Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related

Argentina's 'Sovereignty' of The Falklands

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 18 February 2010, 01:31 PM
  #31  
RA Dunk
Scooby Regular
 
RA Dunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: My turbo blows, air lots of it!!
Posts: 9,073
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by r32
Can you see one eyed Gordie doing that????????? He'll be worried that in a few years there'll be an inquiry. Apart from the fact he's single handidly run our armed forces (both as Chancellor and now as PM) to be at such a low level we cant do anything about it.

List of countries by number of troops - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

We have less men, less fighting vehicles, less planes, less boats etc etc than even France.

Green paper reveals defence budget cuts and new alliance with France | Mail Online

Iraq war inquiry: Gordon Brown 'guillotined' defence budget months after invasion | Mail Online
Well maybe if Labour hadnt opened the gates to immigration then we might have had enough money to have and maintain a decent Armed forces (like we have always had ), looks like this has come back and bitten them in the ****!
Old 18 February 2010, 01:33 PM
  #32  
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Martin2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It's a bit harsh having a go at our PM for a war that hasn't happened, and is almost certian not going to happen.

Honestly the hypocrisy on here is breath taking sometimes, if we have a strong PM who take tough decision he get slagged of to the hilt, if you think he won't take tough decisions, guess what...he gets slagged off to the hilt! Not to mention the 'it's all about oil' statement that nearly made be spit my drink all over the PC!!!

There aint gonna be a war guys, Argentina is all grown up now, it has an elected government not some 2 bit junta of the early 80's.
Old 18 February 2010, 01:34 PM
  #33  
SwissTony
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (19)
 
SwissTony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: In the Doghouse
Posts: 28,228
Received 12 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by john_s
You mean as in... "we might still have something resembling a naval force"?
Couple of tugboats equipped with Dad's army complete with lee enfield 303's and a dash of dunkirk spirit. Sorted
Old 18 February 2010, 01:35 PM
  #34  
stilover
Scooby Regular
 
stilover's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Here, There, Everywhere
Posts: 10,619
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Here we go........
Old 18 February 2010, 01:45 PM
  #35  
SwissTony
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (19)
 
SwissTony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: In the Doghouse
Posts: 28,228
Received 12 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Martin2005
It's a bit harsh having a go at our PM

Honestly the hypocrisy on here is breath taking sometimes, if we have a strong PM who take tough decision he get slagged of to the hilt, if you think he won't take tough decisions, guess what...he gets slagged off to the hilt! Not to mention the 'it's all about oil' statement that nearly made be spit my drink all over the PC!!!
Old 18 February 2010, 01:49 PM
  #36  
RA Dunk
Scooby Regular
 
RA Dunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: My turbo blows, air lots of it!!
Posts: 9,073
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Martin2005
Not to mention the 'it's all about oil' statement that nearly made be spit my drink all over the PC!!!
Considering this has come about due to the upcomming drilling program over there it has quite a bit to do with the oil, unless I'm missing something here

please enlighten me
Old 18 February 2010, 01:51 PM
  #37  
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Martin2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RA Dunk
Considering this has come about due to the upcomming drilling program over there it has quite a bit to do with the oil, unless I'm missing something here

please enlighten me
I thought only evil, America poodling, lying, empirialist went to war over oil?
Old 18 February 2010, 01:55 PM
  #38  
RA Dunk
Scooby Regular
 
RA Dunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: My turbo blows, air lots of it!!
Posts: 9,073
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Martin2005
I thought only evil, America poodling, lying, empirialist went to war over oil?
Nope, we're actually that low now as well, Thanks to NU Labour
Old 18 February 2010, 02:03 PM
  #39  
Jay m A
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Jay m A's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Class record holder at Pembrey Llandow Goodwood MIRA Hethel Blyton Curborough Lydden and Snetterton
Posts: 8,626
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Martin2005
I thought only evil, America poodling, lying, empirialist went to war over oil?
Nope!

