Notices
ScoobyNet General General Subaru Discussion

Time attack rules and regulations

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 25 September 2009, 09:44 PM
  #181  
andyscoobym3
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (11)
 
andyscoobym3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 2.1cdb, gt30 billet, syvecs
Posts: 1,081
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dynamix

Builds going on like Utaka's and Shawys are just two examples of the next crop of club or club pro cars. They have chosen their own targets for power but as Paul said, that extra power brings issues in reliability (as I am sure Andy H will vouch for) and driveability.
Totally agree duncan
a 400-500 classic with a good set up and lots of time in the car and obviously a good jocky, would be very hard to beet in club IMO

i have done countless track days and karting series in the past and its not all about bhp (i just got a bit carried away with mine )

a decent built motor and decent stock mount turbo is the way forward IMO

andy h
Old 25 September 2009, 09:45 PM
  #182  
RA Dunk
Scooby Regular
 
RA Dunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: My turbo blows, air lots of it!!
Posts: 9,073
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dynamix

Don't make the mistake of thinking it is about the power.
ok then tell me which of these is not a seriously tuned car then

Round 4 CLUB CHALLENGE
1. RW Jamie Reynolds (Lotus Elise)…53.048
2. 4W Duncan Graham (Subaru Impreza)…53.100
3. 4W Russ Paton (Mitsubishi EVO 8)…53.910

Round 3
1 – 4WD Shane Smith (Nissan Skyline)…1:02.999
2 – 4WD Duncan Graham (Subaru Impreza)…1:03.419
3 – RWD Paul Whiffin (Toyota Supra JZA80)…1:03.433

Round 2
1 – 4WD Shane Smith (Nissan Skyline)…55.554
2 – 4WD Anthony Elrick (Mitsubishi EVO 6)…55.610
3 – 4WD Russ Paton (Mitsubishi EVO)…56.977

Round 1
1 – 4WD Shane Smith (Nissan Skyline R32 GTR)…1:35.115
2 – 4WD Marcus Webster (Nissan Skyline R32 GTR)…1:36.824
3 – 4WD Duncan Graham (Subaru Impreza)…1:37.111

Why am i seeing no lower powered cars on here say 300-400 horses apart from the Lotus?
Old 25 September 2009, 09:52 PM
  #183  
shawy1976
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
shawy1976's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: manchester
Posts: 889
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dynamix
What class you are put in depends on TA officials.

They decided at the end of last year that Shane should be in club pro. He protested that he should be allowed in club and was to remove NOS and the sequential gearbox to bring it down to club level but was fully aware of the 5% rule. The sequential gearbox stayed in there and although down a bit on power from last year, he fell foul of that 5% rule at all 3 of the first 3 rounds. Therefore he got moved up and is now in 3rd place in club pro, where the level of prep and power reasonably placed him anyway. Shane is a great bloke, a friend and above all a truly fantastic driver that is comfortable in his car - I was disappointed not to have had a fair and square battle with him at Brands. I think and hope that it would have pushed up both on to better times. We will never know who would have won that one.

Having 900bhp in club will not g'tee podiums. Don't make the mistake of thinking it is about the power.

Bloody hell wheres utaka and andy h when you need them
Come on duncan whats it about then? i keep hearing this , dont you think i can overtake a car with the indicator on
Old 25 September 2009, 09:57 PM
  #184  
shawy1976
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
shawy1976's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: manchester
Posts: 889
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RA Dunk
ok then tell me which of these is not a seriously tuned car then

Round 4 CLUB CHALLENGE
1. RW Jamie Reynolds (Lotus Elise)…53.048
2. 4W Duncan Graham (Subaru Impreza)…53.100
3. 4W Russ Paton (Mitsubishi EVO 8)…53.910

Round 3
1 – 4WD Shane Smith (Nissan Skyline)…1:02.999
2 – 4WD Duncan Graham (Subaru Impreza)…1:03.419
3 – RWD Paul Whiffin (Toyota Supra JZA80)…1:03.433

