It Turns out Brown paid his brother £6,000.00 for cleaning services as 'EXPENCES'
#31
6k over 2 years for cleaning services ?
what is so wrong about that,
a cleaner on min wage must earn about 8k per year?
personally i can not see the problem with it
3k per year to have somebody clean his stuff, its loose change in the grand scheme of things, i hate all the politics bollocks as much as the next man, but are we supposed to believe that the PM has to clean his own house/kegs/****, while running the country ??
what is so wrong about that,
a cleaner on min wage must earn about 8k per year?
personally i can not see the problem with it
3k per year to have somebody clean his stuff, its loose change in the grand scheme of things, i hate all the politics bollocks as much as the next man, but are we supposed to believe that the PM has to clean his own house/kegs/****, while running the country ??
#32
Has no body actually read the report? His brother was not doing the cleaning, Andrew Brown paid the cleaner, who was contracted to do both brother's flats in SW1 (Gordon & Andrew) and then Gordon Brown paid him his share.
But lets not let facts get in the way hey.
But lets not let facts get in the way hey.
#33
Scooby Senior
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: West Yorks.
Posts: 4,130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It's amusing to note that no Tory MPs have come out and criticised the Telegraph's revelation of cabinet ministers' expenses - they'll all be sitting with clenched **** cheeks until their ride on the gravy train is exposed ...
Brown's cleaning expenses pales into insignificance compared to Prescott's expense claim for mock Tudor beams on the front of his house, and the two toilet seats he presumably destroyed with his stomach acid.
Brown's cleaning expenses pales into insignificance compared to Prescott's expense claim for mock Tudor beams on the front of his house, and the two toilet seats he presumably destroyed with his stomach acid.
#34
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Disco, Disco!
Posts: 21,825
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Do you feel it right that a man paid 150K+ should claim his house cleaning as an expense on top of his salary, do you know many other UK based people who do?
The point is it is not right, morally as the leader of the party and Prime Minister of the country Brown should lead by example and set a good example...Brown does not - IMHO
#35
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Wanting the English to come first in England for a change!
Posts: 2,091
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If your on the board of edf energy, you have a big enough salary and enough pension and share options not to need 6k of taxpayers money!
Basically if your an mp, you can just give salaries and payouts to family members under the guise of "employing" them all day long, that stinks of ****!
No wonder this countries financially fcuked up, each mp must cost nearly 1/2 a million a year, not forgetting all the ******* quangos that b.liar set up to "advise" the goverment on things, the heads of those get massive salaries and ealry retirement ( at about 55), and all they give us is: "multiculturism works" and frank the drugs dog telling kids to ring him before doing that line of coke, what a ******* joke!
Its about time this and future governments started doing what we want, instead of pandering to the pc *******, the race card and human rights card pullers and some bunch of clowns in brussels telling britain whats best for it!
Let the ghurkas in, kick all the foreign rapists and murders out, i dont care if theyre in prison, or if they get tortured when they land on home soil, they shouldnt have comitted crimes, they cost us money: get rid of them on the next flight and to hell with their human rights!
Lets stop light sentences for all the smack and crack heads who have no intention of getting a job and expect the dole office to pay for them to live while they rob to feed their habit, lets have these ******* in a chain gang weedin old peoples gardens and painting and decorating community halls, and if they commit another crime, cut off all benefits, **** em, they deserve it.
Lets have the right to defend property from intruders, **** their "human rights", you forgive all human rights as soon as you break and enter, if i beat the **** out of a chav for tryin to rob my scooby, he shouldnt be able to sue me, he should be the one the coppers give a hard time to, not me, i should be congratulated!
Lets stop horrble, vile little chav girls looking at kids as house and a paycheck, if you cant afford kids, dont have em!
Lets take the emphasis off speed cameras simply for revenue, and have more old school traffic cops on the roads, the sort that use common sense and dont automatically hand a fine out every time. Lets do away with police targets and tick boxes and let them get on with the job of making this country safer, not more politically correct!
Lets put the great back into Great Britain!
<gc8 wrx steps down from soap box>
Last edited by GC8WRX; 08 May 2009 at 04:42 PM.
#37
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (8)
All these expences for day to dat living is just an added bonus for the MP's. Wasn't it the labour party who said they would not pay bank workers any bonus due to poor running of their services even though the people who really depended on it had nothing to do with how the bank was run? Why should the MP's get such a good expences bonus when they are doing a poor job!
#40
Politics isn't my thing anyway, I would rather try and turn a blind eye to it all, this way taking it in the **** hurts that little bit less
#41
Scooby Regular
MP's should be on the same scale of pay as a parish minister or Rev. as you shouldn't go into politics for money, it should be about what you believe in. Money corrupts and all that.
#44
The cleaners contract said to clean two flats, Andrew was the person to pay said cleaner, Gordo paid Andrew to pay cleaner.
Andrew does not get any taxpayers money.
Last edited by Dedrater; 08 May 2009 at 05:05 PM.
