Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related

Oh no, not again - dog attacks and kills child

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03 December 2009, 05:06 PM
  #241  
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Martin2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Snazy
But thats not a fact, its an assumption. Based on media hype and poorly kept statistics.
The human body has plenty of vunerable areas, to where a single bit could be fatal.

To say being bitten by one dog is better than another is just madness.

I was bitten as a kid by a collie cross as a kid, for being in a friends shared garden. Back of the leg, 4 puncture wounds and bled like a ****!
Should I be grateful?

You just refuse to face up to this don't you? You appear have even managed to convince yourself that all breeds dogs are equally dangerous and have the same potential.
Old 03 December 2009, 05:08 PM
  #242  
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Martin2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by pikeywrx
Snazy you should have this phrase above the pic off your wolf

"ILL HUFF AND ILL PUFF THEN ILL LAY THE **** DOWN " PMSL

Martin your a troll
Oh I see; Troll = anyone who doesn't agree with you
Old 03 December 2009, 05:09 PM
  #243  
Snazy
Scooby Regular
 
Snazy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: S.E London
Posts: 13,654
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by pikeywrx
Snazy you should have this phrase above the pic off your wolf

"ILL HUFF AND ILL PUFF THEN ILL LAY THE **** DOWN " PMSL
Excellent.

Here they are again, hunting, like savages to!
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG00181.jpg
Views:	0
Size:	276.0 KB
ID:	3211  
Old 03 December 2009, 05:14 PM
  #244  
Xx-IAN-xX
Scooby Regular
 
Xx-IAN-xX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Si hoc legere scis numium eruditionis habes
Posts: 1,383
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

[quote=Martin2005;9080444]Oh I see; Troll = Martin 2005


edited for accuracy
Old 03 December 2009, 05:16 PM
  #245  
Snazy
Scooby Regular
 
Snazy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: S.E London
Posts: 13,654
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Martin2005
You just refuse to face up to this don't you? You appear have even managed to convince yourself that all breeds dogs are equally dangerous and have the same potential.
lol its not about facing up to anything.
Some breeds have bigger mouthes, and some could inflict more harm than others, yes I totally agree.

However you seem to indicate that certain breeds WILL turn and bite, while others just would not do that. Or that a small bite is ok.
A bite is a bite, a lip turned up is NOT acceptable, let alone biting.

Im honestly not sure what the final point you make is. But it appears to be, "get a small to medium size dog, they dont hurt as much WHEN they bite you" Is that about the size of it?

ALL dogs have the potential to bite. How you raise them, and where they came from will determine if this is ever likely to become a reality.

Get shot by a .22 not an AK47..... they dont hurt quite as much!
Get run over by a Mini, not a Range Rover...." "
Get punched by Amir Khan not Tyson.... " "

Last edited by Snazy; 03 December 2009 at 05:17 PM.
Old 03 December 2009, 05:20 PM
  #246  
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Martin2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Snazy
lol its not about facing up to anything.
Some breeds have bigger mouthes, and some could inflict more harm than others, yes I totally agree.

However you seem to indicate that certain breeds WILL turn and bite, while others just would not do that. Or that a small bite is ok.
A bite is a bite, a lip turned up is NOT acceptable, let alone biting.

Im honestly not sure what the final point you make is. But it appears to be, "get a small to medium size dog, they dont hurt as much WHEN they bite you" Is that about the size of it?

ALL dogs have the potential to bite. How you raise them, and where they came from will determine if this is ever likely to become a reality.

Get shot by a .22 not an AK47..... they dont hurt quite as much!
No I've never indicated certain breeds are more likely to attack, I have indicated that when certian breeds DO attack the damage is far worse.

Well I don't know about you but I'd rather be shot by the .22 than the AK, wouldn't you?

