Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related

Vulcan XH558 "To the Sky" Leuchars 12/09/09

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 15 September 2009, 08:58 PM
  #31  
Big Pete
Scooby Regular
 
Big Pete's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: By t'canal in West Yorkshire.
Posts: 344
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Just brilliant

First saw one fly when I was a kid & almost cacked me pants coz of its size & noize
Old 15 September 2009, 09:25 PM
  #32  
rob878
Scooby Regular
 
rob878's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 770
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by andys
hmm maybe it just a check over? A seperate company way brought in over the winter to do a full NDT using X-rays to look for hairline cracks and faliures
Pretty much Andy. The X-rays will have been carried out and a report/result sent to whom ever made the legs, (in the RAF they would be sent to the aircraft IPT or the design authority) so I would guess in this case it would be Messier Dowty (Leslie will probably be able to confirm or deny my guess). On the strength of the results, the Design Authority will send back its recommendations.

In this case I would guess, "no cracks apparent", however as the number of landings (the usual unit measure for Main Landing Gear lifing) appears to be guess work then they would return a report stating something along the lines of,

"L+R MLG cleared for flight until "insert date" on condition of NDT "insert technique" being C/O (Carried Out) after every AF (After Flight servicing)." This would also appear in the Reds or Greens, ensuring that the task is C/O and also to allow the aircrew to know what is Lim'd or ADF'd on the jet.

In this way the MLG can be used and the Design Authorities **** is covered. If a fault should occur before the end of the season then it will be picked up.

Once the units have been removed and serviced, when they are refitted the lifing is a known quantity and the requirement for the NDT can be removed, and usual service schedules for the units reinstated.

I hope that this isn't teaching you how to suck eggs, or insulting your intelligence.

Last edited by rob878; 15 September 2009 at 09:49 PM.
Old 15 September 2009, 10:10 PM
  #33  
andys
Scooby Regular
 
andys's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Posts: 779
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

yep thats pretty much what I thought. Think its either Marshalls or Goodridge who are the DA for them. Some interesting blog entries here

Vulcan to the Sky Trust - Avro Vulcan Bomber XH558 - Vulcan To The Sky Trust

Last edited by andys; 15 September 2009 at 10:11 PM.
Old 16 September 2009, 04:45 PM
  #34  
Leslie
Scooby Regular
 
Leslie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 39,877
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I think it was Dowty who made the undercarriage units. They would be the most likely source anyway.

I seem to remember that fitiing a new leg was not an easy matter of straightforward replacement. I remember a nosewheel leg having to be replaced once and it turned out that the aircraft which were built at Shorts were effectively hand assembled in many respects and that the new leg had to be fitted by hand which took a hell of a long time.

That would explain the different handling characteristics of many of the aircraft and we all had our own favourite for displays.

Les
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Steve vRS
Non Scooby Related
8
12 August 2009 02:12 PM
IN THE STICKS
Essex Subaru Owners Club
35
03 July 2009 01:24 PM
Nat
Non Scooby Related
30
28 October 2008 01:50 PM
finchyboy
Non Scooby Related
202
30 May 2008 03:01 PM
astraboy
Non Scooby Related
11
04 July 2006 10:48 AM



Quick Reply: Vulcan XH558 "To the Sky" Leuchars 12/09/09



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:08 AM.