Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related

Oh no, not again - dog attacks and kills child

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03 December 2009, 03:49 PM
  #211  
Snazy
Scooby Regular
 
Snazy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: S.E London
Posts: 13,654
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Devildog

How many Rotties and Staffies have you direct experience of Martin?
Oops, no this was it

I'm guessing if you read the whole reply you would have noticed the questions
Old 03 December 2009, 03:52 PM
  #212  
pikeywrx
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
pikeywrx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 794
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

This thread is getting annoying now.

Yes you can stop your kids being scared off dogs you encourage them slowly to get used to them. your kids are more then likely picking up on your fears. Im only saying this as before i got with the misses her kids were scared off everything, now there not.



Yes if some one tried to hurt my dog they would come off worse as they would have me to deal with.



But this is because you are assuming that if some one was walking there dog and it attacked a child the owner is going to stand and defend there dog.



If my dogs went for a child do you think you would have a chance to boot my dog before id killed it?? my dogs are the most calming loyal trusting things i know but a childs life is un questionably more important,



Ask any owner and they will probably say the same.



I know through training discipline and attention my dogs wont hurt any one.



Spoon

I used to foster rotties that hadn a home before they came to some oe like you?????



Then they went into the prison service.



Iv seen them rip a dummy to shreads then on one command go back to being a happy docile dog its amazing how they do that.
Old 03 December 2009, 03:53 PM
  #213  
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Martin2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Snazy
I believe it was " how many of said breed have you owned"
Well none obviously....

Was that the question, if so why the hell ask it?

The only dog I ever owned (well my parents did) was a Springer this would of been 20 years ago though, he was an amzing animal and it broke a my heart when he died.

I do remember a massive ball of fur and teeth tearing a big hole in his side one day when out for a walk!!!!
Old 03 December 2009, 03:53 PM
  #214  
Snazy
Scooby Regular
 
Snazy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: S.E London
Posts: 13,654
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by EddScott

Your words were basically showing off that if anyone approaches your dog, they will come off worse. Its that attitude that is causing the animosity between those with and without dogs.
See now I read it to mean, if you come at me, act in a threatening way, or are going to cause me harm, my dog will harm you first.
Technically no different to feeling vunerable and smacking you in the mouth before you hit me.

It does NOT say, if you enter my personal space without invitiation for ANY purpose my dog will savage your face off.

I think its THAT attitude also that causes animosity between owners and non owners. If people take things at face value and dont interpret things to suit their beliefs, there would be less misunderstanding.
Old 03 December 2009, 03:58 PM
  #215  
Snazy
Scooby Regular
 
Snazy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: S.E London
Posts: 13,654
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Martin2005
Well none obviously....

Was that the question, if so why the hell ask it?

The only dog I ever owned (well my parents did) was a Springer this would of been 20 years ago though, he was an amzing animal and it broke a my heart when he died.

I do remember a massive ball of fur and teeth tearing a big hole in his side one day when out for a walk!!!!
I think the question was asked to gauge how much experience you actually have of the breeds, so it could be seen if it was experience or rumour and assumption that drove your opinion.

I once saw a rotty pup set upon by 2 labs in the park, it was messy and very bloody. So that should make me believe the complete opposite to you.

Dogs do bite other dogs, fight etc, fact. However responsible owners would prevent 99.999% of these occurances by sensible training, responsible ownership, and proper handling.

Not saying you are not entitled to an opinion, but just to be clear.... Dogs are a species of animal, its all or nothing. You can't choose specific breeds and say safe, safe, safe, savage, safe..savage..
Old 03 December 2009, 04:02 PM
  #216  
EddScott
Scooby Regular
 
EddScott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: West Wales
Posts: 12,573
Received 64 Likes on 32 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Snazy
See now I read it to mean, if you come at me, act in a threatening way, or are going to cause me harm, my dog will harm you first.
Technically no different to feeling vunerable and smacking you in the mouth before you hit me.