Here's a study from the US DOG BITE LAW - Statistics about dog bites in the USA and elsewhere
Old 03 December 2009, 05:31 PM
  #247  
Snazy
Scooby Regular
 
Snazy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: S.E London
Posts: 13,654
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Martin2005
No I've never indicated certain breeds are more likely to attack, I have indicated that when certian breeds DO attack the damage is far worse.

Well I don't know about you but I'd rather be shot by the .22 than the AK, wouldn't you?

Here's a study from the US DOG BITE LAW - Statistics about dog bites in the USA and elsewhere
NO, again, I would rather not be shot at all. In other words I would rather that people incapable of handling something that can cause harm were not allowed to own such "weapons" at all. Rather than limiting the damage they are allowed to inflict.

Using your reasoning. Are you suggesting that a bite from a collie/lab etc would be better than a bite from a Staff ?
Based on what logic exactly?

St Bernard or GSD ? Do you have a preference?

Are you aware of the difference between a defensive "go away" bite, and one intended to cause harm, i.e a full on attack?
Would you rather be told to go away by a Rottie or be "attacked" by a Lab ?

Im trying to understand what you are saying, rather than just rejecting it.
Old 03 December 2009, 05:43 PM
  #248  
ritchie21
Scooby Regular
 
ritchie21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 458
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have refrained from posting on this thread thus far but now will contribute my two penneth!

I have a Rottie. He's called Thunder, is as daft as a brush and as soft as muck. I bought Thunder because I had a Rottie as my first dog when I was seven and he (Deefer) was exactly the same. I fell in love with the breed and knew that it would be a perfect family dog. I researched reputable breeders and bought Thunder from a breeder who was KC registered and who happily allowed us to look at his set up.

Thunder is now 6 and a half. My stepdaughter is 11 and every night goes and lays on Thunder (always with us present) and has her snuggle. Thunder is never left on his own with anybody, not because I think he would do anything but because I do not think you can trust any dog 100%. It's also in part to protect him. His only fault is that he has no concept of his size and regularly stands on your feet when begging for a back scratch-12 stone of Rottie hurts!

He has regularly been attcked by other dogs whilst out walking-the worst being a Jack Russell. He has NEVER attempted to bite back. His response would be to run and hide behind my legs, shaking and whimpering at having been bit.

I am not a Chav or an irresponsible owner. I am a barrister practising in criminal law and regularly prosecute and defend dangerous dog cases. In August, I was burgled at 1am in the morning. The burglar came in through the kitchen window and climbed over Thunder. Thunder did not attack, but he did follow him into our living room and gave him some low growls. That alerted my husband and I and when we ran down to confront the burglar, Thunder knowing that he is not allowed in the living room at night, promptly ran back into the kitchen, knocking the door and shutting it as he went through. The burglar then beat me and was brought down by my husband and we kept him til police arrived. Thunder has really been affected and can not leave us alone, having to be with us wherever we are. Everybody's first comment?? Your dog is useless-why didn't he attack? Because he is a PET not a guard dog. But no, because he is a Rottie, everyone thought it was acceptable for him to attack - even though they said they wouldn't have expected their dogs to do that.

My colleague has a Jack Russell who bites if you ever try and take anything from him - this she feels is acceptable because "he's only little and won't do you any harm!". Still blooming hurts though!

Finally, when Issy (my stepdaughter) was 8 she went to her friends down the road to play. Her friends dad was in the garden, along with their springer spaniel, who had known Issy for as long as they had had him. As soon as Issy closed the gate and turned around, the dog started attacking her. Thank god she stayed on her feet. She suffered bite marks to her chest and penetrative bite marks to both arms. She didn't care that it was a springer spaniel that did it and not a Rottie. All she cared about was that it hurt and she thought she was going to die. Thunder was amazing with her. He knew she was wary and kept his distance until she was ready to deal with him. Now they are once again (and were to be fair two days after the incident when she was feeding him an ice lolly!) the best of friends. Do not make the mistake of thinking that a bite from a spaniel is less harmful than that of a Rottie, it isn't! Issy is permanently scarred from that.

