TRADER RATING POLLS
#32
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
I think overall its a good series of threads which allow companies know what their customers think. Generally most companies are getting good feedback, with some minor niggles, which any decent company wanting to improve their customer relationship would want to take onboard and try to rectify.
Andy
Andy
#33
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (41)
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: in the woods...........555 Wagon Sqn
Posts: 13,350
Received 55 Likes
on
42 Posts
unless there is a well concealed and concerted effort to bad mouth a particular trader, then surely the only people that will lose out are those that have something to hide? It will also be interesting to see how the various owners deal with any issues that arise, regardless of whether they think they are real or manufactured...in my experience its not how truthful\accurate the claims are, its the way in which they are dealt with that gives the biggest insight.
#34
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 905
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
IMHO
the Voters should be shown there is an option for that
the Voters should be shown there is an option for that
unless there is a well concealed and concerted effort to bad mouth a particular trader, then surely the only people that will lose out are those that have something to hide? It will also be interesting to see how the various owners deal with any issues that arise, regardless of whether they think they are real or manufactured...in my experience its not how truthful\accurate the claims are, its the way in which they are dealt with that gives the biggest insight.
To Andy97, thanks very much for jumping in and adding some of the companies I missed. I have been pm'd a very extra requests, so will try add those companies a bit later.
Also thanks to those traders that have seen this in a positive way, as it was intended ... I have been offline since yesterday and was sort of expecting a backlash, but have been relieved by most peoples comments.
#35
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Basingstoke, Hants
Posts: 596
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think this set of threads is one of the best and most help full in a long time! also very pleased it has not been banned for a change! thanks to those who sorted it out
#37
STiFreak,
The only backlash is of you spamming the general forum.
Keep such threads in the respective forum (D&TP) please.
Normal rules apply.... anything that causes ScoobyNet issues will be removed, and not because of some smart alec suggesting this because some are advertisers
Regards,
Shaun
The only backlash is of you spamming the general forum.
Keep such threads in the respective forum (D&TP) please.
Normal rules apply.... anything that causes ScoobyNet issues will be removed, and not because of some smart alec suggesting this because some are advertisers
Regards,
Shaun
#39
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 905
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
STiFreak,
The only backlash is of you spamming the general forum.
Keep such threads in the respective forum (D&TP) please.
Normal rules apply.... anything that causes ScoobyNet issues will be removed, and not because of some smart alec suggesting this because some are advertisers
Regards,
Shaun
The only backlash is of you spamming the general forum.
Keep such threads in the respective forum (D&TP) please.
Normal rules apply.... anything that causes ScoobyNet issues will be removed, and not because of some smart alec suggesting this because some are advertisers
Regards,
Shaun
I do appologise for that. I wanted to setup these in Dealer and 3rd Party forum, but polls are not enabled in that forum. Can you please enable them, so folks can continue to vote.
#43
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: In a 405 BHP/360 ft/lb P1 with SN superstar Sonic dog at my side!
Posts: 1,959
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Webbie,
In the interests of fairness to all suppliers concerned, and to try and stop some of the unfair voting, are any of these possible -
1) Change the polls to remove the anominity. Already it seems one particular company has more than it's fair share of detractors, some of whom i'm sure are doing it for the wrong reason.
2) Delete all the votes that have been cast, that have not been backed up by a post, wether it be positive, neutral, or negative.
2) Group all the seperate threads together. Wether this means stickying them all or creating a sub forum.
In the interests of fairness to all suppliers concerned, and to try and stop some of the unfair voting, are any of these possible -
1) Change the polls to remove the anominity. Already it seems one particular company has more than it's fair share of detractors, some of whom i'm sure are doing it for the wrong reason.
2) Delete all the votes that have been cast, that have not been backed up by a post, wether it be positive, neutral, or negative.
2) Group all the seperate threads together. Wether this means stickying them all or creating a sub forum.
#44
Track Day Organiser
Webbie,
In the interests of fairness to all suppliers concerned, and to try and stop some of the unfair voting, are any of these possible -
1) Change the polls to remove the anominity. Already it seems one particular company has more than it's fair share of detractors, some of whom i'm sure are doing it for the wrong reason.
2) Delete all the votes that have been cast, that have not been backed up by a post, wether it be positive, neutral, or negative.
2) Group all the seperate threads together. Wether this means stickying them all or creating a sub forum.
In the interests of fairness to all suppliers concerned, and to try and stop some of the unfair voting, are any of these possible -
1) Change the polls to remove the anominity. Already it seems one particular company has more than it's fair share of detractors, some of whom i'm sure are doing it for the wrong reason.
2) Delete all the votes that have been cast, that have not been backed up by a post, wether it be positive, neutral, or negative.
2) Group all the seperate threads together. Wether this means stickying them all or creating a sub forum.
#45
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
Little bit uncomfortable with this situation. It's a bit "Trial by Scoobynet"
You could have the situation that two voters cast "poor" votes, one voter says "good" and you have a 66% "poor" rating! Unless you study the true situation that only three people voted, you think the company is crap!
I bet the firms not mentioned are relieved?
JohnD
You could have the situation that two voters cast "poor" votes, one voter says "good" and you have a 66% "poor" rating! Unless you study the true situation that only three people voted, you think the company is crap!
I bet the firms not mentioned are relieved?
JohnD
#46
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 905
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Little bit uncomfortable with this situation. It's a bit "Trial by Scoobynet"
You could have the situation that two voters cast "poor" votes, one voter says "good" and you have a 66% "poor" rating! Unless you study the true situation that only three people voted, you think the company is crap!
You could have the situation that two voters cast "poor" votes, one voter says "good" and you have a 66% "poor" rating! Unless you study the true situation that only three people voted, you think the company is crap!
1) Change the polls to remove the anominity. Already it seems one particular company has more than it's fair share of detractors, some of whom i'm sure are doing it for the wrong reason.
#47
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 905
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have been asked to add some companies that folks have noticed are missing, which is only fair enough, so polls for the following companies have been added:
Andy Forrest Performance
Engine Tuner
JD Performance
Harvey Performance
Godspeed
Graham Goode Racing
Scooby Bits
All polls now open in Dealer and Third Party Forum.
Andy Forrest Performance
Engine Tuner
JD Performance
Harvey Performance
Godspeed
Graham Goode Racing
Scooby Bits
All polls now open in Dealer and Third Party Forum.
#49
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
I have been asked to add some companies that folks have noticed are missing, which is only fair enough, so polls for the following companies have been added:
Andy Forrest Performance
Engine Tuner
JD Performance
Harvey Performance
Godspeed
Graham Goode Racing
Scooby Bits
All polls now open in Dealer and Third Party Forum.
Andy Forrest Performance
Engine Tuner
JD Performance
Harvey Performance
Godspeed
Graham Goode Racing
Scooby Bits
All polls now open in Dealer and Third Party Forum.
JohnD
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post