View Poll Results: Is Scoobynet better since being owned by Internet Brands
Yes
9
5.06%
The Same
32
17.98%
No
137
76.97%
Voters: 178. You may not vote on this poll
Is Scoobynet better since Internet Brands took over
That's a terrible thing to say, I'm shocked 
12 November 2008, 08:36 AM
#365
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Runway two seven right.
Posts: 6,652
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
12 November 2008, 09:01 AM
#369
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Zed Ess Won Hay Tee
Posts: 21,611
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
awghhh this is great, its almost like the olden days, when men were men, admins were trannies, and nobody infracted 
all we need now is a bit off "the clocks go forward tomorrow" malarkey and it will be perfect
class thread
all we need now is a bit off "the clocks go forward tomorrow" malarkey and it will be perfect
class thread
12 November 2008, 09:13 AM
#374
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: GC8 Enthusiast - Scumball3000 Team 69
Posts: 2,002
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Especially when you consider that the person I had to trust to deal with the infractions properly was in colusion with the two advertisers giving them.
I received an infraction on this account for suggesting that a 40yr old who lives with his mother and plays computer games was jealous that Paul Palmer had some mates. His original reply deserved an infraction by that standard and it was worth it to tell him what I thought.
I received an infraction on this account for suggesting that a 40yr old who lives with his mother and plays computer games was jealous that Paul Palmer had some mates. His original reply deserved an infraction by that standard and it was worth it to tell him what I thought.
12 November 2008, 09:13 AM
#375
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Billy Smarts
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I see what you mean though, once you get through the pages of sticky threads about infractions and actually get to a post about an infraction, the infractored isn't treated like something that one has just stood in
12 November 2008, 09:14 AM
#376
BANNED
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: In my own little world
Posts: 9,644
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
12 November 2008, 09:28 AM
#379
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: lurking for ages without a lot to say
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Stu has actually made good in roads into some of the issues and your rude attitude is neither helpful or wanted IMHO
I am sure Stu can see through you
DO us a favour and move on
12 November 2008, 09:31 AM
#380
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: GC8 Enthusiast - Scumball3000 Team 69
Posts: 2,002
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Negatively rating his post (the most useless feature ever introduced) and then infracting him doesnt help though does it? In fact it probably pisses him off even more.
12 November 2008, 09:34 AM
#383
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: lurking for ages without a lot to say
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
12 November 2008, 09:38 AM
#384
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: GC8 Enthusiast - Scumball3000 Team 69
Posts: 2,002
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I was going to say in my first reply that ridng the first person from IB to express any interest in mending the damage done by earlier mismanagement, was foolish. Especially considering a few of Stew's pissed off posts where he was wondering wether the 'problems' were returning and if the infraction system might actually be worthwhile (it isnt).
That said, a petty infraction like this only stokes the fire: doesnt it?
That said, a petty infraction like this only stokes the fire: doesnt it?
Last edited by Simon 69; 12 November 2008 at 09:40 AM.
12 November 2008, 09:40 AM
#387
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: S.E London
Posts: 13,654
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Bye Luke, its been emotional........... for someone by the looks of things.
Im sure Stu said something back on about page 4 that said something about staying on topic...
I would just like to authenticate this thread...
Im sure Stu said something back on about page 4 that said something about staying on topic...
I would just like to authenticate this thread...