Edlington torture attack brothers detained
23 January 2010, 12:36 PM
#31
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 39,877
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I am not sure that they do know between right and wrong - I am not sure that they have any references for it in their upbringing.
I completely agree with your latter point and the police (I assume in hand with the CPS) are looking at a potential prosecution of the parents. They have plenty to go on!
I completely agree with your latter point and the police (I assume in hand with the CPS) are looking at a potential prosecution of the parents. They have plenty to go on!
As Paul said, they have not had much of a fair chance, but they must have realised that their acts on those other lads was basically wrong.
Les
23 January 2010, 02:33 PM
#32
Owner of SNet
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Berkshire
Posts: 11,513
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Whilst that of course explains why they might have done as they did it does not excuse it. They should be sent away for a very long time. Min of 5yrs is no where near long enough 
Future murderers without a doubt.
TX.
Future murderers without a doubt.TX.
23 January 2010, 03:52 PM
#34
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Disco, Disco!
Posts: 21,825
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Agreed, i doubt they will get released, i doubt they will ever be considered normal and safe to release into society. I hope the lads they attacked and thier families get the proper support and help they need because if anyone deserves it it is them.
23 January 2010, 03:58 PM
#35
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Disco, Disco!
Posts: 21,825
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My kids are 7 and 4, they watch Dora the Explorer, Spongebob and I Carly. Doctor Who is about as scarey as it gets and they only watch that with 'us parents'.
There are rubbish parents out there, some parents that just need some help and Social Services is supposed to be the net that catches this but it seems to have failed for whatever reason.
Last edited by The Zohan; 23 January 2010 at 04:07 PM.
23 January 2010, 04:46 PM
#36
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Central Scotland
Posts: 3,687
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Again, lots of kids have violent junkie parents, the fact the social services keep them there is testament o this... they don't all turn into sadistic killers.
These people are like bacteria, they simply breed copies of themselves. Time to stop rewarding them and lock them up/sterilise junkies.
5t.
These people are like bacteria, they simply breed copies of themselves. Time to stop rewarding them and lock them up/sterilise junkies.
5t.
24 January 2010, 08:35 AM
#37
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Near Watford
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Er NO.
I'm sure this isn't a popular view on Scoobynet but they're KIDS. They were 10 and 11 years old when they did this. That's young, and in many countries they would be under the age of criminal responsibility.
Whatever agency decided not to take them away a long time ago from the scum that you could loosely call their parents have to take a large part of the blame. What do you expect they will turn out like when they're left to be brought up by people who let them watch ****, smoke etc etc
The best thing we can do now is help them, because quite frankly the damage done to them in their early lives is the fault of the services in Doncaster. They may be permanently broken, they may not. But the worst thing is to abandon them.
The parents however, well they're a different story. Some kind of public flogging followed by removal of the rest of their kids and sterilisation would be in order.
I'm sure this isn't a popular view on Scoobynet but they're KIDS. They were 10 and 11 years old when they did this. That's young, and in many countries they would be under the age of criminal responsibility.
Whatever agency decided not to take them away a long time ago from the scum that you could loosely call their parents have to take a large part of the blame. What do you expect they will turn out like when they're left to be brought up by people who let them watch ****, smoke etc etc
The best thing we can do now is help them, because quite frankly the damage done to them in their early lives is the fault of the services in Doncaster. They may be permanently broken, they may not. But the worst thing is to abandon them.
The parents however, well they're a different story. Some kind of public flogging followed by removal of the rest of their kids and sterilisation would be in order.
24 January 2010, 09:15 AM
#38
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Disco, Disco!
Posts: 21,825
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Er NO.
I'm sure this isn't a popular view on Scoobynet but they're KIDS. They were 10 and 11 years old when they did this. That's young, and in many countries they would be under the age of criminal responsibility.
Whatever agency decided not to take them away a long time ago from the scum that you could loosely call their parents have to take a large part of the blame. What do you expect they will turn out like when they're left to be brought up by people who let them watch ****, smoke etc etc
The best thing we can do now is help them, because quite frankly the damage done to them in their early lives is the fault of the services in Doncaster. They may be permanently broken, they may not. But the worst thing is to abandon them.
The parents however, well they're a different story. Some kind of public flogging followed by removal of the rest of their kids and sterilisation would be in order.
