DYNAMIX JGM AND THE LIKES OF
16 January 2010, 06:05 PM
#31
Former Sponsor
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Wellingborough, Northamptonshire
Posts: 2,859
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You mean this one?
I would be careful of using the best results you've ever achieved on a dyno that's no longer installed (we can no longer compare) and taking these results as the norm. It will become difficult to explain when your "secret sauce" leaves people 20-30hp down because they base there expectations on a single excellent result. I seem to remember that you were claiming 370hp for a while before the below dyno sheet!
I would be careful of using the best results you've ever achieved on a dyno that's no longer installed (we can no longer compare) and taking these results as the norm. It will become difficult to explain when your "secret sauce" leaves people 20-30hp down because they base there expectations on a single excellent result. I seem to remember that you were claiming 370hp for a while before the below dyno sheet!
It was dyno'd at 356 / 402 on the Maha at Clive Atthowes and a road dyno done at the same time as a benchmark for further tuning. Further increases in performance were over the benchmark road dyno Paul which showed a definite increase in power and acceleration times. Unfortunately I don't have these anymore as they were on the laptop that got stolen a couple of years ago.
16 January 2010, 06:18 PM
#34
If running 340 already with a sports cat - do you believe that 360 is unfeasible with a decat and good CAI Paul?
... mind you not that it matters as Simon will be mapping it and he knows that car and how much is left in it.
... mind you not that it matters as Simon will be mapping it and he knows that car and how much is left in it.
Last edited by dynamix; 16 January 2010 at 06:43 PM.
16 January 2010, 06:49 PM
#35
You mean this one?
I would be careful of using the best results you've ever achieved on a dyno that's no longer installed (we can no longer compare) and taking these results as the norm. It will become difficult to explain when your "secret sauce" leaves people 20-30hp down because they base there expectations on a single excellent result. I seem to remember that you were claiming 370hp for a while before the below dyno sheet!
I would be careful of using the best results you've ever achieved on a dyno that's no longer installed (we can no longer compare) and taking these results as the norm. It will become difficult to explain when your "secret sauce" leaves people 20-30hp down because they base there expectations on a single excellent result. I seem to remember that you were claiming 370hp for a while before the below dyno sheet!
btw - I like the 'secret sauce'
17 January 2010, 10:37 AM
#36
Former Sponsor
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Wellingborough, Northamptonshire
Posts: 2,859
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Possibly, but you can't get blood out of a stone!
17 January 2010, 04:29 PM
#39
how does a jdm engine compare to a uk one, with regards changing pistons etc over 400bhp???
ive been contemplating the new litchfield turbo,new injectors to see me over 400bhp???
as the original op said, id slightly worried if i needed to change any internals as well.......
ive been contemplating the new litchfield turbo,new injectors to see me over 400bhp???
as the original op said, id slightly worried if i needed to change any internals as well.......
17 January 2010, 04:50 PM
#40
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: ECU Mapping - www.JollyGreenMonster.co.uk
Posts: 16,548
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
how does a jdm engine compare to a uk one, with regards changing pistons etc over 400bhp???
ive been contemplating the new litchfield turbo,new injectors to see me over 400bhp???
as the original op said, id slightly worried if i needed to change any internals as well.......
ive been contemplating the new litchfield turbo,new injectors to see me over 400bhp???
as the original op said, id slightly worried if i needed to change any internals as well.......
The 2.5 is different
18 January 2010, 01:28 AM
#48
Loved the look of that car on that day, with the New Age MY01 STi bonnet scoop and the anthracite 15-spoke OZ SuperT's! Gorgeous!
EDIT: No can't be correct - just realised TOTBIII was way after 1999/2000.
Last edited by joz8968; 18 January 2010 at 01:36 AM.
18 January 2010, 09:10 AM
#50
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: ECU Mapping - www.JollyGreenMonster.co.uk
Posts: 16,548
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Was this achieved on your Type R STi v.5 V-Limited that you ran at TOTBIII at the time?
Loved the look of that car on that day, with the New Age MY01 STi bonnet scoop and the anthracite 15-spoke OZ SuperT's! Gorgeous!
EDIT: No can't be correct - just realised TOTBIII was way after 1999/2000.
Loved the look of that car on that day, with the New Age MY01 STi bonnet scoop and the anthracite 15-spoke OZ SuperT's! Gorgeous!
EDIT: No can't be correct - just realised TOTBIII was way after 1999/2000.
18 January 2010, 10:24 AM
#51
Subaru Tuning Specialist
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: 7.74 @179 mph 1/4 mile - road legal
Posts: 6,654
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Yes it was my old RA which later in life went on to be (detuned 
) and used as the Zen T/A car, the Blue one.
Strangely enough I also had a dyno print out from another rolling road (maha at Star performance) which also said 440bhp
) and used as the Zen T/A car, the Blue one.Strangely enough I also had a dyno print out from another rolling road (maha at Star performance) which also said 440bhp
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post