As my grandma used to say, don't judge a book by it's cover!
Old 03 December 2009, 05:55 PM
  #249  
Devildog
Scooby Regular
 
Devildog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Away from this place
Posts: 4,430
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Martin2005
Man I don't need your endorsement on my views, the fact that you cannot control your primeval desire for a huge powerful pet with big teeth, is your problem not mine.
There you go again. Making assumptions about my motives, and contradicting yourself.

Apparently it is your problem, because I don't need to justify my decisions and I am comfortable in my ownership, but you seem to need to question both. The only "problem" i have as a Rottie owner is dealing with the attitude of people like you who follow media sensasionalism like sheep.

The reason I asked what would you rather be attacked by is because it goes to the very heart of the issue...
The heart of a different issue, to the one you raised about why would you want a Rottie or a Staffie. My dogs are no stronger than any of many different breeds that you would seemingly have no issue with. In case you are (once again) sadly misinformed, Rotties don't have a "locking" jaw.

If a Cocker Spaniel has a bad day bites you then you are going to live, if a Pitbull or Rottie loses it then you are going to end up maimed or worse, that is just a fact.
Its also a fact that if any number of 100 other breeds no one ever seems to have any concerns about "loses" it then the same applies. And incidentally, if a cocker spaniel "loses" it, the young for example would be just as at risk.

By your thinking, would you then consider the likes of (for example) Labradors, St Bernards or Standard Poodles to be an irresponsible ownership proposition?

Last edited by Devildog; 03 December 2009 at 05:56 PM.
Old 03 December 2009, 06:55 PM
  #251  
nik52wrx
Scooby Regular
 
nik52wrx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,272
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Martin, do you drive, fly, use public transport, go to the pub on a saturday night or simply sit in a big ball of cotton wool all your life?

IMO you are very narrow minded....

p.s. I ask again, tell me why i shouldn't buy a Rottweiler if i so desire?

Out of curiousity how do you rate my English Mastiff?



Originally Posted by Martin2005
Man I don't need your endorsement on my views, the fact that you cannot control your primeval desire for a huge powerful pet with big teeth, is your problem not mine.

The reason I asked what would you rather be attacked by is because it goes to the very heart of the issue...

If a Cocker Spaniel has a bad day bites you then you are going to live, if a Pitbull or Rottie loses it then you are going to end up maimed or worse, that is just a fact.
Old 03 December 2009, 07:04 PM
  #252  
Snazy
Scooby Regular
 
Snazy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: S.E London
Posts: 13,654
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Devildog

Its also a fact that if any number of 100 other breeds no one ever seems to have any concerns about "loses" it then the same applies. And incidentally, if a cocker spaniel "loses" it, the young for example would be just as at risk.

By your thinking, would you then consider the likes of (for example) Labradors, St Bernards or Standard Poodles to be an irresponsible ownership proposition?
No no DD you dont understand... Spaniels, and other similarly sized dogs just dont hurt when then bite with their foam teeth.

However Great Dane's are savage *******s.

lol
Ever seen a Jack Russell lose it! Nasty little sods!

Originally Posted by nik52wrx
p.s. I ask again, tell me why i shouldn't buy a Rottweiler if i so desire?

Out of curiousity how do you rate my English Mastiff?
Simple! They are savage, and should be banned!

English Mastiff, I thought they were banned, they eat kittens dont they ?

Old 03 December 2009, 07:09 PM
  #253  
Snazy
Scooby Regular
 
Snazy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: S.E London
Posts: 13,654
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Oh Ritchie.... I meant to say, compelling arguement there without a doubt.
Glad you are all ok

PS, well done Thunder. As im sure by todays legal system (no dig intended) if he had bitten the burglar, he would have been taken away and threatened with destruction. And you would have been sued for damages. (overkill I know but I could not resist)

Of course though, this is an isolated incident, and not at all an example of how big vicious child eating, kitten shredding breeds REALLY behave.

