Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related

BBC - so much for impartiality

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 25 January 2009, 12:00 AM
  #31  
hodgy0_2
Scooby Regular
 
hodgy0_2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: K
Posts: 15,633
Received 21 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by hodgy0_2
the fact is the Isreali,s have slaughtered 100's on innocent children, using chemical weapons to target them


Originally Posted by cster
"At least three white phosphorus shells hit the UN compound, where 700 civilians fleeing the fighting were sheltering, wounding three staff members and producing clouds of black smoke.

Israel issued a rapid apology for the strike, saying it was a "grave mistake", as UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon spoke of his outrage at the attack."


it just the facts -- you might not like it, but there it is israel using chemical weapons against civilians
Old 25 January 2009, 12:00 AM
  #32  
cster
Scooby Regular
 
cster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,753
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by f1_fan
You really think that You must live in a parallel universe to me.

Look we aren't going to see eye to eye on this. You convenienlty forget the odd Israeli trotting out the 'one Jew is worth thousand Arabs' mantra as well as forgetting all the little Isareli indiscretions I pointed out.

Most of all though I think you have no comprehension of how desperate the average Palestinian's life is and has been for many years. So desperate that to many of them even putting a terrorist organisation in power can seem like a good idea. Sorry, but that is the way it is in Gaza.
I can see that you have spent more time in Gaza than many of us here.
It is indeed good to see you have taken the time to bump into the "odd Israeli", and had time for a chat.
I personally am very grateful for the enlightenment you provide on this seemingly complex issue.
I understand that the last few weeks have been a "great victory for Hamas".
What is your view on this point?
I am also curious as to how many "victories for Hamas" you think the Gazan civilian population can take?

Last edited by cster; 25 January 2009 at 12:08 AM.
Old 25 January 2009, 12:04 AM
  #33  
cster
Scooby Regular
 
cster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,753
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by hodgy0_2
Originally Posted by hodgy0_2
the fact is the Isreali,s have slaughtered 100's on innocent children, using chemical weapons to target them




"At least three white phosphorus shells hit the UN compound, where 700 civilians fleeing the fighting were sheltering, wounding three staff members and producing clouds of black smoke.

Israel issued a rapid apology for the strike, saying it was a "grave mistake", as UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon spoke of his outrage at the attack."


it just the facts -- you might not like it, but there it is israel using chemical weapons against civilians
Sorry, in trying to make sense of your post and I erroneously got the impression you were saying the Israelis were targetting children!
My mistake
Old 25 January 2009, 12:07 AM
  #34  
rr_ww
Scooby Regular
 
rr_ww's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Croydon (ish)
Posts: 1,887
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ScoTTyB
I respect the BBC's decision. Hard for you to believe since alot of you think the BBC is just the government propaganda machine, but it's a highly respected news service throughout the world. If many other channels are already running the Gaza pledge then why does it matter if the BBC do not.

I think alot of you underestimate how important it is for a news service to appear impartial, especially one with the reputation it has.
Exactly. If a broadcaster is pissing off the government for not doing as its told. Then Im all for it.

Originally Posted by Diesel
Yeah! Maybe they should just calm down a bit, stop getting so emotional and stroppy in their stinky refugee camps and maybe vote LIKUD or Green Party

Have you ZERO empathy pal? Or do you always just roll over???

D

TBH I don't really care either way. I'd like to see that region peaceful. But it's never going to happen. Arabs hate Jews. Jews hate Arabs. And so on and son on. Do you think if Israel poured even MORE money into helping the people of Gaza (and they do because they send medical staff) do you really forsee the suicide bombings or the hostility ending?


Here's a vid I saw the other day. Sums it up to me. Even when the Israelis help. They still get attacked. They simply can't win. And the cycle will continue forever.

Warzone Hospital // Current
Old 25 January 2009, 12:20 AM
  #35  
Diesel
Scooby Regular
 
Diesel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,280
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by cster
I can see that you have spent more time in Gaza than many of us here.
It is indeed good to see you have taken the time to bump into the "odd Israeli", and had time for a chat.
I personally am very grateful for the enlightenment you provide on this seemingly complex issue.
I understand that the last few weeks have been a "great victory for Hamas".
What is your view on this point?
I am also curious as to how many "victories for Hamas" you think the Gazan civilian population can take?
What a cr@p sarcastic post for an otherwise intelligent guy.