Round 2
1 – 4WD Shane Smith (Nissan Skyline)…55.554
2 – 4WD Anthony Elrick (Mitsubishi EVO 6)…55.610
3 – 4WD Russ Paton (Mitsubishi EVO)…56.977

Round 1
1 – 4WD Shane Smith (Nissan Skyline R32 GTR)…1:35.115
2 – 4WD Marcus Webster (Nissan Skyline R32 GTR)…1:36.824
3 – 4WD Duncan Graham (Subaru Impreza)…1:37.111

Why am i seeing no lower powered cars on here say 300-400 horses apart from the Lotus?
come on dunk
thats why i said another class was needed
Old 25 September 2009, 10:07 PM
  #185  
Budgie
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
Budgie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: MSOC..........middlesex subaru owners club
Posts: 10,429
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Moley_WRX
Would hope that was the case, but didn't know if it worked ok or not.

Will certainly be looking at the regs when they come out, as i fancy doing 'something' with the car next year

Will stick to just sponsoring Time Attack cars i think though!!!
hi gary
me and you need to have a chat mate
it can wait till snetterton
time attack is of interest to me and a mate
Old 25 September 2009, 10:13 PM
  #186  
dynamix
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (3)
 
dynamix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: near you
Posts: 9,708
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RA Dunk
Why am i seeing no lower powered cars on here say 300-400 horses apart from the Lotus?
Why does the lotus not count?

Of course the cars at the top of any motorsport are well prepared, set up and well driven. Did you also happen to see further down the leaderboard at any of the rounds and see 600+bhp cars beaten by 350bhp cars? I suspect not because you didnt want to see that.

If you dont want to pit your 340bhp/ton car against other cars that have a similar power/weight for fear of what you deem to be failure that is up to you - I certainly wont be able to talk you into it.

I know Scott Robson has an awful lot less power in his scooby and is embarassing a few cars with a lot more power. I would be chuffed in his position (as I was last year if I had got rid of the niggles)

Does everyone doing F1 really think they will win or get podiums?
Does everyone doing WRC really think they are going to win or get podiums?

Why do they bother?

It seems to me that what you are saying is countering your own argument, in that you think people with higher power (than you) are after easy wins but you dont want to do it unless you have higher power than them.

Its about picking your battles, setting your targets, improving and celebrating those improvements (and learning from what you could do better)
Old 25 September 2009, 10:17 PM
  #187  
andyscoobym3
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (11)
 
andyscoobym3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 2.1cdb, gt30 billet, syvecs
Posts: 1,081
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RA Dunk
ok then tell me which of these is not a seriously tuned car then

Round 4 CLUB CHALLENGE
1. RW Jamie Reynolds (Lotus Elise)…53.048
2. 4W Duncan Graham (Subaru Impreza)…53.100
3. 4W Russ Paton (Mitsubishi EVO 8)…53.910

Round 3
1 – 4WD Shane Smith (Nissan Skyline)…1:02.999
2 – 4WD Duncan Graham (Subaru Impreza)…1:03.419
3 – RWD Paul Whiffin (Toyota Supra JZA80)…1:03.433

Round 2
1 – 4WD Shane Smith (Nissan Skyline)…55.554
2 – 4WD Anthony Elrick (Mitsubishi EVO 6)…55.610
3 – 4WD Russ Paton (Mitsubishi EVO)…56.977

Round 1
1 – 4WD Shane Smith (Nissan Skyline R32 GTR)…1:35.115
2 – 4WD Marcus Webster (Nissan Skyline R32 GTR)…1:36.824
3 – 4WD Duncan Graham (Subaru Impreza)…1:37.111

Why am i seeing no lower powered cars on here say 300-400 horses apart from the Lotus?
just get the touring car times up, and remember 300 ponies in these, from memory i think the touring cars do oulton in 1min 28 secs ok different tyres but thats all relative, this time would be near top of pro group i think that will put this to bed

ITS ABOUT DRIVER ABILLITY NOT POWER
Old 25 September 2009, 10:19 PM
  #188  
P20SPD
Drag it!
iTrader: (1)
 
P20SPD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Flame grilled Wagon anyone?
Posts: 9,866
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Touring car times are on average 1 to 2 seconds behind the pro times. They have considerably less power, but are setup exceptionally well, and have full slicks.