Last edited by Snazy; 03 December 2009 at 07:13 PM.
Old 03 December 2009, 07:09 PM
  #254  
pikeywrx
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
pikeywrx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 794
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

rotties and masstiffs are of very much the same temprement IMO mastiffs are lovely and were a choice when i got my rottie,

Main reason we have staffs and rotties is that they dont mault alot and the wife has a skin complaint
Old 03 December 2009, 07:14 PM
  #255  
tkws5606
Scooby Regular
 
tkws5606's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

FFS get a grip.
I would guess that you are on this site because you bought a loud aggressive and fast car and not a safe slow and reliable one.
So why should responsible people with large/powerful dogs be slated for their choice.
Old 03 December 2009, 07:15 PM
  #256  
Snazy
Scooby Regular
 
Snazy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: S.E London
Posts: 13,654
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by pikeywrx
rotties and masstiffs are of very much the same temprement IMO mastiffs are lovely and were a choice when i got my rottie,

Main reason we have staffs and rotties is that they dont mault alot and the wife has a skin complaint
Personally I chose Malamutes for the following reasons.

1/ the look like wolves
2/ people are scared of them
3/ they enhance the size of my *****
4/ people are impressed by them
5/ people know they are expensive
6/ as they eat cats/kittens, it was cheaper to feed them on neighbourhood cats, than actually buy food for them.
oh and 7/ dem is well 'ard !
Old 03 December 2009, 07:19 PM
  #257  
nik52wrx
Scooby Regular
 
nik52wrx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,272
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

We had a lovely Rott which sadly died of a form of cancer aged 7.
She was also diabetic and never once 'complained' when being injected every day, fantastic temperament. The family had a Mastiff a few years back which was a very similar dog in terms of character, never a spot of bother.

We pick up our latest Mastiff a week on saturday, once she's had her first injection

Originally Posted by pikeywrx
rotties and masstiffs are of very much the same temprement IMO mastiffs are lovely and were a choice when i got my rottie,

Main reason we have staffs and rotties is that they dont mault alot and the wife has a skin complaint

Last edited by nik52wrx; 03 December 2009 at 07:38 PM.
Old 03 December 2009, 07:28 PM
  #258  
pikeywrx
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
pikeywrx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 794
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Mastiffs are ace dogs mate you will have no regrets. I know off a few rottie/mastiff crosses there like bears!
Old 03 December 2009, 07:33 PM
  #259  
Snazy
Scooby Regular
 
Snazy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: S.E London
Posts: 13,654
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by nik52wrx

We pick up the Mastiff a week on saturday, once she's had her first injection
We will of course expect pictures of this savage beast, you realise that
Old 03 December 2009, 07:35 PM
  #260  
Snazy
Scooby Regular
 
Snazy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: S.E London
Posts: 13,654
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by pikeywrx
Mastiffs are ace dogs mate you will have no regrets. I know off a few rottie/mastiff crosses there like bears!
Speaking of bears. Look at this one. Mauling a child for the camera.

Massi-mute!
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Ace.jpg
Views:	0
Size:	20.7 KB
ID:	3213  
Old 03 December 2009, 07:48 PM
  #261  
Jamie
Super Muppet
 
Jamie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Inside out
Posts: 33,364
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Great picture snazy but what the hell is the man smiling for and where is his ****
Old 03 December 2009, 07:55 PM
  #262  
Snazy
Scooby Regular
 
Snazy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: S.E London
Posts: 13,654
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jamie
Great picture snazy but what the hell is the man smiling for and where is his ****
Its what any self respecting malamute owner does, to "bond" with the beast
Old 03 December 2009, 08:08 PM
  #263  
Spoon
Scooby Regular
 
Spoon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Logged Out
Posts: 10,221
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by hutton_d
Strange that people don't read what is written. The first comment I made that mentioned 'boot' and 'dog' in the same sentence said exactly the same thing. Just in two sentences. People should learn to read!

