A minute of your time is all that is required..
27 March 2002 | 11:02 PM
#34
Guest
Posts: n/a
Done, posted about this a while back but it never seemed to get seen, anyway glad its now popular, shame we can't get all 10,000 members to do it daily, £400 a day from scoobynet clickers would be a good thing! Not so sure Microsoft and other partners would think so tho 
28 March 2002 | 09:09 AM
#37
Scooby Regular
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
KWS,
Are you refering to me? Are you capable of holding an intelligent discussion? No, thought not.
It's woolly thinking like yours that has resulted in little ******* being able to run rings round teachers/police, etc..
You are a fool.
Are you refering to me? Are you capable of holding an intelligent discussion? No, thought not.
It's woolly thinking like yours that has resulted in little ******* being able to run rings round teachers/police, etc..
You are a fool.
28 March 2002 | 09:43 AM
#39
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 384
Likes: 2
Devils_ad what a ******** you are. Get of your soapbox for 10 minutes. Regardless of the fact that a considerable amount get's lost in admin. Some poor kid who gets abused, beaten, etc.. on a daily basis is still going to benefit in one way or another.
It is **** like you that have turned this BBS into a joke.
See ya (not)
It is **** like you that have turned this BBS into a joke.
See ya (not)
Perhaps more pressure is needed as my request fell upon deaf ears by the looks of it! 
28 March 2002 | 11:31 AM
#51
Guest
Posts: n/a
Why does every FEKING thread in this place turn into a battle zone [img]images/smilies/mad.gif[/img]
Devil if you had kept your mouth quiet in the first place you wouldn't have been mouthed off! This was a post for people who want to take up the offer of a free contribution to the NSPCC so what was the point telling people how crap they are. I COULDN'T GIVE A **** ON YOUR OPINONS OF NSPCC!! If any of the contributions get put towards what they are meant for then it will be worth it, whether its 40% or not, 40% is still better than fek all!!! If you wanna raise the point, fine, but do it on a seperate thread where people can choose to read it instead of on someone else's thread which is for people who support the NSPCC's work.
Devil if you had kept your mouth quiet in the first place you wouldn't have been mouthed off! This was a post for people who want to take up the offer of a free contribution to the NSPCC so what was the point telling people how crap they are. I COULDN'T GIVE A **** ON YOUR OPINONS OF NSPCC!! If any of the contributions get put towards what they are meant for then it will be worth it, whether its 40% or not, 40% is still better than fek all!!! If you wanna raise the point, fine, but do it on a seperate thread where people can choose to read it instead of on someone else's thread which is for people who support the NSPCC's work.
28 March 2002 | 11:59 AM
#55
Scooby Regular
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
Bravo,
This will be my last post on scoobynet EVER!
The purpose of my post was to educate people as to what the NSPCC gets up to with money that is donated to it. Do you REALLY think it is appropriate to give the NSPCC cash so that they can:
1. Spout their propganda with regards to the smacking of children by loving parents.
2. Campaign for the reduction of the age of consent for homosexual partners?
Sorry, I thought the purpose of the NSPCC was to protect children. Did you know the NSPCC washed their hands of Victoria Climbie when they were asked for help?
I am absolutely appalled at the level of ignorance here on Scooby and thank god I am leaving.
KWS, Paul, Bravo: You ARE the weakest link. Goodbye!
(and so the chipping away at Scoobynet continues. At this rate, there isn't going to be much left of this community.....)
This will be my last post on scoobynet EVER!
The purpose of my post was to educate people as to what the NSPCC gets up to with money that is donated to it. Do you REALLY think it is appropriate to give the NSPCC cash so that they can:
1. Spout their propganda with regards to the smacking of children by loving parents.
2. Campaign for the reduction of the age of consent for homosexual partners?
Sorry, I thought the purpose of the NSPCC was to protect children. Did you know the NSPCC washed their hands of Victoria Climbie when they were asked for help?
I am absolutely appalled at the level of ignorance here on Scooby and thank god I am leaving.
KWS, Paul, Bravo: You ARE the weakest link. Goodbye!
(and so the chipping away at Scoobynet continues. At this rate, there isn't going to be much left of this community.....)
28 March 2002 | 12:10 PM
#57
Guest
Posts: n/a
So by not donating that is going to help is it? I don't agree with the some of the policies/beliefs either but I still hope some of the contributions will go towards helping children who need help desperatley. That is my reason for following this contribution offer, not for any other. By not donating you will be taking away any chance of money going to help children who need it. If you only want to concentrate on their political background then you are ignoring the children who get help from the NSPCC and who need that help!
I think you are the one who is being childish by calling me and others the weakest link. Grow up sunshine!
I think you are the one who is being childish by calling me and others the weakest link. Grow up sunshine!