I'm sure this isn't a popular view on Scoobynet but they're KIDS. They were 10 and 11 years old when they did this. That's young, and in many countries they would be under the age of criminal responsibility.
Whatever agency decided not to take them away a long time ago from the scum that you could loosely call their parents have to take a large part of the blame. What do you expect they will turn out like when they're left to be brought up by people who let them watch ****, smoke etc etc
The best thing we can do now is help them, because quite frankly the damage done to them in their early lives is the fault of the services in Doncaster. They may be permanently broken, they may not. But the worst thing is to abandon them.
The parents however, well they're a different story. Some kind of public flogging followed by removal of the rest of their kids and sterilisation would be in order.
The damage done was by the parents, social services are complicit, if anyone should know better it should be the social services. You have to hope that those who made the poor decisions loose their jobs and thier cushy pensions as a result and do not just get moved elsewhere with a smack on the wrists.
As for the parents i completely agree, only this will be against their human rights, especially the sterilisation - sterilisation should be complusary for anyone over 18 with child abuse convictions anyway.
24 January 2010, 11:21 AM
#39
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 39,877
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I do doubt they did Les, if you consider thier daily diet of ****, 18+ slasher/horror movies and violence then maybe not. It is hard to imagine where their moral compass lies, likely not the same as 99.99% of other people. Allowing kids to watch stuff like this is just wrong, top it up with a violent alcoholic father and druggie for a mum.
My kids are 7 and 4, they watch Dora the Explorer, Spongebob and I Carly. Doctor Who is about as scarey as it gets and they only watch that with 'us parents'.
There are rubbish parents out there, some parents that just need some help and Social Services is supposed to be the net that catches this but it seems to have failed for whatever reason.
My kids are 7 and 4, they watch Dora the Explorer, Spongebob and I Carly. Doctor Who is about as scarey as it gets and they only watch that with 'us parents'.
There are rubbish parents out there, some parents that just need some help and Social Services is supposed to be the net that catches this but it seems to have failed for whatever reason.
As I said before, the parents still must bear the maximum responsiblity for what happened and the law which prevents those boys' names from being published will hopefully not protect the parents from the retribution that they deserve.
Les
24 January 2010, 11:26 AM
#40
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Disco, Disco!
Posts: 21,825
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yes I agree Paul, but they are old enough to know the difference between right and wrong and even with no education there is such a thing as natural law which would tel them that it is not right to behave in the shameful way that they did.
As I said before, the parents still must bear the maximum responsiblity for what happened and the law which prevents those boys' names from being published will hopefully not protect the parents from the retribution that they deserve.
Les
As I said before, the parents still must bear the maximum responsiblity for what happened and the law which prevents those boys' names from being published will hopefully not protect the parents from the retribution that they deserve.
Les
They are ferral by the sounds of things, i will not keep repeating thier circumstances but imagine from an early age - violence on tv violence at home and sex/**** with drugs and booze avaliable. No suprises - but not a defence - they should know better it is whether they do/did.
24 January 2010, 11:42 AM
#41
Owner of SNet
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Berkshire
Posts: 11,513
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Couldn't disagree more. That's typical of this country ... commit a violent act & they need help 
Both are damaged goods (kids personality is formed by 3yrs old so v difficult to alter after that) & need keeping away from the general public IMHO. Neither should lead a normal life ever again.
TX.
Both are damaged goods (kids personality is formed by 3yrs old so v difficult to alter after that) & need keeping away from the general public IMHO. Neither should lead a normal life ever again.TX.
24 January 2010, 01:35 PM
#42
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 39,877
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Les, without being unkind and i really mean that you are a world away from their reality.
They are ferral by the sounds of things, i will not keep repeating thier circumstances but imagine from an early age - violence on tv violence at home and sex/**** with drugs and booze avaliable. No suprises - but not a defence - they should know better it is whether they do/did.
They are ferral by the sounds of things, i will not keep repeating thier circumstances but imagine from an early age - violence on tv violence at home and sex/**** with drugs and booze avaliable. No suprises - but not a defence - they should know better it is whether they do/did.
I think you are arguing against me when my thoughts are the same as yours.
I said that they would have realised that what they were doing was wrong and against the law. Despite their upbringing or lack of it they are still culpable. They deserve to be punished in a manner that they do not enjoy.
The parents also need to be brought to task for their selfish and irresponsible attitude towards the two boys.