It does NOT say, if you enter my personal space without invitiation for ANY purpose my dog will savage your face off.

I think its THAT attitude also that causes animosity between owners and non owners. If people take things at face value and dont interpret things to suit their beliefs, there would be less misunderstanding.
You've missed the point I made about approaching a dog that is threatening you and your family and being harmed by that dog.

That is the point I made for spoon to answer (the implication that approaching his dog would result in harm to the individual) but he just resorted to poor insults in a sad attempt to get a rise out me.

Last edited by EddScott; 03 December 2009 at 04:05 PM.
Old 03 December 2009, 04:10 PM
  #219  
pikeywrx
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
pikeywrx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 794
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

So far theres hutton and edd trolling. i have answered your questions. Im really quite shocked as its not like your normal comments
Old 03 December 2009, 04:11 PM
  #220  
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Martin2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Snazy
I think the question was asked to gauge how much experience you actually have of the breeds, so it could be seen if it was experience or rumour and assumption that drove your opinion.

I once saw a rotty pup set upon by 2 labs in the park, it was messy and very bloody. So that should make me believe the complete opposite to you.

Dogs do bite other dogs, fight etc, fact. However responsible owners would prevent 99.999% of these occurances by sensible training, responsible ownership, and proper handling.

Not saying you are not entitled to an opinion, but just to be clear.... Dogs are a species of animal, its all or nothing. You can't choose specific breeds and say safe, safe, safe, savage, safe..savage..
This hasn't been a discussion about what is safe and what is savage, it's been about the potential of some dogs to do serious harm, and the motivation of people for getting dogs with this potential.

Incidentally I've said at least twice on this thread that I don't doubt most owners are responsible. I just don't think that getting one in the first place is responsible. Kind of like what I feel about guns I guess. Oh BTW I also haven't said anything about banning.

We'll never agree on this, but I'm sure we are both more than comfortable with our own individual choices
Old 03 December 2009, 04:11 PM
  #221  
Snazy
Scooby Regular
 
Snazy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: S.E London
Posts: 13,654
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by EddScott
You've missed the point I made about approaching a dog that is threatening you and your family and being harmed by that dog.

That is the point I made for spoon to answer (the implication that approaching his dog would result in harm to the individual) but he just resorted to poor insults in a sad attempt to get a rise out me.
I think the sensible suggestion to explain both comments is....

No person/dog should be approached or threatened by a dog/person, and should the situation arise, the person/dog would be in their rights to defend themself.

In short, neither has the right to approach the other with intent to cause harm. And should expect retaliation if they do.

Im sure you would not kick a dog in the nuts just for passing within a few feet of you or your family. And I would not expect any owner to allow or encourage their dog to attack your family, just for approaching them.

The insults are beyond my control lol

Key word.... "intent"
Old 03 December 2009, 04:12 PM
  #222  
Spoon
Scooby Regular
 
Spoon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Logged Out
Posts: 10,221
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by pikeywrx
Yes you can stop your kids being scared off dogs you encourage them slowly to get used to them. your kids are more then likely picking up on your fears. Im only saying this as before i got with the misses her kids were scared off everything, now there not.
Excellent, the proof has it.
Originally Posted by pikeywrx
Spoon

I used to foster rotties that hadn a home before they came to some oe like you?????

Then they went into the prison service.

Iv seen them rip a dummy to shreads then on one command go back to being a happy docile dog its amazing how they do that.
A friend of mine has trained the dogs for the Prison Service. You also know then how a dog can appear to be on a switch. Aggressive dogs aren't good dogs. Dogs trained to work in aggression are. A good dogs basic temperament is key. A calm calculated dog with solid nerves is a completely different animal to one that appears agressive all the time. The latter is effectively dangerous.
Originally Posted by Snazy
I think its THAT attitude also that causes animosity between owners and non owners. If people take things at face value and dont interpret things to suit their beliefs, there would be less misunderstanding.
It wasn't just clear to me then.
Old 03 December 2009, 04:16 PM
  #223  
Spoon
Scooby Regular
 
Spoon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Logged Out
Posts: 10,221
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by hutton_d
He feckin' 5!!!!!!! Can't you get that through your thick skull??????????????

