Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related

Brown to 'reform' electoral system

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10 June 2009, 12:35 PM
  #32  
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Martin2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by hutton_d
When you say "and will alos cover off" what the **** do you eman .... ??

Dave
I don't understand why you chose to respond to me like this?

If you need to start to pulling people up on typos then that doesn't help the discussion does it?
Old 10 June 2009, 12:41 PM
  #33  
stuart n
Scooby Regular
 
stuart n's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Essex scooby less crew :(
Posts: 1,095
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

According to newsnight last night, there are 8 peers directly or indirectly involved with government the latest being "Lord" Sugar. That is 8 UNELECTED people in government.
Perhaps that could be the first reform Gordon makes, elected MP's run the country not party donors.
Old 10 June 2009, 12:49 PM
  #34  
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Martin2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by stuart n
According to newsnight last night, there are 8 peers directly or indirectly involved with government the latest being "Lord" Sugar. That is 8 UNELECTED people in government.
Perhaps that could be the first reform Gordon makes, elected MP's run the country not party donors.
I agree this should defo be part of the debate, if we had an elected second chamber then this issue goes away.

I not sure that restricting cabinet positions to MP is an all together good idea though, surely we want the best people in these roles regardless of whether they are politicians or not.
What we need is parliament to hold the government to account more effectively than it current can or does.
Old 10 June 2009, 12:58 PM
  #35  
CrisPDuk
Scooby Regular
 
CrisPDuk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: The Cheshire end of the emasculated Cat & Fiddle
Posts: 9,465
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Let's just hope he doesn't use the 'reforms' put in place by Jeb Bush in Florida as his template

Martin, I personally think an elected upper house is the last thing we need, just take a look at how the US Senate works, if there's a more concentrated collection of crooks, shysters & big corporation lackeys anywhere else on earth, I don't know where it is
Old 10 June 2009, 01:00 PM
  #36  
unclebuck
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
unclebuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Talk to the hand....
Posts: 13,331
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs down

" It is thought more likely that Labour's next manifesto will include a pledge to shift to a system of proportional representation, a move that would be supported by the LibDems. "

So what happened to the debate / referendum then??
Old 10 June 2009, 01:05 PM
  #37  
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Martin2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by CrisPDuk
Let's just hope he doesn't use the 'reforms' put in place by Jeb Bush in Florida as his template

Martin, I personally think an elected upper house is the last thing we need, just take a look at how the US Senate works, if there's a more concentrated collection of crooks, shysters & big corporation lackeys anywhere else on earth, I don't know where it is
I agree about the Senate, but I don't believe that this is down to them being elected. Those same lobbyist would still be there were the Senate appointed.
I think most of the problems with the US system stem from political funding.

It's not beyond the wit of man to come up with a system that is more representative, with better checks and balances than we currently have. The problem has always been political will, rather the justness of the cause.
Old 10 June 2009, 01:07 PM
  #38  
stuart n
Scooby Regular
 
stuart n's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Essex scooby less crew :(
Posts: 1,095
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Martin2005
I agree this should defo be part of the debate, if we had an elected second chamber then this issue goes away.
Indeed, another pledge of new Labour was to reform the lords. All I can see happening is party donors and reality TV stars get offered a seat in the lords by the PM while trying to force out the hereditary lords.
Mean while, "Lord" Mandelson, who was forced to quit goverment TWICE becasue of his dodgy dealings is now back in government through this "loophole" while elected MP's are being forced stand down over their own wrong doings.
You really couldn't make this up!
Old 10 June 2009, 01:12 PM
  #40  
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Martin2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by hutton_d
It does if the typos mean you can't actually understand what is meant!

Just seen Flash on PMQs. Promised to 'consult widely' on parlimentary reform, including 'all political parties' and 'people widely trusted' by the electorate. Absolutely NO mention of asking the electorate what they think. But then he's not interested in reform unless it benefits him/them. Oh, and looking into whether to put the voting age down. 'cos the only reason to do that is because youngsters are more likely to vote for the left.

At least Cameron has caught onto the public mood in the sense that they/we want an election NOW!