From memory, changing something like the gobstopper to full slicks woul knock a minimum of a couple of seconds off its lap times.
Old 25 September 2009, 10:21 PM
  #189  
dynamix
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (3)
 
dynamix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: near you
Posts: 9,708
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by P20SPD
Touring car times are on average 1 to 2 seconds behind the pro times. They have considerably less power, but are setup exceptionally well, and have full slicks.

From memory, changing something like the gobstopper to full slicks woul knock a minimum of a couple of seconds off its lap times.
I would love to see RCM and Zen do a proper test on proper slicks....
Old 25 September 2009, 10:22 PM
  #190  
Budgie
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
Budgie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: MSOC..........middlesex subaru owners club
Posts: 10,429
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by andyscoobym3

ITS ABOUT DRIVER ABILLITY NOT POWER
sorry mate but thats crap
works on a karting day
but at an event like TA

its about using the cars power to weight
with a decent driver with track knowledge
to perform at best on the day
Old 25 September 2009, 10:24 PM
  #191  
shawy1976
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
shawy1976's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: manchester
Posts: 889
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dynamix
Why does the lotus not count?

Of course the cars at the top of any motorsport are well prepared, set up and well driven. Did you also happen to see further down the leaderboard at any of the rounds and see 600+bhp cars beaten by 350bhp cars? I suspect not because you didnt want to see that.

If you dont want to pit your 340bhp/ton car against other cars that have a similar power/weight for fear of what you deem to be failure that is up to you - I certainly wont be able to talk you into it.

I know Scott Robson has an awful lot less power in his scooby and is embarassing a few cars with a lot more power. I would be chuffed in his position (as I was last year if I had got rid of the niggles)

Does everyone doing F1 really think they will win or get podiums?
Does everyone doing WRC really think they are going to win or get podiums?

Why do they bother?

It seems to me that what you are saying is countering your own argument, in that you think people with higher power (than you) are after easy wins but you dont want to do it unless you have higher power than them.

Its about picking your battles, setting your targets, improving and celebrating those improvements (and learning from what you could do better)


I think your pretty much spot on there duncan ,There can be arguments for every rule . Get out there enjoy it try to win but most off all have fun
Old 25 September 2009, 10:26 PM
  #192  
andyscoobym3
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (11)
 
andyscoobym3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 2.1cdb, gt30 billet, syvecs
Posts: 1,081
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by P20SPD
Touring car times are on average 1 to 2 seconds behind the pro times. They have considerably less power, but are setup exceptionally well, and have full slicks.

From memory, changing something like the gobstopper to full slicks woul knock a minimum of a couple of seconds off its lap times.

thanks steven, my point entirely,
Old 25 September 2009, 10:32 PM
  #193  
JB1
Scooby Regular
 
JB1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Midlands
Posts: 393
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Budgie
sorry mate but thats crap
works on a karting day
but at an event like TA

its about using the cars power to weight
with a decent driver with track knowledge
to perform at best on the day
Don't really agree, I saw all but one of the tracks this year on the morning of each round, and learnt my way round on the day. My car has a crap power to weight ratio compared to most of the others.
Old 25 September 2009, 10:33 PM
  #194  
andyscoobym3
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (11)
 
andyscoobym3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 2.1cdb, gt30 billet, syvecs
Posts: 1,081
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Budgie
sorry mate but thats crap
works on a karting day
but at an event like TA

its about using the cars power to weight
with a decent driver with track knowledge
to perform at best on the day
b00l0cks

look at the buddy club car, 300hp, you dont see paul asking for another class or for higher powered cars to move up, it just makes him stronger and i bet he buzzes of it, nice chap he is aswel
Old 25 September 2009, 10:38 PM
  #195  
P20SPD
Drag it!
iTrader: (1)
 