D
Old 25 January 2009, 12:29 AM
  #36  
Diesel
Scooby Regular
 
Diesel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,280
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rr_ww
TBH I don't really care either way. I'd like to see that region peaceful. But it's never going to happen. Arabs hate Jews. Jews hate Arabs. And so on and son on. Do you think if Israel poured even MORE money into helping the people of Gaza (and they do because they send medical staff) do you really forsee the suicide bombings or the hostility ending?


Here's a vid I saw the other day. Sums it up to me. Even when the Israelis help. They still get attacked. They simply can't win. And the cycle will continue forever.

Warzone Hospital // Current
Yo DO care mate - you said you want it more peaceful. Do you feel weaker saying that than purporting to be ambivalent????

I watched the vid in full. Great to see. If only the majority of Israelis with bombs had the compassion of the Israeli minority with scalpels...

D
Old 25 January 2009, 10:00 AM
  #37  
f1_fan
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
f1_fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: .
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by cster
I can see that you have spent more time in Gaza than many of us here.
It is indeed good to see you have taken the time to bump into the "odd Israeli", and had time for a chat.
I personally am very grateful for the enlightenment you provide on this seemingly complex issue.
I understand that the last few weeks have been a "great victory for Hamas".
What is your view on this point?
I am also curious as to how many "victories for Hamas" you think the Gazan civilian population can take?
I love sarcasm as much as the next man, but it is best used intelligently.

As for your reply just open your eyes for goodness sake.

You don't have to spend time in Gaza to see what is happening, you can get plenty of information from a variety of sources, some in one camp and some in the other and just take a view. My view after doing that over many years is as stated. If you don;t like it then that's fine, but I won;t be changing my opinion any tiem soom.

My point of the topic was, however, not to get involved in another Middle East conflict discussion but to point out that the BBC should be happy to back a humanitarian appeal. The fact that they aren't and are funded by taxation does not sit well with me. If they are pro-Israel then that is fine as long as I am not helping to fund them!!!
Old 25 January 2009, 10:11 AM
  #38  
Leslie
Scooby Regular
 
Leslie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 39,877
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I cannot see why the BBC can't publish an appeal for people in genuine hardship regardless of politics which should not be considered part of the equation anway.

Les
Old 25 January 2009, 10:13 AM
  #39  
boomer
Scooby Senior
 
boomer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: West Midlands
Posts: 5,763
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rr_ww
So long as next week they issue an appeal for the women and children of Israel who keep being bombarded by the 30-40 Hamas Un-guided rockets launched every single day!
rr_ww, where do you get the figures of 30 to 40 rockets per day??

According to the BBC...

Since 2001, when the rockets were first fired, more than 8,600 have hit southern Israel, nearly 6,000 of them since Israel withdrew from Gaza in August 2005.
So doing the maths, 8600/(7*365) = 3.4 - Just over three rockets, mortars, RPGs etc per day!

Even taking the figures since Israel withdrew, it is still only 6000/(3.5*365) = 4.7 per day!!

Your figures are out by a factor of ten!

mb
Old 25 January 2009, 01:02 PM
  #40  
greenonedave
Scooby Regular
 
greenonedave's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: romford
Posts: 669
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

1 a day is to many, the stuff they fire over is crap. The point is they still fire the bloody things
Old 25 January 2009, 04:06 PM
  #41  
Abdabz
Scooby Regular
 
Abdabz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Tellins, Home of Super Leagues finest, and where a "split" is not all it seems.
Posts: 5,504
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by greenonedave
Hammas are a party dedicated to the destruction of the state of Isreal.
The people of palestine vote in Hammas.
Hammas start firing missiles into Isreal.
Isreal fights back.
Isreal are now the bad guys !
Golda Myer said When the Palestinian people love their children more than they hate the Jews then there will be peace !
The BBC are right, This situation could have been avoided, I am quite sure if there was a natural occurance flood/drought then they should join in and help.
I couldnt agree more. I was hoping there would be a post in here that showed some level of sanity and here it is.

I am offended that someone has filmed this campaign and I am offended that some tv networks have agreed to show it. Add to that that I am offended that people are offended that BBC have done the right thing and you could say I am offended...
Old 25 January 2009, 07:07 PM
  #42  
Mus
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Mus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: will be back in another scooby in time....
Posts: 2,554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

scoobynet is full of thick uneducated narrow minded chavs who will never achieve anything in life, who just love to hate and discriminate in such a sly way, you will have better luck trying to educate a donkey


mus
Old 25 January 2009, 07:11 PM
  #43  
hodgy0_2
Scooby Regular
 
hodgy0_2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: K
Posts: 15,633
Received 21 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by cster
Sorry, in trying to make sense of your post and I erroneously got the impression you were saying the Israelis were targetting children!
My mistake
Gaza War, watch the brave israeli snipers, targets 4 kids, what if they were your kids?? - AOL Video

sorry it must be hard defending what the Israelis do in the occupied territories but evidence of isreali snipers shooting children is so widepread and documented

maybe not all the 300 odd children were killed by Israeli fire, maybe Hamas used some them as shields, maybe some of them shot each other playing with all the guns lying about
Old 25 January 2009, 09:18 PM
  #44  
Diesel
Scooby Regular
 