Is that so different to your thoughts?
Les
24 January 2010, 04:06 PM
#43
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Disco, Disco!
Posts: 21,825
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well I have met youths like that Paul, so I am not as far as you might think from that situation. No need to repeat their circumstances, and yes their behaviour is directly attributable to the life thay had at their home.
I think you are arguing against me when my thoughts are the same as yours.
I said that they would have realised that what they were doing was wrong and against the law. Despite their upbringing or lack of it they are still culpable. They deserve to be punished in a manner that they do not enjoy.
The parents also need to be brought to task for their selfish and irresponsible attitude towards the two boys.
Is that so different to your thoughts?
Les
I think you are arguing against me when my thoughts are the same as yours.
I said that they would have realised that what they were doing was wrong and against the law. Despite their upbringing or lack of it they are still culpable. They deserve to be punished in a manner that they do not enjoy.
The parents also need to be brought to task for their selfish and irresponsible attitude towards the two boys.
Is that so different to your thoughts?
Les
24 January 2010, 11:19 PM
#44
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Couldn't disagree more. That's typical of this country ... commit a violent act & they need help Both are damaged goods (kids personality is formed by 3yrs old so v difficult to alter after that) & need keeping away from the general public IMHO. Neither should lead a normal life ever again.
TX.
Both are damaged goods (kids personality is formed by 3yrs old so v difficult to alter after that) & need keeping away from the general public IMHO. Neither should lead a normal life ever again.TX.
They have committed a terrible crime and nobody is going to excuse that, but what are we supposed to do with children of this age, it's surely wrong to just simply pour all our scorn and then give up on them.
Last edited by Martin2005; 24 January 2010 at 11:29 PM.
25 January 2010, 12:13 AM
#45
Owner of SNet
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Berkshire
Posts: 11,513
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
^^ They're screwed already, you'll never turn them in to good kids so don't waste your effort. They should suffer the consequences of their actions (as the harmed kids & parents of harmed kids will do forever more) rather than find an easy life via us taxpayers.
TX.
TX.
25 January 2010, 12:29 AM
#46
I live not far from Edlington about 5 miles away infact and whilst the area isn't the best of places the family only lived there for 3 weeks. They were from a place called Wheatley which is a proper sh*t hole. I actually lived in Wheatley for 3 years and ironically didnt get a single bit of trouble despite everyone knowing that I had a 450bhp Impreza in my garage lol
Cant comment on the family as I dont know of them but they were from part of Wheatley nick named Devils Island. It's a load of horrible grotty prefab houses that hold the worst that Doncaster has to offer. Its known for its population of smack heads and general low life no hopers.
Whilst Edlington isn't exactly the best of areas they've had a raw deal in all of this.
As for the family both the two boys and the mother and father should be put to death.
Cant comment on the family as I dont know of them but they were from part of Wheatley nick named Devils Island. It's a load of horrible grotty prefab houses that hold the worst that Doncaster has to offer. Its known for its population of smack heads and general low life no hopers.
Whilst Edlington isn't exactly the best of areas they've had a raw deal in all of this.
As for the family both the two boys and the mother and father should be put to death.
25 January 2010, 10:58 AM
#47
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 39,877
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
25 January 2010, 11:09 AM
#48
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Disco, Disco!
Posts: 21,825
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
NL do not seem to have grasped this nettle, the odd sticking plaster or soundbite has not helped.
Camoron goes on about Broken Britian, he needs to get specific and deal with the broken bits and sections of society and not tar us all with the same brush. I am not broken, nor are my kids, who we work real hard at bringing up as decent people.
If the problems are left any longer then we will have an us and them britian, 'us' who live in gated communities patrolled by armed guards and have jobs, are employable and 'them' who do not...
The chav-scum family who Jennys' brother lives with - i dropped the mum and two kids back at the council house the other day, carrier bag on the step, i picked the bag up to help and out fell a set of drug dealers scales - they belong to her 14 y/o son!
25 January 2010, 11:19 AM
#49
If you cannot provide for your children you should not have them simple as that. We currently have the spawn of satan in my sons school, he has taught my son several swear words and is consatantly hitting other kids. His parents do not work, did not bother attending the nativity play (which this kid ruined) and use the time at he is at school to get p1ssed and smoke cannabis.
And this kid is only 4, imagine what he is going to be like as an adult.
