litchfield twin scroll turbo
#962
it peaks at 1.8 and then drops to 1.6/1.5 till 7.5k rpm
i'm confused at this moment if the dyno reading is faulty or i got a problem in my car, but as I said it is definitely faster than it was prior to the turbo change, so I will try another dyno and see what the results are
i'm confused at this moment if the dyno reading is faulty or i got a problem in my car, but as I said it is definitely faster than it was prior to the turbo change, so I will try another dyno and see what the results are
Those boost figures you state are even more questionable with the power you achieve.
You on normal pump fuel?
For information mine is running 1.7bar peak and 1.3bar at the top end. Nigh on 400bhp and 385lfbt (520nm).
#963
I'm running normal pump fuel, 98 RON, obviously it is not 98 Optimax, but definitely not the worst fuel out there. Will go on another dyno today if lucky.
Also, do you guys by any chance have 800cc Ecutek latency settings etc. cause I have somehow misplaced the piece of paper that came with'em.
Also, do you guys by any chance have 800cc Ecutek latency settings etc. cause I have somehow misplaced the piece of paper that came with'em.
#964
I have been on another dyno today and it seems that there is a problem. the boost is even higher than what you have Shaun, and the car as I said before seems a lot faster than on VF36, however the dyno definitely shows that after 4.5k rpm it all goes pear shaped. any thoughts? I'm wondering if this is a poor map or the engine has developed a problem somewhere
Last edited by Ilya; 11 July 2011 at 11:58 AM.
#965
Have you got Boost vs Torque & Boost vs HP dyno plots?
At approx 1.7 / 1.8 bar the standard Ecu will probably have a nervous breakdown as it cant read beyond that & cut boost & power anyway.
Who mapped the car?
At approx 1.7 / 1.8 bar the standard Ecu will probably have a nervous breakdown as it cant read beyond that & cut boost & power anyway.
Who mapped the car?
Last edited by rickya; 11 July 2011 at 01:23 PM.
#966
unfortunately these are the only graphs I have, considering I am in Moscow, RUS you wouldn't know the guy who mapped the car, I'm talking with him at the moment regarding the situation
#969
If Ilya's is boost cutting I think he'd know about it.
What exhaust system is it Ilya (sorry if you said earlier)?
On the road, at what rpm are you seeing 1bar and max boost in, say, 4th gear?
#970
Tim is it possible to change map sensors for different year ones. My 2004 Ver9 JDM sti seems to be boost cutting at 1.55bar (My Hawkeye spec did at approx 1.7/ 1.8 bar).
Just wondering if I could change it for a later version one.
Im also wondering whether my ECU may be cutting boost (when mapping) as it is hearing Phantom Knock. There is no knock on the det cans?
Apologies for slight thread diversion but it is kind of relevant
Just wondering if I could change it for a later version one.
Im also wondering whether my ECU may be cutting boost (when mapping) as it is hearing Phantom Knock. There is no knock on the det cans?
Apologies for slight thread diversion but it is kind of relevant
#971
Tim is it possible to change map sensors for different year ones. My 2004 Ver9 JDM sti seems to be boost cutting at 1.55bar (My Hawkeye spec did at approx 1.7/ 1.8 bar).
Just wondering if I could change it for a later version one.
Im also wondering whether my ECU may be cutting boost (when mapping) as it is hearing Phantom Knock. There is no knock on the det cans?
Apologies for slight thread diversion but it is kind of relevant
Just wondering if I could change it for a later version one.
Im also wondering whether my ECU may be cutting boost (when mapping) as it is hearing Phantom Knock. There is no knock on the det cans?
Apologies for slight thread diversion but it is kind of relevant
Phantom knock is a common problem - mine suffered too, so the knock sensor was relocated during a mapping session to minimise the problem.
#972
Rickya,
You can over-ride boost cut completely or raise the boost cut limit on the JDM OE ecu (not sure what is or is not possible on the UK variant). Have a chat with your mapper.
Ilya,
Your mapper should know if there is a problem.... he would be your first point of contact as you have suggested. Something certainly seems not right.
It's been so long since I had this problem myself, but it's worth you suggesting your mapper looks at the Neutral Position Switch is operating correctly. Again, not sure if this would result in the situation you're seeing.
Tim,
There doesn't *appear* to be anything wrong with his initial spool, comparing his run with that of his friends VF36. They look very close at low revs which is what I would of expected. However torque is extremely low for the level of boost, but as we have no idea of the ignition map it's hard to comment on that.
You can over-ride boost cut completely or raise the boost cut limit on the JDM OE ecu (not sure what is or is not possible on the UK variant). Have a chat with your mapper.
Ilya,
Your mapper should know if there is a problem.... he would be your first point of contact as you have suggested. Something certainly seems not right.
It's been so long since I had this problem myself, but it's worth you suggesting your mapper looks at the Neutral Position Switch is operating correctly. Again, not sure if this would result in the situation you're seeing.
Tim,
There doesn't *appear* to be anything wrong with his initial spool, comparing his run with that of his friends VF36. They look very close at low revs which is what I would of expected. However torque is extremely low for the level of boost, but as we have no idea of the ignition map it's hard to comment on that.
#973
#974
By over ride you mean to stop the ECU from changing boost & just set boost without the ECU saftey (pain the ***) features?
