Reset ECU without PC?
16 January 2010 | 12:38 PM
#31
Can buy handheld code readers and these have a reset facility. Cost about £30.
Worth having one in your glovebox in case the CEL ever comes on.
Battery off doesnt reset newage subarus.
The ECU is under the passenger carpet.
Worth having one in your glovebox in case the CEL ever comes on.
Battery off doesnt reset newage subarus.
The ECU is under the passenger carpet.
16 January 2010 | 12:57 PM
#32
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 14,333
Likes: 0
From: Slowly rebuilding the kit of bits into a car...
I had a CEL, due fitting a sports cat, took the battery on holiday for a fortnight, and when I got back the CEL was gone. Though this may NOT constitute an ecu reset.
HTH
dunx
P.S. Which bluetooth enabled device will work with a (std ecu) on my 2002 STI Type UK, please ?
16 January 2010 | 01:00 PM
#33
A CEL light will clear but like u say thats not a ecu reset, most cels will clear after a few ignition turns if the fault has gone, it will be stored in the history though.
hth
hth
16 January 2010 | 11:38 PM
#34
Who's we? People in your company?
Controller Area Network is a specific set of protocols for inter-and intra-vehicle communication, not a generic description for "all forms of vehicle communication", which is how you appear to be using it.
Yes, I get that you were generalising. The trouble is that the generalisation you were using was inaccurate. The reason why I pulled you for it, apart from the fact that you're factually incorrect, is because, otherwise, we'd probably see a post on here in a few weeks where someone asks why the CAN cable he's bought on eBay on the basis of your post won't connect to his bugeye. Better to correct it now than do so then.
...or indeed twisted pair. Generalisations are fine. Incorrect or potentially misleading generalisations aren't.
Controller Area Network is a specific set of protocols for inter-and intra-vehicle communication, not a generic description for "all forms of vehicle communication", which is how you appear to be using it.
Yes, I get that you were generalising. The trouble is that the generalisation you were using was inaccurate. The reason why I pulled you for it, apart from the fact that you're factually incorrect, is because, otherwise, we'd probably see a post on here in a few weeks where someone asks why the CAN cable he's bought on eBay on the basis of your post won't connect to his bugeye. Better to correct it now than do so then.
...or indeed twisted pair. Generalisations are fine. Incorrect or potentially misleading generalisations aren't.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
28
29 December 2015 12:07 AM
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
12
18 November 2015 08:03 AM
alcazar
Computer & Technology Related
2
29 September 2015 08:18 PM