Land of opportunity

• Military forces from China, Taiwan, Malaysia, the Philippines and Vietnam patrol the disputed Spratly Islands in the South China Sea, where there is thought to be oil

— In the 1990s Russia tried to have the Caspian Sea redefined as a lake. Bordered by five countries, it holds 47.5 billion barrels of oil, and if it is downgraded to a lake all territorial zones could be voided, allowing Russia to veto oil deals

— The islands of Abu Musa and Greater and Lesser Tumb, in the oil-rich Gulf, have been disputed by Iran and the United Arab Emirates since 1971, when Iran occupied them after the departure of the British

— The first Gulf War began after a dispute over the Rumaila oilfield, on the Iraq-Kuwait border. Saddam Hussein accused Kuwait of using slant drilling to steal Iraq’s oil. He claimed Kuwait as Iraq’s 19th province

— Melting polar ice caps have raised fears of a “cold war” over oil beneath the Arctic. Russia, Canada, Norway, the US and Denmark are hotly disputing territorial borders they have ignored for years as the prospect of drilling becomes feasible

— The uninhabited Senkaku Islands in the East China Sea have an area of less than 2.5 sq miles but are a stumbling block in Sino-Japan relations. They were claimed by Japan in 1895 but China has asserted sovereignty since the 1400s in an dispute fuelled by oil deposits

Sources: about.com, globalsecurity.com
Old 18 February 2010, 02:14 PM
  #40  
GlesgaKiss
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
GlesgaKiss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Scotland
Posts: 6,284
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Martin2005
It's a bit harsh having a go at our PM for a war that hasn't happened, and is almost certian not going to happen.

Honestly the hypocrisy on here is breath taking sometimes, if we have a strong PM who take tough decision he get slagged of to the hilt, if you think he won't take tough decisions, guess what...he gets slagged off to the hilt! Not to mention the 'it's all about oil' statement that nearly made be spit my drink all over the PC!!!

There aint gonna be a war guys, Argentina is all grown up now, it has an elected government not some 2 bit junta of the early 80's.
FFS take the blinkers off. What tough decision are you refering to there? He's an indecisive nampy pampy yes man to the rest of the world, just like most of his party. You must have been watching Piers Morgan the other night. Did it get you all emotional and replenish your reserves of blind support for New Labour?

And do you know why conflict is 'almost certain' not to happen? It's because we'll probably do our very best to come to the first agreement that stops the big bad 'Argies' from bothering us, greatly disadvantaging us in the process of course.

You don't think it's about oil? Why do you think they're stopping ships involved with oil exploration then? It's not because they don't want us to disturb the sea bed.
Old 18 February 2010, 02:24 PM
  #41  
Snazy
Scooby Regular
 
Snazy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: S.E London
Posts: 13,654
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

lol the thread just got entertaining.

*clicks subscribe
Old 18 February 2010, 02:26 PM
  #42  
The Zohan
Scooby Regular
 
The Zohan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Disco, Disco!
Posts: 21,825
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Martin2005
It's a bit harsh having a go at our PM for a war that hasn't happened, and is almost certian not going to happen.

Honestly the hypocrisy on here is breath taking sometimes, if we have a strong PM who take tough decision he get slagged of to the hilt, if you think he won't take tough decisions, guess what...he gets slagged off to the hilt! Not to mention the 'it's all about oil' statement that nearly made be spit my drink all over the PC!!!

There aint gonna be a war guys, Argentina is all grown up now, it has an elected government not some 2 bit junta of the early 80's.

Jump down off of your high-horse ffs!

Do not think Maggie got slagged off for her tough decision(s) on the Falklands - then again it was a long time ago.
Old 18 February 2010, 02:40 PM
  #43  
Puff The Magic Wagon!
Moderator
Support Scoobynet!
iTrader: (2)
 
Puff The Magic Wagon!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: From far, far away...
Posts: 16,978
Received 15 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Paul Habgood
Jump down off of your high-horse ffs!

Do not think Maggie got slagged off for her tough decision(s) on the Falklands - then again it was a long time ago.

Interesting documentary about Maggie on over the weekend of which I watched a bit.

