Petition against Hamiltons penalty!
15 September 2008, 02:32 PM
#211
BANNED
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Your home is worthless.You can't afford to run your car.Your job is on the line.Schadenfreude rules.
Posts: 4,787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I dislike giving infractions but that's the system we have and therefore I have no other choice than to work within it.
15 September 2008, 02:35 PM
#212
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Couch Spud
Posts: 9,277
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There is a fully justified reason for each infraction I've given and I wouldn't have given any infraction if we hadn't seen name calling and trolling in response to my perfectly reasonable post.
I dislike giving infractions but that's the system we have and therefore I have no other choice than to work within it.
I dislike giving infractions but that's the system we have and therefore I have no other choice than to work within it.
that would probably have saved the last 2 pages of trolling off topic chat
Anyway back on topic
15 September 2008, 02:42 PM
#214
BANNED
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Your home is worthless.You can't afford to run your car.Your job is on the line.Schadenfreude rules.
Posts: 4,787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I suppose the salient point here isn't whether or not one should sign the petition (I wouldn't) but rather what possible good would it do?
It's entirely obvious to any impartial observer that public opinion isn't valued by the FIA or anyone else involved in the sport and that the only arbiter is power and who is wielding it.
It's entirely obvious to any impartial observer that public opinion isn't valued by the FIA or anyone else involved in the sport and that the only arbiter is power and who is wielding it.
15 September 2008, 02:54 PM
#215
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Runway two seven right.
Posts: 6,652
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I suppose the salient point here isn't whether or not one should sign the petition (I wouldn't) but rather what possible good would it do?
It's entirely obvious to any impartial observer that public opinion isn't valued by the FIA or anyone else involved in the sport and that the only arbiter is power and who is wielding it.
It's entirely obvious to any impartial observer that public opinion isn't valued by the FIA or anyone else involved in the sport and that the only arbiter is power and who is wielding it.
I'VE GOT THE POWER!!!
Copyright Snap 1990.
15 September 2008, 03:25 PM
#216
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Bring back infractions!
Posts: 4,554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Who got him banned this time? SNet is dull without the NACROs of this world, PSLewis was a troll and got his comeuppance, NACRO's contributions are far more entertaining, I wouldn't class it as trolling. Just you lot get upset when he runs ring around you intellectually so resort to the infraction button
15 September 2008, 03:28 PM
#217
Scooby Regular
Nacro got Nacro banned, end of story. Pillocks have a habit of getting themselves excluded from places
As for intelligence, would someone so clever spend all day long on a Subaru forum picking at it's members? Not my idea of fun.
As for intelligence, would someone so clever spend all day long on a Subaru forum picking at it's members? Not my idea of fun.
15 September 2008, 03:29 PM
#218
Scooby Regular
And, the only one infracting in this thread was the muppet himself, none of us did any infracting or banning, I magine the mods did that to cut down on their workload
15 September 2008, 03:31 PM
#219
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Runway two seven right.
Posts: 6,652
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Who got him banned this time? SNet is dull without the NACROs of this world, PSLewis was a troll and got his comeuppance, NACRO's contributions are far more entertaining, I wouldn't class it as trolling. Just you lot get upset when he runs ring around you intellectually so resort to the infraction button
Pete loves a wind up. People on here should be old enough to ignore it.
NACRO is a different animal. He's nasty, vindictive and clearly believes he's better than most on here. 99% of his posts attempt to belittle people on SN.
As for infractions, well I think he did Chris Purvis 3 times in 20 minutes today.
15 September 2008, 03:34 PM
#220
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Somewhere in Kent, sniffing some V-Power
Posts: 15,029
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That's your opinion.
Pete loves a wind up. People on here should be old enough to ignore it.
NACRO is a different animal. He's nasty, vindictive and clearly believes he's better than most on here. 99% of his posts attempt to belittle people on SN.
As for infractions, well I think he did Chris Purvis 3 times in 20 minutes today.
Pete loves a wind up. People on here should be old enough to ignore it.
NACRO is a different animal. He's nasty, vindictive and clearly believes he's better than most on here. 99% of his posts attempt to belittle people on SN.
As for infractions, well I think he did Chris Purvis 3 times in 20 minutes today.
15 September 2008, 04:00 PM
#223
Scooby Regular
That's your opinion.
Pete loves a wind up. People on here should be old enough to ignore it.
NACRO is a different animal. He's nasty, vindictive and clearly believes he's better than most on here. 99% of his posts attempt to belittle people on SN.
As for infractions, well I think he did Chris Purvis 3 times in 20 minutes today.
Pete loves a wind up. People on here should be old enough to ignore it.
NACRO is a different animal. He's nasty, vindictive and clearly believes he's better than most on here. 99% of his posts attempt to belittle people on SN.
As for infractions, well I think he did Chris Purvis 3 times in 20 minutes today.
Pete is a brillliant and funny wind up merchant, who is probably a nice chap in real life. Nacro is a silly little vindictive, horrible person who I imagine is a very nasty piece of work in the real world.
The 2 couldn't be further apart if you tried. SN needs Pete, nothing needs the likes of Nacro.
16 September 2008, 01:52 PM
#226
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 39,877
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I was surprised nevertheless that you felt you had to do that rather than speak up for yourself which you are perfectly capable of doing.
Les
Last edited by Leslie; 16 September 2008 at 01:55 PM.
17 September 2008, 03:10 PM
#228
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Disco, Disco!
Posts: 21,825
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That's your opinion.
Pete loves a wind up. People on here should be old enough to ignore it.
NACRO is a different animal. He's nasty, vindictive and clearly believes he's better than most on here. 99% of his posts attempt to belittle people on SN.
As for infractions, well I think he did Chris Purvis 3 times in 20 minutes today.
Pete loves a wind up. People on here should be old enough to ignore it.
NACRO is a different animal. He's nasty, vindictive and clearly believes he's better than most on here. 99% of his posts attempt to belittle people on SN.
As for infractions, well I think he did Chris Purvis 3 times in 20 minutes today.
17 September 2008, 03:38 PM
#229
Scooby Regular
Hmm.. I disagree.
Pete reguritates the same, tedious crap over and over, whereas Nacro likes to spar on a more intelligent level (than many on here, inlcuding our "old" webmaster(s)) appear to be able to cope with.
being entirely honest, Paul, which of the two would you rather go for a beer with?
Pete reguritates the same, tedious crap over and over, whereas Nacro likes to spar on a more intelligent level (than many on here, inlcuding our "old" webmaster(s)) appear to be able to cope with.
being entirely honest, Paul, which of the two would you rather go for a beer with?
17 September 2008, 06:03 PM
#230
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Disco, Disco!
Posts: 21,825
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hmm.. I disagree.
Pete reguritates the same, tedious crap over and over, whereas Nacro likes to spar on a more intelligent level (than many on here, inlcuding our "old" webmaster(s)) appear to be able to cope with.
being entirely honest, Paul, which of the two would you rather go for a beer with?
Pete reguritates the same, tedious crap over and over, whereas Nacro likes to spar on a more intelligent level (than many on here, inlcuding our "old" webmaster(s)) appear to be able to cope with.
being entirely honest, Paul, which of the two would you rather go for a beer with?
IMHO of course
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
johnfelstead
ScoobyNet General
27
26 February 2001 05:48 PM