Dave

Reading posts like this serves to remind me of just what a thankless and impossible task governing must be
Old 10 June 2009, 01:24 PM
  #41  
speedking
Scooby Regular
 
speedking's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Warrington
Posts: 4,554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

My proposal for electoral reform.
Old 10 June 2009, 01:56 PM
  #42  
mrtheedge2u2
Scooby Regular
 
mrtheedge2u2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,194
Received 31 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Martin2005
Reading posts like this serves to remind me of just what a thankless and impossible task governing must be
So because the opposition, and lets face it, most of the country, want an election now being in power is now a thankless task?

Face it, if Brown was head of a public company he would of been sacked a long time ago
Old 10 June 2009, 02:01 PM
  #43  
SunnySideUp
Scooby Regular
 
SunnySideUp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 5,559
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I doubt he would have been sacked at all.

The Company was doing fantastic until outside events deflected its business .... you keep the MD - especially, as it now appears, the measures taken by that MD are showing fruit!
Old 10 June 2009, 02:02 PM
  #44  
mrtheedge2u2
Scooby Regular
 
mrtheedge2u2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,194
Received 31 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

But was not the government and Brown responsible for overseeing the FSA ETC.... thus averting the potential for meltdown.......??
Old 10 June 2009, 02:04 PM
  #45  
mrtheedge2u2
Scooby Regular
 
mrtheedge2u2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,194
Received 31 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

Pete, also labour was not doing great before the credit crunch.... you make out like the only thing wrong with labour is the CC and that is not their fault.....

So in other words, Nu labia are a victim of circumstance.
Old 10 June 2009, 02:08 PM
  #46  
tanyatriangles
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
tanyatriangles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: l'on n'y peut rien
Posts: 2,922
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by unclebuck
" It is thought more likely that Labour's next manifesto will include a pledge to shift to a system of proportional representation, a move that would be supported by the LibDems. "

So what happened to the debate / referendum then??
Hang on.........wasn't that in their manifesto in '97 too?
Old 10 June 2009, 02:16 PM
  #47  
JPF
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
JPF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Near Huntingdon
Posts: 754
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

OMGG!! please tell me you guys are ether on drugs, or having a laugh....I know you cant be as stupid as you sound...
Old 10 June 2009, 02:23 PM
  #48  
mrtheedge2u2
Scooby Regular
 
mrtheedge2u2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,194
Received 31 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JPF
OMGG!! please tell me you guys are ether on drugs, or having a laugh....I know you cant be as stupid as you sound...
who?
Old 10 June 2009, 02:53 PM
  #49  
JPF
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
JPF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Near Huntingdon
Posts: 754
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mrtheedge2u2
who?
"This tells you all you will ever need to know about the conniving, dysfunctional, delusional bully that inhabits the No 10 bunker with his new found 'friend' Mandy - and the pissy one!!

Because they can't rig the votes that easily on a national scale, they are now trying to rig the electoral system. "



No one in particular really just posts like the above...everyone is entitled to an opinion and I can understand some people being angry, but posts like that are just pure paranoia and fiction.

Martin had a good point about there needing to be reform, its a good idea and as fare as I can tell wanted by most. The priminister raises it as he should and people attack with crp like that.

Any reform will take too long to change the outcome of the next election so even if reform could be used to keep labour in it would be too late. Also all MPs in the house from all parties vote on reform, so how do people think Brown could pass something in his or Labours favour it just stupid.


To all the Tory boys and girls out there, chill out your time is fast approaching.....god help us
Old 10 June 2009, 07:15 PM
  #50  
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Martin2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JPF
"This tells you all you will ever need to know about the conniving, dysfunctional, delusional bully that inhabits the No 10 bunker with his new found 'friend' Mandy - and the pissy one!!

Because they can't rig the votes that easily on a national scale, they are now trying to rig the electoral system. "



No one in particular really just posts like the above...everyone is entitled to an opinion and I can understand some people being angry, but posts like that are just pure paranoia and fiction.

Martin had a good point about there needing to be reform, its a good idea and as fare as I can tell wanted by most. The priminister raises it as he should and people attack with crp like that.

Any reform will take too long to change the outcome of the next election so even if reform could be used to keep labour in it would be too late. Also all MPs in the house from all parties vote on reform, so how do people think Brown could pass something in his or Labours favour it just stupid.