Geez.


Dave
Well if you think 5 is too young to be teaching him things I pity you.
Old 03 December 2009, 04:21 PM
  #224  
Snazy
Scooby Regular
 
Snazy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: S.E London
Posts: 13,654
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Martin2005
This hasn't been a discussion about what is safe and what is savage, it's been about the potential of some dogs to do serious harm, and the motivation of people for getting dogs with this potential.
See thats my whole point, that you have again missed.
You seem to think that there is some sort of "grading" in dog. And its this that is causing all the confusion.

Dogs are animals. They have instincts, and abilities. You can teach a lab to be a killer, you can teach a teacup yorkie to bite on sight and so on.

There is NO "safe" breed, and NO "unsafe" breed.
There ARE,.... poor bloodlines, bad breeders, thick owners, and egotistical arseholes who own dogs for trophies.

You say
This hasn't been a discussion about what is safe and what is savage
But have already said
Given the hundreds of breeds of dogs out there, what is it about PitBulls, Staffys, Rotts etc, that makes people want to get one?
and

Why would you want a Staff or Rottie? what's the logic, I honestly don't get it?
and

No one has yet answered my question, how do you end up with a Rottie, Staff, etc if you are choosing a dog, and what’s wrong with Spaniels and Labradors etc.
So while you say its not about whats safe/savage, you have already made that assumption, and decided that Rotties and Staffs are savage, and Spaniels and Labs are safe. Contradiction?
Old 03 December 2009, 04:24 PM
  #225  
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Martin2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Snazy
See thats my whole point, that you have again missed.
You seem to think that there is some sort of "grading" in dog. And its this that is causing all the confusion.

Dogs are animals. They have instincts, and abilities. You can teach a lab to be a killer, you can teach a teacup yorkie to bite on sight and so on.

There is NO "safe" breed, and NO "unsafe" breed.
There ARE,.... poor bloodlines, bad breeders, thick owners, and egotistical arseholes who own dogs for trophies.

You say


But have already said


and



and



So while you say its not about whats safe/savage, you have already made that assumption, and decided that Rotties and Staffs are savage, and Spaniels and Labs are safe. Contradiction?

I think it's you who have spectacularly missed the point, so let's put it this way, if you were being attacked by a dog, which breed would you prefer it to be a Cocker Spaniel or a Rottie?
Old 03 December 2009, 04:29 PM
  #226  
pikeywrx
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
pikeywrx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 794
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

niether?
Old 03 December 2009, 04:32 PM
  #227  
EddScott
Scooby Regular
 
EddScott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: West Wales
Posts: 12,573
Received 64 Likes on 32 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by pikeywrx
So far theres hutton and edd trolling. i have answered your questions. Im really quite shocked as its not like your normal comments
Not quite sure how mine and Huttons comments are seen as trolling. I didn't like the way Spoon was showing off that a person would come off worse if approaching his dog and I want to know if the same would be OK if that person was approaching said dog due to a danger to their family.

Hutton, like I said to you in other posts, is pointing out that you can't just flick a switch and a child will no longer fear dogs. I have no fear of dogs but my daughter does and I also pointed out to you that I do everything to show her that in the main, dogs are not to be feared. I thought we at least agree on that point.

As it looks like I'm in the minority here, I'll leave it there.
Old 03 December 2009, 04:40 PM
  #229  
Spoon
Scooby Regular
 
Spoon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Logged Out
Posts: 10,221
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by hutton_d
He gets taught lots of things. As dogs aren't a great part of our lives then he doesn't get to see them much.
Most people don't go swimming much but they make sure their children are taught to swim in case.

Originally Posted by hutton_d
Let me sum things up, as tx tried to earlier.

