Traffic Cops Beeb1
15 May 2009, 12:40 PM
#31
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,581
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
15 May 2009, 12:42 PM
#32
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Wanting the English to come first in England for a change!
Posts: 2,091
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
15 May 2009, 12:50 PM
#34
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Some country and western
Posts: 13,488
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
LOL - nice input from someone who didn't see it!
The fact it cleared a 10 foot fence without even touching it.......and then landing on the roof some 10 meters away from the fence!
The fact it cleared a 10 foot fence without even touching it.......and then landing on the roof some 10 meters away from the fence!
Last edited by davyboy; 15 May 2009 at 12:51 PM.
15 May 2009, 12:54 PM
#35
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Wanting the English to come first in England for a change!
Posts: 2,091
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As usual with me, bull in a china shop!
15 May 2009, 01:15 PM
#36
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Warrington
Posts: 4,554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So a kid in a Nova sees me round a sharp bend at below the speed limit. He fails to make the bend.
Should I be done for dangerous driving?
At any time the Civic driver could have backed off. IMO he is solely responsible for the crash. The other driver could have been done for lying to police etc., but I didn't see sufficient evidence for any driving related offence.
Should I be done for dangerous driving?
At any time the Civic driver could have backed off. IMO he is solely responsible for the crash. The other driver could have been done for lying to police etc., but I didn't see sufficient evidence for any driving related offence.
15 May 2009, 03:05 PM
#37
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 39,877
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I did not see the programme, but from what I can infer from the posts, Felix is quite right about taking the other driver in for questioning.
SSup's views are also quite correct.
Les
SSup's views are also quite correct.
Les
15 May 2009, 03:52 PM
#38
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
15 May 2009, 05:13 PM
#39
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: 'Nuneaton' - Home of The Stealth Scoob
Posts: 1,853
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I guess what the programme did show was that you can get in an awful mess by putting your foot down.
One thing it did do for me was made me think even more about having a safe blast around the twisties, you never know whats around the corner..
One thing it did do for me was made me think even more about having a safe blast around the twisties, you never know whats around the corner..
15 May 2009, 07:01 PM
#42
So a kid in a Nova sees me round a sharp bend at below the speed limit. He fails to make the bend.
Should I be done for dangerous driving?
At any time the Civic driver could have backed off. IMO he is solely responsible for the crash. The other driver could have been done for lying to police etc., but I didn't see sufficient evidence for any driving related offence.
Should I be done for dangerous driving?
At any time the Civic driver could have backed off. IMO he is solely responsible for the crash. The other driver could have been done for lying to police etc., but I didn't see sufficient evidence for any driving related offence.
If the bmw driver was completely blameless, and hadn't been committing some offence, then why make an anonymous call, and then lie to the police later, why not ring for help just saying you'd witnessed an accident? I can't see any reason to cover things up, if you have done nothing wrong.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
fatboy_coach
General Technical
15
18 June 2016 03:48 PM
Hos
ScoobyNet General
1
08 September 2000 08:01 AM
