IEDs
04 November 2009, 11:46 PM
#32
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Weston Super Mare, Somerset.
Posts: 14,102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
OK John, I accept what you are saying - see my post 27.
But do you agree with that philosophy/strategy?
David
05 November 2009, 09:20 AM
#33
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Preston, Lancs.
Posts: 2,977
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I realised you'd accepted it... as several posts had passed since mine and I'd not replied directly to your question, I thought I'd cite my source. 
Yes, I do agree it's the right way to go about things. Gather the evidence required and when there's sufficient to allow something to be done, move in to arrest those responsible.
There is a risk involved by sending someone to disrupt / defuse an IED or suspected IED, but sometimes there can be a bigger risk involved in allowing (or forcing) it to detonate. What if it's outside a hospital or school for example?
Yes, I do agree it's the right way to go about things. Gather the evidence required and when there's sufficient to allow something to be done, move in to arrest those responsible.
There is a risk involved by sending someone to disrupt / defuse an IED or suspected IED, but sometimes there can be a bigger risk involved in allowing (or forcing) it to detonate. What if it's outside a hospital or school for example?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Skoobie Dhu
Non Scooby Related
12
10 February 2011 02:22 PM