Vorderman
#31
Yep, that sounds like a well thought through, logical argument to me!
As to your second point - as I posted earlier right and wrong is a very simplistic view. DL put it very well - you may know something is wrong but may not have the maturity to understand the real consequences of that action, or the moral or ethical context to take responsibility for that action.
Lying is wrong but all adults do it. We like to call it white lies, or economical with the truth but that is a created moral context we use to excuse ourselves.
Of course these kids knew what they were doing was wrong, but within what context and moral structure did they take that action. That we cannot know and legally, as you rightly point out, we as society have taken decisions as to when a person will have an understanding of that context and defined various ages that are recognised for criminal, marital and electoral responsibility, just to use three examples. In this case these children were below the ages we as a society had defined for that responsibility.
Just out of interest do the help you express your point?
#32
Great question from the audience last night...
'Boris, if you don't know something why can't you just say so?'!!!
Vorderman was caught out by Dimbleby. She was ranting on about politicians not being open and then he pointed out that she was supporting and endorsing the Conservative party.
She was shrill last night - the only way to shut her up would be to shove something in her mouth...
...oh hang on
'Boris, if you don't know something why can't you just say so?'!!!
Vorderman was caught out by Dimbleby. She was ranting on about politicians not being open and then he pointed out that she was supporting and endorsing the Conservative party.
She was shrill last night - the only way to shut her up would be to shove something in her mouth...
...oh hang on
She was as i expected her to be really, awful. I believe "up yourself" is the term.
#36
#38
#39
I cannot stand her voice. Especially when she says the vowels. I have stopped watching the show, she grates on me so much
#40
I think it's the ghastly dresses they expect her to wear. They make her bum look massive when in reality it isn't. She has as great figure but............
I cannot stand her voice. Especially when she says the vowels. I have stopped watching the show, she grates on me so much
I cannot stand her voice. Especially when she says the vowels. I have stopped watching the show, she grates on me so much
#42
#43
What as Carol done to her hair reminds me of some pensioner hair do,didn't like her dress either,Grey and boring..some shocking tie wearing going on too in this program...Rachel ohhhh yea Honey
#44
I thought Will Self made some valid points on the Bulger issue. Is a child who kills really more evil than an adult who does it? Whether you agree with him or not, at least he had the ***** to speak his mind which is something that a politician would never do on such an issue.
#45
What does Carol advise the Tories on, does Osbourne need adding help, does DC need vowels or she just wanting to sit for the Tories as a MP.
The only thought that struck me watching her performence on QT I could take a good guess why she is divorced.
The only thought that struck me watching her performence on QT I could take a good guess why she is divorced.
#46
#49
So a child cannot be seen to responsible to make important decisions until they are 18 and yet they can be 'fully capable of knowing right from wrong' when they are 10?
Yep, that sounds like a well thought through, logical argument to me!
As to your second point - as I posted earlier right and wrong is a very simplistic view. DL put it very well - you may know something is wrong but may not have the maturity to understand the real consequences of that action, or the moral or ethical context to take responsibility for that action.
Lying is wrong but all adults do it. We like to call it white lies, or economical with the truth but that is a created moral context we use to excuse ourselves.
Of course these kids knew what they were doing was wrong, but within what context and moral structure did they take that action. That we cannot know and legally, as you rightly point out, we as society have taken decisions as to when a person will have an understanding of that context and defined various ages that are recognised for criminal, marital and electoral responsibility, just to use three examples. In this case these children were below the ages we as a society had defined for that responsibility.
Just out of interest do the help you express your point?
Yep, that sounds like a well thought through, logical argument to me!
As to your second point - as I posted earlier right and wrong is a very simplistic view. DL put it very well - you may know something is wrong but may not have the maturity to understand the real consequences of that action, or the moral or ethical context to take responsibility for that action.
Lying is wrong but all adults do it. We like to call it white lies, or economical with the truth but that is a created moral context we use to excuse ourselves.
Of course these kids knew what they were doing was wrong, but within what context and moral structure did they take that action. That we cannot know and legally, as you rightly point out, we as society have taken decisions as to when a person will have an understanding of that context and defined various ages that are recognised for criminal, marital and electoral responsibility, just to use three examples. In this case these children were below the ages we as a society had defined for that responsibility.
Just out of interest do the help you express your point?
Les
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post