I'm out with my son - and I'll assume the owner is with the dog.

a) dog is nearby paying us no mind. We do likewise, though I'll keep a wary eye on it

b) dog comes up to us and is clearly inquisitive rather than threatening. I'll maybe, depending on the situation and whether my son is scared or not and whether the owner minds, let my son see the dog is friendly and see if he'll stroke it (and NOT poke it in the eye ....)

c) dog comes up in a threatening manner. I get between said dog and son. Maybe pick son up, but keep dog away. *Most* dogs that seem threatening are then actually scared of people if you make it clear you're not scared of them.

d) dog is threatening and won't go away. Then I'll react, owner or no owner. Whether it's a shout, boot, stick or rock that dog is getting nowhere near my son. And yes, you all have dogs that can kill humans with a single glance but if they got a good boot in the head I'm sure they'd think twice.


Clear enough for people? In the world that us non-dog owners live in that's the reaction we'd all have!

Dave
Yes and a lot clearer than just saying you'd stick the boot in. There is nothing there I disagree with.
Old 03 December 2009, 04:41 PM
  #230  
Devildog
Scooby Regular
 
Devildog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Away from this place
Posts: 4,430
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Martin2005
I think it's you who have spectacularly missed the point, so let's put it this way, if you were being attacked by a dog, which breed would you prefer it to be a Cocker Spaniel or a Rottie?
Martin,

That's a whole different argument - and you could just as easily substitute Labrador for Rottweiler. Or any dog of reasonable size and strength.

The point of the question, which you have spectacularly missed, is that as you have had no direct experience of Rotties or Staffies, you are therefore completely unqualified to pass comment on those breeds.

Asking the question:

Why would you want a Staff or Rottie? what's the logic, I honestly don't get it?
And statements like:

I just don't think that getting one in the first place is responsible.
Has therefore lost you what remaining credibility you had on this topic, and anything else for that matter.

Had you simply asked "What's the appeal" with genuine curiosity, rather than the incredulity with which your post was loaded that may have been a different story.

And, please, don't try and argue that you were simply curious. Your subsequent posts were of such a dismissive nature as to prove that clearly wasn't the case.

Last edited by Devildog; 03 December 2009 at 04:46 PM.
Old 03 December 2009, 04:46 PM
  #231  
pikeywrx
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
pikeywrx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 794
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Dont buy a puppy!!!!!!



















That washing basket was innocent and the rug.

i swear its staff/pig
Old 03 December 2009, 04:47 PM
  #232  
pikeywrx
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
pikeywrx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 794
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

please note we have only just got house and kitchen is next to be done lol
Old 03 December 2009, 04:52 PM
  #233  
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Martin2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Devildog
Martin,

That's a whole different argument - and you could just as easily substitute Labrador for Rottweiler. Or any dog of reasonable size and strength.

The point of the question, which you have spectacularly missed, is that as you have had no direct experience of Rotties or Staffies, you are therefore completely unqualified to pass comment on those breeds.

Asking the question:



And statements like:



Has therefore lost you what remaining credibility you had on this topic, and anything else for that matter.

Had you simply asked "What's the appeal" with genuine curiosity, rather than the incredulity with which your post was loaded that may have been a different story.

And, please, don't try and argue that you were simply curious. Your subsequent posts were of such a dismissive nature as to prove that clearly wasn't the case.
Man I don't need your endorsement on my views, the fact that you cannot control your primeval desire for a huge powerful pet with big teeth, is your problem not mine.

The reason I asked what would you rather be attacked by is because it goes to the very heart of the issue...

