Notices

TOP SPEED ON STANDARD ENGINES

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 29 December 2009, 04:45 PM
  #31  
zippy!
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
zippy!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: nowhere fancy
Posts: 1,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Red face

148mph in mine and yes it blew up afterwards
Old 29 December 2009, 04:59 PM
  #32  
joz8968
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (13)
 
joz8968's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Leicester
Posts: 23,761
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by zippy!
148mph in mine and yes it blew up afterwards
Was it worth it? I'm sure not...
Old 29 December 2009, 06:35 PM
  #33  
Anders_WR1
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (8)
 
Anders_WR1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Surrey
Posts: 1,405
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I hit the 155 or 157mph limit on my WR1 a few times during first year of ownership (on a private track). It was my first scooby and didn't know it was bad for the engine and most people who buy one wouldn't know it's not designed to do it.

I haven't been much past 130 for a while, I just enjoy getting there faster now

Anders
Old 29 December 2009, 06:52 PM
  #34  
dabow
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (19)
 
dabow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: notts
Posts: 2,770
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

the only thing i've always been told. once you get to top end. lay off the throttle, as the turbos life is shortend.

the engine, should be fine. as long as the oil & coolent is maintained
if your reving the tots off the car, yes, i can see why. but over a ton wont do anything
Old 29 December 2009, 06:53 PM
  #35  
Anders_WR1
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (8)
 
Anders_WR1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Surrey
Posts: 1,405
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I hit the 155 or 157mph limit on my WR1 a few times during first year of ownership (on a private track). It was my first scooby and didn't know it was bad for the engine and most people who buy one wouldn't know it's not designed to do it.

I haven't been much past 130 for a while, I just enjoy getting there faster now

Anders
Old 29 December 2009, 08:22 PM
  #36  
RA Dunk
Scooby Regular
 
RA Dunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: My turbo blows, air lots of it!!
Posts: 9,073
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dabow
the only thing i've always been told. once you get to top end. lay off the throttle, as the turbos life is shortend.

the engine, should be fine. as long as the oil & coolent is maintained
if your reving the tots off the car, yes, i can see why. but over a ton wont do anything
the problem at least with the earlier models is (AFAIK over 120MHP or there abouts) the inefficency of the bonnet scoop, air misses the bonnet scoop there fore missing the intercooler which leads to det then bang!
Old 29 December 2009, 09:13 PM
  #37  
DaveD
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
DaveD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Bristol-ish
Posts: 2,085
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RA Dunk
the problem at least with the earlier models is (AFAIK over 120MHP or there abouts) the inefficency of the bonnet scoop, air misses the bonnet scoop there fore missing the intercooler which leads to det then bang!
There's probably some truth in that, although the front of the bonnet does appear to lift alarmingly at high speed, which could help cool the engine / intercooler?

I've had my WRX do some prolonged 120+mph running on the continent (with some hard acceleration in between) without any issues. I've maxed-out in 5th (well, hit the 7,000rpm red line in 5th) on a couple of occasions at around 145mph, but mechanical sympathy has made me drop down to a more reasonable(!) 120mph (but still 6k rpm!) pretty quickly.

These high speeds have been done on warm summer days, and the engine has now clocked-up around 200,000 miles without needing a rebuild.....
Old 29 December 2009, 09:28 PM
  #38  
Davey P
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Davey P's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Dorset
Posts: 1,616
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TonyBurns
P1 should be the same as a UK turbo's 5th (167ish mph, limited to 155mph), 155@8k would be a type R's gearbox.

Tony
The P1 is geared for around 180mph assuming your going by the speedo and not GPS.
Old 29 December 2009, 09:33 PM
  #39  
Quasi Modo
Scooby Regular
 
Quasi Modo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: No, don't tell me, i know this one.
Posts: 667
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Limited to 112, but pulls all the way.

Oh no, it's the boob again.

Bitty, Bitty.

