Luton protesters found guilty and yet walk free
#31
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
Jalal Ahmed used to have a part-time job as a baggage handler at Luton airport!!
How on earth can a (pathetic excuse of a) man who wants to destroy the west and implement his own beliefs (by whatever means) get a job on the air-side loading stuff into the hold of aeroplanes? Meanwhile innocent passengers can't carry a pair of tweezers, a bottle of water and are soon to be photographed naked in the cause of anti-terrorism
mb
How on earth can a (pathetic excuse of a) man who wants to destroy the west and implement his own beliefs (by whatever means) get a job on the air-side loading stuff into the hold of aeroplanes? Meanwhile innocent passengers can't carry a pair of tweezers, a bottle of water and are soon to be photographed naked in the cause of anti-terrorism
mb
#32
I think due to there history they didnt get custodial. I know its rubbish but in the eyes of the law they are guilty of a POA and for this the punishment is what they got if they are not known to police.
The circumstances of the offense are only used to establish the offense and do not have an influence on the sentence.
Now I know this is rubbish, and along with many other people I would have liked to see them locked up but in order to prove we are right, and to prove that the democracy in this country is right we have to accept that they get treated the same as anyone who is guilty of a POA. This understanding makes us infinitely better.
The bit that made me laugh was the after hearing statement when they said "This makes a mockery of democracy" and then later said "we will not stop until we have achieved sharia law in the UK"...... No mention of a referendum there boys....I dont think a democratic society is going to go for sharia law.
(POA = legal jargon for a public order offense)
The circumstances of the offense are only used to establish the offense and do not have an influence on the sentence.
Now I know this is rubbish, and along with many other people I would have liked to see them locked up but in order to prove we are right, and to prove that the democracy in this country is right we have to accept that they get treated the same as anyone who is guilty of a POA. This understanding makes us infinitely better.
The bit that made me laugh was the after hearing statement when they said "This makes a mockery of democracy" and then later said "we will not stop until we have achieved sharia law in the UK"...... No mention of a referendum there boys....I dont think a democratic society is going to go for sharia law.
(POA = legal jargon for a public order offense)
You are talking **** Dude
(Public Order Offence = POO)
#33
My view here is, as on another thread, they can *say* what they like as we do live in a democracy and there is supposed 'freedom of speech'. The fact that this case came to court has given them more publicity than they would otherwise have had, Likewise, it has highlighted *differences* between various parts of society which, if ignored, means we all live together quite happily (for the most part). Get rid of all these *equality* quangos and you'll find that a lot of this so-called *tension* will disappear. The politicians have to find ways to keep people at each others throats so they have more control!
With these particular *gentlemen* then they should be a) investigated over their welfare claims/benefits as it's obvious that if they're protesting then they are not looking for work (the fact that they are in receipt of such claims and whether that right should be there for them or anyone else is another argument for another time) and b) if they are not British citizens then they should be deported immediately as their presence is *contrary to the public good* or whatever the legal phrasing is. Yuman rites don't come into it!
Dave
With these particular *gentlemen* then they should be a) investigated over their welfare claims/benefits as it's obvious that if they're protesting then they are not looking for work (the fact that they are in receipt of such claims and whether that right should be there for them or anyone else is another argument for another time) and b) if they are not British citizens then they should be deported immediately as their presence is *contrary to the public good* or whatever the legal phrasing is. Yuman rites don't come into it!
Dave
Les
#34
Guest
Posts: n/a
Dave
#35
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Disco, Disco!
Posts: 21,825
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
But that's the point Les. It is against the law to *say* certain things, such as 'inciting violence' for example. However it shouldn't be. At the end of the day I should be able to, for example, 'preach violence and riots', as long as I don't actually carry out the deed. What is the problem with 'words'?
Dave
Dave
#38
Scooby Regular
But that's the point Les. It is against the law to *say* certain things, such as 'inciting violence' for example. However it shouldn't be. At the end of the day I should be able to, for example, 'preach violence and riots', as long as I don't actually carry out the deed. What is the problem with 'words'?
Dave
Dave
YouTube - John McEnroe - You Can Not Be Serious
Forget the tennis bit
#39
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: England
Posts: 1,131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Don't get me started on these *******
They're obviously hell bent on stirring things up and causing recial tension - and succeeding.
I just can't believe how they're allowed to get away with it - can't someone just make them 'disappear' like they would in certain other countries.
They're obviously hell bent on stirring things up and causing recial tension - and succeeding.
I just can't believe how they're allowed to get away with it - can't someone just make them 'disappear' like they would in certain other countries.
#40
Scooby Regular
Don't get me started on these *******
They're obviously hell bent on stirring things up and causing recial tension - and succeeding.
I just can't believe how they're allowed to get away with it - can't someone just make them 'disappear' like they would in certain other countries.
They're obviously hell bent on stirring things up and causing recial tension - and succeeding.
I just can't believe how they're allowed to get away with it - can't someone just make them 'disappear' like they would in certain other countries.
#41
Dave,
Their avowed aim is to overthrow the government of this country and change GB to an Islamic country under full Sharia Law. These "words" are seriously damaging as well as their intended actions. This is sedition under any meaning.
Les
Their avowed aim is to overthrow the government of this country and change GB to an Islamic country under full Sharia Law. These "words" are seriously damaging as well as their intended actions. This is sedition under any meaning.
Les
#42
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: plymouth
Posts: 415
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
god i cant wait to get back on tour and blow the **** out of some more of these ragheads.nothing more satisfying than watching them drop to the deck after being hit by a gpmg.not very p.c but bollocks to that im a squaddie fighting for my country.shame the politicions home here arent doing the same.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Sam Witwicky
Engine Management and ECU Remapping
17
13 November 2015 10:49 AM