And this kid is only 4, imagine what he is going to be like as an adult.
25 January 2010, 12:17 PM
#50
Guest
Posts: n/a
Rather ironic ad on the radio at the moment wanting applicants. 'Social care for adults and children is changing. Find out by ..... etc etc'. Hmmm. So it's changing from being one big, incestuous, unapologetic, unaccountable, secretive bunch of serial incompetents to .... what exactly???
Dave
Dave
25 January 2010, 01:41 PM
#51
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
^^ They're screwed already, you'll never turn them in to good kids so don't waste your effort. They should suffer the consequences of their actions (as the harmed kids & parents of harmed kids will do forever more) rather than find an easy life via us taxpayers.
TX.
TX.
25 January 2010, 02:03 PM
#52
Owner of SNet
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Berkshire
Posts: 11,513
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
^^ How do I know? I don't for certain just as you don't know that they'll ever get "better". I'd rather not expend further time & money on them though 
It's all about where to exert some effort ... do you try to "improve" some kids who tried to murder some other kids or do you apply that effort somewhere else where it will make a difference? How about helping the victims instead 
TX.
It's all about where to exert some effort ... do you try to "improve" some
kids who tried to murder some other kids or do you apply that effort somewhere else where it will make a difference? How about helping the victims instead TX.
26 January 2010, 01:12 PM
#53
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
^^ How do I know? I don't for certain just as you don't know that they'll ever get "better". I'd rather not expend further time & money on them though
It's all about where to exert some effort ... do you try to "improve" some kids who tried to murder some other kids or do you apply that effort somewhere else where it will make a difference? How about helping the victims instead
TX.
It's all about where to exert some effort ... do you try to "improve" some
kids who tried to murder some other kids or do you apply that effort somewhere else where it will make a difference? How about helping the victims instead TX.
What would that say about our society.....
What does that say about YOU?? The same person who very recently stated that they 'weren't bothered' about the suffering of hundreds of thousands of people of Haiti, yet suddenly you are very interested in the suffering of the poor victims of this crime?
Helping the victims goes without saying, nobody ever said we should help the perpetrators INSTEAD!!
26 January 2010, 01:26 PM
#54
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 39,877
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I get the feeling that this is oing to get worse, these kids are the next genersation of parents breeding at will and if the incentiveas of free housing and money are not reduced or removed then they will live off of the state and imaine what the kids of thier kids will be like?!*!
NL do not seem to have grasped this nettle, the odd sticking plaster or soundbite has not helped.
Camoron goes on about Broken Britian, he needs to get specific and deal with the broken bits and sections of society and not tar us all with the same brush. I am not broken, nor are my kids, who we work real hard at bringing up as decent people.
If the problems are left any longer then we will have an us and them britian, 'us' who live in gated communities patrolled by armed guards and have jobs, are employable and 'them' who do not...
The chav-scum family who Jennys' brother lives with - i dropped the mum and two kids back at the council house the other day, carrier bag on the step, i picked the bag up to help and out fell a set of drug dealers scales - they belong to her 14 y/o son!
NL do not seem to have grasped this nettle, the odd sticking plaster or soundbite has not helped.
Camoron goes on about Broken Britian, he needs to get specific and deal with the broken bits and sections of society and not tar us all with the same brush. I am not broken, nor are my kids, who we work real hard at bringing up as decent people.
If the problems are left any longer then we will have an us and them britian, 'us' who live in gated communities patrolled by armed guards and have jobs, are employable and 'them' who do not...
The chav-scum family who Jennys' brother lives with - i dropped the mum and two kids back at the council house the other day, carrier bag on the step, i picked the bag up to help and out fell a set of drug dealers scales - they belong to her 14 y/o son!
You are dead right about the future if the nettle is not grasped and there is a positive move back to the normality that we used to ecpect in this country.
I have mentioned before more than once that we are looking towards needing a 10 foot electrified fence around one's property in the future!
Its a question of attitudes and sense of values which are going the wrong way in so many cases now.
Les
26 January 2010, 08:04 PM
#57
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I leapt to this conclusion because you said we shouldn't spend any 'taxpayers money' on them. How the hell do we keep them in a detention centre and then jail for the next 6 or 7 decades for free?
26 January 2010, 08:05 PM
#58
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
26 January 2010, 08:15 PM
#59
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Disco, Disco!
Posts: 21,825
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