P20SPD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Flame grilled Wagon anyone?
Posts: 9,866
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by andyscoobym3
b00l0cks

look at the buddy club car, 300hp, you dont see paul asking for another class or for higher powered cars to move up, it just makes him stronger and i bet he buzzes of it, nice chap he is aswel
Bit of a tool though on track when you are on a flyer and he isnt

Dont get me wrong, he's a bloody good driver, he just had a complete lack of respect for other drivers on track at the same time last year. It was his circuit and he was having all the space he wanted.
Old 25 September 2009, 10:39 PM
  #196  
RA Dunk
Scooby Regular
 
RA Dunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: My turbo blows, air lots of it!!
Posts: 9,073
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by andyscoobym3

ITS ABOUT DRIVER ABILLITY NOT POWER
BS, you telling me all of these drivers won because of there driving skills and not the power they run?

Round 4 CLUB CHALLENGE
1. RW Jamie Reynolds (Lotus Elise)…53.048
2. 4W Duncan Graham (Subaru Impreza)…53.100
3. 4W Russ Paton (Mitsubishi EVO 8)…53.910

Round 3
1 – 4WD Shane Smith (Nissan Skyline)…1:02.999
2 – 4WD Duncan Graham (Subaru Impreza)…1:03.419
3 – RWD Paul Whiffin (Toyota Supra JZA80)…1:03.433

Round 2
1 – 4WD Shane Smith (Nissan Skyline)…55.554
2 – 4WD Anthony Elrick (Mitsubishi EVO 6)…55.610
3 – 4WD Russ Paton (Mitsubishi EVO)…56.977

Round 1
1 – 4WD Shane Smith (Nissan Skyline R32 GTR)…1:35.115
2 – 4WD Marcus Webster (Nissan Skyline R32 GTR)…1:36.824
3 – 4WD Duncan Graham (Subaru Impreza)…1:37.111
Old 25 September 2009, 10:43 PM
  #197  
P20SPD
Drag it!
iTrader: (1)
 
P20SPD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Flame grilled Wagon anyone?
Posts: 9,866
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RA Dunk
BS, you telling me all of these drivers won because of there driving skills and not the power they run?

Round 4 CLUB CHALLENGE
1. RW Jamie Reynolds (Lotus Elise)…53.048
2. 4W Duncan Graham (Subaru Impreza)…53.100
3. 4W Russ Paton (Mitsubishi EVO 8)…53.910

Round 3
1 – 4WD Shane Smith (Nissan Skyline)…1:02.999
2 – 4WD Duncan Graham (Subaru Impreza)…1:03.419
3 – RWD Paul Whiffin (Toyota Supra JZA80)…1:03.433

Round 2
1 – 4WD Shane Smith (Nissan Skyline)…55.554
2 – 4WD Anthony Elrick (Mitsubishi EVO 6)…55.610
3 – 4WD Russ Paton (Mitsubishi EVO)…56.977

Round 1
1 – 4WD Shane Smith (Nissan Skyline R32 GTR)…1:35.115
2 – 4WD Marcus Webster (Nissan Skyline R32 GTR)…1:36.824
3 – 4WD Duncan Graham (Subaru Impreza)…1:37.111
Dunk, they are there because they have tried it, tested it, and learnt and improved. Yes all those cars have power, but they also have very good drivers and well set up cars.