Last edited by Quasi Modo; 29 December 2009 at 09:35 PM.
Old 30 December 2009, 07:27 PM
  #40  
Quasi Modo
Scooby Regular
 
Quasi Modo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: No, don't tell me, i know this one.
Posts: 667
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Sorry, making a tit of myself. What do ya mean AGAIN?
Old 30 December 2009, 08:14 PM
  #41  
dabow
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (19)
 
dabow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: notts
Posts: 2,770
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Davey P
The P1 is geared for around 180mph assuming your going by the speedo and not GPS.
not a chance, i did have the same boxas the mc-ray edition. via gps did 157 but had more, after fitting a p1 box & diff. maxed at 149/150
it was alot quicker for my scoob to get there. but to me, there slower than the standard box

Last edited by dabow; 30 December 2009 at 08:15 PM.
Old 30 December 2009, 08:55 PM
  #42  
172sport
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (6)
 
172sport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Nr Grimsby
Posts: 2,641
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Put the numbers in a gearbox calculator, the P1 box is good for 170+
Obviously you need the power to hit the limiter in 5th...................
Old 30 December 2009, 09:03 PM
  #43  
dabow
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (19)
 
dabow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: notts
Posts: 2,770
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 172sport
Put the numbers in a gearbox calculator, the P1 box is good for 170+
Obviously you need the power to hit the limiter in 5th...................
i did, 7k+
317bhp, & 313 torque
wouldn't go anymore, but the same engine but with my old box. 157, but had more.

i spent quite abit on the box/diff/linkage/shafts ect
the clock its self said 160, the gps 149/150

even the brochore for the p1 says 150.
Old 30 December 2009, 09:05 PM
  #44  
172sport
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (6)
 
172sport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Nr Grimsby
Posts: 2,641
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Regardless - maths show its good for 170+ at 8000rpm given enough power.
Old 30 December 2009, 09:14 PM
  #45  
dabow
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (19)
 
dabow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: notts
Posts: 2,770
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 172sport
Regardless - maths show its good for 170+ at 8000rpm given enough power.
i did hit the limitor too at times.
id love to say i did 170 mate, but it dont.
i got the p1 box fitted, as i throught it would be better than my old box, but it wasen't, it pulls a little quicker, but not to much in it.
taking in consideration the fact i have 215/40/17 tryes,
i have a uk classic too, so reads 9k.
but it dont get there.

theres nothing wrong with the box either.
id like to see someone with one of these boxes on, able to get 170 mph.
and ask how the hell did he do it....

its like my engine, put that in a calculator. it should be making more than it does, but it dont mate.
Old 30 December 2009, 09:22 PM
  #46  
dabow
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (19)
 
dabow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: notts
Posts: 2,770
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

just checked the file i have about the ratios in these boxes

the p1 (TY754VBAAA) the final drive is a 0.738 this is also the same as the other boxi had (TY752VN3BA) but the diff is a 4.4 instead of the 4.1

so would be a little slower.
may be wrong

anyways, sorry. back to thread
Old 30 December 2009, 09:24 PM
  #47  
a16pse
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
a16pse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 509
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

id have to agree if they did 170 subaru would of been proud to advertise the fact,your driving subarus not ferrari mate. lol
Old 30 December 2009, 09:30 PM
  #48  
dabow
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (19)
 
dabow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: notts
Posts: 2,770
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

dont want to call anyone here. but just stating my personal best with what i've got.
i was also told, fitting as p1 spoiler, gives more glide, and from 0-100 uses 10bhp less

again, only from what i've been told.
so i managed to get a p1 spoiler too
Old 30 December 2009, 10:18 PM
  #49  
bigarf
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (67)
 
bigarf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: w,yorkshire
Posts: 4,061
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by a16pse
id have to agree if they did 170 subaru would of been proud to advertise the fact,your driving subarus not ferrari mate. lol
the hawkeye sti is geared to do much more than 170 but subaru don't advertise that.
Old 30 December 2009, 11:19 PM
  #50  
dazdavies
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (22)
 
dazdavies's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: N/A
Posts: 7,061
Received 82 Likes on 46 Posts
Default

Top end runs on standard engines is bearing spinning territory!!!!
Old 31 December 2009, 10:13 AM
  #51  
bigsinky
Scooby Regular
 
bigsinky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Sunny BELFAST
Posts: 19,408
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dabow
dont want to call anyone here. but just stating my personal best with what i've got.
i was also told, fitting as p1 spoiler, gives more glide, and from 0-100 uses 10bhp less

again, only from what i've been told.
so i managed to get a p1 spoiler too

was this down the pub?
Old 31 December 2009, 10:38 AM
  #52  
a16pse
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
a16pse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 509
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

bIGARF I own a rather nce and well looked after 2006 STI which is running 340 bhp courtasyof JGM and i dont beleive for one second it would do 170 mph let alone more, there seems to be a lot of pub talk on here.
Old 31 December 2009, 10:46 AM
  #53  
stevebt
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (8)
 
stevebt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 16,732
Received 33 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

