Mr I.Legal
#62
#65
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: in a place where there lots of rocks to chuck at feejits
Posts: 1,854
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#73
Guest
Posts: n/a
Don't be daft we all know the infraction system works a treat, or so we will be told for the millionth time It's the community speaking don't you know!
Fair play to the OP for taking it on the chin, very amusing until the spineless infractors jumped in again where they weren't needed or wanted.
#74
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Runway two seven right.
Posts: 6,652
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Don't be daft we all know the infraction system works a treat, or so we will be told for the millionth time It's the community speaking don't you know!
Fair play to the OP for taking it on the chin, very amusing until the spineless infractors jumped in again where they weren't needed or wanted.
Fair play to the OP for taking it on the chin, very amusing until the spineless infractors jumped in again where they weren't needed or wanted.
#84
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Somewhere in Glasgow
Posts: 614
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
lol cant believe a have an infraction for this!!
I was merely pointing out that he is a dear beloved member of the scoobynet forum.
Please retract the infraction
I was merely pointing out that he is a dear beloved member of the scoobynet forum.
Please retract the infraction
#85
Scooby Regular
Yup - looks that way.
And one who infracts when any suggestion, no matter how tenuous or light hearted, is made that the poster generating the amusement is in some way mentally disabled.
Ironically, contrary to what one must assume are the infractor's best intentions, it just adds flame to that particular fire (as clearly evidenced on this thread).
Full marks to the OP for holding his hands up though
And one who infracts when any suggestion, no matter how tenuous or light hearted, is made that the poster generating the amusement is in some way mentally disabled.
Ironically, contrary to what one must assume are the infractor's best intentions, it just adds flame to that particular fire (as clearly evidenced on this thread).
Full marks to the OP for holding his hands up though
Last edited by Devildog; 23 October 2008 at 05:43 PM.
#86
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: S.E London
Posts: 13,654
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#88
This thread is a prime example of the infraction system being taken to extremes.
You just can't begin imagine what a sad, petty life some of the people giving out these infractions must lead.
Perhaps if they left their keyboard a bit more, and stepped outside into the big, wide world, they'd have a better idea what a bit of banter was about.
Still, if dishing out infractions is the only way they'll be getting any sexual gratification today, then who are we to disagree
You just can't begin imagine what a sad, petty life some of the people giving out these infractions must lead.
Perhaps if they left their keyboard a bit more, and stepped outside into the big, wide world, they'd have a better idea what a bit of banter was about.
Still, if dishing out infractions is the only way they'll be getting any sexual gratification today, then who are we to disagree
#89
Scooby Regular
The best you'll get is probably some bollocks about the posts being in horrendously and unacceptably bad taste, (or, rather more accurately, some sanctimoneously worded question in the same line) rather than the original infractor being told to get a grip and this avoid escalating the "retarded" line as has now happened.