Stop making judgements based on your trackside knowledge, and get your **** in your car, have some fun for a round, and THEN make a judgement on it

See you at Knockhill next year
Old 25 September 2009, 10:44 PM
  #198  
RA Dunk
Scooby Regular
 
RA Dunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: My turbo blows, air lots of it!!
Posts: 9,073
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by andyscoobym3
just get the touring car times up, and remember 300 ponies in these,
yes they maybe 300 but there all similary powered, which is one of the reason were having this discussion

300 v 600 = Time attack = unfair

200 v 300 = Touring cars = fooking good racing

i know which one i would rather compete in given the option
Old 25 September 2009, 10:50 PM
  #199  
andyscoobym3
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (11)
 
andyscoobym3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 2.1cdb, gt30 billet, syvecs
Posts: 1,081
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RA Dunk
BS, you telling me all of these drivers won because of there driving skills and not the power they run?

Round 4 CLUB CHALLENGE
1. RW Jamie Reynolds (Lotus Elise)…53.048
2. 4W Duncan Graham (Subaru Impreza)…53.100
3. 4W Russ Paton (Mitsubishi EVO 8)…53.910

Round 3
1 – 4WD Shane Smith (Nissan Skyline)…1:02.999
2 – 4WD Duncan Graham (Subaru Impreza)…1:03.419
3 – RWD Paul Whiffin (Toyota Supra JZA80)…1:03.433

Round 2
1 – 4WD Shane Smith (Nissan Skyline)…55.554
2 – 4WD Anthony Elrick (Mitsubishi EVO 6)…55.610
3 – 4WD Russ Paton (Mitsubishi EVO)…56.977

Round 1
1 – 4WD Shane Smith (Nissan Skyline R32 GTR)…1:35.115
2 – 4WD Marcus Webster (Nissan Skyline R32 GTR)…1:36.824
3 – 4WD Duncan Graham (Subaru Impreza)…1:37.111
no, the power is enhancing there abillity, what i am trying to say is there are people out there (me included to a degree ) that a deluded into thinking that power is going to get you everywhere you want, there are quite a few more ingredients needed, the standard of driving an all classes of ta is quite high,

in short get your car to 350hp per ton and spend money on setup and yourself, then you should be competative, this will not come overnght
Old 25 September 2009, 11:01 PM
  #200  
andyscoobym3
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (11)
 
andyscoobym3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 2.1cdb, gt30 billet, syvecs
Posts: 1,081
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RA Dunk
yes they maybe 300 but there all similary powered, which is one of the reason were having this discussion

300 v 600 = Time attack = unfair

200 v 300 = Touring cars = fooking good racing

i know which one i would rather compete in given the option
i drove a borrowed road car running 340hp with a hands free kit in it, full uk wieght, no 4th gear,and very poor breaks no geometry setup and turbo with the lag from hell on the hairpin and i had sat in it for the first time on the day of oulton time attack, came 10th in my class and got 10 points had the most fun, and each time out i was trying to better myself, had a realy good day

and i have never moaned about higher power cars
Old 25 September 2009, 11:06 PM
  #201  
dynamix
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (3)
 
dynamix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: near you
Posts: 9,708
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

I had the same power last year or very similar but am between 4 and 6 seconds a lap quicker on every circuit ...I know where that time was gained (and where it could improve a lot further) and who has helped that happen.
Old 25 September 2009, 11:07 PM
  #202  
shawy1976
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
shawy1976's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: manchester
Posts: 889
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Come on dunk its never ending , please tell us how the rules should be made and i,ll show you how i can break them ? More rules cost money and i think time attack is for safety and enjoyment at minimal cost for a series .
you have a 400 bhp car what about the people with standard cars say 300 bhp ?
Old 25 September 2009, 11:22 PM
  #203  
RA Dunk
Scooby Regular
 
RA Dunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: My turbo blows, air lots of it!!
Posts: 9,073
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

So you lot think its competative to race cars against others some with half the horsepower of your own?

Originally Posted by shawy1976
Come on dunk its never ending , please tell us
you have a 400 bhp car what about the people with standard cars say 300 bhp ?
300 v 400 is where a good driver could make a difference, at least its bit more closely matched than 300 v 600 lol
Old 25 September 2009, 11:34 PM
  #204  
Pavlo
Scooby Regular
 
Pavlo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: home
Posts: 6,316
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I didn't say anything about trying to compete with 3-400hp, I am talking about the difference between 500hp, which is achievable for about half the cost of 650-700hp.