Diesel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,280
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by hodgy0_2
Gaza War, watch the brave israeli snipers, targets 4 kids, what if they were your kids?? - AOL Video

sorry it must be hard defending what the Israelis do in the occupied territories but evidence of isreali snipers shooting children is so widepread and documented

maybe not all the 300 odd children were killed by Israeli fire, maybe Hamas used some them as shields, maybe some of them shot each other playing with all the guns lying about
I'm not quite sure I take that video at face value mate - but that could be my utter denial that ANYONE could ever shoot toddlers like that. Maybe some of the less compassionate and more gung-ho Israeli supporters could comment?

D
Old 25 January 2009, 10:42 PM
  #45  
finalzero
Scooby Regular
 
finalzero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Buckinghamshire
Posts: 2,272
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

www.whatreallyhappened.com - enough links there to answer most of the posts - no to go back on topic, the actions of the BBC are not impartial, far from that.

They have blatantly shown which side they are on and not offered a valid explanation which is half the problem (wait that sounds very fimiliar).
Old 26 January 2009, 08:02 AM
  #46  
cster
Scooby Regular
 
cster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,753
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Back on post.
It doesn't really matter that whether the BBC are biased one way or the other.
The key thing is that the BBC wish to be seen as impartial.
The charity has got loads of free advertising for them.
Where the money will end up is another matter.
As many know, a large amount of Hamas's work is in social, welfare, cultural, and educational activities. I believe, this includes school and hospital construction.
This may be a stumbling block for some who think about what they can do in order to help Gazans.
Old 26 January 2009, 08:14 AM
  #47  
cster
Scooby Regular
 
cster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,753
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by hodgy0_2
Gaza War, watch the brave israeli snipers, targets 4 kids, what if they were your kids?? - AOL Video

sorry it must be hard defending what the Israelis do in the occupied territories but evidence of isreali snipers shooting children is so widepread and documented

maybe not all the 300 odd children were killed by Israeli fire, maybe Hamas used some them as shields, maybe some of them shot each other playing with all the guns lying about
Maybe all of them are possible.
You would either have to see what happened or assume.
F*cking tragic all the same.
Old 26 January 2009, 08:53 AM
  #48  
Diesel
Scooby Regular
 
Diesel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,280
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by finalzero
www.whatreallyhappened.com - enough links there to answer most of the posts - no to go back on topic, the actions of the BBC are not impartial, far from that.

They have blatantly shown which side they are on and not offered a valid explanation which is half the problem (wait that sounds very fimiliar).
SKY news have just joined them

I just don't get it. 30" of airtime for a 'commercial' is NOT the same as integrated editorial, opinion or comment. It wouldn't even be IN their news programme, it would be OUTSIDE of it....

D
Old 26 January 2009, 10:43 AM
  #50  
f1_fan
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
f1_fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: .
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by **************
And why do you think Hamas was created in the first place? Why do you think Palestinians have such a hatred of Israel?

I wonder if it has anything to do with the fact that Israel has continually land grabbed from its creation, murdered and displaced Palestinians from their own homes to expand the boundaries of Israel? As I mentioned previously if someone came to where I lived and invaded and started murdering and taking over the land where I lived I would do exactly the same as the Palestinians, fight with everything I had.

Sick of hearing how people think the Israelis are the innocent party as they plainly haven't got a clue what they are talking about.

Oh and as for impartiality how many times did the BBC show interviews with the Israeli spokesman Mark Regev and allow him to spurt his propaganda and how many times did they have a Palestinian spokesman on in comparison?

And for Sky News, Murdoch risk upsetting the Yanks? Risk Fox News? Never so no surprises there
+1 - absolutely 100% on the nail!!
Old 26 January 2009, 11:10 AM
  #51  
The Zohan
Scooby Regular
 
The Zohan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Disco, Disco!
Posts: 21,825
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mus 1st class sti type r
scoobynet is full of thick uneducated narrow minded chavs who will never achieve anything in life, who just love to hate and discriminate in such a sly way, you will have better luck trying to educate a donkey


mus
And your post is helpful and constructive in what ways exactly? - why not add to this thread with some constructive criticism and arguments.

