Clownwatch
08 December 2009, 11:02 AM
#216
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: God's promised land
Posts: 80,907
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Christ, now i'm apparently trying too hard to prove my innocence for one of the turgid little guttersnipes on there 
How it's going to feel to have your **** handed to you on a plate i have no idea, but i'm going to revel in every single second of it.
How it's going to feel to have your **** handed to you on a plate i have no idea, but i'm going to revel in every single second of it.
08 December 2009, 12:15 PM
#222
Scooby Senior
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: 52 Festive Road
Posts: 28,311
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I guess some fool forgot that blogger is a google app and it's fairly simple to track back to their source google mail accounts 
Gives a lot away that does 
Gives a lot away that does
08 December 2009, 12:16 PM
#223
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Cas Vegas
Posts: 60,269
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
08 December 2009, 01:05 PM
#232
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: The Great White North
Posts: 25,080
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It does amuse me that people think Telboy and Bubba are/were behind CW. I'm really not the best at reading people, however to me they both call a spade a spade and seemingly don't hide behind aliases should they wish to comment on thinking someone is a twonk, thus creating a blog to berate, abuse and defame users doesn't seem to be their style.
One could claim in their defiance that they are behind it "The lady doth protest too much, methinks", but I'm not convinced. Do they know who it is? Again, I am fairly sure they do not, but I would not be overly shocked if it turned out to be someone who they knew.
Was the blog removed by choice or by force is another question. It's possible someone reported it using the available link and Google removed it, but I think the message seen is typically something along the lines of "this blog as been removed due to failure to comply with the terms of service", rather than the simple "the blog you were looking for was not found" which is what is seen, thus I'd say the creator(s) decided to remove it.
Why, maybe someone was getting a little too close to finding out who was behind it, and they didn't want their anonymity revealed on here for whatever reason. It's always easier to snipe from the shadows than to stand out in the field and take the shot from where all can see you, and of course shoot back.
One could claim in their defiance that they are behind it "The lady doth protest too much, methinks", but I'm not convinced. Do they know who it is? Again, I am fairly sure they do not, but I would not be overly shocked if it turned out to be someone who they knew.
Was the blog removed by choice or by force is another question. It's possible someone reported it using the available link and Google removed it, but I think the message seen is typically something along the lines of "this blog as been removed due to failure to comply with the terms of service", rather than the simple "the blog you were looking for was not found" which is what is seen, thus I'd say the creator(s) decided to remove it.
Why, maybe someone was getting a little too close to finding out who was behind it, and they didn't want their anonymity revealed on here for whatever reason. It's always easier to snipe from the shadows than to stand out in the field and take the shot from where all can see you, and of course shoot back.
08 December 2009, 01:11 PM
#233
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: God's promised land
Posts: 80,907
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You think too clearly for some on here, Markus
1. Yes i call a spade a spade. There's only one person on here i think is a total tool, and i've not been afraid to say it. Anonymity? Give me a break.
2. No, i wasn't involved. Hopefully the site's demise won't prevent further information from becoming available. I'm assisting where possible.
3. Are any of the Tel and Bob uber-haters prepared to nail their colours to the mast now that the shield of Clownwatch has been removed? My guess is.... no, or not many at least
And that speaks volumes, doesn't it
1. Yes i call a spade a spade. There's only one person on here i think is a total tool, and i've not been afraid to say it. Anonymity? Give me a break.
2. No, i wasn't involved. Hopefully the site's demise won't prevent further information from becoming available. I'm assisting where possible.
3. Are any of the Tel and Bob uber-haters prepared to nail their colours to the mast now that the shield of Clownwatch has been removed? My guess is.... no, or not many at least
And that speaks volumes, doesn't it
08 December 2009, 01:16 PM
#234
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: in a place where there lots of rocks to chuck at feejits
Posts: 1,854
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Tel, Ive told you via pm, I have my suspicions and neither yourself nor Bob are anywhere near the top of the list, admittedly, I have thought of the fact it may have been either or both of you (or even more of the old 'clique') , but untill such time as the truth outs, I guess everyone is open to suspicion, eh? hell, I guess even I am.
Now, maybe , just maybe , whoever the charcacter behind 'Oik/Soci/ CW is/are, theyll take a hint and disappear into the shadows they love so much.
Now, maybe , just maybe , whoever the charcacter behind 'Oik/Soci/ CW is/are, theyll take a hint and disappear into the shadows they love so much.
08 December 2009, 01:24 PM
#238
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: The Great White North
Posts: 25,080
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
They might post on here, but I doubt they will, as unless they play the stealth troll card for a while and I don't think they could be that patient, they'd want to start having a pop at people as soon as possible, then they'd be banned fairly quickly.
The blog may come back, or another one might well appear, I don't see them hiding in the shadows and saying nothing. As said, they are attention seekers.
08 December 2009, 01:36 PM
#240
BANNED
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Armitage Shanks
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I seriously doubt that. They like (crave?) the attention that CW gave them, in the same way they enjoyed the notoriety they had on here, until their accounts were banned.
They might post on here, but I doubt they will, as unless they play the stealth troll card for a while and I don't think they could be that patient, they'd want to start having a pop at people as soon as possible, then they'd be banned fairly quickly.
The blog may come back, or another one might well appear, I don't see them hiding in the shadows and saying nothing. As said, they are attention seekers.
They might post on here, but I doubt they will, as unless they play the stealth troll card for a while and I don't think they could be that patient, they'd want to start having a pop at people as soon as possible, then they'd be banned fairly quickly.
The blog may come back, or another one might well appear, I don't see them hiding in the shadows and saying nothing. As said, they are attention seekers.
The blog was about for some time before the masses got wind of it. If attention was the aim then a link on SN from day 1 would have been available.
The thing that spoilt it was the comments. There were nasty on the whole and detracted from the talent. The Blog itself was, as said, bang on the button, with a few exceptions.