Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related
View Poll Results: Is Scoobynet better since being owned by Internet Brands
Yes
9
5.06%
The Same
32
17.98%
No
137
76.97%
Voters: 178. You may not vote on this poll

Is Scoobynet better since Internet Brands took over

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12 November 2008, 02:55 PM
  #451  
Devildog
Scooby Regular
 
Devildog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Away from this place
Posts: 4,430
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

ps - is there any chance we can keep this thread on track, and those posting "pish" - you know who you are - keep it in muppets?

Ta
Devildog is offline  
Old 12 November 2008, 03:00 PM
  #452  
Lee247
SN Fairy Godmother
 
Lee247's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Far Far Away
Posts: 35,246
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Devildog
ps - is there any chance we can keep this thread on track, and those posting "pish" - you know who you are - keep it in muppets?

Ta
Sorry. I've got to go back to work now anyway
Lee247 is offline  
Old 12 November 2008, 03:01 PM
  #453  
ronjeramy
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
ronjeramy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Cas Vegas
Posts: 7,833
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 84of300
Sorry. I've got to go back to work now anyway
Swearer
ronjeramy is offline  
Old 12 November 2008, 03:03 PM
  #454  
eggsburt nobacon
Scooby Regular
 
eggsburt nobacon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Billy Smarts
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Devildog
ps - is there any chance we can keep this thread on track, and those posting "pish" - you know who you are - keep it in muppets?

Ta

Hmm, okay, but only seeing as it's you

As my legal representitive I nominate TelBoy, he knows some big words and could bore for England. I'll be in the hutch should anyone need to reinstate my original me
eggsburt nobacon is offline  
Old 12 November 2008, 03:09 PM
  #455  
Devils.Advocate
Scooby Regular
 
Devils.Advocate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: lurking for ages without a lot to say
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Simple Polite request to take the "pish" to Muppets

Followed by 3 "pish" posts

and you want Infractions removed !!!
Devils.Advocate is offline  
Old 12 November 2008, 03:23 PM
  #456  
Phil
Track Day Organiser
 
Phil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: SX
Posts: 23,377
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Devildog
I thought about that, but I believe they differ in that RTM's are (or should be) there for posts that merit significant editing or deletion - ****, spam, serious verbal abuse, etc, etc,

Whereas infractions are (or should be) more a slap on the wrist for users which can result in a ban if the poster continues to cross the line. so many strikes and your out, rather than the RTM system for posts that require urgent moderator intervention.

Of course, where that line is drawn is subjective, hence the requirement to have someone who fully understands the terms and conditions to rubber stamp the infraction.


Just throwing some more thoughts in
I see what your saying but couldn't the mod make that call?
Phil is offline  
Old 12 November 2008, 03:30 PM
  #457  
eggsburt nobacon
Scooby Regular
 
eggsburt nobacon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Billy Smarts
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Devils.Advocate
Simple Polite request to take the "pish" to Muppets

Followed by 3 "pish" posts

and you want Infractions removed !!!
That was totally uncalled for, we said we'd stay out, could you now have been happy with that?
eggsburt nobacon is offline  
Old 12 November 2008, 03:34 PM
  #458  
TelBoy
Scooby Regular
 
TelBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: God's promised land
Posts: 80,907
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I simply fail to see what your post rating "statement" there is supposed to achieve, Devil's Advocate. Like infractions, i think it's precisely that sort of anonymous judgment which has led people to avoid this place these days. Do you not see it the same way??
TelBoy is offline  
Old 12 November 2008, 03:42 PM
  #459  
StickyMicky
Scooby Regular
 
StickyMicky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Zed Ess Won Hay Tee
Posts: 21,611
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

just been in policy
yeah, puffs in charge
man for the job

i nearby name you "puffclown"
StickyMicky is offline  
Old 12 November 2008, 03:44 PM
  #460  
ronjeramy
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
ronjeramy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Cas Vegas
Posts: 7,833
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Tel its pathetic, make a couple off topic posts and get neg'd for it, all the more reason to leave it to the mods, if any.

Last edited by ronjeramy; 12 November 2008 at 04:25 PM. Reason: missed the word "topic" ooops :-S
ronjeramy is offline  
Old 12 November 2008, 03:45 PM
  #461  
Devildog
Scooby Regular
 
Devildog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Away from this place
Posts: 4,430
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by phil
I see what your saying but couldn't the mod make that call?
Arguably, given enough mods and enough time, but mods can't read every thread, let alone every post.

If you then rely on the RTM function to notify the moderators, there exists the potential to overburden the RTM function, meaning important stuff, as mentioned above, could get missed.

Especially now as Scoobynet has a culture of "self policing" and not all of it in a good way.