If a Cocker Spaniel has a bad day bites you then you are going to live, if a Pitbull or Rottie loses it then you are going to end up maimed or worse, that is just a fact.
Old 03 December 2009, 04:53 PM
  #234  
Snazy
Scooby Regular
 
Snazy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: S.E London
Posts: 13,654
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Martin2005
I think it's you who have spectacularly missed the point, so let's put it this way, if you were being attacked by a dog, which breed would you prefer it to be a Cocker Spaniel or a Rottie?
lol I have to say that is probably one of the most stupid comments on this thread yet.
All that says to me is... "Buy a Lab or a Spaniel, any idiot can own one, and if they do bite, its not like they are gonna kill you"
A dog bite is a dog bit. Try telling someone who has been bitten in the face by any breed that "it was only a spaniel"

Originally Posted by pikeywrx
niether?
Strange that, my preference too!

Originally Posted by Devildog
Martin,

That's a whole different argument - and you could just as easily substitute Labrador for Rottweiler. Or any dog of reasonable size and strength.

The point of the question, which you have spectacularly missed, is that as you have had no direct experience of Rotties or Staffies, you are therefore completely unqualified to pass comment on those breeds.


Watch out, savage wolf about!
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC04053.jpg
Views:	0
Size:	200.5 KB
ID:	3210  
Old 03 December 2009, 04:59 PM
  #235  
Snazy
Scooby Regular
 
Snazy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: S.E London
Posts: 13,654
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Martin2005

The reason I asked what would you rather be attacked by is because it goes to the very heart of the issue...

If a Cocker Spaniel has a bad day bites you then you are going to live, if a Pitbull or Rottie loses it then you are going to end up maimed or worse, that is just a fact.
But thats not a fact, its an assumption. Based on media hype and poorly kept statistics.
The human body has plenty of vunerable areas, to where a single bit could be fatal.

To say being bitten by one dog is better than another is just madness.

I was bitten as a kid by a collie cross as a kid, for being in a friends shared garden. Back of the leg, 4 puncture wounds and bled like a ****!
Should I be grateful?
Old 03 December 2009, 05:01 PM
  #236  
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Martin2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Snazy
lol I have to say that is probably one of the most stupid comments on this thread yet.
All that says to me is... "Buy a Lab or a Spaniel, any idiot can own one, and if they do bite, its not like they are gonna kill you"
A dog bite is a dog bit. Try telling someone who has been bitten in the face by any breed that "it was only a spaniel"



Strange that, my preference too!





Watch out, savage wolf about!
What is it about multiple choice questions you guys don't understand?
Old 03 December 2009, 05:01 PM
  #237  
Snazy
Scooby Regular
 
Snazy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: S.E London
Posts: 13,654
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by pikeywrx
please note we have only just got house and kitchen is next to be done lol
Serves you right for housing what is clearly the spawn of satan!
Old 03 December 2009, 05:04 PM
  #238  
pikeywrx
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
pikeywrx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 794
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Snazy you should have this phrase above the pic off your wolf

"ILL HUFF AND ILL PUFF THEN ILL LAY THE **** DOWN " PMSL

Martin your a troll
Old 03 December 2009, 05:04 PM
  #239  
Snazy
Scooby Regular
 
Snazy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: S.E London
Posts: 13,654
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Martin2005
What is it about multiple choice questions you guys don't understand?
The fact that there is no "none of the above" option

ALL dogs should be raised and handled with respect and care, and owned by sensible people. To assume a breed is "safe" to have, even for dumb or violent people is wrong.

Watch some animal control programs on tv, and you will see that ANY breed can be problematic. Yes you will see certain breeds more than others, but that is based on the idiot trophy/status dog owners. The sort that should own NO breed.
Old 03 December 2009, 05:06 PM
  #240  
Spoon
Scooby Regular
 
Spoon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Logged Out
Posts: 10,221
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by EddScott
That is the point I made for spoon to answer (the implication that approaching his dog would result in harm to the individual) but he just resorted to poor insults in a sad attempt to get a rise out me.
Yes and I answered it as clearly as I made by original statement that many people understood. If you are so wet as to think I insulted you then I suggest you take a break from trying to twist my words. Getting a rise out of you would be as easy as asking you to get 10 copies of a document.


Quick Reply: Oh no, not again - dog attacks and kills child



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:08 PM.