#45
Scooby Regular
#46
All prisoners released, forgiven and blessed with a windfall of taxes.
Iran invade the Isle of Wight and we throw flowers at them, and in the great 'offer the other cheek' tradition, let them have the Isle of Man too!!
#48
Scooby Regular
I certainly wouldn't want a Reverand or Vicar running the country .... imagine it:-
All prisoners released, forgiven and blessed with a windfall of taxes.
Iran invade the Isle of Wight and we throw flowers at them, and in the great 'offer the other cheek' tradition, let them have the Isle of Man too!!
All prisoners released, forgiven and blessed with a windfall of taxes.
Iran invade the Isle of Wight and we throw flowers at them, and in the great 'offer the other cheek' tradition, let them have the Isle of Man too!!
Could they do any worse that what we already have?
What qualifies someone as elligible to run a country? As whatever the criteria is at the moment, isn't really working imo
#49
I did not make the idiotic comment, "We should pay them a pittance" ... I wonder who did?
#50
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Surrey/London borders.
Posts: 8,300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#52
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Some country and western
Posts: 13,488
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm suprised the PM only earns 150k....that's not a huge amount for a job that is so high profile.
This is about 50k less than the Cheif Exec of a local council!
I'm not suprised he feels the need to subsidise his income somehow. The PM should be on about 300k a year, if not more.
Local elections are a bit of a con too. The Chief Exec will get a certain amount of money to run the election. He has to pay council staff from this pot. Anything else he gets to keep for himself.
This is about 50k less than the Cheif Exec of a local council!
I'm not suprised he feels the need to subsidise his income somehow. The PM should be on about 300k a year, if not more.
Local elections are a bit of a con too. The Chief Exec will get a certain amount of money to run the election. He has to pay council staff from this pot. Anything else he gets to keep for himself.
#54
Scooby Regular
#55
Guest
Posts: n/a
EU Referendum: It has come to this …
" ... On a day when we have reported the highest casualty rate in Afghanistan on one day, since June last, the BBC relegates that news to about fifth or sixth item on its main television bulletin ...".
Sort of sums up where priorities have become somewhat scr3wed up!
Dave
" ... On a day when we have reported the highest casualty rate in Afghanistan on one day, since June last, the BBC relegates that news to about fifth or sixth item on its main television bulletin ...".
Sort of sums up where priorities have become somewhat scr3wed up!
Dave
#56
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Disco, Disco!
Posts: 21,825
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
For those whining on about how much MP are paid, or not as the case may be.
MP's know what they will be paid, it isn't a secret yet they still accept this as their salary when they accept the job.
Yet some choose to play they system to get as much as they can out of the system for as long as they can. Claiming tax payers hard earned money as expenses for thing such as nappies, wet rooms, flipping houses once done up on tax payer money, claiming for horse manure, etc. I am sure there is more to come out on both parties.
Now does anyone here claim for nappies and a business expense, etc. No I do doubt it so why should MP's claim this stuff for free???
So the PM earns £ 192,000.00
Cabinet member some £ 142,000.00
MP £ 65,000.00
The average wage in this country is £ 25,000.00
A lot of MP's then make a name and go on to well paid positions in the city, etc. it is not like their lives are over once they are out of office.
Being an MP is really a vocational job, people want to do this (or at least shroud) for the betterment of their constituents, area, etc and of course and lastly themselves. These days some see it as a way to get more money out of the system by being as cynical as they can and claiming for everything from a system set up by them!
It is wrong IMHO.
MP's know what they will be paid, it isn't a secret yet they still accept this as their salary when they accept the job.
Yet some choose to play they system to get as much as they can out of the system for as long as they can. Claiming tax payers hard earned money as expenses for thing such as nappies, wet rooms, flipping houses once done up on tax payer money, claiming for horse manure, etc. I am sure there is more to come out on both parties.
Now does anyone here claim for nappies and a business expense, etc. No I do doubt it so why should MP's claim this stuff for free???
So the PM earns £ 192,000.00
Cabinet member some £ 142,000.00
MP £ 65,000.00
The average wage in this country is £ 25,000.00
A lot of MP's then make a name and go on to well paid positions in the city, etc. it is not like their lives are over once they are out of office.
Being an MP is really a vocational job, people want to do this (or at least shroud) for the betterment of their constituents, area, etc and of course and lastly themselves. These days some see it as a way to get more money out of the system by being as cynical as they can and claiming for everything from a system set up by them!
It is wrong IMHO.
#57
If I was earning/ earned £100K+ I'd be employing an accountant to ...oh hang on a minute
& if you think that MP's are working for the good 'of the people' you're frankly, delusional ...that went out in the early 80's
& if you think that MP's are working for the good 'of the people' you're frankly, delusional ...that went out in the early 80's
#58
Guest
Posts: n/a
Dave
#60
Scooby Regular
Best way to sort all this guff out, exile the lot of them and get ol' Queeny back in power! We're already paying them for nothing I doubt the Thin White Duke would have any problem is sorting out a few of our immigrant problems