I don't know the answer, only time will tell.
Devildog is offline  
Old 12 November 2008, 03:51 PM
  #462  
Devildog
Scooby Regular
 
Devildog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Away from this place
Posts: 4,430
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by ronjeramy
Tel its pathetic, make a couple off posts and get neg'd for it, all the more reason to leave it to the mods, if any.

Playing devils advocate here (in the true sense of the word, not a Scoobynet poster), was there any purpose or point whatsoever to your "swearer" post though?

Other than to post for the sake of it? On a point which only muppet posters understand?

Which is fine in muppets but is out of context here and, I would suggest, is likely to reinforce the need for post ratings rather than the other way around as you have alluded to?
Devildog is offline  
Old 12 November 2008, 03:57 PM
  #463  
SwissTony
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (19)
 
SwissTony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: In the Doghouse
Posts: 28,228
Received 12 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ronjeramy
Tel its pathetic, make a couple off posts and get neg'd for it, all the more reason to leave it to the mods, if any.
good idea
SwissTony is offline  
Old 12 November 2008, 04:07 PM
  #464  
ronjeramy
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
ronjeramy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Cas Vegas
Posts: 7,833
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Devildog i can see both sides of the coin, with regards to my "swearer" post, but it hardly took the thread off topic, yes it was a muppet joke, but the point is, ignore it, its harmless enough, or are posts in NSR devoid of any humour?
ronjeramy is offline  
Old 12 November 2008, 04:11 PM
  #465  
TelBoy
Scooby Regular
 
TelBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: God's promised land
Posts: 80,907
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Devildog
Playing devils advocate here (in the true sense of the word, not a Scoobynet poster), was there any purpose or point whatsoever to your "swearer" post though?

Other than to post for the sake of it? On a point which only muppet posters understand?

Which is fine in muppets but is out of context here and, I would suggest, is likely to reinforce the need for post ratings rather than the other way around as you have alluded to?
I just don't agree mate (whether or not i would, as it were). It's not a thread about a mass murder or something, it's a relatively lightweight discussion. I could find you lots of threads in NSR which have been trivialised beyond what i think is appropriate, but is an anonymous "I judge you" system the answer? No, i think a chill pill is probably the better way to go, unless it's blatanly to the detriment of the thread.
TelBoy is offline  
Old 12 November 2008, 04:14 PM
  #466  
Spoon
Scooby Regular
 
Spoon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Logged Out
Posts: 10,221
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wink

As DD morphs slowly back into Diablo even before being appointed.
Spoon is offline  
Old 12 November 2008, 04:27 PM
  #467  
Evolution Stu
Administrator
Support Scoobynet!
iTrader: (2)
 
Evolution Stu's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Blackpool, Uk. Destination: Rev Limiter.
Posts: 4,464
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

This seems to have turned into a topic about the infraction system now. Are there no other issues with the forum you would like to discuss or are you all pretty happy once the forum bugs are sorted out?
Evolution Stu is offline  
Old 12 November 2008, 04:34 PM
  #468  
Devils.Advocate
Scooby Regular
 
Devils.Advocate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: lurking for ages without a lot to say
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TelBoy
I just don't agree mate (whether or not i would, as it were). It's not a thread about a mass murder or something, it's a relatively lightweight discussion. I could find you lots of threads in NSR which have been trivialised beyond what i think is appropriate, but is an anonymous "I judge you" system the answer? No, i think a chill pill is probably the better way to go, unless it's blatanly to the detriment of the thread.
It may be lightweight for you but I am interested in where this site goes in the future unlike a lot of you guys that have just returned because Simon has stepped down
Devils.Advocate is offline  
Old 12 November 2008, 04:34 PM
  #469  
Phil
Track Day Organiser
 
Phil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: SX
Posts: 23,377
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Devildog
Arguably, given enough mods and enough time, but mods can't read every thread, let alone every post.

If you then rely on the RTM function to notify the moderators, there exists the potential to overburden the RTM function, meaning important stuff, as mentioned above, could get missed.

Especially now as Scoobynet has a culture of "self policing" and not all of it in a good way.

I don't know the answer, only time will tell.
No mate I don't mean that you have to read every thread just those that are reported

If its not reported then it doesn't need a possible infraction
Phil is offline  
Old 12 November 2008, 04:36 PM
  #470  
Simon 69
Scooby Regular
 
Simon 69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: GC8 Enthusiast - Scumball3000 Team 69
Posts: 2,002
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by OP
Is Scoobynet better since Internet Brands took over?
Policy is certainly better since James took over!
Simon 69 is offline  
Old 12 November 2008, 04:38 PM
  #471  
TelBoy
Scooby Regular
 
TelBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: God's promised land
Posts: 80,907
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Devils.Advocate
It may be lightweight for you but I am interested in where this site goes in the future unlike a lot of you guys that have just returned because Simon has stepped down
We didn't like the way he ran the place, like a lot of other people i'm guessing. I don't think any of the central messages in this thread have been lost on account of a few flippant posts. In fact as i mentioned, i think it highlights what had become a major irritation for many people - being "judged" by people hidden behind a computer screen. In SN's heyday, if you wanted to say something, you said it, not ticked a little bloody box pink or green. The RTM function is there, it just needs to be supported in the right way.
TelBoy is offline  
Old 12 November 2008, 04:38 PM
  #472  
ronjeramy
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
ronjeramy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Cas Vegas
Posts: 7,833
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Phil exactly what i thought, it worked well with the RTM function
ronjeramy is offline  
Old 12 November 2008, 04:39 PM
  #473  
Lee247
SN Fairy Godmother
 
Lee247's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Far Far Away
Posts: 35,246
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Devils.Advocate
Simple Polite request to take the "pish" to Muppets

Followed by 3 "pish" posts

and you want Infractions removed !!!

Excuse me!!!

I made a polite apology to DD. Even Stu has been making the odd light hearted remark as most people have.

This has been a very interesting and entertaining thread. All of which has helped iron out quite a few problems. Even with the odd bit of banter thrown in
Lee247 is offline  
Old 12 November 2008, 04:41 PM
  #474  
Devils.Advocate
Scooby Regular
 
Devils.Advocate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: lurking for ages without a lot to say
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TelBoy
We didn't like the way he ran the place, like a lot of other people i'm guessing. I don't think any of the central messages in this thread have been lost on account of a few flippant posts. In fact as i mentioned, i think it highlights what had become a major irritation for many people - being "judged" by people hidden behind a computer screen. In SN's heyday, if you wanted to say something, you said it, not ticked a little bloody box pink or green. The RTM function is there, it just needs to be supported in the right way.
wouldn't argue that but why do we have to have the inane[sp?] waffle buy a few on a serious thread
Devils.Advocate is offline  
Old 12 November 2008, 04:41 PM
  #475  
fatherpierre
Scooby Regular
 
fatherpierre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Surrey/London borders.
Posts: 8,300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Maybe you should infract for that?
fatherpierre is offline  
Old 12 November 2008, 04:43 PM
  #476  
Devils.Advocate
Scooby Regular
 
Devils.Advocate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: lurking for ages without a lot to say
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 84of300
Excuse me!!!

I made a polite apology to DD. Even Stu has been making the odd light hearted remark as most people have.

This has been a very interesting and entertaining thread. All of which has helped iron out quite a few problems. Even with the odd bit of banter thrown in
Banter no problem but chatting between yourselves is annoying
sorry if this is coming across rudely its not meant that way
Devils.Advocate is offline  
Old 12 November 2008, 04:45 PM
  #477  
fatherpierre
Scooby Regular
 
fatherpierre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Surrey/London borders.
Posts: 8,300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Devils.Advocate
Banter no problem but chatting between yourselves is annoying
sorry if this is coming across rudely its not meant that way
When you buy the site you can dictate to people.

Until then, maybe a winding in of the neck?
fatherpierre is offline  
Old 12 November 2008, 04:45 PM
  #478  
TelBoy
Scooby Regular
 
TelBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: God's promised land
Posts: 80,907
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Devils.Advocate
wouldn't argue that but why do we have to have the inane[sp?] waffle buy a few on a serious thread
Because people know each other, and just like in any real-life conversation, people throw in the occasional aside. I really don't see the problem with it unless the thread becomes a trivial ping pong lasting more than a few posts (again as per quite a few previous NSR threads i could point you to). What does ticking a box pink do? Apart from make you feel self-righteous? If a thread deviates too much, RTM it, let the mods decide.
TelBoy is offline  
Old 12 November 2008, 04:47 PM
  #479  
nogettingridofme
Scooby Newbie
 
nogettingridofme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Stu @ Internet Brands
This seems to have turned into a topic about the infraction system now. Are there no other issues with the forum you would like to discuss or are you all pretty happy once the forum bugs are sorted out?
There is a very good reason why it has turned into a debate over the Infraction system ........ it is pretty much universally hated.

Dump the Infraction system and you will have a happier Forum - it really is that simple!
nogettingridofme is offline  
Old 12 November 2008, 04:48 PM
  #480  
Devils.Advocate
Scooby Regular
 
Devils.Advocate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: lurking for ages without a lot to say
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by fatherpierre
When you buy the site you can dictate to people.

Until then, maybe a winding in of the neck?
I am not dictating so please feel free to wind yours in I had apologised if my point was coming across wrong
Devils.Advocate is offline  


Quick Reply: Is Scoobynet better since Internet Brands took over



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:34 AM.