Notices
ScoobyNet General General Subaru Discussion

Police taking photo of wife

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 19 October 2008, 10:42 PM
  #31  
STi_Si
Scooby Regular
 
STi_Si's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: West Mids
Posts: 471
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by andy97
It's all down to targets. Another crime solved and the coffers filled a little more!
Complete cobblers...... very few minor traffic offences are recordable crimes so nothing to do with targets. Reading this type of thread yet again highlights how little a lot of people know but are quite prepared to gob off about it.
Old 19 October 2008, 10:47 PM
  #32  
Terminator X
Owner of SNet
iTrader: (7)
 
Terminator X's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Berkshire
Posts: 11,513
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

^^ Why do the Rozzers bother with such petty issues then fella? All it does is ruin their reputation a little bit more every time

TX.
Old 19 October 2008, 10:53 PM
  #33  
STi_Si
Scooby Regular
 
STi_Si's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: West Mids
Posts: 471
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Terminator X
^^ Why do the Rozzers bother with such petty issues then fella? All it does is ruin their reputation a little bit more every time

TX.
Traffic officers are there purely to deal with traffic offences, maybe a student officer completing relevant competencies for their development, particular neighbourhood officers concentrating on traffic offences in their area, do you want me to go on?
Old 20 October 2008, 10:32 AM
  #34  
Devils.Advocate
Scooby Regular
 
Devils.Advocate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: lurking for ages without a lot to say
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Who defines it as Petty?

A Law is a Law

and why do people have to resort to name calling on this thread
an opinion is an opinion and IMHO right or wrong why call someone a ********?
Old 20 October 2008, 12:11 PM
  #35  
Peanuts
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (15)
 
Peanuts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 8,606
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

how come the JDM posts received an infraction?
Was it simply that s/he took a different view from the fact that the OP wanted everybody to say, "wow, thats harsh, God, what a bummer?"

At the end of the day you broke a law, that is the black and white undisputable fact, it carries a penalty and you have to pay.
Old 20 October 2008, 12:26 PM
  #36  
billythekid
Scooby Regular
 
billythekid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,574
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

To answer the question in the first post.... no there is no law to stop anyone using a camera in a public place.

So she was just as within her rights to get her phone out and take a photo of him taking a photo of her

There are a couple of bits of law that would cause you to be asked what you are doing when it comes to photos though just for completeness before someone pipes up... (OSA and Terrorism Act) but in all reality this is not going to happen on a normal street (although some misguided CPSOs have been known to do silly things).

Also, you should note privacy and obstruction laws - and harassment - but I am only mentioning these for completeness. Basically if you are in a public place, and the subject is in a public place its a free for all. Within reason.

Please note the above is all in a public place, private property is another ball game.
Old 20 October 2008, 12:50 PM
  #37  
speedking
Scooby Regular
 
speedking's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Warrington
Posts: 4,554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Exclamation

Although you may want to consider the following before whipping out your phone first article and Daily Mail. But if you've done nothing wrong, you've got nothing to fear

Last edited by speedking; 20 October 2008 at 12:51 PM. Reason: speeling mostake
Old 20 October 2008, 01:17 PM
  #38  
GC8
Scooby Regular
 
GC8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sheffield; Rome of the North
Posts: 17,582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Devils.Advocate
Who defines it as Petty?

A Law is a Law

and why do people have to resort to name calling on this thread
an opinion is an opinion and IMHO right or wrong why call someone a ********?
Rather obviously, the issue here is that the officer demanded that the woman sit in his car and leave the child unattended: which he does not have the authority to do. I dont believe that he can insist on taking her picture either.
Old 20 October 2008, 03:25 PM
  #39  
IainMilford
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (15)
 
IainMilford's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: In the garage
Posts: 3,925
Received 90 Likes on 63 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jaywrxsti
i got pulled last week for having 3d letters (on when got car) and the front one in the windscreen . all i got was 14 days to change them and prove it (mot stamp on form) he took pics of my car as well.
I thought 3d letters were legal
Old 20 October 2008, 04:43 PM
  #40  
STi_Si
Scooby Regular
 
STi_Si's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: West Mids
Posts: 471
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GC8
Rather obviously, the issue here is that the officer demanded that the woman sit in his car and leave the child unattended: which he does not have the authority to do. I dont believe that he can insist on taking her picture either.
Re-reading the OP, don't think the officer 'demanded' or 'insisted' on anything, more likely 'requested'. A lot of forces are now taking photos when dealing with people for minor offences, as is usual in custody following arrest.