Dave
Unfortunately though that wasn't the case. Some people do read the posts. Some people also think they can lie without detection.
Your first comment is below. Then you clarified that comment in the post at the bottom. You can clearly see option B) and C) states "the dog comes up to us" and you don't boot it.

HTH.
Originally Posted by hutton_d
Absolutely. A dog goes near my 5-year old and they'd better stay out of the way of my boot!

Dave
Originally Posted by hutton_d
I'm out with my son - and I'll assume the owner is with the dog.

a) dog is nearby paying us no mind. We do likewise, though I'll keep a wary eye on it

b) dog comes up to us and is clearly inquisitive rather than threatening. I'll maybe, depending on the situation and whether my son is scared or not and whether the owner minds, let my son see the dog is friendly and see if he'll stroke it (and NOT poke it in the eye ....)

c) dog comes up in a threatening manner. I get between said dog and son. Maybe pick son up, but keep dog away. *Most* dogs that seem threatening are then actually scared of people if you make it clear you're not scared of them.

d) dog is threatening and won't go away. Then I'll react, owner or no owner. Whether it's a shout, boot, stick or rock that dog is getting nowhere near my son. And yes, you all have dogs that can kill humans with a single glance but if they got a good boot in the head I'm sure they'd think twice.

Dave
Old 03 December 2009, 08:12 PM
  #264  
Jamie
Super Muppet
 
Jamie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Inside out
Posts: 33,364
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Snazy
Its what any self respecting malamute owner does, to "bond" with the beast
Beast dog bond so wrong in so many words
Old 03 December 2009, 08:15 PM
  #265  
Snazy
Scooby Regular
 
Snazy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: S.E London
Posts: 13,654
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jamie
Beast dog bond so wrong in so many words
But this thread is all about dogs and stuff being wrong, so I thought I would lower the tone a little more
Old 03 December 2009, 08:19 PM
  #266  
Jamie
Super Muppet
 
Jamie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Inside out
Posts: 33,364
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Carry on chap
Old 03 December 2009, 08:23 PM
  #267  
Quasi Modo
Scooby Regular
 
Quasi Modo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: No, don't tell me, i know this one.
Posts: 667
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I think we can all agree that two legs or four we love our families to bits and would do anything we could to protect them from any harm, again two legs or four. As long as we are as responsible as we can possibly be there shouldn't be any problems from any sides over any others. By the way, i have a Staffie because my sister got a Staffie/Jack Russell cross from Battersea Dogs Home and had him for nine years before i took over looking after him because she moved and no longer had a garden. We had him for another nine years. When we lost him the home felt empty (as did we) so we got hold of a breeder of Staffies and went to see them and chose the pup that suited our ways the most(she also chose us). Holly's 10 now, and i regret nothing, only that she has a limited life span, as do we all. Peace guys.
Old 03 December 2009, 08:45 PM
  #268  
pikeywrx
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
pikeywrx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 794
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Im quite pleased to see that they might be charging the owner with manslaughter instead off the dangourose dogs act. as he would have only done 3 month,

I personally think they should lock him in a basement with 2 nasty pitbulls so he can deal with what that poor boy did. BUT iv also seen a pic off owner holding hs ak47 (probably a bb gun) and poseing with his trophy dog.
Old 03 December 2009, 09:09 PM
  #269  
Snazy
Scooby Regular
 
Snazy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: S.E London
Posts: 13,654
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yeah that is good news about the more serious charge
Nice to see the courts and CPS going the right way
Old 03 December 2009, 10:04 PM
  #270  
hodgy0_2
Scooby Regular
 
hodgy0_2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: K
Posts: 15,633
Received 21 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

i hadn't realised the whole dog owning population of the UK posts on scoobynet

shouldn't you all be out walking them

(pooping and a scooping)

Last edited by hodgy0_2; 03 December 2009 at 10:05 PM.


Quick Reply: Oh no, not again - dog attacks and kills child



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:55 PM.