JDM vs UK pros and cons
#61
Makes up for the 10 uk ones that go bang in its place but if its about some guy who posted on here ages ago saying his spec c just went bang, think we put that one to rest, wasnt to do with it being standard, long while back (4 months?) but there was something suss about it.
Like I said, more uk ones go bang
Tony
Like I said, more uk ones go bang
Tony
#62
as the uk ones will be anyway, jdm , uk both will go bang as apart from cast pistons in the jdm, all the rest is the same
#63
#65
that was what, basically i was told, they are more or less the same though spec c car is better than uk car, buts thats a different issue, i will post tomorrow what matt from rcm took the time to explain to me about both engines,
#66
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (68)
The JDM engine has a cross drilled nitrided crank, larger ports on the head for better flow, higher rev limit due to better valvetrain and more aggressive cams iirc. So overall it is a better base to start modifying from but then you are limited by the twin scroll setup, if chasing over 400bhp.
Banny
Banny
#67
The JDM engine has a cross drilled nitrided crank, larger ports on the head for better flow, higher rev limit due to better valvetrain and more aggressive cams iirc. So overall it is a better base to start modifying from but then you are limited by the twin scroll setup, if chasing over 400bhp.
Banny
Banny
#69
sorry mate but somebody is saying that jdm are stronger than uk engines but the people/tuner that i use beg to differ,
#70
#71
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: 1600cc's of twin scroll fun :)
Posts: 25,565
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
The JDM's are a stronger engine the even worse crap cast pistons in the 2.5ltr engines are totally useless for tuning, the "forged" pistons in the 2ltrs are well, ok forged but not the highest quality by far, the engine base is stronger in the JDM, the pistons can take much more than people understand, the downside to the hyperheutic is they need a very good map and det reduction, something they have but dont think that the 2ltr uk is a stronger engine, its internals are not as good as those of the JDM, and yes the JDM's are a better tuning point, but push silly bhp and both engines will need decent forged items in there (though still note how the nitrated/grooved crank is added to the uk cars ) but the 2.5ltr sucks in comparison and more of those forged 2ltr uk/jdm cars blow up than you think
Tony
#72
As for them being crap, I think not. They are as strong as forged item and expand very little due to a high silicon content. They don't use as much oil or make as much noise as forged pistons. The only draw back with them is that they cannot handle det as well as a forged piston. And if really made that much of a difference then JDM spec cars would come with them also.
As for the debate over which is better, then it is a JDM car, plain and simple.
- Equal length steel headers (unequal length cast on UK)
- 13:1 quick rack (15:1 on UK cars)
- Twin scroll turbo [roller bearing unit on Spec C] (single scroll on UK)
- Cross-drilled nitrided crank
- Stronger valvetrain
- Larger valved heads
- More aggressive inlet cams
- Better spec ECU
No one here is saying a UK Impreza is a bad car, well I'm not anyway, but the truth is that a JDM is the better car.
So back to the question in hand, there are no real cons to owning a JDM over a UK spec variant. If ever there was one factor that used to stop people going JDM in years gone by then insurance could be counted as the main cause. But nowadays with the likes of A-Plan and Kieth Michaels around, prices are more or less the same. Hell, Direct Line insured my RA-R without so much as a fuss, and that was after clearly explaining what the car was and how it differed.