To all the Tory boys and girls out there, chill out your time is fast approaching.....god help us
Wow thank you for introducing me to a new experience...support on SNLOL

The thing is I really don't care who reforms parliament and/or the voting system Tory's, Labour Lib Dems or a combination of all 3. I just know we have a massive democratic deficit in this country that for too long has been ignored by our political classes.

I don't understand why this had to be turned into the usual anti government vitrolic rant.
Old 10 June 2009, 07:18 PM
  #51  
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Martin2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mrtheedge2u2
So because the opposition, and lets face it, most of the country, want an election now being in power is now a thankless task?

Face it, if Brown was head of a public company he would of been sacked a long time ago
No it's a thankless task because no matter what they try they get slammed by people who are not interested in anything other than their own political dogma and/or cynicism
Old 10 June 2009, 07:57 PM
  #53  
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Martin2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by hutton_d
No. We just don't believe anything they say. If you do, especially after the last few weeks revelations, then more fool you. The real power is in the EU and unless one of the political parties actually grows some ***** and tells them where to go this country as an independent state, is done for. No matter of *tinkering* with the *democratic process* in the UK will matter. As an example, we're even going to be losing control of the city .. Britain isolated as EU tightens grip on City - Telegraph

Meanwhile, after the abysmal Euro vote turnouts and the fact that *most* Euro voting was actually for nationalistic reasons we get the European Commission President saying ... " ... Overall, the results of the June 2009 European Parliament elections are an undeniable victory for those parties and candidates that support the European project and want to see the European Union delivering policy responses to their everyday concerns ... "

( From European Parliament elections ?victory for European project? ? Barroso - Bulgaria abroad - The Sofia Echo )

The guy is as deluded as Flash.

Dave

I'll say it again, lets have genuine reform. Are you going to join me in supporting this?
Old 10 June 2009, 09:08 PM
  #54  
cster
Scooby Regular
 
cster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,753
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Martin2005
people who are not interested in anything other than their own political dogma and/or cynicism
I couldn't find better words to describe politicians if I tried, other than perhaps to add self interested.
Old 10 June 2009, 09:30 PM
  #55  
Devildog
Scooby Regular
 
Devildog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Away from this place
Posts: 4,430
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Not sure what UB's issue is here, PR would have given Labour far less seats and is by defenition a far fairer system.
Old 10 June 2009, 09:37 PM
  #56  
Devildog
Scooby Regular
 
Devildog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Away from this place
Posts: 4,430
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by SunnySideUp
I doubt he would have been sacked at all.

The Company was doing fantastic until outside events deflected its business .... you keep the MD - especially, as it now appears, the measures taken by that MD are showing fruit!

You do post some bollocks Pete

We are unlikely to see a meaningful reversal of the current economic trentds until 2011 at the earliest, and that's nothing to do with the "measures" taken by the current government.

The economy, left to its own devices, is cyclical, irrespectve of government intervention. Its like those tipping bucket water features. It gets to a point where it has to empty, then it starts again.

All Labour are doing is stopping that bucket from dumping its contents all at once, instead the water is spilling out more slowly. A faster release would see a faster restart and recovery.



Stick to what you know (whatever that is) and refrain from posting sh!te on this BBS

Last edited by Devildog; 10 June 2009 at 09:41 PM.
Old 10 June 2009, 10:19 PM
  #57  
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Martin2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by cster
I couldn't find better words to describe politicians if I tried, other than perhaps to add self interested.
Thats as maybe, but it also pretty well describes a lot of the posts and posters on here
Old 11 June 2009, 10:47 AM
  #60  
Leslie
Scooby Regular
 
Leslie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 39,877
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by unclebuck
" It is thought more likely that Labour's next manifesto will include a pledge to shift to a system of proportional representation, a move that would be supported by the LibDems. "

So what happened to the debate / referendum then??
But why should anything change UB. You know the score with this lot. They announce a new initiative in a flourish of trumpets, but it so rarely actually happens and whatever does is purely for their own convenience!

Les


Quick Reply: Brown to 'reform' electoral system



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:42 AM.