Thatcher was in deep doo-doos politically but when the Argentinians invaded, she saw an opportunity and went ***** out for it. She gambled and she won, which was why she sailed the next 2 elections

Present incombent hasn't the *****...
Old 18 February 2010, 02:42 PM
  #44  
RA Dunk
Scooby Regular
 
RA Dunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: My turbo blows, air lots of it!!
Posts: 9,073
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Why does Martin come here and object to every f,ing thread thats doing the rounds?

troll?
Old 18 February 2010, 02:44 PM
  #45  
Lydia72
Scooby Regular
 
Lydia72's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Pleiades
Posts: 1,294
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Martin2005

There aint gonna be a war guys, Argentina is all grown up now, it has an elected government not some 2 bit junta of the early 80's.
Interesting. Three years ago I visited Argentina and the Falklands. OH and I decided to take an excursion to see some penguins (Argentina), on a tour bus full of North Americans we were the only Brits.
The tour guide on the bus was obviously completely unaware of our nationality and spent a good portion of the trip ranting about the conflict and how the 'Malvinas' belonged to them. We were treated to a history of what had happened, completely biased of course, and told that their school children are taught songs from an early age lamenting their lost islands.
The guide was extremely bitter, OH and I sat at the back with our mouths shut!

If the elected government actually listens to their people I wouldn't be at all surprised if it did kick off again.
Old 18 February 2010, 03:09 PM
  #46  
stilover
Scooby Regular
 
stilover's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Here, There, Everywhere
Posts: 10,619
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Lydia72
The guide was extremely bitter, OH and I sat at the back with our mouths shut!
I wouldn't of. Half way through his ranting, I'd have let it be known I was English. Then sat back and watched him squirm.

I'd have probably also mentioned that he was only bitter, because we won.
Old 18 February 2010, 03:11 PM
  #47  
Myles
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (40)
 
Myles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Marlow, Bucks.
Posts: 6,106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Historically, we would stretch as far as we were needed. I cant see the snake ok'ing that though, he is a coin counter not a warfighter. Shame really.
Old 18 February 2010, 03:26 PM
  #48  
Lydia72
Scooby Regular
 
Lydia72's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Pleiades
Posts: 1,294
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by stilover
I wouldn't of. Half way through his ranting, I'd have let it be known I was English. Then sat back and watched him squirm.

I'd have probably also mentioned that he was only bitter, because we won.
It was quite unusual for me to be honest, normally I am not one to shy away from confrontation (and my cousin fought during the conflict so the rant did annoy me greatly).
But it was a three hour trip each way on the bus going through the middle of nowhere (long walk if we got thrown off), lunch was provided so I didn't want her gobbing in my sandwiches and also we had to go through an armed checkpoint on the way back; didn't want her telling the guys with guns we had given her a hard time.
The penguins were nice though
Old 18 February 2010, 03:27 PM
  #49  
WRX_Dazza
Scooby Regular
 
WRX_Dazza's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Going further than the station and back !!! ZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzz
Posts: 11,097
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by stilover
I wouldn't of. Half way through his ranting, I'd have let it be known I was English. Then sat back and watched him squirm.

I'd have probably also mentioned that he was only bitter, because we won.


might as well have stuck a quick jibe about Maradona's "Hand of God" for good measure !!
Old 18 February 2010, 03:30 PM
  #50  
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Martin2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GlesgaKiss
FFS take the blinkers off. What tough decision are you refering to there? He's an indecisive nampy pampy yes man to the rest of the world, just like most of his party. You must have been watching Piers Morgan the other night. Did it get you all emotional and replenish your reserves of blind support for New Labour?

And do you know why conflict is 'almost certain' not to happen? It's because we'll probably do our very best to come to the first agreement that stops the big bad 'Argies' from bothering us, greatly disadvantaging us in the process of course.

You don't think it's about oil? Why do you think they're stopping ships involved with oil exploration then? It's not because they don't want us to disturb the sea bed.
I was referring to Blair and juxtapositioning the anti-Blair opinions on here regarding the Iraq War, to the current situation with Brown


Note to self - be clearer in future

There seems to be a clear trend on here that if you pile assumption upon assumption you can justify say things like 'we'll probably do our very best to come to the first agreement that stops the big bad 'Argies' from bothering us, greatly disadvantaging us in the process of course'
Old 18 February 2010, 03:36 PM
  #51  
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Martin2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Paul Habgood
Jump down off of your high-horse ffs!

Do not think Maggie got slagged off for her tough decision(s) on the Falklands - then again it was a long time ago.
I don't have a short horse, let alone a tall one!!

I'm entitled to challenge things I think are wrong or in some cases deliberately inaccurate. Or have the house rules changed again???