FWIW, we ran 500hp at knockhill in 2008 in Pro class, and were 0.4 seconds behind the gobstopper with 850hp (or whatever you think it has).

Touring cars isn't Time Attack, starting budget for a year in touring cars with a mid grid privateer time is £500,000! If you want to build a competitive competition car for less than £10k, then enter something else, if you want the experience and thrill in TA with a cheap car, you can get it, but be realistic about what it is your entering. You know the rules before hand, you can see the lap times, you know about the cars, don't bitch about!

TimeAttack is what is, and it's not really about cars with stage 1 mods in the UK, sorry but that's the truth, although some compete with similar power and enjoy it, you're not going to be winning.

Incidentally, I dynoed Duncan's car after oulton where he came third, it had 460hp, which isn't a busting lot in a car weighing 1400kg, if you were to field an 1100kg classic you could get similar straightline performance with less than 400hp.
Old 26 September 2009, 12:04 AM
  #205  
flat4
\m/ ^_^ \m/
 
flat4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: 2010 Time Attack Club Pro Champion - Powered by ScoobyClinic
Posts: 36,816
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

^^^ That's pretty much it in a nutshell, i was going to type something similar but got distracted by Shakira
Old 26 September 2009, 09:13 AM
  #206  
Pavlo
Scooby Regular
 
Pavlo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: home
Posts: 6,316
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

aawooooooooooooooooo
Old 26 September 2009, 09:38 AM
  #207  
flat4
\m/ ^_^ \m/
 
flat4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: 2010 Time Attack Club Pro Champion - Powered by ScoobyClinic
Posts: 36,816
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Those hips don't lie!




For the record, just checked what i ran in 2008, started sub 500 from memory and finished with 570 in a car weighing 1152kg. If i'd entered Club Pro this year, judging by the lap times, i wouldn't have needed much evolution in the car to be competitive.
Old 26 September 2009, 11:30 AM
  #208  
fmp
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
fmp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Chichester, West Sussex
Posts: 1,178
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by P20SPD
Bit of a tool though on track when you are on a flyer and he isnt

Dont get me wrong, he's a bloody good driver, he just had a complete lack of respect for other drivers on track at the same time last year. It was his circuit and he was having all the space he wanted.
not just a track hogger, but a pit garage hogger too!

i had the misfortune to share a garage with team Buddy Club last year... well i say share a garage, after they had hauled all thier gear in there was a few inches of space in the corner for the rest of us!!

But as you say, good driver, and a very good car.... but then i guess thats what you get when you buy in an ex touring car from the far east!
Old 26 September 2009, 11:41 AM
  #209  
dynamix
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (3)
 
dynamix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: near you
Posts: 9,708
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by fmp
not just a track hogger, but a pit garage hogger too!

i had the misfortune to share a garage with team Buddy Club last year... well i say share a garage, after they had hauled all thier gear in there was a few inches of space in the corner for the rest of us!!

But as you say, good driver, and a very good car.... but then i guess thats what you get when you buy in an ex touring car from the far east!
i remember that - was awful !

I think he has got better this year, only problems i had on track were at Oulton on my fastest lap of the day getting held up behind Paul West in his civic iirc and at Brands in qualifying with a club pro car hogging the left hand side of the track on a very slow cool down lap (had to undertake him). He did kind of apologise afterwards when I informed him of the error of his ways
Old 26 September 2009, 06:58 PM
  #210  
shawy1976
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
shawy1976's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: manchester
Posts: 889
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by P20SPD
Andy, how is the new build going? Still on target for Snetterton?
He will definately not be at snetterton after what i,ve seen today Unless someone has a complete bottom end .


Quick Reply: Time attack rules and regulations



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:26 PM.