And how do you raise the boost cut limit? Never knew it was possible without changing map sensor maybe?
#975
Rickya,
I was referring to boost cut whereby you hit the max boost limit set by the map in the ECU. Nothing to do with any form of limp mode or whatever the OE ecu can do based on any safety parameters.
Boost cut would be (imo based on my experience) totally different to the ECU reducing ignition for limp mode etc. Boost cut feels like you've hit a brick wall!
Your mapper can change the boost cut level within the map.
I was referring to boost cut whereby you hit the max boost limit set by the map in the ECU. Nothing to do with any form of limp mode or whatever the OE ecu can do based on any safety parameters.
Boost cut would be (imo based on my experience) totally different to the ECU reducing ignition for limp mode etc. Boost cut feels like you've hit a brick wall!
Your mapper can change the boost cut level within the map.
#976
Tim,
sorry to hear your car is still causing you problems. Feel free to call is you need anything.
Ilya,
I have sent you a email with our latancy values for the 800cc injectors. I would be a little concerned with his experience if he is asking for these and by the high level of boost you are running. the LM400 should run about 1.5bar through the mid range about about 1.35 at the very top. Although it can be made to run more there is little point and you just end up flowing hot air.
Regards
Iain
sorry to hear your car is still causing you problems. Feel free to call is you need anything.
Ilya,
I have sent you a email with our latancy values for the 800cc injectors. I would be a little concerned with his experience if he is asking for these and by the high level of boost you are running. the LM400 should run about 1.5bar through the mid range about about 1.35 at the very top. Although it can be made to run more there is little point and you just end up flowing hot air.
Regards
Iain
#977
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 16,548
Likes: 2
From: ECU Mapping - www.JollyGreenMonster.co.uk
Tim is it possible to change map sensors for different year ones. My 2004 Ver9 JDM sti seems to be boost cutting at 1.55bar (My Hawkeye spec did at approx 1.7/ 1.8 bar).
Just wondering if I could change it for a later version one.
Im also wondering whether my ECU may be cutting boost (when mapping) as it is hearing Phantom Knock. There is no knock on the det cans?
Apologies for slight thread diversion but it is kind of relevant
Just wondering if I could change it for a later version one.
Im also wondering whether my ECU may be cutting boost (when mapping) as it is hearing Phantom Knock. There is no knock on the det cans?
Apologies for slight thread diversion but it is kind of relevant
You can change the map sernsor and change the settings inb the map but sounds like the boost cut is set too low or you are now running more boost than it is mapped for?
if ecu is picking up phantom knock it would be easy to spot as ecu would be pulling timing with no det in det cans.. the ecu will pull boost back to actuator pressure if it retards the timing beyond a set amount.
Simon
#978
Simon,
Not sure I understand your remark about the fact boost over 1.55 can't be monitored.
I can see internal boost pressure over 1.55bar.... Are we talking different things here?
Not sure I understand your remark about the fact boost over 1.55 can't be monitored.
I can see internal boost pressure over 1.55bar.... Are we talking different things here?
#983
Tim,
sorry to hear your car is still causing you problems. Feel free to call is you need anything.
Ilya,
I have sent you a email with our latancy values for the 800cc injectors. I would be a little concerned with his experience if he is asking for these and by the high level of boost you are running. the LM400 should run about 1.5bar through the mid range about about 1.35 at the very top. Although it can be made to run more there is little point and you just end up flowing hot air.
Regards
Iain
sorry to hear your car is still causing you problems. Feel free to call is you need anything.
Ilya,
I have sent you a email with our latancy values for the 800cc injectors. I would be a little concerned with his experience if he is asking for these and by the high level of boost you are running. the LM400 should run about 1.5bar through the mid range about about 1.35 at the very top. Although it can be made to run more there is little point and you just end up flowing hot air.
Regards
Iain
#984
No need for the Apexi.
Three port is not a requirement but can help things along.
New uprated pump is not always a requirement on the JDM's at this level, but can be worth it for safety's sake.
No need to get the car mapped on a dyno imo. It all depends on what your mapper has access to and prefers. Nothing wrong with a dyno being used though, but it is not a requirement.
I would however recommend your mapper uses the MEGAROM code, which for the clever stuff will need to be done on the road anyhow.
Hope you get it sorted.
Three port is not a requirement but can help things along.
New uprated pump is not always a requirement on the JDM's at this level, but can be worth it for safety's sake.
No need to get the car mapped on a dyno imo. It all depends on what your mapper has access to and prefers. Nothing wrong with a dyno being used though, but it is not a requirement.
I would however recommend your mapper uses the MEGAROM code, which for the clever stuff will need to be done on the road anyhow.
Hope you get it sorted.
#985
My Deltadash logs clip the boost at 2.55BAR Absolute, which is 1.55BAR relative to atmospheirc pressure. You sure you can see above that Shaun?
I've seen 2.2BAR boost when we were playing with the waste gate restrictor setup on my new 2.1 engine, no sign of any cuts at all. It normally runs 1.8BAR mid range as seen on my Defi's.
I've seen 2.2BAR boost when we were playing with the waste gate restrictor setup on my new 2.1 engine, no sign of any cuts at all. It normally runs 1.8BAR mid range as seen on my Defi's.