#73
just found this info from research i did when i used to own a UK 03 STI and dreamt of owning a JDM>
- Twin Scroll Turbo
- Nitride coated, cross drilled crank (improved hardness and oiling)
- 13:1 STI quick rack
- Slightly larger I/C design
- Auto and manual I/C spray (UK get manual activation only)
- More aggressive inlet cams
- Equal length Stainless headers
- Rear wash wipe
- Electric folding wing mirrors (Surprised if uk doesnt have this)
- Privacy glass
- 235 width tyres (UK get 225)
- 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th same as UK, 5th and 6th are shorter
- Front STI Titanium strut brace
- 8,000rpm Redline
- Lightweight multispoke BBS alloy wheels
- de tango'd already
- Twin Scroll Turbo
- Nitride coated, cross drilled crank (improved hardness and oiling)
- 13:1 STI quick rack
- Slightly larger I/C design
- Auto and manual I/C spray (UK get manual activation only)
- More aggressive inlet cams
- Equal length Stainless headers
- Rear wash wipe
- Electric folding wing mirrors (Surprised if uk doesnt have this)
- Privacy glass
- 235 width tyres (UK get 225)
- 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th same as UK, 5th and 6th are shorter
- Front STI Titanium strut brace
- 8,000rpm Redline
- Lightweight multispoke BBS alloy wheels
- de tango'd already
Here's the thread: MY06 STI Spec C Type RA - Type-RA.co.uk - Forum for Subaru Impreza WRX Type RA, WRX STi, Spec-C, S202, Type RA-R
#74
bit of info for you technically minded out there
uk2000 turbo has cast pistons
p12000 turbo has forged pistons
22b has forged pistons
jdmsti has cast pistons
uksti 2.0 newage has forged pistons, 2.5 has cast
forged pistons are much stronger than cast but a standard subaru bottom end runs a very tightbore clearance to reduce piston slap when cold this can cause engine problems when engine performance is increased in a uk or jdm spec, its the piston bore clearance that causes the problems especially sustained speed in 5th and 6th.
piston clearance on standard subaru is 0.010-0.30 (0.0004"-0.0012") a sheet of paper is 0.10 (0.004")
piston clearance limit on subaru is 0.050 (0.0020")
piston clearance for motorsport use is 0.10 (0.004")
thanks to matt from rogerclark motorsport for taking the time and effort for the above.
matt is stating that the jdm sti is not stronger than the uk engine, they have the same rods, different cranks (the uk crank is very strong) as for the pistons thats already been mentioned, people will always say jdm are stronger for whatever the reason but i know who i believe.
just to add its the engine thats being referred NOT the cars
uk2000 turbo has cast pistons
p12000 turbo has forged pistons
22b has forged pistons
jdmsti has cast pistons
uksti 2.0 newage has forged pistons, 2.5 has cast
forged pistons are much stronger than cast but a standard subaru bottom end runs a very tightbore clearance to reduce piston slap when cold this can cause engine problems when engine performance is increased in a uk or jdm spec, its the piston bore clearance that causes the problems especially sustained speed in 5th and 6th.
piston clearance on standard subaru is 0.010-0.30 (0.0004"-0.0012") a sheet of paper is 0.10 (0.004")
piston clearance limit on subaru is 0.050 (0.0020")
piston clearance for motorsport use is 0.10 (0.004")
thanks to matt from rogerclark motorsport for taking the time and effort for the above.
matt is stating that the jdm sti is not stronger than the uk engine, they have the same rods, different cranks (the uk crank is very strong) as for the pistons thats already been mentioned, people will always say jdm are stronger for whatever the reason but i know who i believe.
just to add its the engine thats being referred NOT the cars
Last edited by black newage; 31 August 2008 at 07:23 AM.
#75
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: 1600cc's of twin scroll fun :)
Posts: 25,565
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Ok i want to point this out.
Yes the JDM pistons in the twin scroll cars are cast but you cannot compare those pistons to that of a uk turbo or wrx because they are made from different materials.
Also note how the JDM engines are 80% different to that of the UK car in 2ltr form, the "cast" JDM pistons are as good as those in the 2ltr "forged" engine, now its a shame that the cranks are different because those grooved and nitrated ones in the JDM cars are in there because one of the main issues was oil starvation to the bearings, note how they are now grooved to give oil to the bearing
If you want to know which engine is "stronger" it is still the JDM STi engine, mainly because they have uprated more parts to deal with issues in older engines (like the UK 2ltr engine) because just having one part that is stronger and the rest weaker does not make for a better engine.
JDM engines if you will, are "better" than their 2ltr counterparts, if they were not, do you think they would have replaced the "forged" 2ltr engines they use to use?