My gearing can do 170 Or just shy of it and if there wasn't such a high head wind it would of been over 170mph. It was reading 190mph on the clock As with most of the cars on the list we are all much faster now



Last edited by stevebt; 31 December 2009 at 10:57 AM.
Old 31 December 2009, 11:20 AM
  #54  
dazdavies
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (22)
 
dazdavies's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: N/A
Posts: 7,061
Received 82 Likes on 46 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by a16pse
bIGARF I own a rather nce and well looked after 2006 STI which is running 340 bhp courtasyof JGM and i dont beleive for one second it would do 170 mph let alone more, there seems to be a lot of pub talk on here.

He said geared to higher than 170 not that a standard car would achieve that. A 340bhp engine wont get you there but a 500bhp plus one will.
Old 31 December 2009, 02:23 PM
  #55  
dabow
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (19)
 
dabow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: notts
Posts: 2,770
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bigsinky
was this down the pub?
no mate, done this acouple of times.
to be honist, i very rare drink.

dont beleave in it at all.

Last edited by dabow; 31 December 2009 at 02:24 PM.
Old 31 December 2009, 03:33 PM
  #56  
bigsinky
Scooby Regular
 
bigsinky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Sunny BELFAST
Posts: 19,408
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dazdavies
He said geared to higher than 170 not that a standard car would achieve that. A 340bhp engine wont get you there but a 500bhp plus one will.
yes it will sir and a bit more to boot. hp = top end speed. torque = acceleration
Old 31 December 2009, 04:24 PM
  #57  
dazdavies
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (22)
 
dazdavies's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: N/A
Posts: 7,061
Received 82 Likes on 46 Posts
Default

Isn't that exactly what I've just said?

i.e 340bhp will struggle to get to 170 where as 500+ will **** it.

My old uk classic did, 6 speed, 2.5, rotated garrett gt30R, 452bhp @ 1.4 bar managed it no bother.

My new one at 600+ with hawkeye box should get nearer 200mph lol
Old 31 December 2009, 04:45 PM
  #58  
joz8968
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (13)
 
joz8968's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Leicester
Posts: 23,761
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

What is it?... Drag squares with speed? So you need exponentially more power to reach higher and higher top speeds i.e to overcome the massive increase in drag (assuming long enough gearing, of course). That's why single seater formulae have those shark-like nose cones, exemplified obviously in F1. Ergo, half the battle's won if you have bugger all frontal area!

Poor old Impreza, what with it's upright bluff snout (esp with a FMIC in place!)

Last edited by joz8968; 31 December 2009 at 08:25 PM.
Old 31 December 2009, 07:17 PM
  #59  
bigarf
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (67)
 
bigarf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: w,yorkshire
Posts: 4,061
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by a16pse
bIGARF I own a rather nce and well looked after 2006 STI which is running 340 bhp courtasyof JGM and i dont beleive for one second it would do 170 mph let alone more, there seems to be a lot of pub talk on here.
i will have to take you for a drive in mine then and i will prove that the hawkeye box will do much more than 170mph.bring a camera,and a spare pair of pants.
Old 31 December 2009, 07:32 PM
  #60  
mickywrx
Unmapped 12.4s @ 105
Support Scoobynet!
iTrader: (29)
 
mickywrx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Newcastle. 330bhp-289lb/ft @ 1bar boost - 12.4s @ 105mph
Posts: 11,776
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Post

Originally Posted by joz8968
What is it?... Drag squares with speed? So you need exponentially more power to reach higher and higher top speeds i.e to overcome the massive increase in drag (assuming long enough gearing, of course). That's why single seater formulae have those shark-like nose cones, exemplified obviously in F1. Ergo, half the battle's won if you have bugger all frontal area!

Poor old Impreza, what with it's upright bluff snout (esp with a FMIC in place!)
So interesting you said it four times.


Quick Reply: TOP SPEED ON STANDARD ENGINES



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:42 PM.