Reading this thread you'd of thought we'd already given away the oil, the Islands, our women children for a few tins of out of date Argentine corned beef!

Is there no subject that doesn't involve bashing the government, how have they done wrong here, and what has the PM blindness in one eye got to do with this?
Old 18 February 2010, 03:39 PM
  #52  
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Martin2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RA Dunk
Why does Martin come here and object to every f,ing thread thats doing the rounds?

troll?
Errr because I don't agree with you that's why

I don't agree that this or any other government could or would give away the Falklands or their natural resources.

I'd love to know what basis there is for believing otherwise
Old 18 February 2010, 03:41 PM
  #53  
RA Dunk
Scooby Regular
 
RA Dunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: My turbo blows, air lots of it!!
Posts: 9,073
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Martin2005

Reading this thread you'd of thought we'd already given away the oil,
What like Maggie did to the North Sea oil fields giving them away to America?
Old 18 February 2010, 03:43 PM
  #54  
RA Dunk
Scooby Regular
 
RA Dunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: My turbo blows, air lots of it!!
Posts: 9,073
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Martin2005
Errr because I don't agree with you that's why
I find it hard to believe one person could disagree with every person in every topic in every thread on Scoobynet, but yet you alway's manage?
Old 18 February 2010, 03:43 PM
  #55  
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Martin2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RA Dunk
What like Maggie did to the North Sea oil fields giving them away to America?
Well I'm sorry but I have to disagree with you here, Maggie was a much stronger leader that Brown
Old 18 February 2010, 03:45 PM
  #56  
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Martin2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RA Dunk
I find it hard to believe one person could disagree with every person in every topic in every thread on Scoobynet, but yet you alway's manage?
No this is just another example somebody being deliberately inaccurate
Old 18 February 2010, 03:51 PM
  #57  
RA Dunk
Scooby Regular
 
RA Dunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: My turbo blows, air lots of it!!
Posts: 9,073
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Martin2005
Well I'm sorry but I have to disagree with you here, Maggie was a much stronger leader that Brown
Yes, I do agree that she was a stronger leader than the spineless muppet we have in charge now, but she did give the North Sea oil fields away which is the point I made
Old 18 February 2010, 03:58 PM
  #58  
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Martin2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RA Dunk
Yes, I do agree that she was a stronger leader than the spineless muppet we have in charge now, but she did give the North Sea oil fields away which is the point I made
But the spineless muppet hasn't given any oil away...


I think the best way to proceed here is for me to comeback and apologise profusley as and when (coz it's surely inevitable reading this thread) GB hands over the Falklands or it's oil.

If on the other hand this doesn't happen, you (and anyone else who slags me off for daring you reason and logic in my arguments) can apologise to me.

Either way neither of us are trolls!!
Old 18 February 2010, 04:03 PM
  #59  
RA Dunk
Scooby Regular
 
RA Dunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: My turbo blows, air lots of it!!
Posts: 9,073
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Martin2005
But the spineless muppet hasn't given any oil away...


I think the best way to proceed here is for me to comeback and apologise profusley as and when (coz it's surely inevitable reading this thread) GB hands over the Falklands or it's oil.

If on the other hand this doesn't happen, you (and anyone else who slags me off for daring you reason and logic in my arguments) can apologise to me.

Either way neither of us are trolls!!
Sounds like a plan, talk to you soon
Old 18 February 2010, 04:20 PM
  #60  
Turbo2
Scooby Regular
 
Turbo2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Northants. 22B sold, as-new Lotus Omega instead.
Posts: 2,027
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

What are we going to send down there to defend the islands with? We've got next-to-no sea-based attack aircraft on the (almost) flat-tops (until the 2 new big 'carriers are built) and no long-range strategic bombers, so unless they reconfigure Vulcan XH558 and the BBMF Lancaster, I can't see what's stopping the Argies from taking the place. Not sure Cunard would like to send QM2 either! Best make sure all the attack Subs are down there, just in case, but even they wouldn't stop an aerial invasion. If I was an Argie, I'd think that the timing was perfect for them, with our military otherwise engaged.

Still look on the bright side: at least we might win back a few acres of desolate Afghanistan in the coming weeks.


Quick Reply: Argentina's 'Sovereignty' of The Falklands



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:04 PM.