The technology in casting has come along way, yes its cheaper and yes they are not as "good" in some situations as a "forged" piston, but if you were going for a rebuild, i seriously doubt you would want to use STi forged pistons in your build
Tony
Yes the JDM pistons in the twin scroll cars are cast but you cannot compare those pistons to that of a uk turbo or wrx because they are made from different materials.
Also note how the JDM engines are 80% different to that of the UK car in 2ltr form, the "cast" JDM pistons are as good as those in the 2ltr "forged" engine, now its a shame that the cranks are different because those grooved and nitrated ones in the JDM cars are in there because one of the main issues was oil starvation to the bearings, note how they are now grooved to give oil to the bearing
If you want to know which engine is "stronger" it is still the JDM STi engine, mainly because they have uprated more parts to deal with issues in older engines (like the UK 2ltr engine) because just having one part that is stronger and the rest weaker does not make for a better engine.
JDM engines if you will, are "better" than their 2ltr counterparts, if they were not, do you think they would have replaced the "forged" 2ltr engines they use to use?
The technology in casting has come along way, yes its cheaper and yes they are not as "good" in some situations as a "forged" piston, but if you were going for a rebuild, i seriously doubt you would want to use STi forged pistons in your build
Tony
#79
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Spec C - 12.5 @ 110(340/350)
Posts: 2,314
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If the UK engine was a strong as the JDM why doesn't it have the 8250rpm limit? Change the limit on the UK car and see how long it lasts.
When I was getting my car mapped, my mapper told me of two customers that were running around 500bhp on standard Spec C internals, one for 2 years.
When I was getting my car mapped, my mapper told me of two customers that were running around 500bhp on standard Spec C internals, one for 2 years.
#80
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Spec C - 12.5 @ 110(340/350)
Posts: 2,314
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I know of a Spec C Type-RA that melted a piston under extreme track conditions in New Zealand. After that the owner fitted a Tomei 2.2 stroker kit. It's still my favourtire modded Impreza ever and had inspired me with some of the mods I'm having fitted to my RA-R.
Here's the thread: MY06 STI Spec C Type RA - Type-RA.co.uk - Forum for Subaru Impreza WRX Type RA, WRX STi, Spec-C, S202, Type RA-R
#81
He had originally fitted a Power Enterprise V-Mount I/C kit, but then went with an APS 525 which is what I'm having fitted to my car along with some bits and bobs. What I really liked was the Tomei Stroker Kit, which is temptng me. Tomei do some quality stuff for Imprezas, both classic and Newage. They've recently developed an ITB system for the Impreza with a complete new inlet manifold and four throttle bodies. I've ordered a set of their headers and will be having them ceramic coated by Zircotec.
#83
My car was remapped when Litcho imported it. It's now at Powerstation having an APS FMIC, APS CAI, Sard 650 injectors and few other bits.
I want to keep the car looking as standard as possible which is why I chose an APS FMIC as you can have the IC core in black. As for the exhaust I want to keep the STI back box that came on the car, again maintaining the standard look so I'll have to it modded in order to be used with an aftermarket system.
The car was plenty quick enough in standard trim. I'll wait and see what results I get and whether or not I feel it will need more power.
#85
RA-R has the larger VF42 unit fitted, along with a larger GrpN spec STI turbo inlet hose and a blueprinted, handbuilt engine, so they will make more power than a standard Spec C. They were quoted as 320bhp straight from the factory.
#87
Ah right. Yes it would make more power. Not yet seen a VF42 up for sale anywhere though, in fact they are pretty hard to get hold of I've been told. I remember reading a thread on NASIOC where someone was asking for one. There was a guy from AVO who said he could probably get them and you would be looking at approx. $2500 USD for one.
#88
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: glasgow
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If the UK engine was a strong as the JDM why doesn't it have the 8250rpm limit? Change the limit on the UK car and see how long it lasts.
When I was getting my car mapped, my mapper told me of two customers that were running around 500bhp on standard Spec C internals, one for 2 years.
When I was getting my car mapped, my mapper told me of two customers that were running around 500bhp on standard Spec C internals, one for 2 years.
mines is a bugeye though so not twin scroll but i am using equal length headers through choice,no trademark burble as such but still sounds good
to me
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post