Your post has you coming across as (to use you own words) an uneducated donkey.

Whilst your blood may be boiling at some of the comments, why not counter them with something a little better thought out

Last edited by The Zohan; 26 January 2009 at 11:13 AM.
Old 26 January 2009, 11:12 AM
  #52  
The Zohan
Scooby Regular
 
The Zohan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Disco, Disco!
Posts: 21,825
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by **************
And why do you think Hamas was created in the first place? Why do you think Palestinians have such a hatred of Israel?

I wonder if it has anything to do with the fact that Israel has continually land grabbed from its creation, murdered and displaced Palestinians from their own homes to expand the boundaries of Israel? As I mentioned previously if someone came to where I lived and invaded and started murdering and taking over the land where I lived I would do exactly the same as the Palestinians, fight with everything I had.

Sick of hearing how people think the Israelis are the innocent party as they plainly haven't got a clue what they are talking about.

Oh and as for impartiality how many times did the BBC show interviews with the Israeli spokesman Mark Regev and allow him to spurt his propaganda and how many times did they have a Palestinian spokesman on in comparison?

And for Sky News, Murdoch risk upsetting the Yanks? Risk Fox News? Never so no surprises there
Yes, very true!

But how to stop the killing and sort this mess out once and for all???
Old 26 January 2009, 12:33 PM
  #54  
mrtheedge2u2
Scooby Regular
 
mrtheedge2u2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,194
Received 31 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

If I was the Israeli PM...... I would simply ask Hamas what they wanted, reach angreement and then tell them that if one more rocket enters any part of Israel that I would simply destroy them all.
Old 26 January 2009, 12:48 PM
  #56  
Gear Head
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Gear Head's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Somewhere in Kent, sniffing some V-Power
Posts: 15,029
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I can understand why Hamas is p%ssed off. But surely, they must have realised that constantly firing rockets at Israel was eventually going to have consequencses. Why did they never appeal to the UN or infact the world about the 'land-grabbing'. To my understanding, they have never done so. They were happy enough just flinging crued rockets that no target.

What I do understand though is that this war has been going on for thousands of years with no end ever in sight. How can you expect an age old hatrid between two nations to end because we say so?
Old 26 January 2009, 12:53 PM
  #57  
f1_fan
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
f1_fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: .
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mrtheedge2u2
If I was the Israeli PM...... I would simply ask Hamas what they wanted, reach angreement and then tell them that if one more rocket enters any part of Israel that I would simply destroy them all.
George Bush on Scoobynet - who'd have thought it?
Old 26 January 2009, 12:59 PM
  #58  
f1_fan
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
f1_fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: .
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by chrispurvis100
I can understand why Hamas is p%ssed off. But surely, they must have realised that constantly firing rockets at Israel was eventually going to have consequencses. Why did they never appeal to the UN or infact the world about the 'land-grabbing'. To my understanding, they have never done so. They were happy enough just flinging crued rockets that no target.

What I do understand though is that this war has been going on for thousands of years with no end ever in sight. How can you expect an age old hatrid between two nations to end because we say so?

I think you'll find that they did appeal over and over and the UN and Western nations stood by and let it carry on. The Western governments and to a certain extent the UN are pretty much pro-Israel.

As I said before those in Hamas didn't wake up one morning and just decide to be terrorists, they have been driven to it. The Palestinian people electing Hamas probably did so as they had nothing else left to vote for. When your homeland has been continually stolen, destroyed and you are starved of life's basics by the action of another nation I guess you maybe just lose a bit of perspective on the whole 'Hamas are nasty terrorists' issue
Old 26 January 2009, 01:40 PM
  #59  
Mus
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Mus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: will be back in another scooby in time....
Posts: 2,554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Paul Habgood
And your post is helpful and constructive in what ways exactly? - why not add to this thread with some constructive criticism and arguments.

Your post has you coming across as (to use you own words) an uneducated donkey.

Whilst your blood may be boiling at some of the comments, why not counter them with something a little better thought out


its pointless as some people are very narrow minded
Old 26 January 2009, 02:49 PM
  #60  
cster
Scooby Regular
 
cster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,753
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Diesel
What a cr@p sarcastic post for an otherwise intelligent guy.

D
I felt the original post lacked balance, objectivity and insight.
That, I can accept.
It is the element of self-righteousness that caused my disengaging response.


Quick Reply: BBC - so much for impartiality



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:48 PM.