I don't believe it is sustainable.
Given that the financial benefit is now acknowledged to be nothing, what else makes this a good thing?
I'm not talking about controlled immigration, I am talking about the level we have now, eg: 23% of all children born in England were born to mothers who were born abroad. This number will only increase and I don't believe it is sustainable.
Why is having children born to mothers who were born abroad a bad thing - I don't understand your point there. It should also be remebered that a significant number of people emigrate each year, so the net numbers are nearly as high as being peddled by the usual suspects in the press.
The financial benefits are still £6bn, as it was yesterday - the issue was how GDP per capita has gone down as a result, the overall amount remains £6bn.
I don't know anybody who believes in uncontrolled immigration, you'd have to be crazy to believe this, but this issue is being hyped into something it is not?
#44
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Worthing..
Posts: 7,575
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You want the numbers to be farily evenm (which they are https://www.cia.gov/library/publicat.../print/uk.html) - So without that 23% we would probably be in a spot of bother.
#45
The financial benefits are not £6bn at all, have you even read the report?
Immigrants generate £6bn, but cost the country about the same, so they are of no benefit overall financially.
As I said before, given the fact they don't benefit the country financially what is the benefit of having uncontrolled immigration?
All you have come up with is someone to serve you a latte.
Immigrants generate £6bn, but cost the country about the same, so they are of no benefit overall financially.
As I said before, given the fact they don't benefit the country financially what is the benefit of having uncontrolled immigration?
All you have come up with is someone to serve you a latte.
#46
Another point made by the report is that house prices will rise by 10% due to this immigration.
When I suggested on here that house price rises were linked to immigration you condemned me for being mad, well now it's a bit more official perhaps you will believe it!
When I suggested on here that house price rises were linked to immigration you condemned me for being mad, well now it's a bit more official perhaps you will believe it!
#47
Guest
Posts: n/a
#48
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Worthing..
Posts: 7,575
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It says that they add £6billion to GDP, but the per capita amount is pennies.
What they are saying is that the average Briton is no better off due to immigration in terms of productivity to GDP - It's not about "cancelling out" the £6 billion at all.
#49
Guest
Posts: n/a
Dave
#50
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The financial benefits are not £6bn at all, have you even read the report?
Immigrants generate £6bn, but cost the country about the same, so they are of no benefit overall financially.
As I said before, given the fact they don't benefit the country financially what is the benefit of having uncontrolled immigration?
All you have come up with is someone to serve you a latte.
Immigrants generate £6bn, but cost the country about the same, so they are of no benefit overall financially.
As I said before, given the fact they don't benefit the country financially what is the benefit of having uncontrolled immigration?
All you have come up with is someone to serve you a latte.
But let's take 'no overall benefit arguement' if thats the case, and the impact in neutral, which I believe is highly unlikey (just using my eyes), come to London and you'll find 100,000's of jobs that would simply not be done by anyone else. If the impacts are neutral then why are you getting so worked up about this issue?
#51
Quote:
"That not what the report says at all.
It says that they add £6billion to GDP, but the per capita amount is pennies.
What they are saying is that the average Briton is no better off due to immigration in terms of productivity to GDP - It's not about "cancelling out" the £6 billion at all. "
So are you saying that the cost to the NHS, Police, housing, etc. is on top of the fact that they generate nothing per capita? If that's the case it's even worse than I thought, I apologise for my misunderstanding.
"That not what the report says at all.
It says that they add £6billion to GDP, but the per capita amount is pennies.
What they are saying is that the average Briton is no better off due to immigration in terms of productivity to GDP - It's not about "cancelling out" the £6 billion at all. "
So are you saying that the cost to the NHS, Police, housing, etc. is on top of the fact that they generate nothing per capita? If that's the case it's even worse than I thought, I apologise for my misunderstanding.
#52
"But let's take 'no overall benefit arguement' if thats the case, and the impact in neutral, which I believe is highly unlikey (just using my eyes), come to London and you'll find 100,000's of jobs that would simply not be done by anyone else. If the impacts are neutral then why are you getting so worked up about this issue? "
I don't believe the social impact is neutral, I think it is disastrous. To answer your worry about your latte, if the government cut the ridiculous amount of benefits given to spongers, they would be able to fill the jobs taken by immigrants, seems like fairly simple economics to me. If people have to work to survive they will do.
I don't believe the social impact is neutral, I think it is disastrous. To answer your worry about your latte, if the government cut the ridiculous amount of benefits given to spongers, they would be able to fill the jobs taken by immigrants, seems like fairly simple economics to me. If people have to work to survive they will do.
#53
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Quote:
"That not what the report says at all.
It says that they add £6billion to GDP, but the per capita amount is pennies.
What they are saying is that the average Briton is no better off due to immigration in terms of productivity to GDP - It's not about "cancelling out" the £6 billion at all. "
So are you saying that the cost to the NHS, Police, housing, etc. is on top of the fact that they generate nothing per capita? If that's the case it's even worse than I thought, I apologise for my misunderstanding.
"That not what the report says at all.
It says that they add £6billion to GDP, but the per capita amount is pennies.
What they are saying is that the average Briton is no better off due to immigration in terms of productivity to GDP - It's not about "cancelling out" the £6 billion at all. "
So are you saying that the cost to the NHS, Police, housing, etc. is on top of the fact that they generate nothing per capita? If that's the case it's even worse than I thought, I apologise for my misunderstanding.
#55
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Worthing..
Posts: 7,575
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Which with the best will in the world I don't think was the sort of time frame anyone here was looking at.
#57
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Worthing..
Posts: 7,575
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I.e. if you have 1000 people contributing £10 per capita then you have a total GDP of £10,000.
Add another 100 people @ £10 per capita and your total GDP goes up to £10,100 - but your per capita GDP stay the same.
Public services etc are nothing to do with the report.
What is being said is that per capita we are not better off
Geddit?
#58
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well immigrants are demonstrably putting more in (in tax) than they are taking out in public services. The highest 'drain' (bad word I know) on the public sevices are the elderly, sick and unemployed. Immigrants tend to be young, healthy and working. And that's before you add in the very high numbers of immigrants working in the public services, especially the NHS.
#59
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Worthing..
Posts: 7,575
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Indeed - Not forgetting the huge amounts we spend each year in State pensions etc (£45 billion at the last count)
What people need to realise is that to pay all these "bills" we need tax revenue, and if needs be, you have to get the revenue by "importing" workers.