Originally Posted by IainMilford
I thought 3d letters were legal
Afraid not, check the DVLA link....

Last edited by STi_Si; 20 October 2008 at 04:49 PM. Reason: added
Old 20 October 2008, 05:33 PM
  #41  
IainMilford
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (15)
 
IainMilford's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: In the garage
Posts: 3,925
Received 90 Likes on 63 Posts
Default

my letters are exactly the same shape and size as standard legal lettering, and from a distance look exactly the same, only when you get close can you see they are 3d. The website I got them from had them in the legal lettering section and I've had police cars behind me and not been pulled over .....
Old 20 October 2008, 05:37 PM
  #42  
IainMilford
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (15)
 
IainMilford's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: In the garage
Posts: 3,925
Received 90 Likes on 63 Posts
Default

back on topic ... I've not heard of police being able or allowed to take photos roadside, but in this day and age it doesn't suprise me either
Old 20 October 2008, 06:45 PM
  #43  
Terminator X
Owner of SNet
iTrader: (7)
 
Terminator X's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Berkshire
Posts: 11,513
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Shall I look it up in the OD for you

If the Police went after us for every Law break we'd all be banged up for life! Some are serious hence worth pursuing others are petty & aren't.

TX.

Originally Posted by Devils.Advocate
Who defines it as Petty?
Old 20 October 2008, 07:03 PM
  #44  
fatherpierre
Scooby Regular
 
fatherpierre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Surrey/London borders.
Posts: 8,300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Words of advice would have been better.

At least the numbe plates weren't removed and seized as evidence. That would really have been nasty!
Old 20 October 2008, 07:24 PM
  #45  
StickyMicky
Scooby Regular
 
StickyMicky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Zed Ess Won Hay Tee
Posts: 21,611
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jaywrxsti
i got pulled last week for having 3d letters (on when got car) and the front one in the windscreen . all i got was 14 days to change them and prove it (mot stamp on form) he took pics of my car as well.
3d letters are illegal?

if they are the stock typeface and are in black, how can they be illegal?
Old 20 October 2008, 07:27 PM
  #46  
StickyMicky
Scooby Regular
 
StickyMicky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Zed Ess Won Hay Tee
Posts: 21,611
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Road Legal Number Plates

There are only two fonts permitted on road legal number plates - standard (plain legal) and 3D font. Personalisation, non-standard images, or honeycomb backing are no longer legal. The spacing of the numbers and letters in your registration must match that printed in your V5C logbook (registration document). If you want to know the legal requirements for road legal plates then please visit the DVLA website.
3d plates should be legal ?!?

actually, this thread concerns me a little as i put an order in for some new plates today, the letters are in a carbon effect, and i specifically asked them if they were road legal, and i was told they were


had to do the whole thing with the logbook/licence and stuff when ordering them.

reason i wanted them, was that my front plate has a crack in it, and the new ones are on special offer complete with the GB badge on the side for £10 a pair, figured it would probably cost the best part of a tenner for them ****e GB stickers you need when driving in europe anyway!!

link to said plates


even says they are legal on the website as well (i spoke to the sales lad in person)

Last edited by StickyMicky; 20 October 2008 at 07:34 PM.
Old 20 October 2008, 10:47 PM
  #47  
GC8
Scooby Regular
 
GC8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sheffield; Rome of the North
Posts: 17,582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by STi_Si
Re-reading the OP, don't think the officer 'demanded' or 'insisted' on anything, more likely 'requested'. A lot of forces are now taking photos when dealing with people for minor offences, as is usual in custody following arrest.
It is far from certain, I will concede that. I can only go on what the OP said and the impression that is given: from that I would conclude that she did not want to.

With regards to fonts, when the law changed with the introduction of the new format registered numbers, existing plates were not covered. I believe that this was retrospectively changed more recently.
Old 22 October 2008, 11:27 AM
  #48  
Andy Stocker
Scooby Regular
 
Andy Stocker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hertfordshire
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by fatherpierre
Words of advice would have been better.

At least the numbe plates weren't removed and seized as evidence. That would really have been nasty!
That happened to me down Southend back in my younger days!
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
slimwiltaz
General Technical
20
09 October 2015 07:40 PM
Littleted
Non Scooby Related
6
02 October 2015 11:31 AM
nik52wrx
Non Scooby Related
4
29 September 2015 05:38 PM
madmover
Member's Gallery
4
28 September 2015 10:46 AM
Littleted
Computer & Technology Related
4
25 September 2015 09:55 PM



Quick Reply: Police taking photo of wife



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:38 AM.